[continued from previous message]

#488 - DATE OF INVASION 24 FEBRUARY 2022 + #488 *DAYS* = 27 JUNE 2023 as
[#20, #8, #20, #40, #400] / [#8, #20, #40, #400, #500] /
#490 - DATE OF INVASION 24 FEBRUARY 2022 + #490 *DAYS* = 29 JUNE 2023 as
[#2, #8, #20, #40, #400, #500] = chokmâh (H2451): {UMBRA: #73 % #41 =
#32} 1) wisdom; 1a) *SKILL* (*IN* *WAR*); 1b) *WISDOM* (*IN*
*ADMINISTRATION*); 1c) shrewdness, wisdom; 1d) wisdom, prudence (in
religious affairs); 1e) wisdom (ethical and religious);

'THINK ABOUT THIS: IF ANYBODY TOLD YOU - AND MY STAFF WASN'T SO SURE,
EITHER - THAT WE'D BE ABLE TO BRING ALL OF EUROPE TOGETHER IN THE
ONSLAUGHT ON *IRAQ* [sic] AND GET NATO TO BE COMPLETELY UNITED, I THINK
THEY WOULD HAVE TOLD YOU IT'S NOT LIKELY,' BIDEN SAID TUESDAY NIGHT.
'THE ONE THING PUTIN COUNTED ON WAS BEING ABLE TO SPLIT NATO.'

Some reporters are allowed into the room during Biden's fundraising
efforts, but cameras - both video and still - are barred, so there's so recording of that blunder. On Wednesday #488 - 27 JUNE as the president
walked toward Marine One he also bristled when asked about the branding
effort around 'BIDENOMICS.'

    #175 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 29 JUNE 2023 as [#80, #70, #10, #5,
#10] /
    #178 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 29 JUNE 2023 as [#80, #70, #10, #8,
#10] /
#488 - DATE OF INVASION 24 FEBRUARY 2022 + #488 *DAYS* = 27 JUNE 2023 as
[#80, #70, #10, #8, #200, #70, #50] /
    #539 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 27 JUNE 2023 as [#80, #5, #80, #70,
#10, #8, #20, #5, #10, #200, #1, #50] = poiéō (G4160): {UMBRA: #965 %
#41 = #22} 1) to make; 1a) with the names of things made, to produce, construct, form, fashion, etc.; 1b) to be the authors of, the cause; 1c)
to make ready, to prepare; 1d) to produce, bear, shoot forth; 1e) to
acquire, to provide a thing for one's self; 1f) to make a thing out of something; 1g) to (make i.e.) render one anything; 1g1) *TO* (*MAKE*
i.e.) *CONSTITUTE* *OR* *APPOINT* *ONE* *ANYTHING*, *TO* *APPOINT* *OR* *ORDAIN* *ONE* *THAT*; 1g2) *TO* (*MAKE* i.e.) *DECLARE* *ONE*
*ANYTHING*; 1h) to put one forth, to lead him out; 1i) to make one do something; 1i1) cause one to; 1j) *TO* *BE* *THE* *AUTHORS* *OF* *A*
*THING* (*TO* *CAUSE*, *BRING* *ABOUT*); 2) to do; 2a) to act rightly,
do well; 2a1) to carry out, to execute; 2b) to do a thing unto one; 2b1)
to do to one; 2c) with designation of time: to pass, spend; 2d) to
celebrate, keep; 2d1) to make ready, and so at the same time to
institute, the celebration of the passover; 2e) to perform: to a promise;

A reporter pointed out that the White House's economics team had been
using the term in recent days.

'Now wait, let's get it straight. The first time it was used was in the
Wall Street Journal. OK? And I don't go around beating my chest
"BIDENOMICS" so the press started calling it BIDENOMICS,' he said.

Despite his tone when answering the questions, BIDEN said he liked the term.

'No, I like it, it's fine,' he said, noting that it referred to 'my
policies.'" <https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12243167/Biden-says-Russia-clearly-losing-war-IRAQ.html>

YOUTUBE: "HANS ZIMMER - BLACK HAWK DOWN (MAIN THEME)"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BWAhVbayGv4>

The movie BLACK HAWK DOWN began its filming in MARCH 2001 in #305 / #700
- *SALÉ*, MOROCCO, and was concluded in June of the same year. But
MOROCCO was not the first place where the crew wanted to film the movie.
They were initially planning to film BLACK HAWK in JORDAN {the river of judgment}.

