This is not going to go over well with the elite in Malibu and such.
Good.
They continue to elect far left politicians so now they can suffer. <https://justthenews.com/nation/states/center-square/los-angeles-law-pacific-palisades-rebuilding-must-include-low-income>
'housing and land use experts say a Los Angeles city law could require
the Pacific Palisades to include “affordable” housing to replace older buildings, and for new buildings where owners cannot definitively prove
that their rental apartments had no low-income renters in the past five years.
The new Resident Protections Ordinance taking effect soon requires that
“In Higher Opportunity Areas and Moderate Opportunity Areas, units
deemed or presumed to be occupied by persons or families above the lower income category shall be replaced with low income units.” The RPO
applies to units “subject to a form of rent or price control through a local government’s valid exercise of its police power.”
In the city of Los Angeles, which includes the Pacific Palisades — a “High Opportunity Area" — all apartment buildings built before October 1978 are subject to the city’s rent control ordinance, which means all units in such buildings would need to be replaced with units
“affordable” to lower-income renters even if the existing tenants were high income.
On 1/30/2025 11:30 AM, John Smyth wrote:
This is not going to go over well with the elite in Malibu and such.
Good.
They continue to elect far left politicians so now they can suffer.
<https://justthenews.com/nation/states/center-square/los-angeles-law-pacific-palisades-rebuilding-must-include-low-income>
'housing and land use experts say a Los Angeles city law could require
the Pacific Palisades to include “affordable” housing to replace older >> buildings, and for new buildings where owners cannot definitively prove
that their rental apartments had no low-income renters in the past five
years.
The new Resident Protections Ordinance taking effect soon requires that
“In Higher Opportunity Areas and Moderate Opportunity Areas, units
deemed or presumed to be occupied by persons or families above the lower
income category shall be replaced with low income units.” The RPO
applies to units “subject to a form of rent or price control through a
local government’s valid exercise of its police power.”
In the city of Los Angeles, which includes the Pacific Palisades — a
“High Opportunity Area" — all apartment buildings built before October >> 1978 are subject to the city’s rent control ordinance, which means all
units in such buildings would need to be replaced with units
“affordable” to lower-income renters even if the existing tenants were >> high income.
Let's see how fat-assed Karen Bass deals with that. There is a reason
people do NOT want low income housing in their neighborhoods.
Let's see how fat-assed Karen Bass deals with that. There is a reasonThe legislation will quietly be amended or repealed.
people do NOT want low income housing in their neighborhoods.
That's how the elite operate.
Rules for thee but not for me.
On 2025-01-31, Eric Sean <ericsean@infiniti.net> wrote:
On 1/30/2025 11:30 AM, John Smyth wrote:
This is not going to go over well with the elite in Malibu and such.
Good.
They continue to elect far left politicians so now they can suffer.
<https://justthenews.com/nation/states/center-square/los-angeles-law-
pacific-palisades-rebuilding-must-include-low-income>
'housing and land use experts say a Los Angeles city law could
require the Pacific Palisades to include “affordable” housing to
replace older buildings, and for new buildings where owners cannot
definitively prove that their rental apartments had no low-income
renters in the past five years.
The new Resident Protections Ordinance taking effect soon requires
that “In Higher Opportunity Areas and Moderate Opportunity Areas,
units deemed or presumed to be occupied by persons or families above
the lower income category shall be replaced with low income
units.” The RPO applies to units “subject to a form of rent or
price control through a local government’s valid exercise of its
police power.”
In the city of Los Angeles, which includes the Pacific Palisades —
a “High Opportunity Area" — all apartment buildings built before
October 1978 are subject to the city’s rent control ordinance,
which means all units in such buildings would need to be replaced
with units “affordable” to lower-income renters even if the
existing tenants were high income.
Let's see how fat-assed Karen Bass deals with that. There is a
reason people do NOT want low income housing in their neighborhoods.
The legislation will quietly be amended or repealed.
That's how the elite operate.
Rules for thee but not for me.
On 31 Jan 2025, pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> posted some news:vnin69$3h02b$13@dont-email.me:
On 2025-01-31, Eric Sean <ericsean@infiniti.net> wrote:
On 1/30/2025 11:30 AM, John Smyth wrote:
This is not going to go over well with the elite in Malibu and such.
Good.
They continue to elect far left politicians so now they can suffer.
<https://justthenews.com/nation/states/center-square/los-angeles-law-
pacific-palisades-rebuilding-must-include-low-income>
'housing and land use experts say a Los Angeles city law could
require the Pacific Palisades to include “affordable” housing to
replace older buildings, and for new buildings where owners cannot
definitively prove that their rental apartments had no low-income
renters in the past five years.
The new Resident Protections Ordinance taking effect soon requires
that “In Higher Opportunity Areas and Moderate Opportunity Areas,
units deemed or presumed to be occupied by persons or families above
the lower income category shall be replaced with low income
units.” The RPO applies to units “subject to a form of rent or
price control through a local government’s valid exercise of its
police power.”
In the city of Los Angeles, which includes the Pacific Palisades —
a “High Opportunity Area" — all apartment buildings built before
October 1978 are subject to the city’s rent control ordinance,
which means all units in such buildings would need to be replaced
with units “affordable” to lower-income renters even if the
existing tenants were high income.
Let's see how fat-assed Karen Bass deals with that. There is a
reason people do NOT want low income housing in their neighborhoods.
The legislation will quietly be amended or repealed.
That's how the elite operate.
Rules for thee but not for me.
Exactly. It was okay for developers to build houses in Porter Ranch
starting in the mid 1960s. The fact that there was an oil field and gas storage there since 1938 didn't matter when a well built in 1958 blew
out in 2015. Then all of a sudden, it was the gas company's fault - not
the city, pols, developers, or coastal commission.
pothead wrote:
Let's see how fat-assed Karen Bass deals with that. There is a reasonThe legislation will quietly be amended or repealed.
people do NOT want low income housing in their neighborhoods.
That's how the elite operate.
Rules for thee but not for me.
You are bloviating on a subject you have no knowledge. You are
such a tool.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 483 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 13:23:26 |
| Calls: | 9,616 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 13,692 |
| Messages: | 6,156,192 |