In article <7y0bP.9801$Hfb1.9771@fx46.iad>,
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 12/25/2024 2:35 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <YM_aP.21945$mi11.3284@fx48.iad>, rc.@hendrie.con says...
On 12/25/2024 2:40 AM, burch cassidy wrote:
In <EGGaP.21943$mi11.14214@fx48.iad> Jon Ball wrote:
No such poster, as the lying cocksucking Nazi subhuman filth spammy well knows.
There you have it folks.
On 12/24/2024 1:23 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <NPCaP.44431$DPl.2117@fx13.iad>,Unlawful presence is not trespassing and is not a crime. This is settled.
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 12/24/2024 9:01 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <OYAaP.67693$DYF8.48946@fx14.iad>,
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 12/18/2024 7:54 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <J1C8P.1340$5c34.1314@fx47.iad>, katt@gmail.com says... >>>>>>>>>>>>
On 12/12/2024 8:00 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
"-hh" <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>> news:vjcujs$1lg1b$3@dont-email.me...
On 12/11/24 3:07 PM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vjcqqq$1lg1b$1@dont-email.me>,
recscuba_google@huntzinger.com says...
On 12/11/24 10:42 AM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vjcbbm$1jlje$2@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com
says...
There will be and at higher wages.
chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote in
news:p27jlj5kt9q7d5evijc2dqef3rf8lnhbba@4ax.com: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
-hh wrote:within
BTW, here's another example of a lack of critical thinking skills
the GOP:
quote
Sen. Hawley spars with witness over impact of mass deportations:
Hawley: "Here's the Democrats' plan: take the 13M-plus illegals who
are here, taking jobs...flooding the labor force..." >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Witness: "They can't flood the labor force if they're already part of
the labor force."
/quote
Only an idiot would think that's a winning rebuttal from Witness.
Millions of illegals have flooded the labor market, and still are.
Another example of a lack of critical thinking skills from -highhorse.
His response will be deleted, unread.
There is no flood of citizens that want those jobs. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Sure, there's always going to be *some* uptake, but the low unemployment
rate means that the current labor shortage will be made worse. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
citizens who would opt for those jobs, but the low unemployment rate
shows that many jobs will have to go unfilled, which means that employer
competition would increase those jobs' wages.
Of course, those higher business costs would be passed along by the
employers as higher product costs .. which causes higher inflation.
So much for keeping his campaign promise to lower retail prices.
-hh
The ones working now just need work visas and they can continue working.
They won't be able to, because the GOP believes that to issue work visas would
be considered to be "Amnesty" ... plus they'll be deported first.
It would be if they are here illegally. You would be rewarding them while
engaged in crime(s).
Unlawful presence is not a crime, scooter.
It is at my house.
Then why didn't you arrest me when I sneaked into your hovel in the middle of
the night a couple of years ago?
You never did liar.
<chuckle> Oh, yes I did!
Trespassing.
Unlawful presence in the U.S. is not a crime. This is settled. >>>>>>>>>
No. Unlawful presence in the U.S. is not a crime.
Trespassing is a crime.
Yes, there we have it: unlawful presence in the USA is not a crime. This is
settled, spammy, you impotent squat-to-piss cocksucking subhuman Nazi filth.
Trespassing.
Nope. Unlawful presence is not trespassing. It is not any crime at all.
Then why is it "unlawful"
In article <B4fbP.30741$qu83.12589@fx35.iad>,
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 12/25/2024 6:07 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <7y0bP.9801$Hfb1.9771@fx46.iad>,
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
Then why is it "unlawful"
On 12/25/2024 2:35 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <YM_aP.21945$mi11.3284@fx48.iad>, rc.@hendrie.con says... >>>>>>
On 12/25/2024 2:40 AM, burch cassidy wrote:
In <EGGaP.21943$mi11.14214@fx48.iad> Jon Ball wrote:
No such poster, as the lying cocksucking Nazi subhuman filth spammy well knows.
There you have it folks.
On 12/24/2024 1:23 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <NPCaP.44431$DPl.2117@fx13.iad>,Unlawful presence is not trespassing and is not a crime. This is settled.
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 12/24/2024 9:01 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <OYAaP.67693$DYF8.48946@fx14.iad>,
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 12/18/2024 7:54 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <J1C8P.1340$5c34.1314@fx47.iad>, katt@gmail.com says...
On 12/12/2024 8:00 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
"-hh" <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:vjcujs$1lg1b$3@dont-email.me...
On 12/11/24 3:07 PM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vjcqqq$1lg1b$1@dont-email.me>,
recscuba_google@huntzinger.com says...
On 12/11/24 10:42 AM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vjcbbm$1jlje$2@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com
says...
There will be and at higher wages.
chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:p27jlj5kt9q7d5evijc2dqef3rf8lnhbba@4ax.com: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
-hh wrote:within
BTW, here's another example of a lack of critical thinking skills
There is no flood of citizens that want those jobs. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>the GOP:
quote
Sen. Hawley spars with witness over impact of mass deportations:
Hawley: "Here's the Democrats' plan: take the 13M-plus illegals who
are here, taking jobs...flooding the labor force..." >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Witness: "They can't flood the labor force if they're already part of
the labor force."
/quote
Only an idiot would think that's a winning rebuttal from Witness.
Millions of illegals have flooded the labor market, and still are.
Another example of a lack of critical thinking skills from -highhorse.
His response will be deleted, unread. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Sure, there's always going to be *some* uptake, but the low unemployment
rate means that the current labor shortage will be made worse.
citizens who would opt for those jobs, but the low unemployment rate
shows that many jobs will have to go unfilled, which means that employer
competition would increase those jobs' wages. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Of course, those higher business costs would be passed along by the
employers as higher product costs .. which causes higher inflation.
So much for keeping his campaign promise to lower retail prices.
-hh
The ones working now just need work visas and they can continue working.
They won't be able to, because the GOP believes that to issue work visas would
be considered to be "Amnesty" ... plus they'll be deported first.
It would be if they are here illegally. You would be rewarding them while
engaged in crime(s).
Unlawful presence is not a crime, scooter.
It is at my house.
Then why didn't you arrest me when I sneaked into your hovel in the middle of
the night a couple of years ago?
You never did liar.
<chuckle> Oh, yes I did!
Trespassing.
Unlawful presence in the U.S. is not a crime. This is settled. >>>>>>>>>>>
No. Unlawful presence in the U.S. is not a crime.
Trespassing is a crime.
Yes, there we have it: unlawful presence in the USA is not a crime. This is
settled, spammy, you impotent squat-to-piss cocksucking subhuman Nazi filth.
Trespassing.
Nope. Unlawful presence is not trespassing. It is not any crime at all. >>>
You really are a fucking idiot. If you libel someone, that is unlawful but you
can't be prosecuted criminally because it's not a crime ? it's a civil tort. >>
You really work at being stupid, don't you?
As a general rule, it is not a crime for a removable alien to remain >> in the United States.
United States Supreme Court - Arizona v. United States
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/11-182
Unlawful presence:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1227
I'm right and you're wrong, and that's that.
Trespassing
On 12/26/2024 8:13 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch of lies:
In article <B4fbP.30741$qu83.12589@fx35.iad>,
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 12/25/2024 6:07 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off
Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another
content-free batch
of lies:
In article <7y0bP.9801$Hfb1.9771@fx46.iad>,
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 12/25/2024 2:35 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off
Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another
content-free batch
of lies:
In article <YM_aP.21945$mi11.3284@fx48.iad>, rc.@hendrie.con says... >>>>>>>
On 12/25/2024 2:40 AM, burch cassidy wrote:
In <EGGaP.21943$mi11.14214@fx48.iad> Jon Ball wrote:
No such poster, as the lying cocksucking Nazi subhuman filth
spammy well knows.
There you have it folks.
On 12/24/2024 1:23 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off
Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another >>>>>>>>> content-free batch
of lies:
In article <NPCaP.44431$DPl.2117@fx13.iad>,Unlawful presence is not trespassing and is not a crime. This >>>>>>>>> is settled.
