As a person of Dutch heritage and first discoverers (eg: pewter plate of
26 October 1616 as reconciled to first mind from before the Bronze Age)
who regard first principles of sovereignty, we are aghast at the
cultural misappropriation.
The fact is Terra Australis incognita was conveyed by Captain Cook as
new holland and the mistaken assertion that there was no prior discovery south of Melbourne (ie the latitude) was the basis of a claim for the
British sovereign which ignored the fact of Van Dieman's land.
Palestinian protestors ought to stop their genocide of Dutch identity
and history.
Do you realise that this designation by Twitter (X) as PERSECUTION:
I QUOTE 7 FEBRUARY 2024 NOTICE: "WHY DOES MY ACCOUNT HAVE A LABEL?
We have found that YOUR ACCOUNT MAY CONTAIN SPAM OR BE ENGAGING IN OTHER TYPES OF PLATFORM MANIPULATION. YOU MAY NOT USE X'S SERVICES IN A MANNER INTENDED TO ARTIFICIALLY AMPLIFY, SUPPRESS INFORMATION, or engage in
behavior that manipulates or disrupts people's experience or platform manipulation defenses on X."
Is due to my on two occasions having repeatedly responded to
anti-Semitic propaganda as slander given I was aware that Hitler's TABLE
TALK was being deployed as a manual for war--such evidence as IDEA #303
- NEW YORK SKY SCRAPERS VULNERABLE TO AIR ATTACK as schema action and is reconnaissance of the terrorist event 11 September 2001 have been
reported by me to defence, American consulate, department of foreign
affairs and my federal parliament member.
Such shameful conduct by Twitter (X) as a vehicle for ISLAMIC / NAZIS /
AL ASQA FLOOD propaganda ought to be a criminal offence prosecuted by
the US GOVERNMENT.
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Refutation%20of%20Religio-Fascism.pdf>
On 6/2/2024 09:27, dolf wrote:
REUTERS (ECONOMIC TIMES INDIA) @ 0411 HOURS ON 4 FEBRUARY 2024: "IRAN,
RUSSIA CONDEMN US AIRSTRIKES IN IRAQ AND SYRIA: Iran's foreign
ministry on Saturday condemned overnight US airstrikes in Iraq and
Syria as "violations of the sovereignty and territorial integrity" of
the two countries.
Ministry spokesperson Nasser Kanaani, in a statement, said the attacks
represented "ANOTHER ADVENTUROUS AND STRATEGIC MISTAKE BY THE UNITED
STATES THAT WILL RESULT ONLY IN INCREASED TENSION IN INSTABILITY IN
THE REGION". The US military launched airstrikes against more than 85
targets linked to Iran's Revolutionary Guard (IRGC) and the militias
it backs, in retaliation for last weekend's drone attack in Jordan
that killed three US troops.
Meanwhile, RUSSIA CONDEMNS US AIRSTRIKES IN IRAQ AND SYRIA AND THE
SITUATION NEEDS TO BE CONSIDERED BY THE UN SECURITY COUNCIL, Russia's
foreign ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said on Saturday.
"It is obvious that the airstrikes are deliberately designed to
further inflame the conflict. By attacking, almost without pause, the
facilities of allegedly pro-Iranian groups in Iraq and Syria, the US
are purposefully trying to drive the largest countries in the region
into conflict," Zakharova said. The United States launched airstrikes
in Iraq and Syria against more than 85 targets linked to Iran's
Revolutionary Guard (IRGC) and militias it backs, reportedly killing
nearly 40 people, in retaliation for a deadly attack on US troops.
After the US airstrikes targeting militia positions in both Iraq and
Syria, the spokesman for the commander-in-chief of the Iraqi armed
forces said these strikes come at a time when Iraq is "striving to
ensure stability in the region," AL JAZEERA REPORTED.
"These strikes constitute a violation of Iraqi sovereignty, an
undermining of the efforts of the Iraqi government, and a threat that
will drag Iraq and the region into undesirable consequences, the
consequences of which will be dire for security and stability in Iraq
and the region," INA quoted the spokesman as saying."
<https://economictimes.indiatimes.com//news/international/world-news/iran-russia-condemn-us-airstrikes-in-iraq-and-syria/articleshow/107390360.cms>
DOLF @ 1631 HOURS ON 5 FEBRUARY 2024: "The meta-descriptive principles
of tetragrams #1 - 𝌆中 = #452 - CHINA to which we have assigned a #451 >> - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY CO-EFFICIENT and a pentamorphic COGITO: [#67,
#14, #35, #15, #19] as #1 - CENTRE (CHUNG) ARRAY are entirely
UNIVERSAL VALUES of humanism and without further clarification from
YANG HENGJUN'S supporters over the CHINESE COURTS determination on 5
FEBRUARY 2024 concerning the indictment of ESPIONAGE, received a
SUSPENDED DEATH SENTENCE, we find the analogy made by allegedly
pro-democracy supporters to be deceptive. You may have different
semantics and political consensus but at core it is a common
anthropocentric / cosmogonic reality.
Since the #CENTER (205 <-> 164) INTERSECTION of the 9x9x9 = 729
appraisals and nomenclature as its ONTIC premise being an extension of
the COGITO which includes the SEPTET VOLUNTĀTIS / TRANSFORMATIVE
PROTOTYPES OF ANTIQUITY (excepting the LUO SHU SQUARE), thereby
produces the IDEA TEMPLATE TO QUEEN VICTORIA's LETTERS PATENT.
<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?telos:205&intersect:164&type:1>
We also make the presumption that MAO ZEDONG dropped (ie. there are
abnormal dictionary entries as absence of linguistic usage) several
tripartite number elements: [#3, #17, #18, #74] within his AUGUST 1937
treatise on contradiction as a LENINIST philosophical accommodation to
then create a homogeneous society.