If you know nothing of the COMMONWEALTH being a product (ie. by letters
patent from the hand of QUEEN VICTORIA as EMPRESS and DEFENDER OF THE
FAITH) of CAESAROPAPISM as a SUPERORDINATE TRIPARTITE NUMBER CONSTRUCT
to the machinery as BIPARTITE sovereign / autonomy dynamic as
differentiated worldviews, then you might not comprehend the underly
HYPOSTASIS issues which can mitigate any culpability for alleged WAR CRIMES.

Firstly the machinery (#65 - SOLDIER / #175 - WOMAN WITH CHILD) of STATE
as BIPARTITE number worldview can lead to a disposition of NARCISSISTIC PERSONALITY DISORDER (eg: the TALIBAN) which may result in a disregard
of other persons such as prisoners.

BURHI TWEET (@Burhimum) @ 2255 HOURS ON 23 JUNE 2023: "(VIDEO): "If a
MUJAHID (TALIBAN) captures an infidel [woman], his wife is a slave and
he can use for sexual purposes without marriage".



[He is saying that] infidel women should be treated like animals, they
should only be used for sex, you can have sex with them, it's not
unfair." These are words like a mentality that deserves rape." <https://twitter.com/Burhimum/status/1672226783565950978>

Secondly the BIPARTITE worldview can predispose one to adverse
behavioural reinforcement (eg: 20 year theatre of war with an ABSENCE OF
ANY VIABLE OBJECTIVE since they know nothing of the COMMONWEALTH being a product of CAESAROPAPISM as a SUPERORDINATE TRIPARTITE NUMBER CONSTRUCT
to the machinery as BIPARTITE sovereign / autonomy dynamic as different worldviews) as high acumen -/+ of DOMINION #n anchors resulting in
patterns [# ... # ... #] of behaviour responses which may not accord
with the #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY for viable action as evidence of
prudent rather than instinctive action.

Lastly it is not known if there has been any investigation as to whether
such misconduct (eg: why was a NAZI flag flown; the CHRISTCHURCH
massacre was given as imprimatur by the RSL members associated with
KNIGHTS TEMPLAR RENEWED IN 2015 and there are 1.8 million AMERICAN
SOLDIERS as potential partners in crime) occurred in the advancement of
the SEDITIOUS CAUSE relating to the IRISH CATHOLIC REPUBLICANISM /
KNIGHTS TEMPLAR RENEWED IN 2015 hijacking the WORLD WAR I 2018
CENTENNIAL by their ATLANTIS 25 APRIL 1915 PHANTASM.

I'm just an ex-member of the police serve and a retired private citizen,
who a leisure watches TV and engages within informal research into
metaphysical and metempirical philosophy with the objective of
technologizing QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT as a single avenue of
enquiry pursued now for some 27 years duration.

IF I MIGHT JUST THEN CONTINUE ON THREE THOUGHTS:

Should the misconduct (eg: why was a NAZI flag flown; the CHRISTCHURCH
massacre was given imprimatur by the RSL members associated with KNIGHTS TEMPLAR RENEWED IN 2015 and there are 1.8 million AMERICAN SOLDIERS as potential associates) have occurred due to PROFESSIONAL COMPETITIVENESS
with AMERICAN SOLDIERS then IN AND OF ITSELF may be an undue adverse
influence since their REPUBLIC is not a product of any CAESAROPAPISM but
an ICONOCLASTIC consequence against such (ie. "We hold these truths to
be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed
by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are
Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness") as INSIPID (ie. lacking
vigour or interest) NOTIONS which merely intersect with the
ANTHROPOLOGICAL SINGULARITY as IDEA TEMPLATE TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS
PATENT (as then EMPRESS and DEFENDER OF THE FAITH).

Secondly the consideration of ICONOCLASM against the TRIPARTITE
WORLDVIEW of VOLUNTARY FREEWILL when it is subject to a PREDISPOSITION
through ADVERSE BEHAVIOURAL REINFORCEMENT BY METAKINESIS (ie. war) from
a BIPARTITE worldview such as ISLAM which has its own ANTHROPOLOGICAL
CONSTRUCT of SUBJECT WILL as claim to piety.

As a #468 - PERPLEXING QUESTION upon ICONOCLASM raised against the
BIPARTITE v's TRIPARTITE usage against this same #71 - DOMINION array construct, we've expanded the hypothetical consideration applicable to
GEORGE FLOYD's "I can't breath" death by continual exertion of force in
total dominion as an extremely high acumen -/+ of those #n anchors which
may be the result of adverse behavioural reinforcement as belligerence
(ie. not necessarily reciprocated) that spirals to its ultimate end as ICONOCLASM (ie.