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 12/24/2024 9:01 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off
Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another >>>>>>>>>>> content-free batch
of lies:
In article <OYAaP.67693$DYF8.48946@fx14.iad>,
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 12/18/2024 7:54 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off >>>>>>>>>>>>> Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted >>>>>>>>>>>>> another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <J1C8P.1340$5c34.1314@fx47.iad>, katt@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>> says...
On 12/12/2024 8:00 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> camper and gutless
chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
"-hh" <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:vjcujs$1lg1b$3@dont-email.me...
On 12/11/24 3:07 PM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vjcqqq$1lg1b$1@dont-email.me>, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> recscuba_google@huntzinger.com says...
On 12/11/24 10:42 AM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vjcbbm$1jlje$2@dont-email.me>, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com
says...
There will be and at higher wages.
chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:p27jlj5kt9q7d5evijc2dqef3rf8lnhbba@4ax.com: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
-hh wrote:within
BTW, here's another example of a lack of critical >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thinking skills
There is no flood of citizens that want those jobs. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>the GOP:
quote
Sen. Hawley spars with witness over impact of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mass deportations:
Hawley: "Here's the Democrats' plan: take the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 13M-plus illegals who
are here, taking jobs...flooding the labor force..." >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Witness: "They can't flood the labor force if >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they're already part of
the labor force."
/quote
Only an idiot would think that's a winning >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rebuttal from Witness.
Millions of illegals have flooded the labor >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> market, and still are.
Another example of a lack of critical thinking >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> skills from -highhorse.
His response will be deleted, unread. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Sure, there's always going to be *some* uptake, but >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the low unemployment
rate means that the current labor shortage will be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> made worse.
citizens who would opt for those jobs, but the low >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unemployment rate
shows that many jobs will have to go unfilled, which >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> means that employer
competition would increase those jobs' wages. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Of course, those higher business costs would be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> passed along by the
employers as higher product costs .. which causes >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> higher inflation.
So much for keeping his campaign promise to lower >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> retail prices.
-hh
The ones working now just need work visas and they can >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> continue working.
They won't be able to, because the GOP believes that to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issue work visas would
be considered to be "Amnesty" ... plus they'll be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deported first.
It would be if they are here illegally. You would be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rewarding them while
engaged in crime(s).
Unlawful presence is not a crime, scooter.
It is at my house.
Then why didn't you arrest me when I sneaked into your >>>>>>>>>>>>> hovel in the middle of
the night a couple of years ago?
You never did liar.
<chuckle> Oh, yes I did!
Trespassing.
Unlawful presence in the U.S. is not a crime. This is settled. >>>>>>>>>>>>
No. Unlawful presence in the U.S. is not a crime.
Trespassing is a crime.
Yes, there we have it: unlawful presence in the USA is not a
crime. This is
settled, spammy, you impotent squat-to-piss cocksucking subhuman >>>>>>> Nazi filth.
Trespassing.
Nope. Unlawful presence is not trespassing. It is not any crime at
all.
Then why is it "unlawful"
You really are a fucking idiot. If you libel someone, that is
unlawful but you
can't be prosecuted criminally because it's not a crime ? it's a
civil tort.
You really work at being stupid, don't you?
As a general rule, it is not a crime for a removable alien to >>> remain
in the United States.
United States Supreme Court - Arizona v. United States
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/11-182
Unlawful presence:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1227
I'm right and you're wrong, and that's that.
Trespassing
Unlawful presence in the U.S. is not trespassing. It's not a crime.
In article <2whbP.11804$XfF8.5254@fx04.iad>,
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 12/26/2024 8:13 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <B4fbP.30741$qu83.12589@fx35.iad>,
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 12/25/2024 6:07 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <7y0bP.9801$Hfb1.9771@fx46.iad>,
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
Then why is it "unlawful"
On 12/25/2024 2:35 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <YM_aP.21945$mi11.3284@fx48.iad>, rc.@hendrie.con says... >>>>>>>>
On 12/25/2024 2:40 AM, burch cassidy wrote:
In <EGGaP.21943$mi11.14214@fx48.iad> Jon Ball wrote:
No such poster, as the lying cocksucking Nazi subhuman filth spammy well knows.
There you have it folks.
On 12/24/2024 1:23 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <NPCaP.44431$DPl.2117@fx13.iad>,Unlawful presence is not trespassing and is not a crime. This is settled.
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 12/24/2024 9:01 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <OYAaP.67693$DYF8.48946@fx14.iad>,
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 12/18/2024 7:54 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <J1C8P.1340$5c34.1314@fx47.iad>, katt@gmail.com says...
On 12/12/2024 8:00 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
"-hh" <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:vjcujs$1lg1b$3@dont-email.me...
On 12/11/24 3:07 PM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vjcqqq$1lg1b$1@dont-email.me>, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> recscuba_google@huntzinger.com says...
On 12/11/24 10:42 AM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vjcbbm$1jlje$2@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com
says...
There will be and at higher wages.
chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:p27jlj5kt9q7d5evijc2dqef3rf8lnhbba@4ax.com: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
-hh wrote:within
BTW, here's another example of a lack of critical thinking skills
There is no flood of citizens that want those jobs. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>the GOP:
quote
Sen. Hawley spars with witness over impact of mass deportations:
Hawley: "Here's the Democrats' plan: take the 13M-plus illegals who
are here, taking jobs...flooding the labor force..." >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Witness: "They can't flood the labor force if they're already part of
the labor force."
/quote
Only an idiot would think that's a winning rebuttal from Witness.
Millions of illegals have flooded the labor market, and still are.
Another example of a lack of critical thinking skills from -highhorse.
His response will be deleted, unread. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Sure, there's always going to be *some* uptake, but the low unemployment
rate means that the current labor shortage will be made worse.
citizens who would opt for those jobs, but the low unemployment rate
shows that many jobs will have to go unfilled, which means that employer
competition would increase those jobs' wages. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Of course, those higher business costs would be passed along by the
employers as higher product costs .. which causes higher inflation.
So much for keeping his campaign promise to lower retail prices.
-hh
The ones working now just need work visas and they can continue working.
They won't be able to, because the GOP believes that to issue work visas would
be considered to be "Amnesty" ... plus they'll be deported first.
It would be if they are here illegally. You would be rewarding them while
engaged in crime(s).
Unlawful presence is not a crime, scooter.
It is at my house.
Then why didn't you arrest me when I sneaked into your hovel in the middle of
the night a couple of years ago?
You never did liar.
<chuckle> Oh, yes I did!
Trespassing.
Unlawful presence in the U.S. is not a crime. This is settled. >>>>>>>>>>>>>
No. Unlawful presence in the U.S. is not a crime.
Trespassing is a crime.
Yes, there we have it: unlawful presence in the USA is not a crime. This is
settled, spammy, you impotent squat-to-piss cocksucking subhuman Nazi filth.
Trespassing.
Nope. Unlawful presence is not trespassing. It is not any crime at all. >>>>>
You really are a fucking idiot. If you libel someone, that is unlawful but you
can't be prosecuted criminally because it's not a crime ? it's a civil tort.
You really work at being stupid, don't you?
As a general rule, it is not a crime for a removable alien to remain
in the United States.
United States Supreme Court - Arizona v. United States
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/11-182
Unlawful presence:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1227
I'm right and you're wrong, and that's that.
Trespassing
Unlawful presence in the U.S. is not trespassing. It's not a crime.
Then it wouldn't be "unlawful".
On 12/26/2024 11:36 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off
Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking
do-nothing, posted another content-free batch of lies:
In article <2whbP.11804$XfF8.5254@fx04.iad>,
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 12/26/2024 8:13 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off
Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch of lies:
In article <B4fbP.30741$qu83.12589@fx35.iad>, mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 12/25/2024 6:07 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another
fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch of lies:
In article <7y0bP.9801$Hfb1.9771@fx46.iad>, mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 12/25/2024 2:35 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another
fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch of
lies:
In article <YM_aP.21945$mi11.3284@fx48.iad>,
rc.@hendrie.con says...
