On 1/7/2025 1:29 PM, Duane D La Motte wrote:
Just as we don't need a term to describe someone who doesn't believe in
astrology or "chakras" or unicorns or leprechauns.
https://www.facebook.com/17841451970413156/videos/1273599303760794/
Sorry, Dr. Harris, "your idea is dumb":
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/atheistNo one suggested it's going to disappear. It still isn't needed and theistic christers are stupid (additionally stupid) for thinking they need it.
The word "atheist" is part of the English lexicon; it is *not* going to disappear.
On 1/7/2025 2:27 PM, % wrote:Whether the word exists and is in use or not, it is an unnecessary word. I don't
Dawn Flood wrote:
On 1/7/2025 1:29 PM, Duane D La Motte wrote:
Just as we don't need a term to describe someone who doesn't believe in >>>> astrology or "chakras" or unicorns or leprechauns.
https://www.facebook.com/17841451970413156/videos/1273599303760794/
Sorry, Dr. Harris, "your idea is dumb":
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/atheist
The word "atheist" is part of the English lexicon; it is *not* going to
disappear.
Dawn
right , it'll just never be used ,
just like the tahltan language ,
it's disappearing because no one uses it
Languages, and their words, evolve. Even if the word "atheist" stops being used, the Merriam-Webster dictionary will simply list it as being "obsolete" or
"archaic".
Duane D La Motte wrote:
On 1/7/2025 12:13 PM, Dawn Flood wrote:
On 1/7/2025 1:29 PM, Duane D La Motte wrote:
Just as we don't need a term to describe someone who doesn't believe in >>>> astrology or "chakras" or unicorns or leprechauns.
https://www.facebook.com/17841451970413156/videos/1273599303760794/
Sorry, Dr. Harris, "your idea is dumb":
No, it's an excellent idea. I *am* an atheist, as others insist on calling it,
but I don't need to word to describe my thoughts.
No one suggested it's going to disappear. It still isn't needed and theistic >> christers are stupid (additionally stupid) for thinking they need it.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/atheist
The word "atheist" is part of the English lexicon; it is *not* going to
disappear.
why are you using it
On 2025-01-04 10:23 p.m., Nadegda wrote:
Time to suck dick again.
On Sat, 04 Jan 2025 03:05:28 -0500, kensi wrote:
On 2025-01-02 8:48 p.m., Nadegda wrote:
He's the uncle nobody wants around during holiday meals because if
he's invited, he'll hold forth on his odious views (and get into
long and unproductive arguments over climate change too), so he's
all alone for the holidays ... if only he'd educate himself, maybe
people would start to want him around.
The sad, sad plight of a kook ...
This could equally describe Ko0kMa7e. He has no successes,
achievements, or accomplishments of his own; he can only live
vicariously through the successes of others, which he trumpets as if
he had anything at all to do with them.
So pathetic.
As usual, kensi, you've hit the nail right on the head.
Perhaps many of our kooks are in similar situations ...
I don't get it.
Duane D La Motte wrote:
On 1/7/2025 12:13 PM, Dawn Flood wrote:
On 1/7/2025 1:29 PM, Duane D La Motte wrote:
Just as we don't need a term to describe someone who doesn't believe
in astrology or "chakras" or unicorns or leprechauns.
https://www.facebook.com/17841451970413156/videos/1273599303760794/
Sorry, Dr. Harris, "your idea is dumb":
No, it's an excellent idea. I *am* an atheist, as others insist on
calling it, but I don't need to word to describe my thoughts.
No one suggested it's going to disappear. It still isn't needed and
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/atheist
The word "atheist" is part of the English lexicon; it is *not* going
to disappear.
theistic christers are stupid (additionally stupid) for thinking they
need it.
why are you using it
On 07 Jan 2025, kensi <kkensington01-NOSPAM@gmail.invalid> posted some news:vlk2hh$1dt68$1@paganini.bofh.team:
On 2025-01-04 10:23 p.m., Nadegda wrote:
Time to suck dick again.
On Sat, 04 Jan 2025 03:05:28 -0500, kensi wrote:
On 2025-01-02 8:48 p.m., Nadegda wrote:
He's the uncle nobody wants around during holiday meals because if
he's invited, he'll hold forth on his odious views (and get into
long and unproductive arguments over climate change too), so he's
all alone for the holidays ... if only he'd educate himself, maybe
people would start to want him around.
The sad, sad plight of a kook ...
This could equally describe Ko0kMa7e. He has no successes,
achievements, or accomplishments of his own; he can only live
vicariously through the successes of others, which he trumpets as if
he had anything at all to do with them.
So pathetic.
As usual, kensi, you've hit the nail right on the head.
Perhaps many of our kooks are in similar situations ...
I don't get it.
Bend over and I'll make sure you do.