Byzantine Greek εἰκονοκλάστης [TELOS: #984 (BY ISOPSEPHY) dolióō
(G1387): *DECEIT*, eidōleîon (G1493): *TEMPLE* *OF* *IDOLS*, echthrós (G2190): *HOSTILE*; *OPPOSING* *GOD* *IN* *THE* *MIND*; *DEMONIC* *AS*
*BITTER* *ENEMY* *OF* *THE* *DIVINE* *GOVERNMENT*, syníēmi (G4920): *COMBATANTS*, MALE: #468 - PERPLEXING QUESTION, FEME: #417 - CAUSE OR
REASON, DEME: #155 - JUDGE OR UMPIRE] as etymology from εἰκών (eikṓn, “figure, icon, pattern, archetype”) + κλάω (kláō, “to break, weaken,
frustrate”) + -της (-tēs, agent suffix representing a state of being)

) AGAINST THE #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY WHICH IS CONSTITUTIONALLY
INTRINSIC TO [BY METHOD OF TRIPARTITE NUMBER META DESCRIPTOR REDACTION
AGAINST THE ONTIC PREMISE MANIFESTING THE IDEA TEMPLATE] TO QUEEN
VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT AND THE ONTOLOGY OF THE HUMAN BEING (ie. homo sapiens) REFLECTING IMAGO DEI.

#885 as [#5, #10, #20, #800, #50] = eikṓn (G1504): {UMBRA: #885 % #41 =
#24} 1) an image, figure, likeness; 1a) *AN* *IMAGE* *OF* *THE* *THINGS*
(*THE* *HEAVENLY* *THINGS*); 1a1) used of the moral likeness of renewed
men to God; 1a2) the image of the Son of God, into which true Christians
are transformed, is likeness not only to the heavenly body, but also to
the most holy and blessed state of mind, which Christ possesses; 1b) the
image of one; 1b1) one in whom the likeness of any one is seen; 1b2)
*APPLIED* *TO* *MAN* *ON* *ACCOUNT* *OF* *HIS* *POWER* *OF* *COMMAND*;
1b3) to Christ on account of his divine nature and absolute moral
excellence;

    #257 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 23 JUNE 2023 as [#5, #20, #30, #1,
#200, #1] /
#851 as [#20, #30, #1, #800] = kláō (G2806): {UMBRA: #851 % #41 = #31}
1) *TO* *BREAK*; 1a) used in the NT of the *BREAKING* *OF* *BREAD* *OR* *COMMUNION*;

#676 as [#80, #70, #10, #8, #300, #8, #200] = poiētḗs (G4163): {UMBRA:
#676 % #41 = #20} 1) a maker, a producer, author; 2) a doer, performer;
2a) *ONE* *WHO* *OBEYS* *OR* *FULFILS* *THE* *LAW*; 3) a poet;

I'm not a lawyer and only possess a modicum of knowledge which is
subject to a process of self education, but I think that the relevant jurisprudent principle is CASUS DATAE LEGIS to describe the circumstance
of a BIPARTITE NUMBER ICONOCLASM against the TRIPARTITE NUMBER premise
of #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY as constitutionally intrinsic to the
ontology of the human being which would then conform to IMMANUEL KANT'S representation of the unity of consciousness linking together several
other representations, or a representation of their relation in a single concept (9: 101). In the Critique of Pure Reason he characterizes
judgment as [Pure general logic] deals with concepts, judgments, and inferences, corresponding exactly to the functions and order of those
powers of the mind, which are comprehended under the broad designation
of understanding in general… If the understanding in general is
explained as the faculty of rules, then the power of judgment is the
faculty of subsuming under rules, i.e., of determining whether something
stands under a given rule (CASUS DATAE LEGIS) or not.
(A130-132/B170-172) <https://plato.stanford.edu/Archives/Win2004/entries/kant-judgment/>

WHILST WE HAVE DESIGNATED THE SEMANTICAL BASIS FOR A RATIONAL FACULTY OF
RULES WHICH IS CONSISTENT WITH THE ANTHROPOLOGICAL SINGULARITY as IDEA
TEMPLATE TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT (then as EMPRESS and
DEFENDER OF THE FAITH). And UNDOUBTEDLY the relevant jurisprudent
principle of CASUS DATAE LEGIS is known and conjectured upon but not
with any substantial clarity.