On 12/25/2024 2:40 AM, burch cassidy wrote:
In <EGGaP.21943$mi11.14214@fx48.iad> Jon Ball wrote:
No such poster, as the lying cocksucking Nazi
subhuman filth spammy well knows.
On 12/24/2024 1:23 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey"
Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child
molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted
another content-free batch of lies:
In article <NPCaP.44431$DPl.2117@fx13.iad>, mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 12/24/2024 9:01 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey"
Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child
molester and another fucking do-nothing,
posted another content-free batch of lies:
In article
<OYAaP.67693$DYF8.48946@fx14.iad>, mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 12/18/2024 7:54 AM, Skeeter-Shit
"Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
convicted child molester and another
fucking do-nothing, posted another
content-free batch of lies:
In article
<J1C8P.1340$5c34.1314@fx47.iad>,
katt@gmail.com says...
On 12/12/2024 8:00 AM, scooter, the
drunken Virginia camper and gutless chickenshit who is frightened to
death of Rudy, lied:
message"-hh" <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote in
news:vjcujs$1lg1b$3@dont-email.me...
On 12/11/24 3:07 PM, Skeeter
wrote:
In article <vjcqqq$1lg1b$1@dont-email.me>, recscuba_google@huntzinger.com
says...
On 12/11/24 10:42 AM, Skeeter
wrote:
In article <vjcbbm$1jlje$2@dont-email.m
,bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com
says...
chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote in
news:p27jlj5kt9q7d5evijc2d qef3rf8lnhbba@4ax.com:
-hh wrote:
withinBTW, here's another
example of a lack of
critical thinking
skills
the GOP:
quote
Sen. Hawley spars
with witness over
impact of mass
deportations:
Hawley: "Here's the Democrats' plan: take
the 13M-plus illegals
who are here, taking jobs...flooding the
labor force..."
Witness: "They can't
flood the labor force
if they're already
part of the labor
force." /quote
Only an idiot would
think that's a winning
rebuttal from Witness.
Millions of illegals
have flooded the labor
market, and still are.
Another example of a
lack of critical
thinking skills from -highhorse.
His response will be
deleted, unread.
There is no flood of
citizens that want those
jobs.
There will be and at higher
wages.
Sure, there's always going to
be some uptake, but the low unemployment rate means that
the current labor shortage
will be made worse.
citizens who would opt for
those jobs, but the low
unemployment rate shows that
many jobs will have to go
unfilled, which means that
employer competition would
increase those jobs' wages.
Of course, those higher
business costs would be
passed along by the employers
as higher product costs ..
which causes higher inflation.
So much for keeping his
campaign promise to lower
retail prices.
-hh
The ones working now just need
work visas and they can
continue working.
They won't be able to, because
the GOP believes that to issue
work visas would be considered to
be "Amnesty" ... plus they'll be
deported first.
It would be if they are here
illegally. You would be rewarding
them while engaged in crime(s).
Unlawful presence is not a crime,
scooter.
It is at my house.
Then why didn't you arrest me when I
sneaked into your hovel in the middle of
the night a couple of years ago?
You never did liar.
<chuckle> Oh, yes I did!
Unlawful presence in the U.S. is not a
crime. This is settled.
Trespassing.
No. Unlawful presence in the U.S. is not a
crime.
There you have it folks.Trespassing is a crime.Unlawful presence is not trespassing and is not a
crime. This is settled.
Yes, there we have it: unlawful presence in the USA
is not a crime. This is settled, spammy, you impotent squat-to-piss cocksucking subhuman Nazi filth.
Trespassing.
Nope. Unlawful presence is not trespassing. It is not any
crime at all.
Then why is it "unlawful"
You really are a fucking idiot. If you libel someone, that is unlawful but you can't be prosecuted criminally because it's
not a crime ? it's a civil tort.
You really work at being stupid, don't you?
to remain >>>> in the United States.As a general rule, it is not a crime for a removable alien
United States Supreme Court - Arizona v. United States
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/11-182
Unlawful presence:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1227
I'm right and you're wrong, and that's that.
Trespassing
Unlawful presence in the U.S. is not trespassing. It's not a
crime.
Then it wouldn't be "unlawful".
False. Civil violations are unlawful but not criminal.
But mere unlawful presence in the country is not a crime. It is a violation of federal immigration law to remain in the country
without legal authorization, but this violation is punishable by
civil penalties, not criminal. Chief among these civil penalties
is deportation or removal, where an unlawful resident may be
detained and removed from the country.
Unlawful presence is not a crime. This is settled.
You lose. You always lose.
On 12/25/2024 6:07 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <7y0bP.9801$Hfb1.9771@fx46.iad>,
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 12/25/2024 2:35 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <YM_aP.21945$mi11.3284@fx48.iad>, rc.@hendrie.con says...
On 12/25/2024 2:40 AM, burch cassidy wrote:
In <EGGaP.21943$mi11.14214@fx48.iad> Jon Ball wrote:
No such poster, as the lying cocksucking Nazi subhuman filth spammy well knows.
There you have it folks.
On 12/24/2024 1:23 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <NPCaP.44431$DPl.2117@fx13.iad>,Unlawful presence is not trespassing and is not a crime. This is settled.
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 12/24/2024 9:01 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <OYAaP.67693$DYF8.48946@fx14.iad>,
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 12/18/2024 7:54 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <J1C8P.1340$5c34.1314@fx47.iad>, katt@gmail.com says... >>>>>>>>>>>>>
On 12/12/2024 8:00 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied: >>>>>>>>>>>>>
"-hh" <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:vjcujs$1lg1b$3@dont-email.me...
On 12/11/24 3:07 PM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vjcqqq$1lg1b$1@dont-email.me>,
recscuba_google@huntzinger.com says...
On 12/11/24 10:42 AM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vjcbbm$1jlje$2@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com
says...
There will be and at higher wages.
chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote in
news:p27jlj5kt9q7d5evijc2dqef3rf8lnhbba@4ax.com: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
-hh wrote:within
BTW, here's another example of a lack of critical thinking skills
the GOP:
quote
Sen. Hawley spars with witness over impact of mass deportations:
Hawley: "Here's the Democrats' plan: take the 13M-plus illegals who
are here, taking jobs...flooding the labor force..." >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Witness: "They can't flood the labor force if they're already part of
the labor force."
/quote
Only an idiot would think that's a winning rebuttal from Witness.
Millions of illegals have flooded the labor market, and still are.
Another example of a lack of critical thinking skills from -highhorse.
His response will be deleted, unread.
There is no flood of citizens that want those jobs. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Sure, there's always going to be *some* uptake, but the low unemployment
rate means that the current labor shortage will be made worse.
citizens who would opt for those jobs, but the low unemployment rate
shows that many jobs will have to go unfilled, which means that employer
competition would increase those jobs' wages. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Of course, those higher business costs would be passed along by the
employers as higher product costs .. which causes higher inflation.
So much for keeping his campaign promise to lower retail prices.
-hh
The ones working now just need work visas and they can continue working.
They won't be able to, because the GOP believes that to issue work visas would
be considered to be "Amnesty" ... plus they'll be deported first.
It would be if they are here illegally. You would be rewarding them while
engaged in crime(s).
Unlawful presence is not a crime, scooter.
It is at my house.
Then why didn't you arrest me when I sneaked into your hovel in the middle of
the night a couple of years ago?
You never did liar.
<chuckle> Oh, yes I did!
Trespassing.
Unlawful presence in the U.S. is not a crime. This is settled. >>>>>>>>>>
No. Unlawful presence in the U.S. is not a crime.
Trespassing is a crime.
Yes, there we have it: unlawful presence in the USA is not a crime. This is
settled, spammy, you impotent squat-to-piss cocksucking subhuman Nazi filth.
Trespassing.
Nope. Unlawful presence is not trespassing. It is not any crime at all.
Then why is it "unlawful"
You really are a fucking idiot. If you libel someone, that is unlawful but you
can't be prosecuted criminally because it's not a crime — it's a civil tort.
You really work at being stupid, don't you?
As a general rule, it is not a crime for a removable alien to remain
in the United States.