On 1/7/2025 2:37 PM, Duane D La Motte wrote:
On 1/7/2025 12:29 PM, Dawn Flood wrote:
On 1/7/2025 2:27 PM, % wrote:Whether the word exists and is in use or not, it is an unnecessary
Dawn Flood wrote:
On 1/7/2025 1:29 PM, Duane D La Motte wrote:
Just as we don't need a term to describe someone who doesn'tSorry, Dr. Harris, "your idea is dumb":
believe in astrology or "chakras" or unicorns or leprechauns.
https://www.facebook.com/17841451970413156/videos/1273599303760794/ >>>>>
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/atheist
The word "atheist" is part of the English lexicon; it is *not*
going to disappear.
Dawn
right , it'll just never be used ,
just like the tahltan language ,
it's disappearing because no one uses it
Languages, and their words, evolve. Even if the word "atheist" stops
being used, the Merriam-Webster dictionary will simply list it as
being "obsolete" or "archaic".
word. I don't believe in the tooth fairy or alchemy, and no word is
needed to describe that absence of belief.
Nonetheless, most human beings hold to the existence of immaterial
entities and/or forces, including God or gods, and so, as long as those beliefs persist, the category of those of us who do not believe will be
the label of "not whatever".
You can say that the word is unnecessary, but as long as it persists in writing and/or spoken speech, it will continue to be listed in the
various dictionaries.
On 1/7/2025 2:37 PM, Duane D La Motte wrote:
On 1/7/2025 12:29 PM, Dawn Flood wrote:
On 1/7/2025 2:27 PM, % wrote:Whether the word exists and is in use or not, it is an unnecessary word. I >> don't believe in the tooth fairy or alchemy, and no word is needed to describe
Dawn Flood wrote:
On 1/7/2025 1:29 PM, Duane D La Motte wrote:
Just as we don't need a term to describe someone who doesn't believe in >>>>>> astrology or "chakras" or unicorns or leprechauns.Sorry, Dr. Harris, "your idea is dumb":
https://www.facebook.com/17841451970413156/videos/1273599303760794/ >>>>>
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/atheist
The word "atheist" is part of the English lexicon; it is *not* going to >>>>> disappear.
Dawn
right , it'll just never be used ,
just like the tahltan language ,
it's disappearing because no one uses it
Languages, and their words, evolve. Even if the word "atheist" stops being
used, the Merriam-Webster dictionary will simply list it as being "obsolete"
or "archaic".
that absence of belief.
Nonetheless, most human beings hold to the existence of immaterial entities and/
or forces,
Dawn Flood wrote:
On 1/7/2025 2:34 PM, Duane D La Motte wrote:
On 1/7/2025 12:13 PM, Dawn Flood wrote:
On 1/7/2025 1:29 PM, Duane D La Motte wrote:
Just as we don't need a term to describe someone who doesn't
believe in astrology or "chakras" or unicorns or leprechauns.
Sorry, Dr. Harris, "your idea is dumb":
No, it's an excellent idea. I am an atheist, as others insist on
calling it, but I don't need to word to describe my thoughts.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/atheist
The word "atheist" is part of the English lexicon; it is notNo one suggested it's going to disappear. It still isn't needed
going to disappear.
and theistic christers are stupid (additionally stupid) for
thinking they need it.
Most Christians are theists; those of us who are not are "a-theist".
Dawn
right and you believe in nothing
On 1/7/2025 12:40 PM, % wrote:
Duane D La Motte wrote:
On 1/7/2025 12:13 PM, Dawn Flood wrote:
On 1/7/2025 1:29 PM, Duane D La Motte wrote:
Just as we don't need a term to describe someone who doesn't
believe in astrology or "chakras" or unicorns or leprechauns.
https://www.facebook.com/17841451970413156/videos/1273599303760794/
Sorry, Dr. Harris, "your idea is dumb":
No, it's an excellent idea. I *am* an atheist, as others insist on
calling it, but I don't need to word to describe my thoughts.
No one suggested it's going to disappear. It still isn't needed and
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/atheist
The word "atheist" is part of the English lexicon; it is *not*
going to disappear.
theistic christers are stupid (additionally stupid) for thinking
they need it.
why are you using it
I don't.
Dawn Flood wrote:
On 1/7/2025 2:34 PM, Duane D La Motte wrote:
On 1/7/2025 12:13 PM, Dawn Flood wrote:
On 1/7/2025 1:29 PM, Duane D La Motte wrote:
Just as we don't need a term to describe someone who doesn't believe in >>>>> astrology or "chakras" or unicorns or leprechauns.
https://www.facebook.com/17841451970413156/videos/1273599303760794/
Sorry, Dr. Harris, "your idea is dumb":
No, it's an excellent idea. I *am* an atheist, as others insist on calling >>> it, but I don't need to word to describe my thoughts.
No one suggested it's going to disappear. It still isn't needed and theistic
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/atheist
The word "atheist" is part of the English lexicon; it is *not* going to >>>> disappear.
christers are stupid (additionally stupid) for thinking they need it.
Most Christians are theists; those of us who are not are "a-theist".
Dawn
right and you believe in nothing
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 483 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 204:47:46 |
| Calls: | 9,602 |
| Calls today: | 3 |
| Files: | 13,682 |
| Messages: | 6,153,060 |