"Kant restricts the sense of 'Judgment" to the act of "subsuming under
rules, that is, of distinguishing whether something falls under a given
rule or not (CASUS DATAE LEGIS)" (id. A 132-34, B 171-74). This sense is borrowed from lawyerly usage, not from logic, for, as Kant shows, logic
has nothing to say regarding this operation. There are, and there can
be, no rules regarding the application of rules. If Kant is right, a
sizeable part of what we take to be "law," and almost all jurisprudence,
are nothing but a futile striving to overcome this essential unruliness
of judgment. How can it be that the saying of law is lawless?

Perhaps, however, even to lawyers, the essence of a judgment does not
lie in the application of a rule to a particular case, but rather in the statement, or restatement, of the rule to be applied (eg: #451 - PRAXIS
OF RATIONALITY OF WHICH THERE IS NO KNOWLEDGE). If law consists of
rules, and if rules themselves are general propositions stating
obligations in general terms, then the properly 'judicial" in a judgment
would bet he stating of rules. The"case"would then matter only as
providing an occasion for such a ruling. If so, 'Judging," juridictio,
would find its most manifest instantiation in what we call
"legislation," legisatio, from legem tollere, the elevation of a lex, or statute, to its position of authority, which is always at once also the corresponding degradation of another.

Kant too, perhaps following this unmistakable hint of language, found a
kind of judgment in which the casus itself was manifestly decided,
indeed incontrovertibly, although the rule under which the fallen case
fell was still to be found, and would eventually deny itself entirely to
man's power to say. To this type of judgment, he devoted the most heroic
of his works, which he called a critique of the power of judgment,
Kritik der Urteilskraft. There the will to judge seems to run up against
its outer limits. In what sense indeed is there still a 'Judgment," that
is, a saying of law, when the supposed "law" withdraws into
ineffability?" [Vanderbuilt Law Review, Volume 48, Issue 4 Issue 4 - May
1995]

To that end we've included the broader statement on an identified CHRISTOLOGICAL AND METASCHEMA OF EVASION WITH PARADIGM EQUIVALENCE TO
FASCIST IDENTITY (ie. the BIPARTITE @1 - SOVEREIGN AUTONOMY DYNAMIC / @5
- STATE AS ITS INVENTION), from which you can conclude that if ISLAM has
only a CIRCUMSTANTIAL / SPECULATIVE CHRISTOLOGY THAT HAS NO CRUCIFIXION
then IPSO FACTO it envisions a METASCHEMA OF EVASION that is being
deployed and detrimental to anything but its ANTHROPOLOGICAL idealism.

#68 #11 #44
#17 #41 #65
#38 #71 #14

The TRIPARTITE use of a temporal heuristic as metakosmeo which has an
implicit conception of autonomy rather than a bipartite
HETEROS-AFFECTION (ie. I utilised this in relation to the #328 -
TRANSFORMATION PROTOTYPE as its therapeutic imperative) stricture such
as the NUMI / NUMEN AUGUSTI [#38, #71, #14] metakinesis inducement as imposition [#17, #41, #65] made upon autonomy.

On that physiological basis the police member's presumption of guilt
resulting in the elimination of GEORGE FLOYD is mitigated. Any implicit adverse institutional [#68, #11, #44] imperative which is self evident
since we stated it before the findings of those systemic prejudices were
made known, ought not be ipso facto imputed against the police officer's
#237 - USE OF FORCE as an AUTO-AFFECTIVE action.

Again, using the same #71 - DOMINION array construct, it ought to be
possible to resolve the #468: PERPLEXING QUESTION (#17) of prudent #519: discernment (#68) made in relation to the #495: seminal cause (#44) for
the exercising of #462: dominion (#11) corresponding to #465: limits
(#14) and the viability of #492: freewill (#41).

#123 as [#40, #1, #10, #2, #10, #20, #600] = ʼôyêb (H341): {UMBRA: #13 %
#41 = #13} 1) (Qal) *ENEMY*; 1a) personal; 1b) national;

#516 (-> #65) - *METAKOSMEO* *ASSOCIATOR* as [#6, #8, #6, #90, #6, #400] /
#519 (-> #68) as [#8, #6, #90, #400, #10, #5] /
#522 (-> #71) as [#2, #8, #6, #90, #400, #10, #6] = chûwts (H2351):
{UMBRA: #104 % #41 = #22} 1) *OUTSIDE*, outward, street, the outside;

As the need for an enquiry method to determine viability of the DOMINION
array [] to assay the #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY for viable action. A
high acumen -/+ of those #n anchors is evidence of prudent rather than instinctive action.

