In article <j2DgP.381931$aTp4.312816@fx09.iad>, rudy@phil.hendrie.con
says...
On 1/11/2025 3:11 PM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
On 1/11/2025 3:00 PM, "pothole," chromosomally and anatomically male but not the least bit masculine, and who is deathly afraid of Rudy, lied:
Even "legal experts" on CNN are admitting the trial was a sham and Trump will
have the verdict
overturned.
Citation?
Forget it. "pothole," chromosomally and anatomically male but not the least bit
masculine, doesn't have any, because no one on CNN said that.
Many legal experts originally thought that Bragg's case was weak. Most
eventually changed their minds on that. "pothole," chromosomally and
anatomically male but not the least bit masculine, may feel that the *case* was
dodgy, but the trial itself absolutely was *not* a "sham." It was conducted >> impeccably and entirely according to law.
Who's [sic] law?
In article <vlv1r1$qk4p$3@dont-email.me>, j_carlson@gmx.com says...
On 1/11/2025 3:45 PM, pothead wrote:
On 2025-01-11, Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 1/11/2025 3:00 PM, pothead wrote:
Even "legal experts" on CNN are admitting the trial was a sham and Trump will have the verdict
overturned.
Citation?
I mixed up trials,
No, you fucking liar. There was only *one* criminal trial of the convicted felon
Trump. There was nothing with which to mix it up.
*No* "legal experts on CNN" said that the New York State trial against Trump was
a "sham." Some experts think the case was not very good, but the *trial* was >> impeccable. A jury found Trump guilty of felonies. Trump is going to *lose* his
appeals in New York State courts.
Like he cares.
In article <XnsB264D079D879F629555@185.151.15.190>, noemail@aol.com
says...
pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote in
news:vlunak$pja7$2@dont-email.me:
On 2025-01-11, Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 1/11/2025 11:01 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote in
news:vlu8rd$n21b$1@dont-email.me:
On 2025-01-11, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
In article <vltmts$jubq$2@dont-email.me>, OFeem1987@teleworm.us
says...
super70s wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
On 2025-01-11 01:56:18 +0000, Josh Rosenbluth said:
On 1/10/2025 5:02 PM, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote:
Who cares ?
He will just pardon himself eventually anyhow.
He can't because it is a state crime.
He's hoping his 5 asskissers on the SCOTUS will overturn it on >>>>>>>>> appeal, which could keep his felony conviction in the headlines >>>>>>>>> for years.
He's too stupid/egotistic just to move on.
Exactly.
He's used to what worked when he was a rapacious real estate
dealer... "any publicity is good publicity".
Yet it will be appealed and he's gonna be your daddy.
There is so many things wrong with this sham of a trial that the
toughest decision Trump's lawyers have to make is which one to
focus on for appeal.
Trump will most likely lose on appeal in NYS because the courts are >>>>>> far left leaning and the judges will protect Marchon at all costs. >>>>>> He will win if it reaches the SCOTUS though.
Trump will need to show violation
of the Constitution to get there. And
what was unconstititional about his trial?
Based on their filings so far, they will likely argue that some
evidence should not have been presented in conflict with the previous
SCOTUS immunity case (Trump v. United States).
Agreed.
Plus denial of due process and a judge who acted much like another
prosecutor on the case.
This has to be the only case where AG Bragg raises a misdemeanor to a
felony for a book keeping error. He is well known for being soft on
crime and lowering offenses from felonies to misdemeanors. Then of
course there is the specific underlying crime which "permitted" him to
do that.
Trump was unfairly prosecuted because he is Trump.
Trump was unfairly SENTENCED because he is Trump.
True.
Name any other defendant convicted of a felony
offense who walked out of court with no jail, no
prison, no fine and no probation.
Most get nothing but the judge changed the crime from misdemeanor to
felony.
Just one, any one.
Put their name right here:
Others doing the same and worse pay a fine and move on.
Not a felony.
Bingo. ALL others convicted of ANYTHING
have *some* punishment.
But not Trump.
Because they know it will never happen.
In article <vm12tb$1864s$1@dont-email.me>, joelcrump@gmail.com says...
On 1/12/2025 6:34 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Sat, 11 Jan 2025 07:52:53 -0800, Josh Rosenbluth
<noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 1/10/2025 11:37 PM, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote:
On 1/10/25 8:56 PM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
On 1/10/2025 5:02 PM, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote:
Who cares ?
He will just pardon himself eventually anyhow.