And note by difficult historical contrast that the RUSSO-GERMAN PACT
(eg: RIBBENTROP-MOLOTOV PACT [#237 / #316 - 6 SEPTEMBER 1940
ASSOCIATIVE SCHEMA RELATING TO KING CAROL II (15 OCTOBER 1893 [O.S. 3
OCTOBER 1893] – 4 APRIL 1953) OF ROMANIA WHO REIGNED FROM 8 JUNE 1930
UNTIL HIS FORCED ABDICATION UPON 6 SEPTEMBER 1940. AS IPSO FACTO
DEPLOYING PROTOTYPE #EIGHT OF THE LUO SHU REFERENCE OBJECT) DATED 23
AUGUST 1939 applies an ADVERSE FASCIST / SOVIET CONDITION OF EQUALS
involving the #237 - USE OF FORCE [#8, #35, #62, #17, #44, #71]
RELATING TO USURPATION OF #71 - DOMINION.
On 22 JUNE 1941, HITLER LAUNCHED OPERATION BARBAROSSA, an invasion of
the Soviet Union with the largest invasion force in history, leading
to some of the largest battles and most horrific atrocities. This
offensive comprised three army groups. The city of Leningrad was
besieged while other major cities fell to the Germans. Despite initial
successes, the German offensive ground to a halt in the Battle of
Moscow, and the Soviets launched a counteroffensive, pushing the
Germans back. The failure of Operation Barbarossa reversed the
fortunes of Germany, and Stalin was confident that the Allied war
machine would eventually defeat Germany."
LUOSHU ORDER #369 MATRIX REFERENCE OBJECT

[#1, {@1: Sup: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#1); Ego: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#1)}
#23, {@2: Sup: 24 - JOY: LE (#25); Ego: 23 - EASE: YI (#24)}
#16, {@3: Sup: 40 - LAW / MODEL: FA (#65); Ego: 16 - CONTACT: CHIAO
(#40)}
#4, {@4: Sup: 44 - STOVE: TSAO (#109); Ego: 4 - BARRIER: HSIEN (#44)}
#21] {@5: Sup: 65 - INNER: NEI (#174); Ego: 21 - RELEASE: SHIH (#65)}
#634 - MALE CHECKSUM TOTAL: #174 as [#1, #6, #10, #2, #10, #5, #600] =
ʼôyêb (H341): {UMBRA: #13 % #41 = #13} 1) (Qal) *ENEMY*; 1a)
*PERSONAL*; 1b) *NATIONAL*;
Furthermore given the REDUCTIO AD HITLERUM as TABLE TALK IDEAS #237 -
8 JUNE 1942 AND #316 - 6 SEPTEMBER 1942 by an explicit DATE / IDEA
CORRESPONDENCE AS ANNIVERSARY OF ROMANIAN SOVEREIGN DOMINION /
ABDICATION and deploying PROTOTYPE #EIGHT OF THE LUO SHU REFERENCE
OBJECT, appear to confer that such are "FOUNDATIONS TO EXISTENCE" of
the GERMAN FASCIST REICH, RUSSIAN AND ISLAMIC STATEHOOD AS SOVEREIGN
IDENTITY being a habitual implication of recourse to the #237 - *USE*
*OF* *FORCE* *TO* *EFFECT* *USURPATION* *OF* #71 - *DOMINION*
deploying such as a WAR MANUAL and masterful guide for HOSTILE
MILITARY OPERATIONS SUCH AS THE UKRAINE INCURSION COMMENCING NOUS #1 -
24 FEBRUARY 2022 is consistent with an evasion of NAZIS IDENTITY as
public pious deception purveyed by a FIXED ISLAMIC / RUSSIAN MINDSET
in conformity with the informal philological research observation that
the NEW YORK TERRORIST attack of 11 SEPTEMBER 2001 similarly has an
impetus of systemic BIPARTITE NUMBER foundation associated with
ISLAMIC BELIEF (ie. there is no innocent party) being consequential to
REDUCTIO AD HITLERUM AS TABLE TALK IDEA #303 - 28 AUGUST 1942
deployment which specifically relates to “NEW YORK SKY-SCRAPERS: THEIR
VULNERABILITY TO AIR ATTACK”.
Upon such historical precedent, it is plausible to make a rationale of
impunity and we await RUSSIAN PRESIDENT PUTIN raising matters of
SOVEREIGNTY as breaches by WESTERN POWERS in response to MIDDLE EAST
FERMENTING TURMOIL at a special session of the UNITED NATIONS SECURITY
COUNCIL."
SEE ALSO: "DALEK PRODUCTION LINE CONSCIOUSNESS: ON ART AND THE
AESTHETIC OF AWE -- IS IT IMITATION (mimesis) OR SUCCEEDING (diádochos)?" >>
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Dalek%20Revival.pdf>
A revision of this document may be obtained from the following URL:
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Refutation%20of%20Religio-Fascism.pdf> >>
Revision Date: 6 February 2024
On 4/2/2024 20:38, dolf wrote:
News media here has just reported a criminal action as a harrowing
incident in Queensland, Australia, where a 70-year-old grandmother
was stabbed to death in front of her 6-year-old granddaughter. The
tragic attack occurred in the underground carpark of the Town Square
Redbank Plains Shopping Centre, southwest of Brisbane, around 6:10 PM
on a Saturday evening. The assailant, described as having an African
appearance, fled the scene and was still at large as of Sunday
morning...
We are just wondering if this is the nature a NELSON MANDELA's
FREEDOM... and if so his nobel peace prize ought to rescinded.
<https://www.thenewdaily.com.au/news/2024/02/04/grandmother-stabbed-redbank-plains>
----------------
IF THE OPTIMAL NEW YORK TERRORIST EVENT RESPONSE IS COGITO #45 - 𝌲大 >>> = #496 THEN THE OPTIMAL HOUTHIS RED SEA SHIP HIJACKING RESPONSE IS
COGITO #68 - 𝍉瞢 = #519
DOLF (TWEET) @ 0744 HOURS ON 4 FEBRUARY 2024: "In relation to the NEW
YORK TERRORIST attack as the possibility of it having an impetus as
systemic BIPARTITE NUMBER foundation of ISLAMIC BELIEF (ie. there is
no innocent party) being consequential to REDUCTIO AD HITLERUM AS
TABLE TALK IDEA #303 - 28 AUGUST 1942 which specifically relates to
“NEW YORK SKY-SCRAPERS: THEIR VULNERABILITY TO AIR ATTACK”.
