Among the thousands of protesters, hundreds have even called for the removal of Chinese leader Xi Jinping, who for nearly three years has overseen a strategy of mass-testing, brute-force lockdowns, enforced quarantine and digital tracking that has come at a devastating human and economic cost. Here's what we know:
Why is this significant?
----------------------
Public protest is exceedingly rare in China, where the Communist Party has tightened its grip on all aspects of life, launched a sweeping crackdown
on dissent, wiped out much of civil society and built a high-tech surveillance state.
"We continue to stand up and support the right of peaceful protest."
UK Foreign Secretary James Cleverly told reporters the Chinese govt
should "listen to the voices of its own people
Among the thousands of protesters, hundreds have even called for the removalWhat I know is, among many recent protest actions in various China's
of Chinese leader Xi Jinping, who for nearly three years has overseen a strategy of mass-testing, brute-force lockdowns, enforced quarantine and digital tracking that has come at a devastating human and economic cost. Here's what we know:
cities, the slogans like "Xi Jinping to resign" were heard only at one protest action in Shanghai.
Russia's major news outlets are not enthusiastic to report about
problematic internals in China, but there are also dozens of bloggers
who tell about China from the inside, so those who are interested in
China's life might watch recently hundreds of amateur videos related to
the protests.
Why is this significant?AfaIk, public protest isn't "exceedingly rare" in China, but
----------------------
Public protest is exceedingly rare in China, where the Communist Party has tightened its grip on all aspects of life, launched a sweeping crackdown
on dissent, wiped out much of civil society and built a high-tech surveillance state.
protesting activities usually happen due to some specific and more or
less local issues. The CNN itself essentially recognizes the fact when telling that the China's protesters "tend to focus their claims and
demands on local officials and on very targeted societal and economic issues". The Zero Covid policy, that caused the very recent protests,
is essentially a "very targeted societal issue", so it's not really "a different type of protest", but since this policy isn't linked with a locality, the protests happened in many places.
"We continue to stand up and support the right of peaceful protest."On another occasion, they find it appropriate to claim that "it's time
UK Foreign Secretary James Cleverly told reporters the Chinese govt
should "listen to the voices of its own people
for the elites to rise up against the ignorant masses". In the early
2014, the Atlanticist speakers were repeating this "right of peaceful protest" mantra even when the violent part of the Kiev protesters
turned to extreme violence, up to use of firearms. Meanwhile, not so
violent - at least absolutely incomparable to the Kiev case - 'Capitol
riot' has been branded as such a horrendously big deal.
People start protesting when they feel an indignation and irritation
about something, or some injustice. And a fact of some public protest
often provides an opportunity for variety of interpretations about
things that can not be subjected to objective measurement. Whether the protest sentiment is shared by the vast majority, or it's
characteristic of some more or less special group. There also may be different speculations about what exactly the protesters want / demand
and what is the very root cause of the protest impulse. Analysts often
can [mis]interpret such features differently.
It's easy to notice the fact that when Western politicians and media
analysts comment on some protests happening in different countries,
their rhetoric and interpretation principally depends on whether they consider the country "garden" or "jungle", so that they would apply
very different standards and accents depending on that.
Basically, it is better not to let things get to the point when some
start protesting at the streets. It requires a social communication infrastructure where someone can tell about issues causing their
indignation and suggest improvements and corrections, and others can
hear and respond with an action or elucidation. In fact, organization
of such a communication infrastructure is a fundamental civilizational question, and in this respect China goes in its peculiar way (while
within the Western world there are steady trends of popular loss of confidence in institutions).
In the recent decades, China has experienced very rapid economic and
cultural development. So it'd be silly to call the CPC evil. However,
any rapid development is usually accompanied by accumulation of misc. imbalances and side effects, which can stimulate protest sentiments
among certain groups. Also, the dialectics of social development is so
that an improvement of people's quality of life also affects their
behavioral patterns and raises their expectations, thus causing a
popular demand for better quality of governance. Commitment to sanity
and sense of proportion should be the key.
* * *
By the way, today, street protests, with analogue of "Capitol riot",
are going on in the Mongolia's capital (the protesters are unhappy
mainly about corruption and poor life of regular people).
<https://t.me/Monuzel/3312> near the Government Palace <https://t.me/Monuzel/3311> rioters break into the Government Palace <https://t.me/Monuzel/3313> rioters inside the Government Palace
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 483 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 129:11:51 |
Calls: | 9,585 |
Calls today: | 2 |
Files: | 13,673 |
Messages: | 6,146,660 |