On 2025-02-04 1:00 p.m., Tim wrote:
On 2025-02-04 12:54 p.m., Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
scooter lied:
Indeed I know of one [gun control law] right know [sic] that
is part of federal law that I believe it [sic] to be Constitutional [sic]
scooter — 05/02/2023, 4:50pm drunken Virginia camper time
Indeed I can think of a current federal gun control law which
I do consider Constitutional.
scooter — 05/02/2023, 10:53am drunken Virginia camper time
Note scooter's uncontrollable need to add wheeze: "indeed" both
times. It adds nothing and changes no meaning, exactly the same
as "pretty much," "by and large," "generally," "virtually," "on
the contrary," "well," "and yet," etc. These are padding,
filler, whatever you want to call them. They are empty wheeze.
You can remove them with no loss of meaning.
scooter believes the right to arms is unlimited, that he has a
right to just whatever arms he wishes, and that all gun control
laws are unconstitutional. He has told us that in black and
white.
He is wrong, of course.
Now, watch: he's likely to come back and start stupidly
conflating the amendment with the right, e.g. "Where in the
'2nd' [sic] is it written that..." The amendment isn't the
right. The amendment takes the right, with its inherent limits,
as previously defined. But scooter thinks the amendment defines
the right. He is wrong. scooter is always wrong. scooter is so stupid...and wrong.
The skeet said that if the authorities ever came for his guns he'd
give them his ammo. I then laughed in his face and explained the difference between ammo and bullets. Poor skeet.
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.atheism/c/FP4KSloFIRo/m/n10sv3pwAAAJ
scooter lied:
Indeed I know of one [gun control law] right know [sic] that is part of
federal law that I believe it [sic] to be Constitutional [sic]
scooter — 05/02/2023, 4:50pm drunken Virginia camper time
Indeed I can think of a current federal gun control law which I do consider
Constitutional.
scooter — 05/02/2023, 10:53am drunken Virginia camper time
On 2025-02-04 1:17 p.m., Terry Miles wrote:
Tim wrote:
On 2025-02-04 1:00 p.m., Tim wrote:
On 2025-02-04 12:54 p.m., Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
scooter lied:
Indeed I know of one [gun control law] right know [sic] that
is part of federal law that I believe it [sic] to be Constitutional [sic]
scooter — 05/02/2023, 4:50pm drunken Virginia camper time
Indeed I can think of a current federal gun control law which
I do consider Constitutional.
scooter — 05/02/2023, 10:53am drunken Virginia camper time
Note scooter's uncontrollable need to add wheeze: "indeed"
both times. It adds nothing and changes no meaning, exactly
the same as "pretty much," "by and large," "generally,"
"virtually," "on the contrary," "well," "and yet," etc.
These are padding, filler, whatever you want to call them.
They are empty wheeze. You can remove them with no loss of
meaning.
scooter believes the right to arms is unlimited, that he has a
right to just whatever arms he wishes, and that all gun
control laws are unconstitutional. He has told us that in
black and white.
He is wrong, of course.
Now, watch: he's likely to come back and start stupidly
conflating the amendment with the right, e.g. "Where in the
'2nd' [sic] is it written that..." The amendment isn't the
right. The amendment takes the right, with its inherent
limits, as previously defined. But scooter thinks the
amendment defines the right. He is wrong. scooter is always
wrong. scooter is so stupid...and wrong.
The skeet said that if the authorities ever came for his guns
he'd give them his ammo. I then laughed in his face and
explained the difference between ammo and bullets. Poor skeet.
Here's another informative link:
Yes, it proves that I eat shit.
Tim wrote:
On 2025-02-04 1:17 p.m., Terry Miles wrote:https://groups.google.com/g/alt.atheism/c/FP4KSloFIRo/m/n10sv3pwAAAJ
Tim wrote:
On 2025-02-04 1:00 p.m., Tim wrote:
On 2025-02-04 12:54 p.m., Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
scooter lied:
Indeed I know of one [gun control law] right know [sic] that >>>>>> is part of federal law that I believe it [sic] to be
Constitutional [sic]
scooter — 05/02/2023, 4:50pm drunken Virginia camper time >>>>>>
Indeed I can think of a current federal gun control law which >>>>>> I do consider Constitutional.
scooter — 05/02/2023, 10:53am drunken Virginia camper time >>>>>>
Note scooter's uncontrollable need to add wheeze: "indeed"
both times. It adds nothing and changes no meaning, exactly
the same as "pretty much," "by and large," "generally,"
"virtually," "on the contrary," "well," "and yet," etc.
These are padding, filler, whatever you want to call them.
