There is; a method used in India under the Gandhis, in the 1980s, where Kiosks-on-Wheels were trundled around the country dragging young men off
the streets for the Big Snip. This sounds most humane.
They better do something. India has surpassed China in population and isn't >about to slow down.
China daily live births: 49,899: https://countrymeters.info/en/China
India daily live births: 67,385 according to UNICEF, though other estimates >place the number between 72,000 and 80,000.
You frequently see people claiming how India has this great "population pyramid" - with lots of young people - as compared to aging countries like Japan, US, Russia, etc - and how that is good national economic dominance, but the fact is that it is awful for individuals.
In article <mDqdnbzcINpvy8f7nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@earthlink.com>,
Byker <byker@do~rag.net> wrote:
...
They better do something. India has surpassed China in population and isn't >about to slow down.
China daily live births: 49,899: https://countrymeters.info/en/China
India daily live births: 67,385 according to UNICEF, though other estimates >place the number between 72,000 and 80,000.
Paradoxically, this is a formula for both massive suffering at the personal level - as well as national/economic success.
You frequently see people claiming how India has this great "population pyramid" - with lots of young people - as compared to aging countries like Japan, US, Russia, etc - and how that is good national economic dominance, but the fact is that it is awful for individuals.
And guess who actually benefits from "national economic dominance"? Yep,
the 1%. Not you or me.
On Sun, 2 Jun 2024 11:45:11 -0000 (UTC)
gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) wrote:
In article <mDqdnbzcINpvy8f7nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@earthlink.com>,
Byker <byker@do~rag.net> wrote:
...
They better do something. India has surpassed China in population and isn't >> >about to slow down.
China daily live births: 49,899: https://countrymeters.info/en/China
India daily live births: 67,385 according to UNICEF, though other estimates >> >place the number between 72,000 and 80,000.
Paradoxically, this is a formula for both massive suffering at the personal >> level - as well as national/economic success.
You frequently see people claiming how India has this great "population
pyramid" - with lots of young people - as compared to aging countries like >> Japan, US, Russia, etc - and how that is good national economic dominance, >> but the fact is that it is awful for individuals.
And guess who actually benefits from "national economic dominance"? Yep,
the 1%. Not you or me.
There is nothing we can do, where we get economic benefit. It always
goes to the 1%, always. The system is geared that way, so we, really,
should not worry about productivity, the population pyramid, tax
breaks or anything like that, but in opposing the 1% and
redistributing the wealth. Unless we break their stranglehold ALL
economic benefit to anyone will go in their pockets.
Yup. See sig.
Religion is what keeps the poor from murdering the rich.
- Napoleon Bonaparte -
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 483 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 167:54:01 |
Calls: | 9,594 |
Files: | 13,677 |
Messages: | 6,149,727 |