United States Supreme Court - Arizona v. United States https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/11-182
Unlawful presence:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1227
In article <4TibP.7079$q1_9.3403@fx03.iad>,
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 12/26/2024 11:36 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another
content-free batch of lies:
In article <2whbP.11804$XfF8.5254@fx04.iad>,
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 12/26/2024 8:13 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <B4fbP.30741$qu83.12589@fx35.iad>,
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 12/25/2024 6:07 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <7y0bP.9801$Hfb1.9771@fx46.iad>,
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 12/25/2024 2:35 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <YM_aP.21945$mi11.3284@fx48.iad>, rc.@hendrie.con says... >>>>>>>>>>
On 12/25/2024 2:40 AM, burch cassidy wrote:
In <EGGaP.21943$mi11.14214@fx48.iad> Jon Ball wrote:
No such poster, as the lying cocksucking Nazi subhuman filth spammy well knows.
There you have it folks.
On 12/24/2024 1:23 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <NPCaP.44431$DPl.2117@fx13.iad>,Unlawful presence is not trespassing and is not a crime. This is settled.
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 12/24/2024 9:01 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <OYAaP.67693$DYF8.48946@fx14.iad>,
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 12/18/2024 7:54 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <J1C8P.1340$5c34.1314@fx47.iad>, katt@gmail.com says...
On 12/12/2024 8:00 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
"-hh" <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:vjcujs$1lg1b$3@dont-email.me...
On 12/11/24 3:07 PM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vjcqqq$1lg1b$1@dont-email.me>, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> recscuba_google@huntzinger.com says... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On 12/11/24 10:42 AM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vjcbbm$1jlje$2@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com
says...Sure, there's always going to be *some* uptake, but the low unemployment
There will be and at higher wages. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:p27jlj5kt9q7d5evijc2dqef3rf8lnhbba@4ax.com: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
-hh wrote:within
BTW, here's another example of a lack of critical thinking skills
There is no flood of citizens that want those jobs. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>the GOP:
quote
Sen. Hawley spars with witness over impact of mass deportations:
Hawley: "Here's the Democrats' plan: take the 13M-plus illegals who
are here, taking jobs...flooding the labor force..." >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Witness: "They can't flood the labor force if they're already part of
the labor force."
/quote
Only an idiot would think that's a winning rebuttal from Witness.
Millions of illegals have flooded the labor market, and still are.
Another example of a lack of critical thinking skills from -highhorse.
His response will be deleted, unread. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
rate means that the current labor shortage will be made worse.
citizens who would opt for those jobs, but the low unemployment rate
shows that many jobs will have to go unfilled, which means that employer
competition would increase those jobs' wages. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Of course, those higher business costs would be passed along by the
employers as higher product costs .. which causes higher inflation.
So much for keeping his campaign promise to lower retail prices.
-hh
The ones working now just need work visas and they can continue working.
They won't be able to, because the GOP believes that to issue work visas would
be considered to be "Amnesty" ... plus they'll be deported first.
It would be if they are here illegally. You would be rewarding them while
engaged in crime(s).
Unlawful presence is not a crime, scooter.
It is at my house.
Then why didn't you arrest me when I sneaked into your hovel in the middle of
the night a couple of years ago?
You never did liar.
<chuckle> Oh, yes I did!
Trespassing.
Unlawful presence in the U.S. is not a crime. This is settled. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
No. Unlawful presence in the U.S. is not a crime.
Trespassing is a crime.
Yes, there we have it: unlawful presence in the USA is not a crime. This is
settled, spammy, you impotent squat-to-piss cocksucking subhuman Nazi filth.
Trespassing.
Nope. Unlawful presence is not trespassing. It is not any crime at all.
Then why is it "unlawful"
You really are a fucking idiot. If you libel someone, that is unlawful but you
can't be prosecuted criminally because it's not a crime ? it's a civil tort.
You really work at being stupid, don't you?
As a general rule, it is not a crime for a removable alien to remain
in the United States.
United States Supreme Court - Arizona v. United States
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/11-182
Unlawful presence:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1227
I'm right and you're wrong, and that's that.
Trespassing
Unlawful presence in the U.S. is not trespassing. It's not a crime.
Then it wouldn't be "unlawful".
False. Civil violations are unlawful but not criminal.
But mere unlawful presence in the country is not a crime. It is a violation
of federal immigration law to remain in the country without legal
authorization, but this violation is punishable by civil penalties, not >> criminal. Chief among these civil penalties is deportation or removal, where
an unlawful resident may be detained and removed from the country.
https://www.findlaw.com/legalblogs/criminal-defense/is-illegal-immigration-a-crime-improper-entry-v-unlawful-presence/
Unlawful presence is not a crime. This is settled.
It will be soon.
You lose. You always lose.
In article <ChzbP.73241$DYF8.4993@fx14.iad>,
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 12/27/2024 4:04 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <4TibP.7079$q1_9.3403@fx03.iad>,
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 12/26/2024 11:36 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, >>>> convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another >>>> content-free batch of lies:
In article <2whbP.11804$XfF8.5254@fx04.iad>,
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
Then it wouldn't be "unlawful".
On 12/26/2024 8:13 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <B4fbP.30741$qu83.12589@fx35.iad>,
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 12/25/2024 6:07 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <7y0bP.9801$Hfb1.9771@fx46.iad>,
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 12/25/2024 2:35 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <YM_aP.21945$mi11.3284@fx48.iad>, rc.@hendrie.con says...
On 12/25/2024 2:40 AM, burch cassidy wrote:
In <EGGaP.21943$mi11.14214@fx48.iad> Jon Ball wrote:
No such poster, as the lying cocksucking Nazi subhuman filth spammy well knows.
There you have it folks.
On 12/24/2024 1:23 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <NPCaP.44431$DPl.2117@fx13.iad>,Unlawful presence is not trespassing and is not a crime. This is settled.
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
Trespassing is a crime.
On 12/24/2024 9:01 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <OYAaP.67693$DYF8.48946@fx14.iad>, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 12/18/2024 7:54 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <J1C8P.1340$5c34.1314@fx47.iad>, katt@gmail.com says...
It is at my house.
On 12/12/2024 8:00 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
"-hh" <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:vjcujs$1lg1b$3@dont-email.me... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/11/24 3:07 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vjcqqq$1lg1b$1@dont-email.me>, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> recscuba_google@huntzinger.com says... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On 12/11/24 10:42 AM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vjcbbm$1jlje$2@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com
says...Sure, there's always going to be *some* uptake, but the low unemployment
There will be and at higher wages. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:p27jlj5kt9q7d5evijc2dqef3rf8lnhbba@4ax.com: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
-hh wrote:within
BTW, here's another example of a lack of critical thinking skills
There is no flood of citizens that want those jobs. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>the GOP:
quote
Sen. Hawley spars with witness over impact of mass deportations:
Hawley: "Here's the Democrats' plan: take the 13M-plus illegals who
are here, taking jobs...flooding the labor force..."
Witness: "They can't flood the labor force if they're already part of
the labor force."
/quote
Only an idiot would think that's a winning rebuttal from Witness.
Millions of illegals have flooded the labor market, and still are.
Another example of a lack of critical thinking skills from -highhorse.
His response will be deleted, unread. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
rate means that the current labor shortage will be made worse.
citizens who would opt for those jobs, but the low unemployment rate
shows that many jobs will have to go unfilled, which means that employer
competition would increase those jobs' wages. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Of course, those higher business costs would be passed along by the
employers as higher product costs .. which causes higher inflation.
So much for keeping his campaign promise to lower retail prices.
-hh
The ones working now just need work visas and they can continue working.
They won't be able to, because the GOP believes that to issue work visas would
be considered to be "Amnesty" ... plus they'll be deported first.
It would be if they are here illegally. You would be rewarding them while
engaged in crime(s).
Unlawful presence is not a crime, scooter. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Then why didn't you arrest me when I sneaked into your hovel in the middle of
the night a couple of years ago?
You never did liar.
<chuckle> Oh, yes I did!
Unlawful presence in the U.S. is not a crime. This is settled.
Trespassing.