We ought to further tease out this point: “Surely the terrorists have
been in Guantanamo Bay detention camp for sufficient time to coerce
an answer.”
As I understand it, normally evidence obtained by means of torture is
not admissible within a court of law, however if the terrorist event
is specifically related to TABLE TALK IDEA #303 and this fact was
never divulged by action of torture, then we ask whether ignorance
has any LOCUS STANDI (ie. the right or capacity to bring an action or
to appear in a court).
That torture in this circumstance of “Guantanamo Bay detention” is
then evidence of a fixed and bestial mindset which is not amenable to
disclosure or recognition to any fact such as TABLE TALK IDEA #303
dependency.
It could be argued that a “fixed and bestial mindset” is not
adversely affected by environmental issues like an animal in a zoo
and that therefore the “Guantanamo Bay detention camp” met their
cogito requirements as life viability."
COGITO #45 - METHODOLOGY + #68 - RIGHTS = @113 - ONTIC PRINCIPLE OF
ETHICAL ENGAGEMENT AS HOUTHIS RED SEA SHIP HIJACKING RESPONSE
#68 - 𝍉瞢 = #519
COGITO: [#42, #42, #50, #40, #51] as #68 - DIMMING (MENG)
<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Mystery&tetra:68>
[#42 {@1: Sup: 42 - GOING TO MEET: YING (#42); Ego: 42 - GOING TO
MEET: YING (#42)}
#42 {@2: Sup: 3 - MIRED: HSIEN (#45 - I AM NOT A DOER OF WRONG {%1});
Ego: 42 - GOING TO MEET: YING (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2})}
#50 {@3: Sup: 53 - ETERNITY: YUNG (#98 - MALE DEME IS UNNAMED {%24});
Ego: 50 - VASTNESS / WASTING: T'ANG (#134 - MALE DEME IS UNNAMED {%34})} >>>
#40 {@4: Sup: 12 - YOUTHFULNESS: T'UNG (#110 - MALE DEME IS UNNAMED
{%30}); Ego: 40 - LAW / MODEL: FA (#174)}
#51] {@5: Sup: 63 - WATCH: SHIH (#173 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO UNNATURAL
LUST {%27}); Ego: 51 - CONSTANCY: CH'ANG (#225)}
TELOS TOTAL: #225
ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #302
DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #342
#519 as [#80, #100, #70, #200, #1, #3, #5, #10, #50] = proságō
(G4317): {UMBRA: #1254 % #41 = #24} 1) to lead, to bring; 1a) to open
a way of access, for one to God; 1a1) to render one acceptable to
God; 1b) in a forensic sense, to summon (to trial or punishment); 2)
to draw near to, approach; 2a) the *LAND* *WHICH* *A* *SAILOR* *IS*
*APPROACHING* *SEEMING* *TO* *APPROACH* *HIM*;
#237 - USE OF FORCE [#8, #35, #62, #17, #44, #71] RELATING TO #71 -
DOMINION
#35 #80 #17
#26 #44 #62
#71 #8 #53
[LUOSHU SQUARE PROTOTYPE #EIGHT: ETHICAL #237 - *USE* *OF* *FORCE*
*TO* *OBTAIN* #71 - *DOMINION*)
#8 - REDUCING SOVEREIGN IDENTITY TO AGRARIAN ECONOMIC SUBMISSION
#43 - EATING BREAD FROM SOIL WON BY THE SWORD
#105 - OUT-DATED POLITICAL IDEAS: IMPERIAL BRITAIN / SUPPORT OF
THE JEW
#122 - ODES TO WAR
#166 - TECHNOLOGIZING PRO DOMO NEEDS
#237 - SOCIETAL / YOUTH INVIGORATION AND PROPAGANDA
#263 - SAILORS, SUPERSTITION AND PERILS
#316 - RETALIATION AS SCHEMA #237 - 8 JUNE / #316 - 6 SEPTEMBER
#396 - SEE ALSO TORAH BIPARTITE NUMBER PROTOTYPE #SEVEN
CAROL II (15 OCTOBER 1893 [O.S. 3 OCTOBER 1893] – 4 APRIL 1953) was
the King of Romania from 8 JUNE 1930 until his forced abdication on 6
SEPTEMBER 1940. After the fall of France, Carol II's policy changed
towards re-alignment with Nazi Germany in hopes of gaining a German
guarantee. He was however not aware of the secret clauses of the
Ribbentrop-Molotov pact between Germany and the Soviet Union that
would see Romania lose significant parts of its territory. The year
1940 marked the fragmentation of Greater Romania by the seceding of
Bessarabia and Northern Bukovina to the USSR, Northern Transylvania
to Hungary and Southern Dobruja to Bulgaria. Although after which, a
German guarantee was finally achieved, the situation had, had a
disastrous effect on the reputation of Carol II. The reorientation of
Romania's foreign policy towards Nazi Germany, however, would not
prevent his regime from collapsing and he was forced to abdicate by
General Ion Antonescu, the newly appointed and Nazi-backed prime
minister, and was succeeded by his son Michael. [Wikpedia,
Carol_II_of_Romania]
#630 - FEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #225 as [#200, #10, #300, #70, #50] =
sîtos (G4621): {UMBRA: #780 % #41 = #1} 1) *WHEAT*, *GRAIN*;
REDUCTIO AD HITLERUM AS IDEA #8 - 25 JULY 1941: "Rumania would do
well to give up, as far as possible, the idea of having her own
industry. She would direct the wealth of her soil, and especially her
*WHEAT*, towards the German market. She would receive from us, in
exchange, the manufactured goods she needs. Bessarabia is a real
granary. Thus the Rumanian proletariat, which is contaminated by
Bolshevism, would disappear, and the country would never lack
anything. I must own that King Carol has worked in that direction.”
