• Why all Brits (and Canadians and Australians and Kiwis) say Trump is a

    From Rudy Canoza@21:1/5 to All on Sun Feb 2 20:37:43 2025
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.society.liberalism, alt.atheism
    XPost: alt.fun, alt.politics.democrats.d

    Someone asked "Why do some British people not like Donald Trump?"

    Nate White, an articulate and witty writer from England, wrote this magnificent response:

    "A few things spring to mind.
    Trump lacks certain qualities which the British traditionally esteem.
    For instance, he has no class, no charm, no coolness, no credibility, no compassion, no wit, no warmth, no wisdom, no subtlety, no sensitivity, no self-awareness, no humility, no honour and no grace - all qualities, funnily enough, with which his predecessor Mr. Obama was generously blessed.

    So for us, the stark contrast does rather throw Trump’s limitations into embarrassingly sharp relief.

    Plus, we like a laugh. And while Trump may be laughable, he has never once said anything wry, witty or even faintly amusing - not once, ever.

    I don’t say that rhetorically, I mean it quite literally: not once, not ever. And that fact is particularly disturbing to the British sensibility - for us, to
    lack humour is almost inhuman.

    But with Trump, it’s a fact. He doesn’t even seem to understand what a joke is -
    his idea of a joke is a crass comment, an illiterate insult, a casual act of cruelty.

    Trump is a troll. And like all trolls, he is never funny and he never laughs; he
    only crows or jeers.

    And scarily, he doesn’t just talk in crude, witless insults - he actually thinks
    in them. His mind is a simple bot-like algorithm of petty prejudices and knee-jerk nastiness.

    There is never any under-layer of irony, complexity, nuance or depth. It’s all
    surface.

    Some Americans might see this as refreshingly upfront.

    Well, we don’t. We see it as having no inner world, no soul.

    And in Britain we traditionally side with David, not Goliath. All our heroes are
    plucky underdogs: Robin Hood, Dick Whittington, Oliver Twist.

    Trump is neither plucky, nor an underdog. He is the exact opposite of that. He’s not even a spoiled rich-boy, or a greedy fat-cat.

    He’s more a fat white slug. A Jabba the Hutt of privilege.

    And worse, he is that most unforgivable of all things to the British: a bully. That is, except when he is among bullies; then he suddenly transforms into a snivelling sidekick instead.

    There are unspoken rules to this stuff - the Queensberry rules of basic decency - and he breaks them all. He punches downwards - which a gentleman should, would, could never do - and every blow he aims is below the belt. He particularly likes to kick the vulnerable or voiceless - and he kicks them when they are down.

    So the fact that a significant minority - perhaps a third - of Americans look at
    what he does, listen to what he says, and then think 'Yeah, he seems like my kind of guy’ is a matter of some confusion and no little distress to British people, given that:

    * Americans are supposed to be nicer than us, and mostly are.
    * You don't need a particularly keen eye for detail to spot a few flaws in the man.

    This last point is what especially confuses and dismays British people, and many
    other people too; his faults seem pretty bloody hard to miss.

    After all, it’s impossible to read a single tweet, or hear him speak a sentence
    or two, without staring deep into the abyss. He turns being artless into an art form; he is a Picasso of pettiness; a Shakespeare of shit. His faults are fractal: even his flaws have flaws, and so on ad infinitum.

    God knows there have always been stupid people in the world, and plenty of nasty
    people too. But rarely has stupidity been so nasty, or nastiness so stupid.

    He makes Nixon look trustworthy and George W look smart.

    In fact, if Frankenstein decided to make a monster assembled entirely from human
    flaws - he would make a Trump.

    And a remorseful Doctor Frankenstein would clutch out big clumpfuls of hair and scream in anguish:

    'My God… what… have… I… created?

    If being a twat was a TV show, Trump would be the boxed set."



    Trump is filth. This is settled.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ted@21:1/5 to Rudy Canoza on Tue Feb 4 04:41:21 2025
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.society.liberalism, alt.atheism
    XPost: alt.fun, alt.politics.democrats.d

    Rudy Canoza wrote:

    Someone asked "Why do some British people not like Donald Trump?"