No. Unlawful presence in the U.S. is not a crime. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Yes, there we have it: unlawful presence in the USA is not a crime. This is
settled, spammy, you impotent squat-to-piss cocksucking subhuman Nazi filth.
Trespassing.
Nope. Unlawful presence is not trespassing. It is not any crime at all.
Then why is it "unlawful"
You really are a fucking idiot. If you libel someone, that is unlawful but you
can't be prosecuted criminally because it's not a crime ? it's a civil tort.
You really work at being stupid, don't you?
As a general rule, it is not a crime for a removable alien to remain
in the United States.
United States Supreme Court - Arizona v. United States >>>>>>>> https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/11-182
Unlawful presence:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1227
I'm right and you're wrong, and that's that.
Trespassing
Unlawful presence in the U.S. is not trespassing. It's not a crime. >>>>>
False. Civil violations are unlawful but not criminal.
But mere unlawful presence in the country is not a crime. It is a violation
of federal immigration law to remain in the country without legal >>>> authorization, but this violation is punishable by civil penalties, not
criminal. Chief among these civil penalties is deportation or removal, where
an unlawful resident may be detained and removed from the country. >>>>
https://www.findlaw.com/legalblogs/criminal-defense/is-illegal-immigration-a-crime-improper-entry-v-unlawful-presence/
Unlawful presence is not a crime. This is settled.
It will be soon.
Nope. Congress is not going to pass a law that criminalizes unlawful presence.
This is settled.
If they cross anywhere other than
In article <7JAbP.9860$YXj.5424@fx34.iad>, mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...Nothing about them.
On 12/27/2024 7:13 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <ChzbP.73241$DYF8.4993@fx14.iad>,
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 12/27/2024 4:04 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <4TibP.7079$q1_9.3403@fx03.iad>,
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 12/26/2024 11:36 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, >>>>>> convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another >>>>>> content-free batch of lies:
In article <2whbP.11804$XfF8.5254@fx04.iad>,
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
Then it wouldn't be "unlawful".
On 12/26/2024 8:13 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <B4fbP.30741$qu83.12589@fx35.iad>,
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 12/25/2024 6:07 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <7y0bP.9801$Hfb1.9771@fx46.iad>,
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 12/25/2024 2:35 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <YM_aP.21945$mi11.3284@fx48.iad>, rc.@hendrie.con says...
On 12/25/2024 2:40 AM, burch cassidy wrote:
In <EGGaP.21943$mi11.14214@fx48.iad> Jon Ball wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>No such poster, as the lying cocksucking Nazi subhuman filth spammy well knows.
There you have it folks.
On 12/24/2024 1:23 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <NPCaP.44431$DPl.2117@fx13.iad>,Unlawful presence is not trespassing and is not a crime. This is settled.
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
Trespassing is a crime.
On 12/24/2024 9:01 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <OYAaP.67693$DYF8.48946@fx14.iad>, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 12/18/2024 7:54 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <J1C8P.1340$5c34.1314@fx47.iad>, katt@gmail.com says...
It is at my house.
On 12/12/2024 8:00 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
"-hh" <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:vjcujs$1lg1b$3@dont-email.me... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/11/24 3:07 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vjcqqq$1lg1b$1@dont-email.me>, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> recscuba_google@huntzinger.com says... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On 12/11/24 10:42 AM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vjcbbm$1jlje$2@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com
says...Sure, there's always going to be *some* uptake, but the low unemployment
chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:p27jlj5kt9q7d5evijc2dqef3rf8lnhbba@4ax.com: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
-hh wrote:within
BTW, here's another example of a lack of critical thinking skills
There is no flood of citizens that want those jobs.the GOP:
quote
Sen. Hawley spars with witness over impact of mass deportations:
Hawley: "Here's the Democrats' plan: take the 13M-plus illegals who
are here, taking jobs...flooding the labor force..."
Witness: "They can't flood the labor force if they're already part of
the labor force."
/quote
Only an idiot would think that's a winning rebuttal from Witness.
Millions of illegals have flooded the labor market, and still are.
Another example of a lack of critical thinking skills from -highhorse.
His response will be deleted, unread. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
There will be and at higher wages. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
rate means that the current labor shortage will be made worse.
citizens who would opt for those jobs, but the low unemployment rate
shows that many jobs will have to go unfilled, which means that employer
competition would increase those jobs' wages. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Of course, those higher business costs would be passed along by the
employers as higher product costs .. which causes higher inflation.
So much for keeping his campaign promise to lower retail prices.
-hh
The ones working now just need work visas and they can continue working.
They won't be able to, because the GOP believes that to issue work visas would
be considered to be "Amnesty" ... plus they'll be deported first.
It would be if they are here illegally. You would be rewarding them while
engaged in crime(s).
Unlawful presence is not a crime, scooter. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Then why didn't you arrest me when I sneaked into your hovel in the middle of
the night a couple of years ago?
You never did liar.
<chuckle> Oh, yes I did!
Unlawful presence in the U.S. is not a crime. This is settled.
Trespassing.
No. Unlawful presence in the U.S. is not a crime. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Yes, there we have it: unlawful presence in the USA is not a crime. This is
settled, spammy, you impotent squat-to-piss cocksucking subhuman Nazi filth.
Trespassing.
Nope. Unlawful presence is not trespassing. It is not any crime at all.
Then why is it "unlawful"
You really are a fucking idiot. If you libel someone, that is unlawful but you
can't be prosecuted criminally because it's not a crime ? it's a civil tort.
You really work at being stupid, don't you?
As a general rule, it is not a crime for a removable alien to remain
in the United States.
United States Supreme Court - Arizona v. United States >>>>>>>>>> https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/11-182 >>>>>>>>>>
Unlawful presence:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1227
I'm right and you're wrong, and that's that.
Trespassing
Unlawful presence in the U.S. is not trespassing. It's not a crime. >>>>>>>
False. Civil violations are unlawful but not criminal.
But mere unlawful presence in the country is not a crime. It is a violation
of federal immigration law to remain in the country without legal >>>>>> authorization, but this violation is punishable by civil penalties, not
criminal. Chief among these civil penalties is deportation or removal, where
an unlawful resident may be detained and removed from the country.
https://www.findlaw.com/legalblogs/criminal-defense/is-illegal-immigration-a-crime-improper-entry-v-unlawful-presence/
Unlawful presence is not a crime. This is settled.
It will be soon.
Nope. Congress is not going to pass a law that criminalizes unlawful presence.
This is settled.
If they cross anywhere other than
It has nothing to do with "crossing," you fucking idiot. It has to do only with
being present in the country without authorization. As I have instructed you (an
idiot) many times, the large majority of people who are unlawfully present are
"visa overstays." They are people who *entered* the country legally, but then
remained in the U.S> beyond the expiration date of their visa. They have
committed *no* crime relating to immigration.
People who enter the country other than at a port of entry have committed the
crime of improper entry (8 U.S.C. § 1325). Those people comprise fewer than half
of all those who are unlawfully present. People who entered the country legally
but then did not depart on or before the expiration of their visa have committed
no immigration crime at all. Unlawful presence is *not* a crime.
You really are a fucking idiot. You know you are.
What about the millions here now that didn't cross legally?
In article <Y3CbP.50628$DPl.36429@fx13.iad>,
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 12/27/2024 9:54 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <7JAbP.9860$YXj.5424@fx34.iad>, mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut >>> says...Nothing about them.
On 12/27/2024 7:13 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <ChzbP.73241$DYF8.4993@fx14.iad>,
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 12/27/2024 4:04 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <4TibP.7079$q1_9.3403@fx03.iad>,
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 12/26/2024 11:36 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another
content-free batch of lies:
In article <2whbP.11804$XfF8.5254@fx04.iad>,
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
Then it wouldn't be "unlawful".
On 12/26/2024 8:13 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <B4fbP.30741$qu83.12589@fx35.iad>,
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 12/25/2024 6:07 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <7y0bP.9801$Hfb1.9771@fx46.iad>,
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 12/25/2024 2:35 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <YM_aP.21945$mi11.3284@fx48.iad>, rc.@hendrie.con says...