[page 14]
#1116 - FEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #225 as [#40, #70, #100, #200, #6, #700]
= ʻEqrôwn (H6138): {UMBRA: #426 % #41 = #16} 0) Ekron =
'*EMIGRATION*' or 'torn up by the roots'; 1) the most northerly of
the 5 principal cities of the Philistines; located in the lowlands of
Judah and later given to Dan;
#408 - DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #342 as [#80, #1, #100, #5, #80, #10, #4,
#8, #40, #70, #10] /
#608 - DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #342 as [#80, #1, #100, #5, #80, #10, #4,
#8, #40, #70, #10, #200] = parepídēmos (G3927): {UMBRA: #598 % #41 =
#24} 1) *ONE* *WHO* *COMES* *FROM* *A* *FOREIGN* *COUNTRY* *INTO* *A*
*CITY* *OR* *LAND* *TO* *RESIDE* *THERE* *BY* *THE* *SIDE* *OF* *THE*
*NATIVES*; 2) a stranger; 3) sojourning in a strange place, a
foreigner; 4) in the NT metaph. in reference to heaven as the native
country, one who sojourns on earth;
REDUCTIO AD HITLERUM AS IDEA #43 - 17 OCTOBER 1941: "For them the
word "liberty" means the right to wash on feast-days. If we arrive
bringing soft soap, we'll obtain no sympathy. These are views that
will have to be completely readjusted. THERE'S ONLY ONE DUTY: TO
*GERMANISE* *THIS* *COUNTRY* *BY* *THE* *IMMIGRATION* *OF* *GERMANS*,
and to look upon the natives as Red-skins. If these people had
defeated us, Heaven have mercy! But we don't hate them. That
sentiment is unknown to us. We are guided only by reason. They, on
the other hand, have an inferiority complex. They have a real hatred
towards a conqueror whose crushing superiority they can feel. The
intelligentsia? We have too many of them at home.
All those who have the feeling for Europe can join in our work.
#638 - MALE CHECKSUM TOTAL: #173 as [#6, #5, #8, #9, #10, #600] =
chiṭṭâh (H2406): {UMBRA: #22 % #41 = #22} 1) *WHEAT*; 1a) wheat
(plant); 1b) *WHEAT* *FLOUR*;
#380 - MALE CHECKSUM TOTAL: #173 as [#80, #200, #100] = pârâq
(H6564): {UMBRA: #380 % #41 = #11} 1) *FRAGMENT*, *BROKEN* *CRUMB*,
broth;
In this business I shall go straight ahead, cold-bloodedly. What they
may think about me, at this juncture, is to me a matter of complete
indifference. I don't see *WHY* *A* *GERMAN* *WHO* *EATS* *A* *PIECE*
*OF* *BREAD* should torment himself with the idea that the soil that
produces this bread has been won by the sword. When we eat wheat from
Canada, we don't think about the
despoiled Indians.
#387 - FEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #225 as [#4, #10, #1, #2, #70, #30, #70,
#200] = diábolos (G1228): {UMBRA: #387 % #41 = #18} 1) prone to
slander, slanderous, accusing falsely; 1a) a calumniator, false
accuser, slanderer,; 2) metaph. applied to a man who, by *OPPOSING*
*THE* *CAUSE* *OF* *GOD*, *MAY* *BE* *SAID* *TO* *ACT* *THE* *PART*
*OF* *THE* *DEVIL* or to side with him;
#794 - ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #302 as [#5, #600, #9, #100, #70, #10] =
echthrós (G2190): {UMBRA: #984 % #41 = #41} 1) hated, odious,
hateful; 2) hostile, hating, and opposing another; 2a) used of men as
at enmity with God by their sin; 2a1) opposing (God) in the mind;
2a2) a man that is hostile; 2a3) a certain enemy; 2a4) the hostile
one; 2a5) *THE* *DEVIL* *WHO* *IS* *THE* *MOST* *BITTER* *ENEMY* *OF*
*THE* *DIVINE* *GOVERNMENT*;
#181 - MALE CHECKSUM TOTAL: #173 as [#5, #30, #70, #6, #30, #40] =
ʻôwlâm (H5769): {UMBRA: #146 % #41 = #23} 1) long duration,
antiquity, futurity, for ever, ever, everlasting, evermore,
perpetual, old, ancient, world; 1a) ancient time, long time (of
past); 1b) (of future); 1b1) for ever, always; 1b2) continuous
existence, perpetual; 1b3) everlasting, indefinite or unending
future, *ETERNITY*;
The *PRECEPT* *THAT* *IT'S* *MEN'S* *DUTY* *TO* *LOVE* *ONE*
*ANOTHER* is theory—and the Christians are the last to practise it! A
negro baby who has the misfortune to die before a missionary gets his
clutches on him, goes to Hell! If that were true, one might well
lament that sorrowful destiny: to have lived only three years, and to
burn for all *ETERNITY* with Lucifer!” [page 69]
#1318 - ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #302 as [#80, #30, #8, #200, #200,
#800] = plḗssō (G4141): {UMBRA: #1318 % #41 = #6} 1) to *STRIKE*, smite; >>>
REDUCTIO AD HITLERUM AS IDEA #105 - 12 / 13 JANUARY 1942: "In the
Wehrmacht there used until now to be no obligation to confirm the
carrying out of an order, except at lower levels. I've just changed
that. Without this obligation, there's a risk that people may
consider an order as having been carried out simply because it has
been given. One must have a confirmation, so as to be quite sure…
#447 - ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #302 as [#80, #30, #8, #200, #9, #70,
#50] = plēsíon (G4139): {UMBRA: #448 % #41 = #38} 1) a *NEIGHBOUR*;
1a) a friend; 1b) any other person, and where two are concerned, the
other (thy fellow man, thy neighbour), according to the Jews, *ANY*
*MEMBER* *OF* *THE* *HEBREW* *NATION* *AND* *COMMONWEALTH*; 1c)
according to Christ, any other man irrespective of nation or religion
with whom we live or whom we chance to meet;
"AND THE SECOND IS LIKE, NAMELY THIS, THOU SHALT LOVE THY
*NEIGHBOUR*-G4139 AS THYSELF. THERE IS NONE OTHER COMMANDMENT GREATER
THAN THESE." [Mark 12:31]
#705 - MALE CHECKSUM TOTAL: #173 as [#5, #20, #80, #200, #400] =
kappôreth (H3727): {UMBRA: #700 % #41 = #3} 1) mercy-seat, place of
atonement; 1a) the golden plate of propitiation on which the High
Priest sprinkled the seat 7 times on the *DAY* *OF* *ATONEMENT*
*SYMBOLICALLY* *RECONCILING* *JEHOVAH* *AND* *HIS* *CHOSEN* *PEOPLE*;
1a1) the slab of gold on top of the ark of the covenant which
measured 2.5 by 1.5 cubits; on it and part of it were the two golden
cherubim facing each other whose outstretched wings came together
above and constituted the throne of God;
On 10/2/2024 07:28, Michael Christ wrote:
1) There is no Jew or Gentile.
