"By at least one measure, China now leads the world in producing high-quality science. My research shows that Chinese scholars now publish a larger fraction of the top 1% most cited scientific papers globally than scientists from any other country.scientific research, the number of scholarly papers published and the quality of those papers are good stand-in measures.
I am a policy expert and analyst who studies how governmental investment in science, technology and innovation improves social welfare. While a country's scientific prowess is somewhat difficult to quantify, I'd argue that the amount of money spent on
China is not the only nation to drastically improve its science capacity in recent years, but China's rise has been particularly dramatic. This has left U.S. policy experts and government officials worried about how China's scientific supremacy willshift the global balance of power. China's recent ascendancy results from years of governmental policy aiming to be tops in science and technology. The country has taken explicit steps to get where it is today, and the U.S. now has a choice to make about
...surprised to find that in 2019, Chinese authors published a greater percentage of the most influential papers, with China claiming 8,422 articles in the top category, while the U.S had 7,959 and the European Union had 6,074. In just one recent example,
My colleagues and I counted how many papers published by a country were in the top 1% of science as measured by the number of citations in various disciplines. Going year by year from 2015 to 2019, we then compared different countries. We were
Our research also found that Chinese research was surprisingly novel and creative—and not simply copying western researchers. To measure this, we looked at the mix of disciplines referenced in scientific papers. The more diverse and varied thereferenced research was in a single paper, the more interdisciplinary and novel we considered the work. We found Chinese research to be as innovative as other top performing countries.
Taken together, these measures suggest that China is now no longer an imitator nor producer of only low-quality science. China is now a scientific power on par with the U.S. and Europe, both in quantity and in quality.government has taken steps to slow China's growth. The recent Chips and Science Act of 2022 explicitly limits cooperation with China in some areas of research and manufacturing. In October 2022, the Biden administration put restrictions in place to limit
Fear or collaboration?
Scientific capability is intricately tied to both military and economic power. Because of this relationship, many in the U.S.—from politicians to policy experts—have expressed concern that China's scientific rise is a threat to the U.S., and the
A number of scholars, including me, see these fears and policy responses as rooted in a nationalistic view that doesn't wholly map onto the global endeavor of science.
Academic research in the modern world is in large part driven by the exchange of ideas and information."
https://phys.org/news/2023-01-china-publishes-high-quality-science-nation.html
On Monday, July 3, 2023 at 11:47:26 AM UTC-4, ltlee1 wrote:on scientific research, the number of scholarly papers published and the quality of those papers are good stand-in measures.
"By at least one measure, China now leads the world in producing high-quality science. My research shows that Chinese scholars now publish a larger fraction of the top 1% most cited scientific papers globally than scientists from any other country.
I am a policy expert and analyst who studies how governmental investment in science, technology and innovation improves social welfare. While a country's scientific prowess is somewhat difficult to quantify, I'd argue that the amount of money spent
shift the global balance of power. China's recent ascendancy results from years of governmental policy aiming to be tops in science and technology. The country has taken explicit steps to get where it is today, and the U.S. now has a choice to make aboutChina is not the only nation to drastically improve its science capacity in recent years, but China's rise has been particularly dramatic. This has left U.S. policy experts and government officials worried about how China's scientific supremacy will
surprised to find that in 2019, Chinese authors published a greater percentage of the most influential papers, with China claiming 8,422 articles in the top category, while the U.S had 7,959 and the European Union had 6,074. In just one recent example,...
My colleagues and I counted how many papers published by a country were in the top 1% of science as measured by the number of citations in various disciplines. Going year by year from 2015 to 2019, we then compared different countries. We were
referenced research was in a single paper, the more interdisciplinary and novel we considered the work. We found Chinese research to be as innovative as other top performing countries.Our research also found that Chinese research was surprisingly novel and creative—and not simply copying western researchers. To measure this, we looked at the mix of disciplines referenced in scientific papers. The more diverse and varied the
government has taken steps to slow China's growth. The recent Chips and Science Act of 2022 explicitly limits cooperation with China in some areas of research and manufacturing. In October 2022, the Biden administration put restrictions in place to limitTaken together, these measures suggest that China is now no longer an imitator nor producer of only low-quality science. China is now a scientific power on par with the U.S. and Europe, both in quantity and in quality.
Fear or collaboration?
Scientific capability is intricately tied to both military and economic power. Because of this relationship, many in the U.S.—from politicians to policy experts—have expressed concern that China's scientific rise is a threat to the U.S., and the
A number of scholars, including me, see these fears and policy responses as rooted in a nationalistic view that doesn't wholly map onto the global endeavor of science.
Academic research in the modern world is in large part driven by the exchange of ideas and information."
https://phys.org/news/2023-01-china-publishes-high-quality-science-nation.htmlCompany level R & D: https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/which-companies-spend-the-most-in-research-and-development-rd-2021-06-21
"Amazon (AMZN), $42.74 billion
...
Alphabet (GOOG, GOOGL), $27.57 billion
...
Huawei, $22.04 billion
Huawei is a leading global provider of information and communications technology (ICT) infrastructure and smart
devices. During the fiscal 2020, it spent around ¥141.893 billion on R&D, which is equivalent to $22.04 billion. Its R&D
spending constituted 15.9% of its total revenue of ¥891.37 billion in fiscal 2020.
Huawei is one of the world’s largest patent holders; the company was granted 2,761 patents in 2020, an increase of 14%
vis-à-vis 2019. Overall, Huawei has more than 100,000 active patents across 40,000 plus families. The number of people
working in R&D at Huawei is around 105,000, which is more than half of its total workforce. The company has three guiding
principles when it comes to ecosystem and industry development—growth in the industry, work together, and share value.
Huawei has partnered with major industry players to innovate in emerging domains such as cloud computing, 5G, and the
Internet of Things (IoT).
Microsoft (MSFT), $19.27 billion
...
Apple (AAPL), $18.75 billion
...
Samsung, $18.75 billion
...
Facebook (FB), $18.45 billion"
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 483 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 178:16:20 |
Calls: | 9,598 |
Calls today: | 4 |
Files: | 13,679 |
Messages: | 6,150,646 |
Posted today: | 1 |