They are empty wheeze. You can remove them with no loss of
meaning.
scooter believes the right to arms is unlimited, that he has a
right to just whatever arms he wishes, and that all gun
control laws are unconstitutional. He has told us that in
black and white.
He is wrong, of course.
Now, watch: he's likely to come back and start stupidly
conflating the amendment with the right, e.g. "Where in the
'2nd' [sic] is it written that..." The amendment isn't the
right. The amendment takes the right, with its inherent
limits, as previously defined. But scooter thinks the
amendment defines the right. He is wrong. scooter is always
wrong. scooter is so stupid...and wrong.
The skeet said that if the authorities ever came for his guns
he'd give them his ammo. I then laughed in his face and
explained the difference between ammo and bullets. Poor skeet.
https://alt.atheism.narkive.com/gbrQzaSx/bob-duncan-s-gay-personals-ad-from-2008#post17
Here's another informative link:
Yes, it proves that I eat shit.
Exactly.
Tim wrote:
On 2025-02-04 1:00 p.m., Tim wrote:
On 2025-02-04 12:54 p.m., Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
scooter lied:
Indeed I know of one [gun control law] right know [sic] that
is part of federal law that I believe it [sic] to be Constitutional [sic]
scooter — 05/02/2023, 4:50pm drunken Virginia camper time
Indeed I can think of a current federal gun control law
which I do consider Constitutional.
scooter — 05/02/2023, 10:53am drunken Virginia camper time
Note scooter's uncontrollable need to add wheeze: "indeed" both
times. It adds nothing and changes no meaning, exactly the same
as "pretty much," "by and large," "generally," "virtually," "on
the contrary," "well," "and yet," etc. These are padding,
filler, whatever you want to call them. They are empty wheeze.
You can remove them with no loss of meaning.
scooter believes the right to arms is unlimited, that he has a
right to just whatever arms he wishes, and that all gun control
laws are unconstitutional. He has told us that in black and
white.
He is wrong, of course.
Now, watch: he's likely to come back and start stupidly
conflating the amendment with the right, e.g. "Where in the
'2nd' [sic] is it written that..." The amendment isn't the
right. The amendment takes the right, with its inherent limits,
as previously defined. But scooter thinks the amendment defines
the right. He is wrong. scooter is always wrong. scooter is so stupid...and wrong.
The skeet said that if the authorities ever came for his guns he'd
give them his ammo. I then laughed in his face and explained the difference between ammo and bullets. Poor skeet.
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.atheism/c/FP4KSloFIRo/m/n10sv3pwAAAJ
Here's another informative link:
Terry Miles wrote:
Tim wrote:https://alt.atheism.narkive.com/gbrQzaSx/bob-duncan-s-gay-personals-ad-from-2008#post17
On 2025-02-04 1:00 p.m., Tim wrote:
On 2025-02-04 12:54 p.m., Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
scooter lied:
Indeed I know of one [gun control law] right know [sic] that >>>>> is part of federal law that I believe it [sic] to be
Constitutional [sic]
scooter — 05/02/2023, 4:50pm drunken Virginia camper time
Indeed I can think of a current federal gun control law
which I do consider Constitutional.
scooter — 05/02/2023, 10:53am drunken Virginia camper time >>>>>
Note scooter's uncontrollable need to add wheeze: "indeed" both
times. It adds nothing and changes no meaning, exactly the same
as "pretty much," "by and large," "generally," "virtually," "on
the contrary," "well," "and yet," etc. These are padding,
filler, whatever you want to call them. They are empty wheeze.
You can remove them with no loss of meaning.
scooter believes the right to arms is unlimited, that he has a
right to just whatever arms he wishes, and that all gun control
laws are unconstitutional. He has told us that in black and
white.
He is wrong, of course.
Now, watch: he's likely to come back and start stupidly
conflating the amendment with the right, e.g. "Where in the
'2nd' [sic] is it written that..." The amendment isn't the
right. The amendment takes the right, with its inherent limits,
as previously defined. But scooter thinks the amendment defines
the right. He is wrong. scooter is always wrong. scooter is so
stupid...and wrong.
The skeet said that if the authorities ever came for his guns he'd
give them his ammo. I then laughed in his face and explained the
difference between ammo and bullets. Poor skeet.
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.atheism/c/FP4KSloFIRo/m/n10sv3pwAAAJ
Here's another informative link:
Quite revealing. And somehow I'm not surprised. Tim has always
impressed me as being demented to the core. This just confirms it.