2) You are the phallus worshiper.
3) You can't win because you are a sinner Christian, a fake.
DOLF @ 1132 HOURS ON 10 FEBRUARY 2024: "I detect more slander by just
three lines as a guide for attaining the center of perfection.
No I'm a #983 - Philólogos (G5378): *LOVER* *OF* *THE* *WORD* = #33 - CLOSENESS (MI) + #48 - RITUAL (LI) + #902 (#451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY
x 2) - archḗ (G746): *FIRST* *PRINCIPLES* / Pharisaîos (G5330): *OPPOSITION* *TO* *ROMAN* / *CATHOLIC* *RULE* and the latter as JEWISH
of which the APOSTLE PAUL was a proponent, practices circumcision which
is a rejection of phallus or MARRIAGE / #1827 - EUCHARIST IDOLATROUS
WORSHIP, whilst being a Jewish / Gentile Christian I do not engage in
such #48 - RITUAL (LI) AS #6 - CONTRARIETY (LI) practices.
However on that question, I provide an opinion of some 58 pages which substantiates my sapient religious belief in conforming to that of the
JEWISH / GENTILE CHRISTIANS of that era.
Do cease your CHRISTO-FASCIST ANTI-SEMITISM for we will not cast what is sacred to the profane whether yourself or AFRICANS as JESUS JANGLERS
like KANYE WEST."
SEE ALSO: "INFORMAL RESEARCH NOTES ON JERUSALEM COUNCIL 50 CE CONFORMING
TO COGITO ARRAY AS IMAGO DEI WHICH BEING AN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY IS NOT
THEN ANY PROVIDENCE OF THE PAPAL AUTHORITY / ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH"
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Notes%20on%20Jerusalem%20Council%2020240119.pdf>
On 10/2/2024 07:28, Michael Christ wrote:
1) There is no Jew or Gentile.
2) You are the phallus worshiper.
3) You can't win because you are a sinner Christian, a fake.
DOLF @ 1132 HOURS ON 10 FEBRUARY 2024: "I detect more slander by just
three lines as a guide for attaining the center of perfection.
No I'm a #983 - Philólogos (G5378): *LOVER* *OF* *THE* *WORD* = #33 - CLOSENESS (MI) + #48 - RITUAL (LI) + #902 (#451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY
x 2) - archḗ (G746): *FIRST* *PRINCIPLES* / Pharisaîos (G5330): *OPPOSITION* *TO* *ROMAN* / *CATHOLIC* *RULE* and the latter as JEWISH
of which the APOSTLE PAUL was a proponent, practices circumcision which
is a rejection of phallus or MARRIAGE / #1827 - EUCHARIST IDOLATROUS
WORSHIP, whilst being a Jewish / Gentile Christian I do not engage in
such #48 - RITUAL (LI) AS #6 - CONTRARIETY (LI) practices.
However on that question, I provide an opinion of some 58 pages which substantiates my sapient religious belief in conforming to that of the
JEWISH / GENTILE CHRISTIANS of that era.
Do cease your CHRISTO-FASCIST ANTI-SEMITISM for we will not cast what is sacred to the profane whether yourself or AFRICANS as JESUS JANGLERS
like KANYE WEST."
SEE ALSO: "INFORMAL RESEARCH NOTES ON JERUSALEM COUNCIL 50 CE CONFORMING
TO COGITO ARRAY AS IMAGO DEI WHICH BEING AN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY IS NOT
THEN ANY PROVIDENCE OF THE PAPAL AUTHORITY / ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH"
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Notes%20on%20Jerusalem%20Council%2020240119.pdf>
MICHAEL [TIN MAN] CHRIST @ 1211 HRS ON 10 FEBRUARY 2024: "Nothing, you
detect nothing that does not centre itself on thy will be done.
A typical sinner Christian."
DOLF @ 1317 HOURS ON 10 FEBRUARY 2024: "Thy will be done?
Is that a MORAL, IMMORAL or an AMORAL will and can it be codified:
"MAKEST THY BOAST OF GOD, AND KNOWEST HIS WILL, AND APPROVEST THE THINGS
THAT ARE MORE EXCELLENT, BEING INSTRUCTED OUT OF THE LAW (ie. shǒu fǎ (守法): TO ABIDE BY THE LAW AS COGITO #57 - GUARDEDNESS (SHOU) - 𝌾守 = #508 / #40 - LAW / MODEL (FA) - 𝌭法 = #491) ..." [Romans 2:17-18]
Your reprobate response is irrational."
MICHAEL [TIN MAN] CHRIST @ 1607 HRS ON 10 FEBRUARY 2024: "Have it your
way."
EMAIL TO MICHAEL NYLAN (BERKELEY.EDU) @ 1500 HOURS ON 10 FEBRUARY 2024: "WHETHER THERE WAS CULTURAL EXCHANGE BETWEEN HAN DYNASTY CHINESE DAOIST SCHOOL OF THOUGHT / TORAH JUDAISM?
A consideration on whether there was a CULTURAL EXCHANGE between HAN
DYNASTY CHINESE DAOist school of thought / TORAH JUDAISM especially
given 104 BCE (ie. 103 if no zero year for 19 year metonic lunar cycle
or 293 x 365.2423 tropical year or 294 x 364 day / years) and the consideration of ROMAN ERA political censure (a euphemism concerning the crucifixion as convenient opposition elimination) conveys both obscured
and dispersed comments, such as for instance within the EPISTLE TO THE
ROMANS there is made a comment about indebtedness to the GREEKS and the BARBARIANS [Romans 1:14] but that the ORACLES OF GOD [Romans 3:2] are a special intellectual possession of the JEWS and yet by the MORAL
PROSCRIPTION on the CHINESE: 貪財 (tāncái) / 貪求 (tānqiú) we're able to
see equivalent FIRST PRINCIPLES despite a lack of any documented SEVEN
day cosmogony until later antiquity.
