https://www.nytimes.com/2022/03/26/world/europe/biden-ukraine-poland-speech.htmlhome for Polish monarchs — was not intended as an appeal for regime change."
"WARSAW — They were among the final few words of a carefully crafted speech. But they strayed far from the delicate balance that President Biden had tried to strike during three days of wartime diplomacy in Europe.
“For God’s sake, this man cannot remain in power,” Mr. Biden said Saturday, his cadence slowing for emphasis.
On its face, he appeared to be calling for President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia to be ousted for his brutal invasion of Ukraine. But Mr. Biden’s aides quickly insisted that the remark — delivered in front of a castle that served for centuries as a
The NYtimes framed the incident as a slip or a veiled threat. The Atlantic called it an unforced error.disclosure is timely?
My take: Language and intention have been circulating among Biden and his close advisors for a while. IF the US hasn't made the final decision, it is a threat. The question is "Why Now?" IF it does reach a decision, the question is whether such
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/03/26/world/europe/biden-ukraine-poland-speech.htmlhome for Polish monarchs — was not intended as an appeal for regime change."
"WARSAW — They were among the final few words of a carefully crafted speech. But they strayed far from the delicate balance that President Biden had tried to strike during three days of wartime diplomacy in Europe.
“For God’s sake, this man cannot remain in power,” Mr. Biden said Saturday, his cadence slowing for emphasis.
On its face, he appeared to be calling for President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia to be ousted for his brutal invasion of Ukraine. But Mr. Biden’s aides quickly insisted that the remark — delivered in front of a castle that served for centuries as a
The NYtimes framed the incident as a slip or a veiled threat. The Atlantic called it an unforced error.disclosure is timely?
My take: Language and intention have been circulating among Biden and his close advisors for a while. IF the US hasn't made the final decision, it is a threat. The question is "Why Now?" IF it does reach a decision, the question is whether such
On Monday, March 28, 2022 at 2:04:50 AM UTC+8, ltlee1 wrote:a home for Polish monarchs — was not intended as an appeal for regime change."
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/03/26/world/europe/biden-ukraine-poland-speech.html
"WARSAW — They were among the final few words of a carefully crafted speech. But they strayed far from the delicate balance that President Biden had tried to strike during three days of wartime diplomacy in Europe.
“For God’s sake, this man cannot remain in power,” Mr. Biden said Saturday, his cadence slowing for emphasis.
On its face, he appeared to be calling for President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia to be ousted for his brutal invasion of Ukraine. But Mr. Biden’s aides quickly insisted that the remark — delivered in front of a castle that served for centuries as
disclosure is timely?The NYtimes framed the incident as a slip or a veiled threat. The Atlantic called it an unforced error.
My take: Language and intention have been circulating among Biden and his close advisors for a while. IF the US hasn't made the final decision, it is a threat. The question is "Why Now?" IF it does reach a decision, the question is whether such
Biden read from the prepared speech goes to show that it is not a slip up or an unforced error. It is intended to show the power dynamics of America supremacy to exert influence and control to the audiences. It is American power to admonish a leader ofanother big power and not an appeal of regime change. It is not easy for big power to appeal for regime change of another big power. If the other power is a small and weak power, then such admonishment remark could mean an appeal for regime change, a war
On Sunday, March 27, 2022 at 10:41:07 PM UTC, borie wrote:as a home for Polish monarchs — was not intended as an appeal for regime change."
On Monday, March 28, 2022 at 2:04:50 AM UTC+8, ltlee1 wrote:
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/03/26/world/europe/biden-ukraine-poland-speech.html
"WARSAW — They were among the final few words of a carefully crafted speech. But they strayed far from the delicate balance that President Biden had tried to strike during three days of wartime diplomacy in Europe.
“For God’s sake, this man cannot remain in power,” Mr. Biden said Saturday, his cadence slowing for emphasis.
On its face, he appeared to be calling for President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia to be ousted for his brutal invasion of Ukraine. But Mr. Biden’s aides quickly insisted that the remark — delivered in front of a castle that served for centuries
disclosure is timely?The NYtimes framed the incident as a slip or a veiled threat. The Atlantic called it an unforced error.
My take: Language and intention have been circulating among Biden and his close advisors for a while. IF the US hasn't made the final decision, it is a threat. The question is "Why Now?" IF it does reach a decision, the question is whether such
of another big power and not an appeal of regime change. It is not easy for big power to appeal for regime change of another big power. If the other power is a small and weak power, then such admonishment remark could mean an appeal for regime change, aBiden read from the prepared speech goes to show that it is not a slip up or an unforced error. It is intended to show the power dynamics of America supremacy to exert influence and control to the audiences. It is American power to admonish a leader
All US outlets said Biden's remark was unscripted. No reason not to believe them on this issue.
Anyway, scripted or unscripted made no different at present. The information is already out.
In addition, It is clear that Biden really wants Putin out according to Niall Fugerson.
"The only end game now is the end of Putin regime."
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/03/26/world/europe/biden-ukraine-poland-speech.htmlhome for Polish monarchs — was not intended as an appeal for regime change."
"WARSAW — They were among the final few words of a carefully crafted speech. But they strayed far from the delicate balance that President Biden had tried to strike during three days of wartime diplomacy in Europe.