On 12/25/2024 2:40 AM, burch cassidy wrote:
In <EGGaP.21943$mi11.14214@fx48.iad> Jon Ball wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>No such poster, as the lying cocksucking Nazi subhuman filth spammy well knows.
There you have it folks.
On 12/24/2024 1:23 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <NPCaP.44431$DPl.2117@fx13.iad>, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...Unlawful presence is not trespassing and is not a crime. This is settled.
Trespassing is a crime.
On 12/24/2024 9:01 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <OYAaP.67693$DYF8.48946@fx14.iad>, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On 12/18/2024 7:54 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <J1C8P.1340$5c34.1314@fx47.iad>, katt@gmail.com says...
It is at my house.
On 12/12/2024 8:00 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
"-hh" <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote in message
news:vjcujs$1lg1b$3@dont-email.me... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/11/24 3:07 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vjcqqq$1lg1b$1@dont-email.me>, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> recscuba_google@huntzinger.com says... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On 12/11/24 10:42 AM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vjcbbm$1jlje$2@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com
says...Sure, there's always going to be *some* uptake, but the low unemployment
chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:p27jlj5kt9q7d5evijc2dqef3rf8lnhbba@4ax.com: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
-hh wrote:within
BTW, here's another example of a lack of critical thinking skills
There is no flood of citizens that want those jobs.the GOP:
quote
Sen. Hawley spars with witness over impact of mass deportations:
Hawley: "Here's the Democrats' plan: take the 13M-plus illegals who
are here, taking jobs...flooding the labor force..."
Witness: "They can't flood the labor force if they're already part of
the labor force." >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /quote
Only an idiot would think that's a winning rebuttal from Witness.
Millions of illegals have flooded the labor market, and still are.
Another example of a lack of critical thinking skills from -highhorse.
His response will be deleted, unread. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
There will be and at higher wages. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
rate means that the current labor shortage will be made worse.
citizens who would opt for those jobs, but the low unemployment rate
shows that many jobs will have to go unfilled, which means that employer
competition would increase those jobs' wages. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Of course, those higher business costs would be passed along by the
employers as higher product costs .. which causes higher inflation.
So much for keeping his campaign promise to lower retail prices.
-hh
The ones working now just need work visas and they can continue working.
They won't be able to, because the GOP believes that to issue work visas would
be considered to be "Amnesty" ... plus they'll be deported first.
It would be if they are here illegally. You would be rewarding them while
engaged in crime(s).
Unlawful presence is not a crime, scooter. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Then why didn't you arrest me when I sneaked into your hovel in the middle of
the night a couple of years ago?
You never did liar.
<chuckle> Oh, yes I did!
Unlawful presence in the U.S. is not a crime. This is settled.
Trespassing.
No. Unlawful presence in the U.S. is not a crime. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Yes, there we have it: unlawful presence in the USA is not a crime. This is
settled, spammy, you impotent squat-to-piss cocksucking subhuman Nazi filth.
Trespassing.
Nope. Unlawful presence is not trespassing. It is not any crime at all.
Then why is it "unlawful"
You really are a fucking idiot. If you libel someone, that is unlawful but you
can't be prosecuted criminally because it's not a crime ? it's a civil tort.
You really work at being stupid, don't you?
As a general rule, it is not a crime for a removable alien to remain
in the United States.
United States Supreme Court - Arizona v. United States >>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/11-182 >>>>>>>>>>>>
Unlawful presence:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1227 >>>>>>>>>>>>
I'm right and you're wrong, and that's that.
Trespassing
Unlawful presence in the U.S. is not trespassing. It's not a crime. >>>>>>>>>
False. Civil violations are unlawful but not criminal.
But mere unlawful presence in the country is not a crime. It is a violation
of federal immigration law to remain in the country without legal
authorization, but this violation is punishable by civil penalties, not
criminal. Chief among these civil penalties is deportation or removal, where
an unlawful resident may be detained and removed from the country.
https://www.findlaw.com/legalblogs/criminal-defense/is-illegal-immigration-a-crime-improper-entry-v-unlawful-presence/
Unlawful presence is not a crime. This is settled.
It will be soon.
Nope. Congress is not going to pass a law that criminalizes unlawful presence.
This is settled.
If they cross anywhere other than
It has nothing to do with "crossing," you fucking idiot. It has to do only with
being present in the country without authorization. As I have instructed you (an
idiot) many times, the large majority of people who are unlawfully present are
"visa overstays." They are people who *entered* the country legally, but then
remained in the U.S> beyond the expiration date of their visa. They have >>>> committed *no* crime relating to immigration.
People who enter the country other than at a port of entry have committed the
crime of improper entry (8 U.S.C. § 1325). Those people comprise fewer than half
of all those who are unlawfully present. People who entered the country legally
but then did not depart on or before the expiration of their visa have committed
no immigration crime at all. Unlawful presence is *not* a crime.
You really are a fucking idiot. You know you are.
What about the millions here now that didn't cross legally?
Trump is not going to deport the vast majority of them.
Yes.
If they can't be vetted they are gone.
In article <FUCbP.74064$DYF8.3132@fx14.iad>,
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 12/27/2024 10:35 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another
content-free batch of lies:
In article <Y3CbP.50628$DPl.36429@fx13.iad>,
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 12/27/2024 9:54 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <7JAbP.9860$YXj.5424@fx34.iad>, mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut >>>>> says...Nothing about them.
On 12/27/2024 7:13 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <ChzbP.73241$DYF8.4993@fx14.iad>,
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 12/27/2024 4:04 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <4TibP.7079$q1_9.3403@fx03.iad>,
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 12/26/2024 11:36 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another
content-free batch of lies:
In article <2whbP.11804$XfF8.5254@fx04.iad>,
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 12/26/2024 8:13 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <B4fbP.30741$qu83.12589@fx35.iad>,
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 12/25/2024 6:07 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <7y0bP.9801$Hfb1.9771@fx46.iad>,
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 12/25/2024 2:35 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <YM_aP.21945$mi11.3284@fx48.iad>, rc.@hendrie.con says...
On 12/25/2024 2:40 AM, burch cassidy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In <EGGaP.21943$mi11.14214@fx48.iad> Jon Ball wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
No such poster, as the lying cocksucking Nazi subhuman filth spammy well knows.
There you have it folks.
On 12/24/2024 1:23 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <NPCaP.44431$DPl.2117@fx13.iad>, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Unlawful presence is not trespassing and is not a crime. This is settled.
On 12/24/2024 9:01 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convictedTrespassing is a crime.
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <OYAaP.67693$DYF8.48946@fx14.iad>, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On 12/18/2024 7:54 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convictedYou never did liar.
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <J1C8P.1340$5c34.1314@fx47.iad>, katt@gmail.com says...
It is at my house.
On 12/12/2024 8:00 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
"-hh" <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote in message
news:vjcujs$1lg1b$3@dont-email.me... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/11/24 3:07 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vjcqqq$1lg1b$1@dont-email.me>, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> recscuba_google@huntzinger.com says... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On 12/11/24 10:42 AM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vjcbbm$1jlje$2@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com
says...Sure, there's always going to be *some* uptake, but the low unemployment
chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:p27jlj5kt9q7d5evijc2dqef3rf8lnhbba@4ax.com:
-hh wrote:within
BTW, here's another example of a lack of critical thinking skills
There is no flood of citizens that want those jobs.the GOP:
quote
Sen. Hawley spars with witness over impact of mass deportations:
Hawley: "Here's the Democrats' plan: take the 13M-plus illegals who
are here, taking jobs...flooding the labor force..."
Witness: "They can't flood the labor force if they're already part of
the labor force." >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /quote
Only an idiot would think that's a winning rebuttal from Witness.
Millions of illegals have flooded the labor market, and still are.
Another example of a lack of critical thinking skills from -highhorse.
His response will be deleted, unread. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
There will be and at higher wages. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
rate means that the current labor shortage will be made worse.
citizens who would opt for those jobs, but the low unemployment rate
shows that many jobs will have to go unfilled, which means that employer
competition would increase those jobs' wages. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Of course, those higher business costs would be passed along by the
employers as higher product costs .. which causes higher inflation.