#608 as [#3, #200, #400, #5] = gûwr (H1481): {UMBRA: #209 % #41 = #4} 1)
to sojourn, abide, dwell in, dwell with, remain, inhabit, be a stranger,
be continuing, surely; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) *TO* *SOJOURN*, *DWELL* *FOR* *A* *TIME*; 1a2) to abide, stay, temporarily dwell; 1b) (Hithpolel); 1b1) to
seek hospitality with; 1b2) to assemble oneself; 1c) to stir up trouble, strife, quarrel, gather together; 1c1) (Qal); i) to stir up strife; ii)
to quarrel; 1c2) (Hithpolel) to excite oneself; 1d) to dread, fear,
stand in awe, be afraid; 1d1) (Qal); i) to fear, be afraid; ii) to be in
awe, stand in awe;
#608 as [#80, #1, #100, #5, #80, #10, #4, #8, #40, #70, #10, #200] = parepídēmos (G3927): {UMBRA: #598 % #41 = #24} 1) *ONE* *WHO* *COMES* *FROM* *A* *FOREIGN* *COUNTRY* *INTO* *A* *CITY* *OR* *LAND* *TO*
*RESIDE* *THERE* *BY* *THE* *SIDE* *OF* *THE* *NATIVES*; 2) a stranger;
3) sojourning in a strange place, a foreigner; 4) in the NT metaph. in reference to heaven as the native country, one who sojourns on earth;
<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?idea:608>
The common teleological notion #608 - *SILK* would appear to imply such,
but when did it first occur and was it recursive at diverse times over centuries? The LUOSHU SQUARE is clearly a western philosophy
indebtedness to oriental thought and accordingly the BABYLONIAN "THE
GREAT MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH" ASSOCIATION is
then a question about viable FOUNDATIONS to the ROMAN STATE and its
WORLDVIEW (eg: RUSSIA only adopted the GREGORIAN CALENDAR upon 14
FEBRUARY 1918 pursuant to a Sovnarkom decree signed 24 JANUARY 1918
(Julian) by VLADIMIR LENIN) whether CATHOLIC, ISLAM or ORTHODOX being an artifice of obmutescence concerning a seething iniquitous maleficence as
its only claim to an exquisite piety which has no association with ours.
The only undoubted explicit reference of silk within the Bible occurs in [Revelation 18:12] where it is mentioned among the treasures of the
typical BABYLON.
#608 as [#200, #8, #100, #10, #20, #70, #200] = sērikós (G4596): {UMBRA: #608 % #41 = #34} 1) made of silk; 2) *SILK*, i.e. the fabric, silken garments;
According to accounts it is however, in the highest degree probable that
the texture was known to the Hebrews from the time that their commercial relations were extended by KING SOLOMON (reigned: 970-930 BCE).
MICHAEL NYLAN (BERKELEY.EDU) @ 0803 HOURS ON 11 FEBRUARY 2024: "WHETHER
THERE WAS CULTURAL EXCHANGE BETWEEN HAN DYNASTY CHINESE DAOIST SCHOOL OF THOUGHT / TORAH JUDAISM?
If you knew my work, you would know that there was no Daoist school of thought in the Han.
That there may have been cross-cultural borrowings goes without saying.
But the direction of borrowing is not always clear, nor can such
borrowings be proven,
since many ideas are independently developed in different cultures."
If I may state this very politely but nonetheless with great clarity, it
is a matter of concern to myself that in having engaged within urgent
labour in relation to the NEW YORK TERRORIST ATTACK dated 11 SEPTEMBER
2001 concerning its being a TRIPARTITE v's BIPARTITE NUMBER META LOGIC
issue as the possibility of it having an impetus as systemic BIPARTITE
NUMBER foundation of ISLAMIC BELIEF being consequential to a conformity
with REDUCTIO AD HITLERUM AS TABLE TALK IDEA #303 - 28 AUGUST 1942 which specifically relates to “NEW YORK SKY-SCRAPERS: THEIR VULNERABILITY TO
AIR ATTACK” which a perusal of your academic research appears to convey
by COGITO #45 - GREATNESS (TA) - 𝌲大 = #496 / [#23, #55, #54, #50, #35].
#568 - ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #182 as [#2, #40, #90, #30, #6, #400] = mᵉtsôwlâh (H4688): {UMBRA: #171 % #41 = #7} 1) *DEPTH*, the deep, the deep sea;
REDUCTIO AD HITLERUM AS IDEA #303 - 28 AUGUST 1942: "The *DEPTH* of the foundations of some sky-scrapers in New York is as much as seventy
metres, and the driving of the cement foundation demands a pressure of
six or eight thousand hundredweights. An air raid, such as those against London, would have a devastating effect on New York. It would be
physically impossible to clear the débris, and it is not possible to
build air-raid shelters.” [page 669]

<https://vcresearch.berkeley.edu/faculty/michael-nylan>
[MICHAEL NYLAN IS A PROFESSOR IN THE DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY, UNIVERSITY
OF CALIFORNIA AT BERKELEY]
I quite accept your DISTINGUISHED scholarly opinion "IF YOU KNEW MY
WORK, YOU WOULD KNOW THAT THERE WAS NO DAOIST SCHOOL OF THOUGHT IN THE
HAN" as punctilious #65 - INNER (NEI) - 𝍆內 = #516 - PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY / [#25, #76, #47, #59, #57] custodian (ie. THE UNAVOIDABLE ANALOGY IS TO EITHER A *DUTIFUL* *CATHOLIC* *WIFE* *IN* *THE* *KITCHEN*
OR ONE WITH *POISON* *ON* *A* *COMFORT* *WOMAN'S* *LIPS* *IN* *THE* *FÜHRERBUNKER* BENEATH THE REICH CHANCELLERY GARDEN AND AS TO WHETHER IT INCLUDED ROSES REMAINS A FASCINATING PIECE OF ARCHITECTURAL AND
POLITICAL HISTORY OVER ANY CLANDESTINED CATHOLIC UBER ALLES MENTALITY
AND ANTI-SEMITISM) of early Chinese history from the fifth century BC to
the fifth century AD, with an emphasis on the sociopolitical context
such as myths and rituals, aesthetic theories and material culture,
belief: "No translation can ever hope to fully suggest the intricate
beauty of the original text by YANG HSIUNG. My hope is simply that this
study will revive interest in this important thinker. It is an
invitation to others to enter into the pleasures of HAN PHILOSOPHY.