He can't because it is a state crime.
Some Wokie govs are suddenly buying red MAGA hats.
So don't bet on everything not being dismissed/disappeared.
While he may prevail on appeal (*), I will bet Trump will not be
pardoned for this crime.
(*) He will lose on appeal up to the highest NY court. SCOTUS will rule >>>> 5-4 with Roberts being the deciding vote (one way or the other - I'm not >>>> sure which way).
He WILL win on appeal since the case is a complete farce
He will *not* win on appeal in NY courts.
He now has the power to make it happen.
In article <cjWgP.82355$qu83.35506@fx35.iad>,He has no strings to pull with New York state.
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 1/12/2025 1:13 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <vm12tb$1864s$1@dont-email.me>, joelcrump@gmail.com says...
On 1/12/2025 6:34 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Sat, 11 Jan 2025 07:52:53 -0800, Josh Rosenbluth
<noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 1/10/2025 11:37 PM, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote:
On 1/10/25 8:56 PM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:While he may prevail on appeal (*), I will bet Trump will not be
On 1/10/2025 5:02 PM, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote:
Who cares ?
He will just pardon himself eventually anyhow.
He can't because it is a state crime.
Some Wokie govs are suddenly buying red MAGA hats.
So don't bet on everything not being dismissed/disappeared. >>>>>>
pardoned for this crime.
(*) He will lose on appeal up to the highest NY court. SCOTUS will rule >>>>>> 5-4 with Roberts being the deciding vote (one way or the other - I'm not >>>>>> sure which way).
He WILL win on appeal since the case is a complete farce
He will *not* win on appeal in NY courts.
He now has the power to make it happen.
He does not. He will have no power over state courts.
Don't you ever get tired of being wrong?
It's called pulling strings.
In article <sfZgP.33641$Hfb1.23863@fx46.iad>,
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 1/12/2025 1:53 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <cjWgP.82355$qu83.35506@fx35.iad>,He has no strings to pull with New York state.
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 1/12/2025 1:13 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <vm12tb$1864s$1@dont-email.me>, joelcrump@gmail.com says... >>>>>>
On 1/12/2025 6:34 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Sat, 11 Jan 2025 07:52:53 -0800, Josh Rosenbluth
<noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 1/10/2025 11:37 PM, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote:
On 1/10/25 8:56 PM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:While he may prevail on appeal (*), I will bet Trump will not be >>>>>>>> pardoned for this crime.
On 1/10/2025 5:02 PM, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote:
Who cares ?
He will just pardon himself eventually anyhow.
He can't because it is a state crime.
Some Wokie govs are suddenly buying red MAGA hats.
So don't bet on everything not being dismissed/disappeared. >>>>>>>>
(*) He will lose on appeal up to the highest NY court. SCOTUS will rule
5-4 with Roberts being the deciding vote (one way or the other - I'm not
sure which way).
He WILL win on appeal since the case is a complete farce
He will *not* win on appeal in NY courts.
He now has the power to make it happen.
He does not. He will have no power over state courts.
Don't you ever get tired of being wrong?
It's called pulling strings.
As president he has plenty.
In article <uKchP.134842$5c34.4813@fx47.iad>,
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 1/13/2025 6:06 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <sfZgP.33641$Hfb1.23863@fx46.iad>,
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 1/12/2025 1:53 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <cjWgP.82355$qu83.35506@fx35.iad>,He has no strings to pull with New York state.
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 1/12/2025 1:13 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <vm12tb$1864s$1@dont-email.me>, joelcrump@gmail.com says... >>>>>>>>
On 1/12/2025 6:34 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Sat, 11 Jan 2025 07:52:53 -0800, Josh Rosenbluth
<noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 1/10/2025 11:37 PM, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote:
On 1/10/25 8:56 PM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
On 1/10/2025 5:02 PM, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote:
Who cares ?
He will just pardon himself eventually anyhow.
He can't because it is a state crime.
Some Wokie govs are suddenly buying red MAGA hats. >>>>>>>>>>>
So don't bet on everything not being dismissed/disappeared.
While he may prevail on appeal (*), I will bet Trump will not be >>>>>>>>>> pardoned for this crime.
(*) He will lose on appeal up to the highest NY court. SCOTUS will rule
5-4 with Roberts being the deciding vote (one way or the other - I'm not
sure which way).
He WILL win on appeal since the case is a complete farce
He will *not* win on appeal in NY courts.
He now has the power to make it happen.