So much for keeping his campaign promise to lower retail prices.
-hh
The ones working now just need work visas and they can continue working.
They won't be able to, because the GOP believes that to issue work visas would
be considered to be "Amnesty" ... plus they'll be deported first.
It would be if they are here illegally. You would be rewarding them while
engaged in crime(s).
Unlawful presence is not a crime, scooter. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Then why didn't you arrest me when I sneaked into your hovel in the middle of
the night a couple of years ago? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
<chuckle> Oh, yes I did!
Unlawful presence in the U.S. is not a crime. This is settled.
Trespassing.
No. Unlawful presence in the U.S. is not a crime. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Yes, there we have it: unlawful presence in the USA is not a crime. This is
settled, spammy, you impotent squat-to-piss cocksucking subhuman Nazi filth.
Trespassing.
Nope. Unlawful presence is not trespassing. It is not any crime at all.
Then why is it "unlawful"
You really are a fucking idiot. If you libel someone, that is unlawful but you
can't be prosecuted criminally because it's not a crime ? it's a civil tort.
You really work at being stupid, don't you?
As a general rule, it is not a crime for a removable alien to remain
in the United States.
United States Supreme Court - Arizona v. United States
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/11-182 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Unlawful presence:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1227 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I'm right and you're wrong, and that's that.
Trespassing
Unlawful presence in the U.S. is not trespassing. It's not a crime.
Then it wouldn't be "unlawful".
False. Civil violations are unlawful but not criminal.
But mere unlawful presence in the country is not a crime. It is a violation
of federal immigration law to remain in the country without legal
authorization, but this violation is punishable by civil penalties, not
criminal. Chief among these civil penalties is deportation or removal, where
an unlawful resident may be detained and removed from the country.
https://www.findlaw.com/legalblogs/criminal-defense/is-illegal-immigration-a-crime-improper-entry-v-unlawful-presence/
Unlawful presence is not a crime. This is settled.
It will be soon.
Nope. Congress is not going to pass a law that criminalizes unlawful presence.
This is settled.
If they cross anywhere other than
It has nothing to do with "crossing," you fucking idiot. It has to do only with
being present in the country without authorization. As I have instructed you (an
idiot) many times, the large majority of people who are unlawfully present are
"visa overstays." They are people who *entered* the country legally, but then
remained in the U.S> beyond the expiration date of their visa. They have >>>>>> committed *no* crime relating to immigration.
People who enter the country other than at a port of entry have committed the
crime of improper entry (8 U.S.C. § 1325). Those people comprise fewer than half
of all those who are unlawfully present. People who entered the country legally
but then did not depart on or before the expiration of their visa have committed
no immigration crime at all. Unlawful presence is *not* a crime.
You really are a fucking idiot. You know you are.
What about the millions here now that didn't cross legally?
Trump is not going to deport the vast majority of them.
Yes.
No, he isn't.
If they can't be vetted they are gone.
You can't just stop people and demand that they show papers. That's illegal.
Most already are in the legal system.
In article <gzEbP.5489$jUJ9.3406@fx08.iad>,
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 12/27/2024 12:46 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another
content-free batch of lies:
In article <FUCbP.74064$DYF8.3132@fx14.iad>,
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 12/27/2024 10:35 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, >>>> convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another >>>> content-free batch of lies:
In article <Y3CbP.50628$DPl.36429@fx13.iad>,
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 12/27/2024 9:54 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <7JAbP.9860$YXj.5424@fx34.iad>, mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nutNothing about them.
says...
On 12/27/2024 7:13 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <ChzbP.73241$DYF8.4993@fx14.iad>,
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 12/27/2024 4:04 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <4TibP.7079$q1_9.3403@fx03.iad>,
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 12/26/2024 11:36 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another
content-free batch of lies:
In article <2whbP.11804$XfF8.5254@fx04.iad>,
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 12/26/2024 8:13 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <B4fbP.30741$qu83.12589@fx35.iad>,
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 12/25/2024 6:07 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <7y0bP.9801$Hfb1.9771@fx46.iad>,
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 12/25/2024 2:35 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <YM_aP.21945$mi11.3284@fx48.iad>, rc.@hendrie.con says...
On 12/25/2024 2:40 AM, burch cassidy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In <EGGaP.21943$mi11.14214@fx48.iad> Jon Ball wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
No such poster, as the lying cocksucking Nazi subhuman filth spammy well knows.
There you have it folks.
On 12/24/2024 1:23 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <NPCaP.44431$DPl.2117@fx13.iad>, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Unlawful presence is not trespassing and is not a crime. This is settled.
On 12/24/2024 9:01 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convictedTrespassing is a crime.
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <OYAaP.67693$DYF8.48946@fx14.iad>, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On 12/18/2024 7:54 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convictedYou never did liar.
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <J1C8P.1340$5c34.1314@fx47.iad>, katt@gmail.com says...
It is at my house.
On 12/12/2024 8:00 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
"-hh" <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote in message
news:vjcujs$1lg1b$3@dont-email.me... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/11/24 3:07 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vjcqqq$1lg1b$1@dont-email.me>, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> recscuba_google@huntzinger.com says... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On 12/11/24 10:42 AM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vjcbbm$1jlje$2@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com
says...Sure, there's always going to be *some* uptake, but the low unemployment
chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:p27jlj5kt9q7d5evijc2dqef3rf8lnhbba@4ax.com:
-hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>within
BTW, here's another example of a lack of critical thinking skills
There is no flood of citizens that want those jobs.the GOP: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
quote
Sen. Hawley spars with witness over impact of mass deportations:
Hawley: "Here's the Democrats' plan: take the 13M-plus illegals who
are here, taking jobs...flooding the labor force..."
Witness: "They can't flood the labor force if they're already part of
the labor force." >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /quote
Only an idiot would think that's a winning rebuttal from Witness.
Millions of illegals have flooded the labor market, and still are.
Another example of a lack of critical thinking skills from -highhorse.
His response will be deleted, unread. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
There will be and at higher wages. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
rate means that the current labor shortage will be made worse.
citizens who would opt for those jobs, but the low unemployment rate
shows that many jobs will have to go unfilled, which means that employer
competition would increase those jobs' wages. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Of course, those higher business costs would be passed along by the
employers as higher product costs .. which causes higher inflation.
So much for keeping his campaign promise to lower retail prices.
-hh
The ones working now just need work visas and they can continue working.
They won't be able to, because the GOP believes that to issue work visas would
be considered to be "Amnesty" ... plus they'll be deported first.
It would be if they are here illegally. You would be rewarding them while
engaged in crime(s).
Unlawful presence is not a crime, scooter. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Then why didn't you arrest me when I sneaked into your hovel in the middle of
the night a couple of years ago? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
<chuckle> Oh, yes I did!
Unlawful presence in the U.S. is not a crime. This is settled.
Trespassing.
No. Unlawful presence in the U.S. is not a crime. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Yes, there we have it: unlawful presence in the USA is not a crime. This is
settled, spammy, you impotent squat-to-piss cocksucking subhuman Nazi filth.
Trespassing.
Nope. Unlawful presence is not trespassing. It is not any crime at all.
Then why is it "unlawful"
You really are a fucking idiot. If you libel someone, that is unlawful but you
can't be prosecuted criminally because it's not a crime ? it's a civil tort.
You really work at being stupid, don't you?
As a general rule, it is not a crime for a removable alien to remain
in the United States.
United States Supreme Court - Arizona v. United States
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/11-182
Unlawful presence:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1227 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I'm right and you're wrong, and that's that.
Trespassing
Unlawful presence in the U.S. is not trespassing. It's not a crime.
Then it wouldn't be "unlawful".
False. Civil violations are unlawful but not criminal. >>>>>>>>>>>>
But mere unlawful presence in the country is not a crime. It is a violation
of federal immigration law to remain in the country without legal
authorization, but this violation is punishable by civil penalties, not
criminal. Chief among these civil penalties is deportation or removal, where
an unlawful resident may be detained and removed from the country.
https://www.findlaw.com/legalblogs/criminal-defense/is-illegal-immigration-a-crime-improper-entry-v-unlawful-presence/
Unlawful presence is not a crime. This is settled.