[NYLAN, page xi]
YANG HSIUNG (53 B.C.A.D. 18) initially won fame under EMPEROR CH'ENG
(r. 33-7 B.C.) for long prose-poems (fu) whose satirical content was cloaked in lush imagery, hyperbole, and allusion. By the reign of
EMPEROR AI (r. 71 B.C.), however, YANG HSIUNG had redirected his considerable talents to the writing of two philosophical works, the FA
YEN (MODEL SAYINGS) and the T'AI HSÜAN CHING (CANON OF SUPREME MYSTERY) ...
The initial difficulty, of course, lay in determining the exact
boundaries of each logical category, so that inferences were not
mistakenly drawn. Generations of Chinese scholars, first the early
Logicians and later the Han scholastics, devoted a great deal of time
and energy to this problem. Due to the occasional rift between logic and language, their first task was to establish formal rules of logic (ie.
ON 28 JANUARY 2024 WE RAISED WITH YOURSELF AN IMPORTANT ISSUE OF
VARIANCE TO THE META-DESCRIPTOR NOMENCLATURE, RETENTION OF AGENCY INTEROPERABILITY AND ITS SUITABLE REPRESENTATION OF FACULTY
REQUIREMENTS. FOR INSTANCE WE NOTE THAT THE FOLLOWING CAN BE NUANCED
AND THAT OUR PRIOR ASSUMPTIONS CONFORMED TO THE COGITO PREMISES OR
DIALECTIC TO A DEVISED NEURAL LINGUISTIC PRAGMA:
#52 - MEASURE --> CANON = kanṓn (G2583):
#68 - DIMMING --> RIGHTS
#71 - STOPPAGE --> WORLDVIEW
AND PROVIDED TO YOU THE PROPOSITION OF THE COGITO ARRAY AS THEN THE MEAN
FOR CONSCIOUSNESS AS IMAGO DEI) by which to discover the defining characteristics of each entity in the universe, so that essential
attributes could be clearly distinguished from accidental attributes...
While it was relatively simple to agree upon fundamental definitions for animals, shapes, and inanimate objects, the true definition of human
nature was a thornier problem, as it touched upon a host of problems
which stubbornly resisted solution by the logical method:
- What is the proper definition of human nature?
- What is the proper sphere and existential significance of human activity?
- What can humans reasonably hope to accomplish in this life?
In the Han Confucian synthesis, then, the proto-scientist's impulse
towards categorization and the logician's search for orderly expression joined forces with the ethical concerns of the traditional scholar. Categorical thinking, inherently preoccupied with the relation of
macrocosm to microcosm, came to be applied to many areas of inquiry,
most significantly (1) portent theory; (2) the rectification of names;
and (3) point-by-point analogies between the human body, the body politic, and the universe. We are familiar enough with body analogies;
we often talk of "heads of state," for example. Portent theory and the rectification of names, however, may need some explanation for the
modern reader. {NYLAN, page 67]
The impact of YANG HSIUNG'S PHILOSOPHY on later Chinese thought is undeniable. The historian PAN KU (32-92 CE) revered YANG HSIUNG as one
of the THREE GREAT CONFUCIAN PHILOSOPHERS OF WESTERN HAN, in company
with LIU HSIANG and LIU HSIN. PAN KU'S opinion was shared by the leading Eastern Han thinkers, including HUAN T'AN, WANG CH'UNG, CHANG HENG, YING SHAO, and Sung Chung, all of whom appreciated the breadth and critical
acumen of YANG HSIUNG'S writings. Through them, the T'AI HSÜAN provided inspiration and vocabulary for the HSÜAN HSÜEH movement (in Chinese, "Mystery Learning") of the post-Han period. The Mystery, in fact,
continued to greatly influence Chinese thought for a millennium, until prominent SUNG thinkers like SU HSÜN (1009-1066) and CHU HSI
(1130-1200) applied contemporary standards retroactively to YANG
HSIUNG, thereby discrediting him on three counts:
(a) his service at the court of the "usurper" WANG MANG (r. 923);
(b) his outright rejection of the theory of human nature proposed by the Confucian master Mencius (c. 371-289); and
(c) his supposed presumption in composing ''classics" in imitation of
the sages. [NYLAN, pages 1, 2]
Of course, YANG HSIUNG could claim to be emulating the model of
Confucius, who "seldom spoke of ming," presumably because the most
sacred aspects of human existence are taboo. But it is no less likely
that YANG'S reticence is meant to entice the reader to embark upon that step-by-step immersion in the sage-author's mind that SCHOOLS THE READER IN THE MORAL PROCESS ITSELF.
#12 - 𝌑童 = #463 - PRINCIPLE OF EMANATION / SABBATH
#17 - 𝌖䎡 = #468 - TERMS OF COMPLIANCE / HONOUR PARENTS
#26 - 𝌟務 = #477 - JUDGEMENT SENSIBILITY / DO NOT KILL
#65 - 𝍆內 = #516 - PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY / AVOID HETERONOMY AGAINST AUTONOMY
#66 - 𝍇去 = #517 - PRINCIPLE OF PERSISTENCE / DO NOT STEAL
#71 - 𝍌止 = #522 - OBLIGATING NORM APPRAISAL / DON'T BEAR FALSE WITNESS #76 - 𝍑劇 = #527 - MANIFESTING NORM APPRAISAL / DO NOT COVET
YANG HSIUNG imbedded the necessary clues to his solution for ming in
three linked statements. The longest passage begins:
Someone asked about ming. I replied, "Ming refers to the decrees of
Heaven. It has nothing to do with people's actions." "If people's
actions do not constitute ming, I beg to ask what about people's
actions?" I responded: "By [their actions] they may be preserved or
lost; by them they may live or die. [Still,] that is not ming. Ming
refers to what cannot be avoided."