He does not. He will have no power over state courts.
Don't you ever get tired of being wrong?
It's called pulling strings.
As president he has plenty.
None. NY courts are not going to overturn his conviction because Trump threatens
to withhold highway funds. If he tries something stupid like that, federal >> courts will cut his little raisin nads off.
He will get what he wants.
In article <3ZWhP.185613$FOb4.74081@fx15.iad>,
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 1/15/2025 1:53 PM, pothead wrote:
On 2025-01-15, Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> wrote:
pothead wrote:
Interpreting the FEC code.
It is so complex that judges themselves have a difficult time understanding it.
In this case the expert witness is well known as the best in the business.
Defence counsel participates in jury instructions. Defence
counsels cannot bypass the judge. The defence counsel was allowed
to consult his expert when arguing instructions.
The judge limited what the expert could testify to.
*Properly*. Trump was not on trial for a FECA violation. Cohen had *already* >> pleaded guilty to a FECA violation, so there was no need for any FECA expert to
testify to "interpret" the law.
So defense decided it was not worth putting him on the stand and dealing with cross.
If they had put him on, the prosecution would have got an opportunity to call
their own expert. It was all a waste of time.
Either way, this will be overturned on appeal
Almost certainly not. Trump has no legitimate appealable issues.
but will probably happen after Trump's term in office.
Trump will not live out his term in office.
You just made the list.
Be aware.
In article <GIaiP.816692$oR74.44632@fx16.iad>,
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 1/16/2025 5:59 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <3ZWhP.185613$FOb4.74081@fx15.iad>,
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 1/15/2025 1:53 PM, pothead wrote:
On 2025-01-15, Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> wrote:
pothead wrote:
Interpreting the FEC code.
It is so complex that judges themselves have a difficult time understanding it.
In this case the expert witness is well known as the best in the business.
Defence counsel participates in jury instructions. Defence
counsels cannot bypass the judge. The defence counsel was allowed
to consult his expert when arguing instructions.
The judge limited what the expert could testify to.
*Properly*. Trump was not on trial for a FECA violation. Cohen had *already*
pleaded guilty to a FECA violation, so there was no need for any FECA expert to
testify to "interpret" the law.
So defense decided it was not worth putting him on the stand and dealing with cross.
If they had put him on, the prosecution would have got an opportunity to call
their own expert. It was all a waste of time.
Either way, this will be overturned on appeal
Almost certainly not. Trump has no legitimate appealable issues.
but will probably happen after Trump's term in office.
Trump will not live out his term in office.
You just made the list.
No list.
Be aware.
*Beware*, you illiterate fucknozzle, not "be aware."
No list, and you wouldn't know about one even if one existed...but no list >> exists. This is settled.
Keep thinking that.
In article <DEbiP.70625$oCrf.25932@fx33.iad>,
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 1/16/2025 9:07 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <GIaiP.816692$oR74.44632@fx16.iad>,
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 1/16/2025 5:59 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <3ZWhP.185613$FOb4.74081@fx15.iad>,
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 1/15/2025 1:53 PM, pothead wrote:
On 2025-01-15, Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> wrote:
pothead wrote:
Interpreting the FEC code.
It is so complex that judges themselves have a difficult time understanding it.
In this case the expert witness is well known as the best in the business.
Defence counsel participates in jury instructions. Defence
counsels cannot bypass the judge. The defence counsel was allowed >>>>>>>> to consult his expert when arguing instructions.
The judge limited what the expert could testify to.
*Properly*. Trump was not on trial for a FECA violation. Cohen had *already*
pleaded guilty to a FECA violation, so there was no need for any FECA expert to
testify to "interpret" the law.
So defense decided it was not worth putting him on the stand and dealing with cross.
If they had put him on, the prosecution would have got an opportunity to call
their own expert. It was all a waste of time.
Either way, this will be overturned on appeal
Almost certainly not. Trump has no legitimate appealable issues.
but will probably happen after Trump's term in office.
Trump will not live out his term in office.
You just made the list.
No list.
Be aware.
*Beware*, you illiterate fucknozzle, not "be aware."
No list, and you wouldn't know about one even if one existed...but no list >>>> exists. This is settled.
Keep thinking that.
<yawn> You've tried that gag before. It failed then, it fails now.
No list.
It's working just fine and
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 483 |
| Nodes: | 16 (3 / 13) |
| Uptime: | 183:42:33 |
| Calls: | 9,600 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 13,679 |
| Messages: | 6,151,259 |