Whilst my usage of language is not as superlative, I AM (ie. I = #123 - JUDGEMENT SENSIBILITY / INTELLECT, AM = #82 - TERMS OF COMPLIANCE: @491
- PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY TO @1 - SELF) nevertheless able within a
TRIPARTITE paradigm as grounding for perspective to then accommodate by syncretic progression DERRIDA's obtuse semantical construct which is a BIPARTITE encapsulation of being as: "what he is trying to do with auto-affection: if the auto-position, the automonstrative autotely of
the ‘I,’ even in the human, implies the ‘I’ to be an other that must welcome within itself some irreducible hetero-affection."

Simply expressed as an ontic premise, if there are reciprocal I = #123 - judgement sensibility / intellect, then an obligating norm is implied as conformity to rule-based conventions:

#246 (ANTI-THESIS) - UTTERANCE; ACTIONS / #410 - OBLIGATING NORM (rule
based: BEAR NO FALSE WITNESS)

I did convey that a historical dependence upon the LUOSHU reference
object introduces an anthropological idealism associative to the META
LOGIC FALLACY within its #38 - *JUPITER* *PRINCIPLE* as aesthetic (ie.
the hypotenuse thesis) which is made against #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL
(#41 - ONTIC GROUNDING + #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY) being a
methodology of #491 - AGENCY that we redacted two policing #237 - USE OF
FORCE scenarios (not included here) as CASE STUDIES to their
metaphysical constructs relative to the DOMINION ARRAY in the context of
the COMMONWEALTH being a CAESAROPAPISM and DEFENDER [#44, #17,
#38]@(#123 / #99 -- to deploy the DOMINION array anchors as a TRIPARTITE intellectual construct against the ontic substitution premise within the machinery as BIPARTITE sovereign / autonomy dynamic) OF THE FAITH: DIEU
ET MON DROIT conforming to a SUPERORDINATE TRIPARTITE NUMBER CONSTRUCT.

"THE JEWS ANSWERED HIM, WE HAVE A LAW, AND BY OUR LAW HE OUGHT TO DIE,
BECAUSE HE MADE HIMSELF THE #415 - *SON* (ie. FOSTERING (yǎng): to
raise; to *BRING* *UP* (*CHILDREN*, animals); to give birth / #81 - 𝍖養
= #532 - shâbar (H7665): *BRING* *TO* *THE* *BIRTH*) OF GOD... AND WENT
AGAIN INTO THE JUDGMENT [#1521 = praitṓrion (G4232): 'HEAD-QUARTERS' IN
A ROMAN CAMP; MAGNIFICENT PALACE OF HEROD (son of a hero) THE GREAT;
#341 - MAIN CATHEDRAL (TO THE RESURRECTION OF CHRIST) OF THE RUSSIAN
ARMED FORCES *CONSECRATION* ON 14 JUNE 2020 / #387 - *VICTORY* *DAY*
WHEN CONSTRUCTION OF THE CATHEDRAL WAS COMPLETED ON 9 MAY 2020] HALL ...

#509 - *YAHAD* (JEWISH / CHRISTIANS) / #516 - *METAKOSMEO* ASSOCIATOR =
3 APRIL 33 AD

    #232 - *CUNNING* *PLAN* / NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 20 JUNE 2023 as
[#20, #100, #1, #60, #1, #50] /
    #237 - *USE* *OF* *FORCE* / NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 20 JUNE 2023 as [#5, #20, #100, #1, #60, #1, #50] = krázō (G2896): {UMBRA: #928 % #41 =
#26} 1) to croak; 1a) of the *CRY* *OF* *A* *RAVEN*; 1b) hence, to cry
out, cry aloud, vociferate; 1c) *TO* *CRY* *OR* *PRAY* *FOR*
*VENGEANCE*; 2) to cry; 2a) *CRY* *OUT* *ALOUD*, speak with a loud voice;

BUT THE JEWS *CRIED*-G2896: OUT, SAYING IF THOU LET THIS MAN GO, THOU
ART NOT CAESAR'S FRIEND: WHOSOEVER MAKETH HIMSELF A KING SPEAKETH
AGAINST CAESAR." [John 19:7, 12]