It will be soon.
Nope. Congress is not going to pass a law that criminalizes unlawful presence.
This is settled.
If they cross anywhere other than
It has nothing to do with "crossing," you fucking idiot. It has to do only with
being present in the country without authorization. As I have instructed you (an
idiot) many times, the large majority of people who are unlawfully present are
"visa overstays." They are people who *entered* the country legally, but then
remained in the U.S> beyond the expiration date of their visa. They have
committed *no* crime relating to immigration.
People who enter the country other than at a port of entry have committed the
crime of improper entry (8 U.S.C. § 1325). Those people comprise fewer than half
of all those who are unlawfully present. People who entered the country legally
but then did not depart on or before the expiration of their visa have committed
no immigration crime at all. Unlawful presence is *not* a crime. >>>>>>>>
You really are a fucking idiot. You know you are.
What about the millions here now that didn't cross legally?
Trump is not going to deport the vast majority of them.
Yes.
No, he isn't.
If they can't be vetted they are gone.
You can't just stop people and demand that they show papers. That's illegal.
Most already are in the legal system.
No, they aren't.
Any that have committed a crime are.
In article <Lc_bP.22923$DPp5.17851@fx01.iad>,
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 12/27/2024 2:27 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <gzEbP.5489$jUJ9.3406@fx08.iad>,
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 12/27/2024 12:46 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, >>>> convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another >>>> content-free batch of lies:
In article <FUCbP.74064$DYF8.3132@fx14.iad>,
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 12/27/2024 10:35 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, >>>>>> convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another >>>>>> content-free batch of lies:
In article <Y3CbP.50628$DPl.36429@fx13.iad>,
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 12/27/2024 9:54 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <7JAbP.9860$YXj.5424@fx34.iad>, mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nutNothing about them.
says...
On 12/27/2024 7:13 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <ChzbP.73241$DYF8.4993@fx14.iad>,
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 12/27/2024 4:04 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <4TibP.7079$q1_9.3403@fx03.iad>,
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 12/26/2024 11:36 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another
content-free batch of lies:
In article <2whbP.11804$XfF8.5254@fx04.iad>,
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 12/26/2024 8:13 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <B4fbP.30741$qu83.12589@fx35.iad>, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
Trespassing
On 12/25/2024 6:07 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <7y0bP.9801$Hfb1.9771@fx46.iad>, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 12/25/2024 2:35 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <YM_aP.21945$mi11.3284@fx48.iad>, rc.@hendrie.con says...
On 12/25/2024 2:40 AM, burch cassidy wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In <EGGaP.21943$mi11.14214@fx48.iad> Jon Ball wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
No such poster, as the lying cocksucking Nazi subhuman filth spammy well knows.
There you have it folks.
On 12/24/2024 1:23 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <NPCaP.44431$DPl.2117@fx13.iad>, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Unlawful presence is not trespassing and is not a crime. This is settled.
On 12/24/2024 9:01 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convictedTrespassing is a crime.
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <OYAaP.67693$DYF8.48946@fx14.iad>, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On 12/18/2024 7:54 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convictedYou never did liar.
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <J1C8P.1340$5c34.1314@fx47.iad>, katt@gmail.com says...
It is at my house.
On 12/12/2024 8:00 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
Unlawful presence is not a crime, scooter. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
"-hh" <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote in message
news:vjcujs$1lg1b$3@dont-email.me... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/11/24 3:07 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vjcqqq$1lg1b$1@dont-email.me>, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> recscuba_google@huntzinger.com says... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On 12/11/24 10:42 AM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vjcbbm$1jlje$2@dont-email.me>, bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com
says... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Sure, there's always going to be *some* uptake, but the low unemployment
chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:p27jlj5kt9q7d5evijc2dqef3rf8lnhbba@4ax.com:
-hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>within >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the GOP: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
BTW, here's another example of a lack of critical thinking skills
There is no flood of citizens that want those jobs.quote >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sen. Hawley spars with witness over impact of mass deportations:Only an idiot would think that's a winning rebuttal from Witness.
Hawley: "Here's the Democrats' plan: take the 13M-plus illegals who
are here, taking jobs...flooding the labor force..."
Witness: "They can't flood the labor force if they're already part of
the labor force." >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /quote >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Millions of illegals have flooded the labor market, and still are.
Another example of a lack of critical thinking skills from -highhorse.
His response will be deleted, unread. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
There will be and at higher wages. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
rate means that the current labor shortage will be made worse.
citizens who would opt for those jobs, but the low unemployment rate
shows that many jobs will have to go unfilled, which means that employer
competition would increase those jobs' wages.
Of course, those higher business costs would be passed along by the
employers as higher product costs .. which causes higher inflation.
So much for keeping his campaign promise to lower retail prices.
-hh
The ones working now just need work visas and they can continue working.
They won't be able to, because the GOP believes that to issue work visas would
be considered to be "Amnesty" ... plus they'll be deported first.
It would be if they are here illegally. You would be rewarding them while
engaged in crime(s). >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Then why didn't you arrest me when I sneaked into your hovel in the middle of
the night a couple of years ago? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
<chuckle> Oh, yes I did!
Unlawful presence in the U.S. is not a crime. This is settled.
Trespassing.
No. Unlawful presence in the U.S. is not a crime. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Yes, there we have it: unlawful presence in the USA is not a crime. This is
settled, spammy, you impotent squat-to-piss cocksucking subhuman Nazi filth.
Trespassing.
Nope. Unlawful presence is not trespassing. It is not any crime at all.
Then why is it "unlawful"
You really are a fucking idiot. If you libel someone, that is unlawful but you
can't be prosecuted criminally because it's not a crime ? it's a civil tort.
You really work at being stupid, don't you? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
As a general rule, it is not a crime for a removable alien to remain
in the United States.
United States Supreme Court - Arizona v. United States
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/11-182
Unlawful presence:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1227 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I'm right and you're wrong, and that's that. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Unlawful presence in the U.S. is not trespassing. It's not a crime.
Then it wouldn't be "unlawful".
False. Civil violations are unlawful but not criminal. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
But mere unlawful presence in the country is not a crime. It is a violation
of federal immigration law to remain in the country without legal
authorization, but this violation is punishable by civil penalties, not
criminal. Chief among these civil penalties is deportation or removal, where
an unlawful resident may be detained and removed from the country.
https://www.findlaw.com/legalblogs/criminal-defense/is-illegal-immigration-a-crime-improper-entry-v-unlawful-presence/
Unlawful presence is not a crime. This is settled.
It will be soon.
Nope. Congress is not going to pass a law that criminalizes unlawful presence.
This is settled.
If they cross anywhere other than
It has nothing to do with "crossing," you fucking idiot. It has to do only with
being present in the country without authorization. As I have instructed you (an
idiot) many times, the large majority of people who are unlawfully present are
"visa overstays." They are people who *entered* the country legally, but then
remained in the U.S> beyond the expiration date of their visa. They have
committed *no* crime relating to immigration.
People who enter the country other than at a port of entry have committed the
crime of improper entry (8 U.S.C. § 1325). Those people comprise fewer than half
of all those who are unlawfully present. People who entered the country legally
but then did not depart on or before the expiration of their visa have committed
no immigration crime at all. Unlawful presence is *not* a crime. >>>>>>>>>>
You really are a fucking idiot. You know you are.
What about the millions here now that didn't cross legally?
Trump is not going to deport the vast majority of them.
Yes.
No, he isn't.
If they can't be vetted they are gone.
You can't just stop people and demand that they show papers. That's illegal.
Most already are in the legal system.
No, they aren't.
Any that have committed a crime are.
Very few have committed any crimes, and most of those have *already* been
deported once they're out of jail or prison.
Many have and
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 483 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 185:11:46 |
| Calls: | 9,600 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 13,679 |
| Messages: | 6,151,363 |