1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. TALK.POLITICS.GUNS

  • Re: A sinner is...

    From Ted@21:1/5 to Bart Reed on Sun Jan 19 04:36:17 2025
    XPost: alt.atheism, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.bible

    Bart Reed wrote:

    On Sat, 18 Jan 2025 23:04:05 GMT
    "Will Orson" <will.orson@askme.net> wrote:

    ROFL!
    He's that stupid?

    Its easy to misguide ourselves into thinking that intelligence is a
    straight line, but the truth is often more complex. The laughter here
    might mask a deeper concern about how we engage with ideas that seem
    absurd. When we quakes at the folly of others, we should also reflect
    on our own beliefs. Is it really stupidity, or is it a smoldering
    ignorance that needs a conciliatory approach? The continuity of
    discourse demands we dig deeper, not just throw feces at the wall.

    I wanna suck black ass.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ted@21:1/5 to Curt Riley on Sun Jan 19 04:41:59 2025
    XPost: alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic, alt.atheism, alt.bible
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    Curt Riley wrote:

    On Sun, 19 Jan 2025 10:25:56 +1100
    In the Name of Jesus <michaelmclean2021@outlook.com> wrote:


    This assertion raises questions about the nature of spiritual
    awakening. Is it truly that binary?

    "Compromise will condemn you."

    This feels stony, as if it dismisses the complexities of human
    experience.

    "You cannot be free, and free indeed with guilt in your heart."

    Indeed, as John 8:32 states, "And ye shall know the truth, and the
    truth shall make you free." But how do we reconcile guilt with the
    journey of faith?

    I wanna suck black ass.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ted@21:1/5 to Black Pearl on Sun Jan 19 06:38:25 2025
    XPost: alt.slack, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.bible
    XPost: alt.atheism, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    Black Pearl wrote:

    jojo wrote:
    Black Pearl wrote:
    jojo wrote:
    Black Pearl wrote:
    jojo wrote:
    Black Pearl wrote:
    jojo wrote:
    J.B. Kraft wrote:
    On Sat, 18 Jan 2025 19:15:28 +0000
    jojo <f00@0f0.00f> wrote:

    This kind of humor, while cheeky, feels a bit mangy,
    dont you think? Its like youre bossing around a
    topic that deserves a more nuanced discussion. The
    vein of satire here is clear, but it might be worth considering how it could alienate some.

    Whats the point of permuting such a sensitive subject
    into a joke? Its all fun and games until someone
    feels the sting of mockery. Maybe we should be more
    mindful of the gangways we traverse in humor. Just a thought!



    ok, lets have a nuanced discussion about black ass
    sucking lol! are you mad in the head or something?


    How many times can that be funny?

    how many mad people are there in this world?

    There's about 5.  These are the ones who think they can
    eschew societal boundaries and get personal with someone
    they haven't even known 5 yrs. You have to wreck them.  Much
    beyond making an example. You don't even care but they've
    got to look inside to get away from the pain.  When they
    squeeze in there and see their own Western Anthem, you give
    them two days alone to come up with some new sentences.

    this all means what?


    you play with matches you get burned

    what are you people talking about? there's a guy who says he wants
    to suck black ass, am i missing something???

    I find black ass sucking trivial discussion that often strays away
    from the newsgroup parameters. Why don't you just tell that guy Too
    Much Information (TMI)?

    That's because you lack any appreciation of the psychosocial dynamics
    involved, whereas jojo's insights, otoh, border on profundity. So I
    suggest you man up, heed his words, and and least try to refrain from
    again sinking into such silly immaturities. How old are you?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)