It ought to be understood that #237 - USE OF FORCE is a conceptual form presently deployed by our state police whose motto is TENEZ LE DROIT /
UPHOLD THE RIGHT that is also an ontic / deme boundary and a general
principle of #491 - AGENCY (ie. no less applicable to healthcare)
capacity in conformity to [... #40 - LAW / MODEL (FE)] as then a
functional #277 - RIGHT TO PLACE A TEST which is distinct to the #111 - FALLACIOUS OR VACUOUS assertion that attaining #71 - *DOMINION* [#38 -
FULLNESS (SHENG), #33 - CLOSENESS (MI)] is judgement sensibility's
ultimate end as it's centre of value.

#71 as [#1, #30, #10, #30] /
#73 as [#6, #1, #30, #6, #30] /
#81 as [#1, #30, #10, #30, #10] /
#111 as [#1, #30, #10, #30, #600] /
#123 as [#2, #1, #30, #10, #30, #10, #600] = ʼĕlîyl (H457): {UMBRA: #71
% #41 = #30} 1) of nought, *GOOD* *FOR* *NOTHING*, worthless; 1a) *OF* *PHYSICIANS*, a shepherd, *A* *DIVINATION*; 1b) of false gods;

Which is also a requisite for GNOSIS EX MACHINA being a nomenclature
provision of acceptable meta descriptors for articulating the viable
boundary (ie. SUGGESTED BY THE EXPRESSION nán táo fǎ wǎng (難逃法網): [#79 -
𝍔難 = #530 / #49 - 𝌶逃 = #500 / #40 - 𝌭法 = #491] - IT IS HARD TO ESCAPE
THE DRAGNET OF THE LAW; THE LONG ARM OF THE LAW) of consciousness instantiation, having a correspondence to the cosmological primitives
(ie. LAWS OF NATURE: fǎ dù (法度): [#40 - 𝌭法 = #491 / #52 - 𝌹度 = #503]
- (A) LAW / chéng wén fǎ (成文法): [#73 - 𝍎成 = #524 / #47 - 𝌴文 = #498 /
#40 - 𝌭法 = #491] - STATUTE) published within the CANON OF SUPREME
MYSTERY (太玄經) TETRADS of 4 BCE.

It is therefore UNLIKELY (in my humble opinion) that you'll find a
COMPETENT JUDGE let alone a PROSECUTOR who could make any determination
of WAR CRIMES in the circumstance of a BIPARTITE NUMBER ICONOCLASM
against the TRIPARTITE NUMBER premise such as the #451 - PRAXIS OF
RATIONALITY.

Such a pity then that you would not be able to prosecute WAR CRIMES on
the basis of either NARCISSISTIC PERSONALITY DISORDER or any
PREDISPOSITION TO ADVERSE BEHAVIOURAL REINFORCEMENT BY METAKINESIS (ie.
war) as an ICONOCLASM against FREEWILL from a BIPARTITE NUMEBR worldview
such as ISLAM which claims a piety established upon a metaphorical root
(eg: #232 - METEOR IDOL SECRETED WITHIN THE KAABA) and a demanded
SUBJUGATED WILL.

However if misconduct occurred in the advancement of the SEDITIOUS CAUSE relating to the IRISH CATHOLIC REPUBLICANISM / KNIGHTS TEMPLAR (THE RESURRECTION OF CHRIST) RENEWED ON 11 APRIL 201,5 I would then prosecute.

Otherwise, I would propose the adoption of a #237 - USE OF FORCE / #277
- RIGHT TO PLACE A TEST methodology as an effective means for assaying
and negation by the introduction of an alternative postulate upon the
thinking dynamic concept of #123 - INTELLECT and its relationship to
#164 - DOMINION as impetus for #205 - STRATEGIC ACTION.

Towards that end I have provided defence media with the ONTIC as
MATHEMATICAL IDEA TEMPLATE to QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT which as ANTHROPOLOGICAL SINGULARITY and ONTIC VARIANCE provides a CENTRAL means
for FACILITATORS / ARBITRATORS of FREEWILL.

Those philosophical contemplations which have now taken some
considerable time (many years) to formulate into a comprehensive,
substantial and persuasive jurisprudent argument was then the basis as
to the nature of a disclosure recorded within A FREEDOM OF INFORMATION
REQUEST INTO THE INCIDENT AT THE STAR HOTEL, 173 RAYMOND STREET, SALE @
1130 TO 1245 HOURS ON SUNDAY 26 MARCH 2017:

"Have dealt with the male customer once prior, where ... [CENSORED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 33(1)] ... On this particular occasion, he
mentioned having been up since 2 AM working on ANTI-TERRORISM documents,
that he was a very important person to the county and had UNUSUAL
SKILLS, etc. All of which he revealed in a quick conversation before ordering."

