• Trade Wars Are Easy to Lose..Disadvantage US

    From ltlee1@21:1/5 to All on Sun Apr 13 19:03:23 2025
    XPost: alt.politics.usa

    From ForeignAffairs
    "The Trump administration believes that the more you import, the less
    you have at stake—that because the United States has a trade deficit
    with China, importing more Chinese goods and services than China does
    U.S. goods and services, it is less vulnerable. This is factually wrong,
    not a matter of opinion. ...

    To the degree that the bilateral trade balance predicts which side will “win” in a trade war, the advantage lies with the surplus economy, not
    the deficit one. China, the surplus country, is giving up sales, which
    is solely money; the United States, the deficit country, is giving up
    goods and services it does not produce competitively or at all at home.
    Money is fungible: if you lose income, you can cut back spending, find
    sales elsewhere, spread the burden across the country, or draw down
    savings (say, by doing fiscal stimulus). China, like most countries with overall trade surpluses, saves more than it invests—meaning that it, in
    a sense, has too much savings. The adjustment would be relatively easy.
    There would be no critical shortages, and it could replace much of what
    it normally sold to the United States with sales domestically or to
    others.

    Countries with overall trade deficits, like the United States, spend
    more than they save. In trade wars, they give up or reduce the supply of
    things they need (since the tariffs make them cost more), and these are
    not nearly as fungible or easily substituted for as money. Consequently,
    the impact is felt in specific industries, locations, or households that
    face shortages, sometimes of necessary items, some of which are
    irreplaceable in the short term. Deficit countries also import
    capital—which makes the United States more vulnerable to shifts in
    sentiment about the reliability of its government and about its
    attractiveness as a place to do business.

    In short, the U.S. economy will suffer enormously in a large-scale trade
    war with China, which the current levels of Trump-imposed tariffs, at
    more than 100 percent, surely constitute if left in place. In fact, the
    U.S. economy will suffer more than the Chinese economy will, and the
    suffering will only increase if the United States escalates. The Trump administration may think it’s acting tough, but it’s in fact putting the U.S. economy at the mercy of Chinese escalation."

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From ltlee1@21:1/5 to All on Mon Apr 14 14:54:39 2025
    XPost: alt.politics.usa

    Even with computers, cell phones and some semiconductors terporarily
    exempted,

    "The United States will face shortages of critical inputs ranging from
    basic ingredients of most pharmaceuticals to inexpensive semiconductors
    used in cars and home appliances to critical minerals for industrial
    processes including weapons production. The supply shock from
    drastically reducing or zeroing out imports from China, as Trump
    purports to want to achieve, would mean stagflation, ..."

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)