• Re: The brain damage Biden has. It's not a myth: TOTAL damage

    From LOLOCT7@21:1/5 to All on Fri Dec 27 23:38:55 2024
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.society.liberalism, alt.atheism
    XPost: sac.politics, alt.politics.obama

    On 27 Dec 2024, Michael A Terrell <mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut> posted
    some news:7JAbP.9860$YXj.5424@fx34.iad:

    On 12/27/2024 7:13 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted
    another content-free batch of lies:

    In article <ChzbP.73241$DYF8.4993@fx14.iad>,
    mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...

    On 12/27/2024 4:04 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off
    Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking
    do-nothing, posted another content-free batch of lies:

    In article <4TibP.7079$q1_9.3403@fx03.iad>,
    mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...

    On 12/26/2024 11:36 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off
    Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking
    do-nothing, posted another content-free batch of lies:

    In article <2whbP.11804$XfF8.5254@fx04.iad>,
    mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...

    On 12/26/2024 8:13 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off
    Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking
    do-nothing, posted another content-free batch of lies:

    In article <B4fbP.30741$qu83.12589@fx35.iad>,
    mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...

    On 12/25/2024 6:07 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off
    Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking >>>>>>>>> do-nothing, posted another content-free batch of lies:

    In article <7y0bP.9801$Hfb1.9771@fx46.iad>,
    mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...

    On 12/25/2024 2:35 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off
    Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another
    fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
    of lies:

    In article <YM_aP.21945$mi11.3284@fx48.iad>,
    rc.@hendrie.con says...

    On 12/25/2024 2:40 AM, burch cassidy wrote:
    In <EGGaP.21943$mi11.14214@fx48.iad> Jon Ball wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>
    No such poster, as the lying cocksucking Nazi subhuman >>>>>>>>>>>>> filth spammy well knows.


    On 12/24/2024 1:23 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of lies:

    In article <NPCaP.44431$DPl.2117@fx13.iad>,
    mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...

    On 12/24/2024 9:01 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of lies:

    In article <OYAaP.67693$DYF8.48946@fx14.iad>, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...

    On 12/18/2024 7:54 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> another fucking do-nothing, posted another >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> content-free batch of lies:

    In article <J1C8P.1340$5c34.1314@fx47.iad>, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> katt@gmail.com says...

    On 12/12/2024 8:00 AM, scooter, the drunken >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Virginia camper and gutless
    chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lied:



    "-hh" <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> message news:vjcujs$1lg1b$3@dont-email.me... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/11/24 3:07 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vjcqqq$1lg1b$1@dont-email.me>, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> recscuba_google@huntzinger.com says... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    On 12/11/24 10:42 AM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vjcbbm$1jlje$2@dont-email.me>, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> says...

    chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:p27jlj5kt9q7d5evijc2dqef3rf8lnhbba@4ax.c >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> om:

    -hh wrote:

    BTW, here's another example of a lack of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> critical thinking skills >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> within
    the GOP:

    quote
    Sen. Hawley spars with witness over impact >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of mass deportations: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    Hawley: "Here's the Democrats' plan: take >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the 13M-plus illegals who >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are here, taking jobs...flooding the labor >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> force..."

    Witness: "They can't flood the labor force >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if they're already part of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the labor force."
    /quote

    Only an idiot would think that's a winning >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rebuttal from Witness. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Millions of illegals have flooded the labor >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> market, and still are. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    Another example of a lack of critical >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thinking skills from -highhorse. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    His response will be deleted, unread. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    There is no flood of citizens that want >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> those jobs.

    There will be and at higher wages. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    Sure, there's always going to be *some* >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> uptake, but the low unemployment >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rate means that the current labor shortage >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will be made worse.

    citizens who would opt for those jobs, but the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> low unemployment rate
    shows that many jobs will have to go unfilled, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which means that employer
    competition would increase those jobs' wages. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    Of course, those higher business costs would >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be passed along by the
    employers as higher product costs .. which >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> causes higher inflation.

    So much for keeping his campaign promise to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lower retail prices.

    -hh

    The ones working now just need work visas and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they can continue working.

    They won't be able to, because the GOP believes >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that to issue work visas would
    be considered to be "Amnesty" ... plus they'll >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be deported first.

    It would be if they are here illegally. You would >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be rewarding them while engaged in crime(s). >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    Unlawful presence is not a crime, scooter. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    It is at my house.

    Then why didn't you arrest me when I sneaked into >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your hovel in the middle of the night a couple of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> years ago?

    You never did liar.

    <chuckle> Oh, yes I did!


    Unlawful presence in the U.S. is not a crime. This >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is settled.

    Trespassing.

    No. Unlawful presence in the U.S. is not a crime. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    Trespassing is a crime.
    Unlawful presence is not trespassing and is not a crime. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is settled.
    There you have it folks.

    Yes, there we have it: unlawful presence in the USA is not >>>>>>>>>>>>> a crime. This is settled, spammy, you impotent
    squat-to-piss cocksucking subhuman Nazi filth.

    Trespassing.

    Nope. Unlawful presence is not trespassing. It is not any >>>>>>>>>>> crime at all.

    Then why is it "unlawful"

    You really are a fucking idiot. If you libel someone, that is >>>>>>>>> unlawful but you can't be prosecuted criminally because it's >>>>>>>>> not a crime ? it's a civil tort.

    You really work at being stupid, don't you?

    As a general rule, it is not a crime for a removable >>>>>>>>> alien to remain in the United States.

    United States Supreme Court - Arizona v. United
    States
    https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/11-182 >>>>>>>>>

    Unlawful presence:

    https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1227


    I'm right and you're wrong, and that's that.

    Trespassing

    Unlawful presence in the U.S. is not trespassing. It's not a
    crime.

    Then it wouldn't be "unlawful".

    False. Civil violations are unlawful but not criminal.

    But mere unlawful presence in the country is not a crime. It
    is a violation of federal immigration law to remain in the
    country without legal authorization, but this violation is
    punishable by civil penalties, not criminal. Chief among
    these civil penalties is deportation or removal, where
    an unlawful resident may be detained and removed from the
    country.


    https://www.findlaw.com/legalblogs/criminal-defense/is-illegal-immi
    gration-a-crime-improper-entry-v-unlawful-presence/

    Unlawful presence is not a crime. This is settled.

    It will be soon.

    Nope. Congress is not going to pass a law that criminalizes unlawful
    presence. This is settled.

    If they cross anywhere other than

    It has nothing to do with "crossing," you fucking idiot. It has to do
    only with being present in the country without authorization.

    Either way they are expressing intent to commit a multitude of crimes.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)