XPost: alt.computer.workshop, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
In article <6770641a$28$1781$
882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
"Charlie Glock"@localhost.com says...
On 12/27/24 18:26, Snit wrote:
On Dec 27, 2024 at 3:29:05 PM MST, "Glock" wrote <676f29c1$16$2761$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
On 12/27/24 13:49, Snit wrote:
Apologize for some of your more aggressive, insane, and harmful nonsense and I
will consider giving you continued replies to your trolling crap posts in >>> 2025. These are the specifics:
Carroll:
* Lied about me stalking my ex wife
MSG-ID where Steve Carroll lied.
Glad you are asking, Carroll. Happy to provide some.
Although I am not Carroll and you are unable to prove otherwise I'm glad
you are providing your half truth answers.
http://al.howardknight.net/?STYPE=msgid&MSGI=%3Cvc9r88$2ulnv$6@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org%3E
Message-ID: <vc9r88$2ulnv$6@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>
-----
Said the projecting, dishonest hypocrite who stalked his wife
"until the police were involved".
-----
He lied and said I stalked her.
http://al.howardknight.net/?STYPE=msgid&MSGI=%3Cv80dir$2r1cs$31@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org%3E
Message-ID: <v80dir$2r1cs$31@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>
-----
To Goofy: Why did you stalk her? What did you think would happen?!
-----
Not stated as speculation or the like. A direct lie that I did something I did
not do. He repeats this:
-----
My concerns clearly were, and are:
1. Why you stalked her
-----
I did no such thing. He lied.
Actually you did snit.
The charge was "Harass-Follow In Public" which constitutes stalking.
Look it up fool.
http://al.howardknight.net/?STYPE=msgid&MSGI=%3Cv861l7$9tt$20@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org%3E
Message-ID: <v861l7$9tt$20@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>
-----
It's ironic that 'friend Brooks' gives me sh*t about what he
called a "fuss" I was making over the childish BS you and peabrain
post, yet, he's fine with all the disingenuous and irrelevant
smoke blowing you're doing in an attempt to hide the extent to
which you're a wife-stalking man-child.
-----
Another example of him lying and saying I stalked my wife. I did no such thing.
Same answer as above.
You are not doing well here.
* Lied about me having a restraining order
MSG-ID where Steve Carroll lied.
Carroll <utf3ms$1j7f1$3@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>:
-----
Either the cops showed up and 'witnessed' him
within 'x feet' of her or she had a video of him being
'obviously too close' for the terms of the restraining
order.
-----
A complete and utter fiction. A lie. A harmful lie designed to harm me personally and professionally.
Do you know what a theory, opinion, theory is?
See the word EITHER?
You lose again.
Oh and what does this have to do with your so called professional
reputation?
By your own posts (I am mentally ill, what is a good mix of drugs, I
carry a comfort teddy bear) and many others sunk any reputation you
might have had and they were all done by YOU.
Add in 20 years of obsessive trolling Carroll and your reputation both personal and professional is very bad.
A quick Google confirms this.
Most wouldn't hire you to pick up dog shit on their lawn.
You have only yourself to blame for that.
* Lied about me going against this restraining order
MSG-ID where Steve Carroll lied.
http://al.howardknight.net/?STYPE=msgid&MSGI=%3Cve10ml$1osmf$4@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org%3E
Message-ID: <ve10ml$1osmf$4@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>
-----
This was along the
lines of Glasser violating the restraining order his wife
obtained,
-----
No such order. No such violation of an order that did not exist.
I will leave that to Carroll to answer but I suspect it is another
opinion, theory that you are dishonestly misconstruing as fact.
Let's see you admit to those... and we will go from there. But you will not admit to it. You are a trolling, sock using, piece of shit troll.
What about all the other ones?
You conveniently snipped those snit.
Come on goofy, at least give it a try.
You'll lose but at least you tried.
If you are expecting a rational, cogent reply from snit
aka Michael L. Glasser, forget it. Snit is a head case who
lives life high on prescription drugs and doesn't seem to
have any functioning brain cells left.
Don't waste your time.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)