Is it not as "ANTI-TERRORISM" action, by an "UNUSUAL SKILL" to exercise
faith in GOD with the intellectual and spontaneous capacity in writing a
POEM constituting a dialectic depth of fifteen lines including
consecutive WORDS OF THE DAY for 8 to 12 DECEMBER 2016;
www.dictionary.com and then weaponise it subsequently, with just a TITLE
CHANGE on 6 MARCH 2022 as [#371, #392, #424, #492] for the occasion of
an important anniversary, as resonance to the RUSSIAN DAY OF REMEMBRANCE
AND SORROW (the day Germany invaded the Soviet Union in 1941) on 22 JUNE
2023?

TRIPLE F (#666) CAFE: “Why did you put this rubbish on our Triple F Cafe Facebook Page?”

<https://www.facebook.com/Triple-F-Cafe-freshfastfood-225837177482258>

DOLF: "Because that is what occupied my mind (ie. it is a demand of
compliance which was made to 1.6 billion people) when I came into your
cafe this last morning CAROL (manly, strong)...

NOTE: The POEM was initially written as empathetic response to a
PERVERSE JUDGMENT on 9 DECEMBER 2016 by the DUTCH COURTS within CASE
NUMBER: 09/837304-15 against GEERT WILDER'S public speech on 19 MARCH 2014:

On 12 MARCH 2014 the Dutch politician GEERT WILDERS and several members
of his party, PVV, also known as The Freedom Party, visited a market in
The Hague. Part of their visit was broadcast on national TV and GEERT
WILDERS said that his party would make the city more safe, more
sociable, and if possible, make it a city with fewer Moroccans. When
later confronted with his statement WILDERS held that he had merely
referred to criminal Moroccans and Moroccans receiving benefits from the
state.

On 19 MARCH 2014 the Freedom Party held an election rally at CAFÉ DE
TIJD in The Hague. During the meeting, GEERT WILDERS held a speech which
was recorded and broadcast on TV. In his speech he stated: “Before I go,
I would like everyone here to answer the following three questions.
Three questions, please give a clear answer which defines our party, the
PVV. Do you want more or less European Union?” The crowd present
repeatedly shouted “less”. WILDERS then went on to pose the second question: “Do you want more or less Labour Party?” The crowd again
shouted “less”. WILDERS continued: “And the third question is, and actually I’m not allowed to say it, because you get reported to the
police, and maybe there are even D66 prosecutors who will launch a case,
but freedom of expression is a great good and we haven’t said anything
that isn’t allowed, we haven’t said anything that’s incorrect, so I ask you: do you want more or fewer Moroccans in this city and in the Netherlands?”. The crowd repeatedly shouted “less”. GEERT WILDERS then concluded his speech with the words: “Nah, we’ll arrange it”.

At the election meeting a coordinator (witness 3) from the PVV had been
aware that WILDERS would ask the public whether they wanted fewer
Moroccans. The coordinator had been asked (by witness 4) to instruct the
public in advance of the question and answer. Before the speech witness
4 had heard GEERT WILDERS emphasize that it should be as strong as
possible so the content would be picked up by the press and broadcast.
The legal implications of the speech had not been discussed. The issue
of including the topic of Moroccans or criminal Moroccans was discussed
and there was some concern whether there would be a prompt response from
the public. This was the reason why witness 4 called witness 3 and asked
him to ensure that a proper interaction would take place.

Among the many Dutch politicians who have had a FATWA [Arabic: فتوى,
TELOS: #487 - RITUAL ADMINISTRATION (#36 - STRENGTH: CH'IANG); MALE:
#237 - USE OF FORCE; FEME: #163 - ANGRY, RAGING, VEXED; ONTIC: #156 -
LIVING SUBSTANCE; DEME: #548 - COMMANDMENT] issued against them,
possibly the best-known internationally is GEERT WILDERS. In 2008
WILDERS received 285 death threats, with a further 264 aimed at all
Dutch politicians. There were a total of 145 protection orders for
WILDERS in 2006; in 2005 there were 110.