    Nate White, an articulate and witty writer from England, wrote this magnificent response:

    "A few things spring to mind.
    Trump lacks certain qualities which the British traditionally esteem.
    For instance, he has no class, no charm, no coolness, no credibility,
    no compassion, no wit, no warmth, no wisdom, no subtlety, no
    sensitivity, no self-awareness, no humility, no honour and no grace -
    all qualities, funnily enough, with which his predecessor Mr. Obama
    was generously blessed.

    So for us, the stark contrast does rather throw Trump’s limitations
    into embarrassingly sharp relief.

    Plus, we like a laugh. And while Trump may be laughable, he has never
    once said anything wry, witty or even faintly amusing - not once,
    ever.

    I don’t say that rhetorically, I mean it quite literally: not once,
    not ever. And that fact is particularly disturbing to the British
    sensibility - for us, to lack humour is almost inhuman.

    But with Trump, it’s a fact. He doesn’t even seem to understand what
    a joke is - his idea of a joke is a crass comment, an illiterate
    insult, a casual act of cruelty.

    Trump is a troll. And like all trolls, he is never funny and he never
    laughs; he only crows or jeers.

    And scarily, he doesn’t just talk in crude, witless insults - he
    actually thinks in them. His mind is a simple bot-like algorithm of
    petty prejudices and knee-jerk nastiness.

    There is never any under-layer of irony, complexity, nuance or depth.
    It’s all surface.

    Some Americans might see this as refreshingly upfront.

    Well, we don’t. We see it as having no inner world, no soul.

    And in Britain we traditionally side with David, not Goliath. All our
    heroes are plucky underdogs: Robin Hood, Dick Whittington, Oliver
    Twist.

    Trump is neither plucky, nor an underdog. He is the exact opposite of
    that. He’s not even a spoiled rich-boy, or a greedy fat-cat.

    He’s more a fat white slug. A Jabba the Hutt of privilege.

    And worse, he is that most unforgivable of all things to the British:
    a bully. That is, except when he is among bullies; then he suddenly transforms into a snivelling sidekick instead.

    There are unspoken rules to this stuff - the Queensberry rules of
    basic decency - and he breaks them all. He punches downwards - which
    a gentleman should, would, could never do - and every blow he aims is
    below the belt. He particularly likes to kick the vulnerable or
    voiceless - and he kicks them when they are down.

    So the fact that a significant minority - perhaps a third - of
    Americans look at what he does, listen to what he says, and then
    think 'Yeah, he seems like my kind of guy’ is a matter of some
    confusion and no little distress to British people, given that:

    * Americans are supposed to be nicer than us, and mostly are.
    * You don't need a particularly keen eye for detail to spot a few
    flaws in the man.

    This last point is what especially confuses and dismays British
    people, and many other people too; his faults seem pretty bloody hard
    to miss.

    After all, it’s impossible to read a single tweet, or hear him speak
    a sentence or two, without staring deep into the abyss. He turns
    being artless into an art form; he is a Picasso of pettiness; a
    Shakespeare of shit. His faults are fractal: even his flaws have
    flaws, and so on ad infinitum.

    God knows there have always been stupid people in the world, and
    plenty of nasty people too. But rarely has stupidity been so nasty,
    or nastiness so stupid.

    He makes Nixon look trustworthy and George W look smart.

    In fact, if Frankenstein decided to make a monster assembled entirely
    from human flaws - he would make a Trump.

    And a remorseful Doctor Frankenstein would clutch out big clumpfuls
    of hair and scream in anguish:

    'My God… what… have… I… created?

    If being a twat was a TV show, Trump would be the boxed set."



    Trump is filth. This is settled.

    I wanna suck black ass.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bud Frawley@21:1/5 to Ted on Mon Feb 3 21:26:27 2025
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.society.liberalism, alt.atheism
    XPost: alt.fun, alt.politics.democrats.d

    On 2/3/2025 8:41 PM, Ted wrote:
    Rudy Canoza wrote:

    Someone asked "Why do some British people not like Donald Trump?"

    Nate White, an articulate and witty writer from England, wrote this
    magnificent response:

    "A few things spring to mind.
    Trump lacks certain qualities which the British traditionally esteem.
    For instance, he has no class, no charm, no coolness, no credibility,
    no compassion, no wit, no warmth, no wisdom, no subtlety, no
    sensitivity, no self-awareness, no humility, no honour and no grace -
    all qualities, funnily enough, with which his predecessor Mr. Obama
    was generously blessed.

