XPost: talk.politics.misc, alt.politics.usa

On 10/16/24 2:25 AM, Louie wrote:

WASHINGTON – The Supreme Court weighed on Tuesday whether a truck driver can use an anti-racketeering law to recover lost wages after he said he unknowingly ingested a product containing THC, the active ingredient in marijuana.

Hey, if it's defective CBD oil - lots of D9 THC or
whatever - then the maker IS responsible. Make it
plain on the fuckin' label or PAY UP for fallout.

I think a lot of 'CBD' really IS intended to be a
sneaky way to get buzzed. Low regulation lets that
slip by. Not gonna complain, just be aware.

Also kinda surprised that anybody is doing THC
*tests* anymore. Apparently an anal-retentive
employer, or more likely insurer.

Employment drug testing is kinda passe these days.
SO much of the old naughty stuff is now legal, at
least for 'medical' reasons. The 'medical' angle
is actually major legal LEVERAGE. Sue the insurance
people demanding such tests.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)