A second passage from the Mystery echoes the last line of the preceding statement with one important change; it substitutes "time" for ming or
the Decree, saying, "TIME IS WHAT CANNOT BE OVERCOME." And a third
passage repeats the association of ming with time in defining the Decree
as "what is timely or not."
YANG HSIUNG'S first statement about ming suggests that "fate" is an
adequate translation for the term if we do not invest it with
supernatural overtones. Ming in referring to time (meaning "present circumstance" as well as "opportune time") describes the involuntary and imposed part of human existence that will not change through individual effort. [NYLAN, pages 39, 40]
The early Chinese assumed that the transition from primordial chaos to civilized order represented successive stages of increasing
differentiation. In effect, the Chinese argued that the world as they
knew it had evolved by a process analogous to human attempts to
identify, demarcate, and name significant geographical, political,
social, and religious boundaries. [NOMES OF EGYPT TO NOMOS OF GREEKS BUT
IS THERE SUCH FOR SAPIENCE?]From this they concluded that there existed
in the primordial Tao a divine basis for the development of the various
human orders. Some Han thinkers even argued that humans engaged in the
search for intrinsic categories can further or complete the cosmic
processes through their continual ordering and reordering of categories.
This helps to explain why categorical thinking and correlative thought
figure so largely in Chinese philosophical writings. [NYLAN, page 68]
Among modern translators, no consensus exists about the proper
definition of ming; the term is most often rendered as fate or Decree
(as in my own introductory remarks), but it is also translated as
variously as "duty," "destiny," "predestination," "causal connections
and their possibilities," "manifestation of Heaven's will," "the
inevitable," "empirical facts," "created world," "lifespan," "objective circumstances," "circumstances beyond human control," and so on. The
problem is not simply one of translation. Any Chinese of YANG HSIUNG'S
time would have found a bewildering array of usages for the term, some mutually contradictory. In part, the confusion stemmed from a typical
feature of Chinese classical philosophy, in which rival thinkers
consciously used the same terminology to articulate significantly
different ideas. But there were also unconscious adoptions of meanings through conceptual overlays and etymological extensions as the
so-called "Hundred Schools" of philosophy emerged from the earlier religious matrix.
THERE IS THE OBVIOUS CONSIDERATION ABOUT THE INNATE LACK (ie. IF YOU
KNEW MY WORK we'd know that you've put "schools" in QUOTATION MARKS TO INDICATE MY OWN DISTRUST of the attempt by many scholars to pigeonhole
the works of various thinkers into different "schools") OF ACADEMIC
INTEGRITY and is it any different to Samuele R. Bacchiocchi [29 January
1938 to 20 December 2008] getting doctoral thesis on "FROM SABBATH TO
SUNDAY" from the Pontifical Gregorian University?
Do we have to ask, whether such CONTEMPTUOUS NONCHALANCE (ie. perhaps
just my reply will be so pre-occupying much like throwing a dog a bone)
as reply a SUBSTANTIAL ENQUIRY is entirely due to your ACADEMIC COHORT
upon that issue being RAOUL BIRNBAUM, as to whether he is in any manner related PIERRE BIRNBAUM as visiting PROFESSOR OF JEWISH STUDIES AT
COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY and therefore a proponent of NOACHIDE LAWS (in
CONTRA to COGITO #26 - ENDEAVOUR (WU) 𝌟務 = #477 - JUDGEMENT SENSIBILITY [#23, #48, #36, #81, #54] ENDORSED BY THE AMERICAN CONGRESS ON 13 APRIL
1992 AS 106 STATUTE 102 PUBLIC LAW 102-268 DESIGNATING 14 APRIL 1992 as EDUCATION AND SHARING DAY USA) for UNTOUCHABLE GOY FILTH reinforced by
recent ANTI-ZIONIST / TORAH JEWISH CONDUCT post 7 OCTOBER 2023 and their prohibitions on DISSEMINATING TORAH KNOWLEDGE as WORLDVIEW of IDOLATRY
in denial and its INEVITABLE NIHILISTIC CONSEQUENCE as we conveyed by
email on 1500 HOURS ON 10 FEBRUARY 2023, is the consideration of ROMAN
ERA political censure (a pious euphemism concerning death or crucifixion
for convenient opposition elimination [Acts 3:14, 26:21; Philippians
3:4-6] and more recently the WORLD JEWISH CONGRESS opened an OFFICE IN
THE VATICAN ON 19 OCTOBER 2023 in preparation for the GREATEST WHITEWASH
OF HUMAN HISTORY 1939-1945 as genocide not seen since JESUS OF NAZARETH
was linen wrapped and placed within a SEPULCHRE as COGITO #33 -
CLOSENESS (MI) - 𝌦密 = #484: 3 APRIL 33 CE [#49, #75, #62, #22, #22]
that the BIBLICAL NEW TESTAMENT record as a matter of survival, conveys
both obscured and dispersed commentary.
I CANNOT RECONCILE THE AMERICAN CONGRESS LAW ON MASQUERADING JEWISH
IDOLATRY WITH THE GOD ALMIGHTY BLASPHEMOUS SENILE AMERICAN IRISH
CATHOLIC PRESIDENT PRAYING A ROSARY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RELIGIOUS FALSEHOODS AND DICTUMS OF CATHOLIC CHRISTO FASCIST STATE:
<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?male:226&feme:242&ontic:146&deme:71&idea:242>
#137 - ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #146 as [#30, #2, #50, #10, #5, #40] /
#1002 - ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #146 as [#300, #2, #700] = bên (H1121): {UMBRA: #52 % #41 = #11} 1) son, grandson, child, member of a group; 1a)
son, male child; 1b) grandson; 1c) children (pl. - male and female); 1d) youth, young men (pl.); 1e) young (of animals); 1f) sons (as characterisation, i.e. sons of injustice [for un- righteous men] or sons
of God [for angels]; 1g) *PEOPLE* (*OF* *A* *NATION*) (pl.); 1h) of
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 482 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 47:59:44 |
Calls: | 9,566 |
Files: | 13,660 |
Messages: | 6,142,222 |