    So for us, the stark contrast does rather throw Trump’s limitations
    into embarrassingly sharp relief.

    Plus, we like a laugh. And while Trump may be laughable, he has never
    once said anything wry, witty or even faintly amusing - not once,
    ever.

    I don’t say that rhetorically, I mean it quite literally: not once,
    not ever. And that fact is particularly disturbing to the British
    sensibility - for us, to lack humour is almost inhuman.

    But with Trump, it’s a fact. He doesn’t even seem to understand what
    a joke is - his idea of a joke is a crass comment, an illiterate
    insult, a casual act of cruelty.

    Trump is a troll. And like all trolls, he is never funny and he never
    laughs; he only crows or jeers.

    And scarily, he doesn’t just talk in crude, witless insults - he
    actually thinks in them. His mind is a simple bot-like algorithm of
    petty prejudices and knee-jerk nastiness.

    There is never any under-layer of irony, complexity, nuance or depth.
    It’s all surface.

    Some Americans might see this as refreshingly upfront.

    Well, we don’t. We see it as having no inner world, no soul.

    And in Britain we traditionally side with David, not Goliath. All our
    heroes are plucky underdogs: Robin Hood, Dick Whittington, Oliver
    Twist.

    Trump is neither plucky, nor an underdog. He is the exact opposite of
    that. He’s not even a spoiled rich-boy, or a greedy fat-cat.

    He’s more a fat white slug. A Jabba the Hutt of privilege.

    And worse, he is that most unforgivable of all things to the British:
    a bully. That is, except when he is among bullies; then he suddenly
    transforms into a snivelling sidekick instead.

    There are unspoken rules to this stuff - the Queensberry rules of
    basic decency - and he breaks them all. He punches downwards - which
    a gentleman should, would, could never do - and every blow he aims is
    below the belt. He particularly likes to kick the vulnerable or
    voiceless - and he kicks them when they are down.

    So the fact that a significant minority - perhaps a third - of
    Americans look at what he does, listen to what he says, and then
    think 'Yeah, he seems like my kind of guy’ is a matter of some
    confusion and no little distress to British people, given that:

    * Americans are supposed to be nicer than us, and mostly are.
    * You don't need a particularly keen eye for detail to spot a few
    flaws in the man.

    This last point is what especially confuses and dismays British
    people, and many other people too; his faults seem pretty bloody hard
    to miss.

    After all, it’s impossible to read a single tweet, or hear him speak
    a sentence or two, without staring deep into the abyss. He turns
    being artless into an art form; he is a Picasso of pettiness; a
    Shakespeare of shit. His faults are fractal: even his flaws have
    flaws, and so on ad infinitum.

    God knows there have always been stupid people in the world, and
    plenty of nasty people too. But rarely has stupidity been so nasty,
    or nastiness so stupid.

    He makes Nixon look trustworthy and George W look smart.

    In fact, if Frankenstein decided to make a monster assembled entirely
    from human flaws - he would make a Trump.

    And a remorseful Doctor Frankenstein would clutch out big clumpfuls
    of hair and scream in anguish:

    'My God… what… have… I… created?

    If being a twat was a TV show, Trump would be the boxed set."



    Trump is filth. This is settled.

    I wanna suck black ass.

    Well, that just stands to reason.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From bud@21:1/5 to Bud Frawley on Tue Feb 4 07:34:29 2025
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.society.liberalism, alt.atheism
    XPost: alt.fun, alt.politics.democrats.d

    Bud Frawley wrote:

    On 2/3/2025 8:41 PM, Ted wrote:
    Rudy Canoza wrote:

    Someone asked "Why do some British people not like Donald Trump?"

    Nate White, an articulate and witty writer from England, wrote
    this magnificent response:

    "A few things spring to mind.
    Trump lacks certain qualities which the British traditionally
    esteem. For instance, he has no class, no charm, no coolness, no credibility, no compassion, no wit, no warmth, no wisdom, no
    subtlety, no sensitivity, no self-awareness, no humility, no
    honour and no grace - all qualities, funnily enough, with which
    his predecessor Mr. Obama was generously blessed.

    So for us, the stark contrast does rather throw Trump’s
    limitations into embarrassingly sharp relief.

    Plus, we like a laugh. And while Trump may be laughable, he has
    never once said anything wry, witty or even faintly amusing - not
    once, ever.