“For God’s sake, this man cannot remain in power,” Mr. Biden said Saturday, his cadence slowing for emphasis.
On its face, he appeared to be calling for President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia to be ousted for his brutal invasion of Ukraine. But Mr. Biden’s aides quickly insisted that the remark — delivered in front of a castle that served for centuries as a
The NYtimes framed the incident as a slip or a veiled threat. The Atlantic called it an unforced error.disclosure is timely?
My take: Language and intention have been circulating among Biden and his close advisors for a while. IF the US hasn't made the final decision, it is a threat. The question is "Why Now?" IF it does reach a decision, the question is whether such
On Sunday, March 27, 2022 at 6:04:50 PM UTC, ltlee1 wrote:a home for Polish monarchs — was not intended as an appeal for regime change."
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/03/26/world/europe/biden-ukraine-poland-speech.html
"WARSAW — They were among the final few words of a carefully crafted speech. But they strayed far from the delicate balance that President Biden had tried to strike during three days of wartime diplomacy in Europe.
“For God’s sake, this man cannot remain in power,” Mr. Biden said Saturday, his cadence slowing for emphasis.
On its face, he appeared to be calling for President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia to be ousted for his brutal invasion of Ukraine. But Mr. Biden’s aides quickly insisted that the remark — delivered in front of a castle that served for centuries as
On Thursday, March 31, 2022 at 6:44:17 AM UTC-7, ltlee1 wrote:as a home for Polish monarchs — was not intended as an appeal for regime change."
On Sunday, March 27, 2022 at 6:04:50 PM UTC, ltlee1 wrote:
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/03/26/world/europe/biden-ukraine-poland-speech.html
"WARSAW — They were among the final few words of a carefully crafted speech. But they strayed far from the delicate balance that President Biden had tried to strike during three days of wartime diplomacy in Europe.
“For God’s sake, this man cannot remain in power,” Mr. Biden said Saturday, his cadence slowing for emphasis.
On its face, he appeared to be calling for President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia to be ousted for his brutal invasion of Ukraine. But Mr. Biden’s aides quickly insisted that the remark — delivered in front of a castle that served for centuries
Putin should of course be ousted. But Biden was speaking for himself, not announcing American foreign policy.
Putin is a bad man.
On Friday, April 1, 2022 at 12:29:44 AM UTC, bmoore wrote:centuries as a home for Polish monarchs — was not intended as an appeal for regime change."
On Thursday, March 31, 2022 at 6:44:17 AM UTC-7, ltlee1 wrote:
On Sunday, March 27, 2022 at 6:04:50 PM UTC, ltlee1 wrote:
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/03/26/world/europe/biden-ukraine-poland-speech.html
"WARSAW — They were among the final few words of a carefully crafted speech. But they strayed far from the delicate balance that President Biden had tried to strike during three days of wartime diplomacy in Europe.
“For God’s sake, this man cannot remain in power,” Mr. Biden said Saturday, his cadence slowing for emphasis.
On its face, he appeared to be calling for President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia to be ousted for his brutal invasion of Ukraine. But Mr. Biden’s aides quickly insisted that the remark — delivered in front of a castle that served for
Putin should of course be ousted. But Biden was speaking for himself, not announcing American foreign policy.
Putin is a bad man.1. Biden spoke as the US president in an official setting. Whatever he said would naturally carry foreign policy implication.
2. A specific utterance is not as important as long running policy. In this case, the Bush-Biden doctrine under
which the " planning for regime change in Russia has been under way for at least a decade."
On Friday, April 1, 2022 at 11:10:51 AM UTC-7, ltlee1 wrote:centuries as a home for Polish monarchs — was not intended as an appeal for regime change."
On Friday, April 1, 2022 at 12:29:44 AM UTC, bmoore wrote:
On Thursday, March 31, 2022 at 6:44:17 AM UTC-7, ltlee1 wrote:
On Sunday, March 27, 2022 at 6:04:50 PM UTC, ltlee1 wrote:
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/03/26/world/europe/biden-ukraine-poland-speech.html
"WARSAW — They were among the final few words of a carefully crafted speech. But they strayed far from the delicate balance that President Biden had tried to strike during three days of wartime diplomacy in Europe.
“For God’s sake, this man cannot remain in power,” Mr. Biden said Saturday, his cadence slowing for emphasis.
On its face, he appeared to be calling for President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia to be ousted for his brutal invasion of Ukraine. But Mr. Biden’s aides quickly insisted that the remark — delivered in front of a castle that served for
Putin should of course be ousted. But Biden was speaking for himself, not announcing American foreign policy.
You are not an elected official. You don't understand the difference between personal statements and foreign policy.Putin is a bad man.1. Biden spoke as the US president in an official setting. Whatever he said would naturally carry foreign policy implication.
2. A specific utterance is not as important as long running policy. In this case, the Bush-Biden doctrine underHmm, no evidence presented.
which the " planning for regime change in Russia has been under way for at least a decade."
But Putin is a bad man.Please start a new thread.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 483 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 154:53:58 |
Calls: | 9,592 |
Calls today: | 6 |
Files: | 13,676 |
Messages: | 6,148,764 |
Posted today: | 3 |