<https://gatesofvienna.net/2010/09/australian-fatwa-behead-wilders/>

An Australian imam named FEIZ MUHAMMAD who as head of the Global Islamic
Youth Centre in Liverpool, a suburb of Sydney is viewed by intelligence agencies worldwide as one of the main jihadist ideologues, a great
inspiration for young Western Muslim radicals had issued a FATWA calling
for the Dutch politician’s beheading.

According to Dutch newspaper Elsevier on 3 SEPTEMBER 2010: "PVV leader
GEERT WILDERS [was] angry at the Dutch Intelligence Service [AIVD]. The
AIVD is in the possession of a sound recording on which WILDERS is
threatened with death by the imam on a secluded site of jihadists, in
response to questions by Dutch radicals says:

“WE SEE THE #271 / 348 / #372 - *EVIL* FILTH OF PEOPLE SUCH AS THAT
FILTHY DUTCH POLITICIAN. ANYONE WHO #238 / #485 - *MOCKS* OUR LEARNING,
LAUGHS AT THE ISLAM AND DEGRADES IT MUST ENTER DEATH, DECAPITATE HIM,
CUT OFF HIS HEAD.”

The PVV leader was only informed in detail about the matter around 2
SEPTEMBER 2010. Accordingly WILDERS says he is shocked, and last night consulted ERIC AKERBOOM, National Coordinator for Counterterrorism (NCTb).

“I urgently want to know why the NCTb and AIVD never informed me about this.”

He also asked “what kind of consequences this has for me,” and called
the recording “terrible”." <http://www.elsevier.nl/web/Nieuws/Nederland/274863/Radicale-imam-adviseert-Geert-Wilders-te-onthoofden.htm>
[Link no longer active]

DOES THE GOVERNOR GENERAL HAVE AN EX-JUDICIAL AUTHORITY TO ORDER *BIRCHING*?

If one considers as corporal punishment the legal precedent of the cat
o' nine tails, which is a type of multi-tailed whip or flail. It
originated as an implement for severe physical punishment, notably in
the Royal Navy and British Army, and as a judicial punishment in Britain
and some other countries.

The term judicial birch generally refers to the severe type in use for court-ordered *BIRCHINGS*, especially the Manx hazel birch. A 1951
memorandum (possibly confirming earlier practice) ordered all UK male
prisons to use birches (and cats-o'-nine-tails) from only a national
stock at South London's Wandsworth prison, where they were to be
'thoroughly' tested before being supplied in triplicate to a prison
whenever required for use as prison discipline.

FOSTER V MINISTER FOR CUSTOMS AND JUSTICE B92/1999 [2000] HCATRANS 121
(23 MARCH 2000)

KIRBY J: I think the question is still relevant because we have to test
your theory of the section against the possibility that the Minister has
to, as it were, speculate not only on what the discretion that will be exercised by the sentencing judge will be, not only what might be the
subject of some review of the sentence, but what factors would enter
into the sentence, such as offers of return to people who have been
defrauded or a pleading of guilty and so on.

Are any of the other matters that have to be considered under the
section of this problematical class? In other words, the death penalty,
well, one just looks that up. But are any of the other matters that the Minister has to take into account of this variable malleable content?
Torture, for example. Would one know whether in a particular case for particular offences - I suppose you could have some offences where even
in oppressive countries there is no torture but in such countries there
is for particular offences having a political character, so presumably - - -

MR SOFRONOFF: Your Honour, the direct answer is none of the other
specific matters that are addressed in section 22 are of that flexible
kind. With respect to torture, one can readily see that say a sentence
of *BIRCHING* might be regarded here as torture and if that is possible
under an enactment of a foreign country, then that is readily
ascertainable as a matter of objectivity. However, although we are
speaking of Commonwealth countries here, some of them from time to time
are in such a state that one could readily accept that in some of them,
despite the absence of the provision for lawful imposition of torture,
there may be a risk that that would occur and that would be something
that - - -

KIRBY J: There was a report only last week of one Commonwealth country
where they were going to cut the person up and do it in public and do
other such things to the person, so I assume it just depends from time
to time on the evidence available.

MR SOFRONOFF: Yes, and in our submission, although it is true that the
actual sentence that would be passed would depend upon a great number of matters, some of which will not be known until much later, it is always possible for a range to be given by those who are familiar with such
things, such that for the broad purposes that the Attorney is required
to consider it is possible to conclude that no oppression would result
because some significant gaol term would, nevertheless, be imposed - 3

[continued in next message]

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)