    I don’t say that rhetorically, I mean it quite literally: not
    once, not ever. And that fact is particularly disturbing to the
    British sensibility - for us, to lack humour is almost inhuman.

    But with Trump, it’s a fact. He doesn’t even seem to understand
    what a joke is - his idea of a joke is a crass comment, an
    illiterate insult, a casual act of cruelty.

    Trump is a troll. And like all trolls, he is never funny and he
    never laughs; he only crows or jeers.

    And scarily, he doesn’t just talk in crude, witless insults - he actually thinks in them. His mind is a simple bot-like algorithm
    of petty prejudices and knee-jerk nastiness.

    There is never any under-layer of irony, complexity, nuance or
    depth. It’s all surface.

    Some Americans might see this as refreshingly upfront.

    Well, we don’t. We see it as having no inner world, no soul.

    And in Britain we traditionally side with David, not Goliath. All
    our heroes are plucky underdogs: Robin Hood, Dick Whittington,
    Oliver Twist.

    Trump is neither plucky, nor an underdog. He is the exact
    opposite of that. He’s not even a spoiled rich-boy, or a greedy fat-cat.

    He’s more a fat white slug. A Jabba the Hutt of privilege.

    And worse, he is that most unforgivable of all things to the
    British: a bully. That is, except when he is among bullies;
    then he suddenly transforms into a snivelling sidekick instead.

    There are unspoken rules to this stuff - the Queensberry rules of
    basic decency - and he breaks them all. He punches downwards -
    which a gentleman should, would, could never do - and every blow
    he aims is below the belt. He particularly likes to kick the
    vulnerable or voiceless - and he kicks them when they are down.

    So the fact that a significant minority - perhaps a third - of
    Americans look at what he does, listen to what he says, and then
    think 'Yeah, he seems like my kind of guy’ is a matter of some confusion and no little distress to British people, given that:

    * Americans are supposed to be nicer than us, and mostly are.
    * You don't need a particularly keen eye for detail to spot a few
    flaws in the man.

    This last point is what especially confuses and dismays British
    people, and many other people too; his faults seem pretty bloody
    hard to miss.

    After all, it’s impossible to read a single tweet, or hear him
    speak a sentence or two, without staring deep into the abyss. He
    turns being artless into an art form; he is a Picasso of
    pettiness; a Shakespeare of shit. His faults are fractal: even
    his flaws have flaws, and so on ad infinitum.

    God knows there have always been stupid people in the world, and
    plenty of nasty people too. But rarely has stupidity been so
    nasty, or nastiness so stupid.

    He makes Nixon look trustworthy and George W look smart.

    In fact, if Frankenstein decided to make a monster assembled
    entirely from human flaws - he would make a Trump.

    And a remorseful Doctor Frankenstein would clutch out big
    clumpfuls of hair and scream in anguish:

    'My God… what… have… I… created?

    If being a twat was a TV show, Trump would be the boxed set."



    Trump is filth. This is settled.

    I wanna suck black ass.

    Well, that just stands to reason.

    Yes it does. Black ass suckers can be found in every aspect of society, including different professions, social classes, educational levels,
    and backgrounds, essentially meaning that sucking black ass is not
    limited to any specific group or lifestyle; black ass suckers exist
    across the entire spectrum of human experience.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From scumquats@21:1/5 to All on Tue Feb 4 09:37:15 2025
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.society.liberalism, alt.atheism
    XPost: alt.fun, alt.politics.democrats.d

    On 03 Feb 2025, "bud" <suck@black.ass> posted some news:1820f10732f3c87e$173908$292657$28dd226e@news.thecubenet.com:

    Bud Frawley wrote:

    On 2/3/2025 8:41 PM, Ted wrote:
    Rudy Canoza wrote:

    Someone asked "Why do some British people not like Donald Trump?"

    Nate White, an articulate and witty writer from England, wrote
    this magnificent response:

    "A few things spring to mind.
    Trump lacks certain qualities which the British traditionally
    esteem. For instance, he has no class, no charm, no coolness, no
    credibility, no compassion, no wit, no warmth, no wisdom, no
    subtlety, no sensitivity, no self-awareness, no humility, no
    honour and no grace - all qualities, funnily enough, with which
    his predecessor Mr. Obama was generously blessed.

    So for us, the stark contrast does rather throw Trump’s
    limitations into embarrassingly sharp relief.

    Plus, we like a laugh. And while Trump may be laughable, he has
    never once said anything wry, witty or even faintly amusing - not
    once, ever.

    I don’t say that rhetorically, I mean it quite literally: not
    once, not ever. And that fact is particularly disturbing to the
    British sensibility - for us, to lack humour is almost inhuman.

    But with Trump, it’s a fact. He doesn’t even seem to understand
    what a joke is - his idea of a joke is a crass comment, an
    illiterate insult, a casual act of cruelty.

    Trump is a troll. And like all trolls, he is never funny and he
    never laughs; he only crows or jeers.

    And scarily, he doesn’t just talk in crude, witless insults - he
    actually thinks in them. His mind is a simple bot-like algorithm
    of petty prejudices and knee-jerk nastiness.

    There is never any under-layer of irony, complexity, nuance or
    depth. It’s all surface.

    Some Americans might see this as refreshingly upfront.

    Well, we don’t. We see it as having no inner world, no soul.

    And in Britain we traditionally side with David, not Goliath. All
    our heroes are plucky underdogs: Robin Hood, Dick Whittington,
    Oliver Twist.

    Trump is neither plucky, nor an underdog. He is the exact
    opposite of that. He’s not even a spoiled rich-boy, or a greedy
    fat-cat.

    He’s more a fat white slug. A Jabba the Hutt of privilege.

    And worse, he is that most unforgivable of all things to the
    British: a bully. That is, except when he is among bullies;
    then he suddenly transforms into a snivelling sidekick instead.

    There are unspoken rules to this stuff - the Queensberry rules of
    basic decency - and he breaks them all. He punches downwards -
    which a gentleman should, would, could never do - and every blow
    he aims is below the belt. He particularly likes to kick the
    vulnerable or voiceless - and he kicks them when they are down.

    So the fact that a significant minority - perhaps a third - of
    Americans look at what he does, listen to what he says, and then
    think 'Yeah, he seems like my kind of guy’ is a matter of some
    confusion and no little distress to British people, given that:

    * Americans are supposed to be nicer than us, and mostly are.
    * You don't need a particularly keen eye for detail to spot a few
    flaws in the man.

    This last point is what especially confuses and dismays British
    people, and many other people too; his faults seem pretty bloody
    hard to miss.

    After all, it’s impossible to read a single tweet, or hear him
    speak a sentence or two, without staring deep into the abyss. He
    turns being artless into an art form; he is a Picasso of
    pettiness; a Shakespeare of shit. His faults are fractal: even
    his flaws have flaws, and so on ad infinitum.

    God knows there have always been stupid people in the world, and
    plenty of nasty people too. But rarely has stupidity been so
    nasty, or nastiness so stupid.

    He makes Nixon look trustworthy and George W look smart.

    In fact, if Frankenstein decided to make a monster assembled
    entirely from human flaws - he would make a Trump.

    And a remorseful Doctor Frankenstein would clutch out big
    clumpfuls of hair and scream in anguish:

    'My God… what… have… I… created?

    If being a twat was a TV show, Trump would be the boxed set."



    Trump is filth. This is settled.

    I wanna suck black ass.

    Well, that just stands to reason.

    Yes it does. Black ass suckers can be found in every aspect of society, including different professions, social classes, educational levels,
    and backgrounds, essentially meaning that sucking black ass is not
    limited to any specific group or lifestyle; black ass suckers exist
    across the entire spectrum of human experience.

    https://web.archive.org/web/20051031041807fw_/http://www.resist.com/CARTOO N%20GALLERY/NIGGERS/nig_image29.jpg

    https://web.archive.org/web/20051031041525fw_/http://www.resist.com/CARTOO N%20GALLERY/NIGGERS/nig_image13.jpg

    https://web.archive.org/web/20051031042555fw_/http://www.resist.com/CARTOO N%20GALLERY/NIGGERS/nig_image20.jpg

    Enjoy!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ted@21:1/5 to bud on Tue Feb 4 09:56:42 2025
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.society.liberalism, alt.atheism
    XPost: alt.fun, alt.politics.democrats.d

    bud wrote:

    Bud Frawley wrote:

    On 2/3/2025 8:41 PM, Ted wrote:
    Rudy Canoza wrote:

    Someone asked "Why do some British people not like Donald
    Trump?"

    Nate White, an articulate and witty writer from England, wrote
    this magnificent response:

    "A few things spring to mind.
    Trump lacks certain qualities which the British traditionally
    esteem. For instance, he has no class, no charm, no coolness,
    no credibility, no compassion, no wit, no warmth, no wisdom, no subtlety, no sensitivity, no self-awareness, no humility, no
    honour and no grace - all qualities, funnily enough, with which
    his predecessor Mr. Obama was generously blessed.

    So for us, the stark contrast does rather throw Trump’s
    limitations into embarrassingly sharp relief.

    Plus, we like a laugh. And while Trump may be laughable, he has
    never once said anything wry, witty or even faintly amusing -
    not once, ever.

    I don’t say that rhetorically, I mean it quite literally: not
    once, not ever. And that fact is particularly disturbing to the
    British sensibility - for us, to lack humour is almost inhuman.

    But with Trump, it’s a fact. He doesn’t even seem to understand what a joke is - his idea of a joke is a crass comment, an
    illiterate insult, a casual act of cruelty.

    Trump is a troll. And like all trolls, he is never funny and he
    never laughs; he only crows or jeers.

    And scarily, he doesn’t just talk in crude, witless insults - he actually thinks in them. His mind is a simple bot-like algorithm
    of petty prejudices and knee-jerk nastiness.

    There is never any under-layer of irony, complexity, nuance or
    depth. It’s all surface.

    Some Americans might see this as refreshingly upfront.

    Well, we don’t. We see it as having no inner world, no soul.

    And in Britain we traditionally side with David, not Goliath.
    All our heroes are plucky underdogs: Robin Hood, Dick
    Whittington, Oliver Twist.

    Trump is neither plucky, nor an underdog. He is the exact
    opposite of that. He’s not even a spoiled rich-boy, or a greedy fat-cat.

    He’s more a fat white slug. A Jabba the Hutt of privilege.

    And worse, he is that most unforgivable of all things to the
    British: a bully. That is, except when he is among bullies;
    then he suddenly transforms into a snivelling sidekick instead.

    There are unspoken rules to this stuff - the Queensberry rules
    of basic decency - and he breaks them all. He punches downwards
    - which a gentleman should, would, could never do - and every
    blow he aims is below the belt. He particularly likes to kick
    the vulnerable or voiceless - and he kicks them when they are
    down.

    So the fact that a significant minority - perhaps a third - of Americans look at what he does, listen to what he says, and then
    think 'Yeah, he seems like my kind of guy’ is a matter of some confusion and no little distress to British people, given that:

    * Americans are supposed to be nicer than us, and mostly are.
    * You don't need a particularly keen eye for detail to spot a
    few flaws in the man.

    This last point is what especially confuses and dismays British
    people, and many other people too; his faults seem pretty bloody
    hard to miss.

    After all, it’s impossible to read a single tweet, or hear him
    speak a sentence or two, without staring deep into the abyss. He
    turns being artless into an art form; he is a Picasso of
    pettiness; a Shakespeare of shit. His faults are fractal: even
    his flaws have flaws, and so on ad infinitum.

    God knows there have always been stupid people in the world, and
    plenty of nasty people too. But rarely has stupidity been so
    nasty, or nastiness so stupid.

    He makes Nixon look trustworthy and George W look smart.

    In fact, if Frankenstein decided to make a monster assembled
    entirely from human flaws - he would make a Trump.

    And a remorseful Doctor Frankenstein would clutch out big
    clumpfuls of hair and scream in anguish:

    'My God… what… have… I… created?

    If being a twat was a TV show, Trump would be the boxed set."



    Trump is filth. This is settled.

    I wanna suck black ass.

    Well, that just stands to reason.

    Yes it does. Black ass suckers can be found in every aspect of
    society, including different professions, social classes, educational
    levels, and backgrounds, essentially meaning that sucking black ass
    is not limited to any specific group or lifestyle; black ass suckers
    exist across the entire spectrum of human experience.

    Exactly, Bud, thank you. We're everywhere. And we need to make it well
    known that we wanna suck black ass.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Malte Runz@21:1/5 to All on Tue Feb 4 11:49:15 2025
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.society.liberalism, alt.atheism
    XPost: alt.fun, alt.politics.democrats.d

    On Sun, 2 Feb 2025 20:37:43 -0800, Rudy Canoza <rudy@phil.hendrie.con>
    wrote:

    Someone asked "Why do some British people not like Donald Trump?"

    Nate White, an articulate and witty writer from England, wrote this magnificent
    response:

    "A few things spring to mind.
    Trump lacks certain qualities which the British traditionally esteem.
    For instance, he has no class, no charm, no coolness, no credibility, no >compassion, no wit, no warmth, no wisdom, no subtlety, no sensitivity, no >self-awareness, no humility, no honour and no grace - all qualities, funnily >enough, with which his predecessor Mr. Obama was generously blessed.

    So for us, the stark contrast does rather throw Trump’s limitations into >embarrassingly sharp relief.

    Plus, we like a laugh. And while Trump may be laughable, he has never once said
    anything wry, witty or even faintly amusing - not once, ever.

    I don’t say that rhetorically, I mean it quite literally: not once, not ever. >And that fact is particularly disturbing to the British sensibility - for us, to
    lack humour is almost inhuman.

    But with Trump, it’s a fact. He doesn’t even seem to understand what a joke is -
    his idea of a joke is a crass comment, an illiterate insult, a casual act of >cruelty.

    Trump is a troll. And like all trolls, he is never funny and he never laughs; he
    only crows or jeers.

    And scarily, he doesn’t just talk in crude, witless insults - he actually thinks
    in them. His mind is a simple bot-like algorithm of petty prejudices and >knee-jerk nastiness.

    There is never any under-layer of irony, complexity, nuance or depth. It’s all >surface.

    Some Americans might see this as refreshingly upfront.

    Well, we don’t. We see it as having no inner world, no soul.

    And in Britain we traditionally side with David, not Goliath. All our heroes are
    plucky underdogs: Robin Hood, Dick Whittington, Oliver Twist.

    Trump is neither plucky, nor an underdog. He is the exact opposite of that. >He’s not even a spoiled rich-boy, or a greedy fat-cat.

    He’s more a fat white slug. A Jabba the Hutt of privilege.

    And worse, he is that most unforgivable of all things to the British: a bully. >That is, except when he is among bullies; then he suddenly transforms into a >snivelling sidekick instead.

    There are unspoken rules to this stuff - the Queensberry rules of basic decency
    - and he breaks them all. He punches downwards - which a gentleman should, >would, could never do - and every blow he aims is below the belt. He >particularly likes to kick the vulnerable or voiceless - and he kicks them when
    they are down.

    So the fact that a significant minority - perhaps a third - of Americans look at
    what he does, listen to what he says, and then think 'Yeah, he seems like my >kind of guy’ is a matter of some confusion and no little distress to British >people, given that:

    * Americans are supposed to be nicer than us, and mostly are.
    * You don't need a particularly keen eye for detail to spot a few flaws in the man.

    This last point is what especially confuses and dismays British people, and many
    other people too; his faults seem pretty bloody hard to miss.

    After all, it’s impossible to read a single tweet, or hear him speak a sentence
    or two, without staring deep into the abyss. He turns being artless into an art
    form; he is a Picasso of pettiness; a Shakespeare of shit. His faults are >fractal: even his flaws have flaws, and so on ad infinitum.

    God knows there have always been stupid people in the world, and plenty of nasty
    people too. But rarely has stupidity been so nasty, or nastiness so stupid.

    He makes Nixon look trustworthy and George W look smart.

    In fact, if Frankenstein decided to make a monster assembled entirely from human
    flaws - he would make a Trump.

    And a remorseful Doctor Frankenstein would clutch out big clumpfuls of hair and
    scream in anguish:

    'My God… what… have… I… created?

    If being a twat was a TV show, Trump would be the boxed set."



    Trump is filth. This is settled.

    Not only the Brits, Canucks, Aussies and Kiwis... I can think of one
    Dane, who wholeheartedly agrees.

    --
    Malte Runz

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From jerry house@21:1/5 to Ted on Tue Feb 4 20:58:47 2025
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.society.liberalism, alt.atheism
    XPost: alt.fun, alt.politics.democrats.d

    On 2/4/2025 1:56 AM, Ted wrote:
    bud wrote:

    Bud Frawley wrote:

    On 2/3/2025 8:41 PM, Ted wrote:
    Rudy Canoza wrote:

    Someone asked "Why do some British people not like Donald
    Trump?"

    Nate White, an articulate and witty writer from England, wrote
    this magnificent response:

    "A few things spring to mind.
    Trump lacks certain qualities which the British traditionally
    esteem. For instance, he has no class, no charm, no coolness,
    no credibility, no compassion, no wit, no warmth, no wisdom, no
    subtlety, no sensitivity, no self-awareness, no humility, no
    honour and no grace - all qualities, funnily enough, with which
    his predecessor Mr. Obama was generously blessed.

    So for us, the stark contrast does rather throw Trump’s
    limitations into embarrassingly sharp relief.

    Plus, we like a laugh. And while Trump may be laughable, he has
    never once said anything wry, witty or even faintly amusing -
    not once, ever.

    I don’t say that rhetorically, I mean it quite literally: not
    once, not ever. And that fact is particularly disturbing to the
    British sensibility - for us, to lack humour is almost inhuman.

    But with Trump, it’s a fact. He doesn’t even seem to understand
    what a joke is - his idea of a joke is a crass comment, an
    illiterate insult, a casual act of cruelty.

    Trump is a troll. And like all trolls, he is never funny and he
    never laughs; he only crows or jeers.

    And scarily, he doesn’t just talk in crude, witless insults - he
    actually thinks in them. His mind is a simple bot-like algorithm
    of petty prejudices and knee-jerk nastiness.

    There is never any under-layer of irony, complexity, nuance or
    depth. It’s all surface.

    Some Americans might see this as refreshingly upfront.

    Well, we don’t. We see it as having no inner world, no soul.

    And in Britain we traditionally side with David, not Goliath.
    All our heroes are plucky underdogs: Robin Hood, Dick
    Whittington, Oliver Twist.

    Trump is neither plucky, nor an underdog. He is the exact
    opposite of that. He’s not even a spoiled rich-boy, or a greedy
    fat-cat.

    He’s more a fat white slug. A Jabba the Hutt of privilege.

    And worse, he is that most unforgivable of all things to the
    British: a bully. That is, except when he is among bullies;
    then he suddenly transforms into a snivelling sidekick instead.

    There are unspoken rules to this stuff - the Queensberry rules
    of basic decency - and he breaks them all. He punches downwards
    - which a gentleman should, would, could never do - and every
    blow he aims is below the belt. He particularly likes to kick
    the vulnerable or voiceless - and he kicks them when they are
    down.

    So the fact that a significant minority - perhaps a third - of
    Americans look at what he does, listen to what he says, and then
    think 'Yeah, he seems like my kind of guy’ is a matter of some
    confusion and no little distress to British people, given that:

    * Americans are supposed to be nicer than us, and mostly are.
    * You don't need a particularly keen eye for detail to spot a
    few flaws in the man.

    This last point is what especially confuses and dismays British
    people, and many other people too; his faults seem pretty bloody
    hard to miss.

    After all, it’s impossible to read a single tweet, or hear him
    speak a sentence or two, without staring deep into the abyss. He
    turns being artless into an art form; he is a Picasso of
    pettiness; a Shakespeare of shit. His faults are fractal: even
    his flaws have flaws, and so on ad infinitum.

    God knows there have always been stupid people in the world, and
    plenty of nasty people too. But rarely has stupidity been so
    nasty, or nastiness so stupid.

    He makes Nixon look trustworthy and George W look smart.

    In fact, if Frankenstein decided to make a monster assembled
    entirely from human flaws - he would make a Trump.

    And a remorseful Doctor Frankenstein would clutch out big
    clumpfuls of hair and scream in anguish:

    'My God… what… have… I… created?

    If being a twat was a TV show, Trump would be the boxed set."



    Trump is filth. This is settled.

    I wanna suck black ass.

    Well, that just stands to reason.

    Yes it does. Black ass suckers can be found in every aspect of
    society, including different professions, social classes, educational
    levels, and backgrounds, essentially meaning that sucking black ass
    is not limited to any specific group or lifestyle; black ass suckers
    exist across the entire spectrum of human experience.

    Exactly, Bud, thank you. We're everywhere. And we need to make it well
    known that we wanna suck black ass.

    What happens when you get monkeypox? Do they take y'all to the
    veterinarian or just shoot ya?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)