On 2/4/2025 10:48 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreude.entf�rben.@gmail.com> wrote in >> message news:gvsoP.271870$Hfb1.261430@fx46.iad...
scooter lied:
Indeed I know of one [gun control law] right know [sic] that is part
of
federal law that I believe it [sic] to be Constitutional [sic]
scooter — 05/02/2023, 4:50pm drunken Virginia camper time
Never prove to be a lie
Yes, it is proved to be a lie, scooter.
Indeed I can think of a current federal gun control law which I do
consider
Constitutional.
scooter — 05/02/2023, 10:53am drunken Virginia camper time
Never prove to be a lie
Yes, it is a lie, scooter.
You have never identified a gun control law that you believe to be >constitutional.
I know you once blabbered something about the "fifth amendment," but that amendment is not a gun control law, so you lied.
On 2/5/2025 7:23 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreude.entf�rben.@gmail.com>
wrote in message news:42uoP.257887$HO1.228229@fx14.iad...
On 2/4/2025 10:48 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and
gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreude.entf�rben.@gmail.com>
wrote in message news:gvsoP.271870$Hfb1.261430@fx46.iad...
scooter lied:
Indeed I know of one [gun control law] right know [sic] that
is part of federal law that I believe it [sic] to be
Constitutional [sic]
scooter — 05/02/2023, 4:50pm drunken Virginia camper time
Never prove to be a lie
Yes, it is proved to be a lie, scooter.
Indeed I can think of a current federal gun control law which
I do consider
Constitutional.
scooter — 05/02/2023, 10:53am drunken Virginia camper time
Never prove to be a lie
Yes, it is a lie, scooter.
Prove it.
Done, scooter.
On 2/5/2025 7:23 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreude.entf�rben.@gmail.com> wrote in >> message news:42uoP.257887$HO1.228229@fx14.iad...
On 2/4/2025 10:48 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreude.entf�rben.@gmail.com> wrote >>>> in message news:gvsoP.271870$Hfb1.261430@fx46.iad...
scooter lied:
Indeed I know of one [gun control law] right know [sic] that is
part of
federal law that I believe it [sic] to be Constitutional [sic]
scooter — 05/02/2023, 4:50pm drunken Virginia camper time
Never prove to be a lie
Yes, it is proved to be a lie, scooter.
Indeed I can think of a current federal gun control law which I do >>>>> consider
Constitutional.
scooter — 05/02/2023, 10:53am drunken Virginia camper time
Never prove to be a lie
Yes, it is a lie, scooter.
Prove it.
Done, scooter.
You have never identified a gun control law that you believe to be
constitutional.
Sure I have.
No, scooter.
1) The Second Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of
America.
Among the very first gun control laws in our nation, and
That's not a gun control law, scooter.
2) 18USC922(g)
That's a gun control law, scooter, and you oppose all of it.
Supported by the 5th Amendment
No, scooter.
I've stated this to you before and
No, scooter. What you said, and it is bullshit, is that the fifth
amendment *itself* is a gun control law. It isn't, scooter.
I know you once blabbered something about the "fifth amendment," but
that amendment is not a gun control law, so you lied.
Not directly, but
Not in any way, scooter. It is not a gun control law, scooter.
"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreude.entf�rben.@gmail.com> wrote in message news:AgOoP.328170$HO1.246361@fx14.iad...
On 2/5/2025 7:23 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreude.entf�rben.@gmail.com> wrote in >>> message news:42uoP.257887$HO1.228229@fx14.iad...
On 2/4/2025 10:48 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless >>>> chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreude.entf�rben.@gmail.com> wrote in
message news:gvsoP.271870$Hfb1.261430@fx46.iad...
scooter lied:
Indeed I know of one [gun control law] right know [sic] that is part of
federal law that I believe it [sic] to be Constitutional [sic] >>>>>>
scooter — 05/02/2023, 4:50pm drunken Virginia camper time
Never prove to be a lie
Yes, it is proved to be a lie, scooter.
Indeed I can think of a current federal gun control law which I do >>>>>> consider
Constitutional.
scooter — 05/02/2023, 10:53am drunken Virginia camper time
Never prove to be a lie
Yes, it is a lie, scooter.
Prove it.
Done, scooter.
Then it should make it very easy for you to show here.
You have never identified a gun control law that you believe to be
constitutional.
Sure I have.
No, scooter.
Your denial doesn’t alter the facts
1) The Second Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America.
Among the very first gun control laws in our nation, and
That's not a gun control law, scooter.
Sure it is.
2) 18USC922(g)
That's a gun control law, scooter, and you oppose all of it.
I just told you I don't oppose it
Supported by the 5th Amendment
No, scooter.
So you're saying
the 5th Amendment is void?
I've stated this to you before and
No, scooter. What you said, and it is bullshit, is that the fifth amendment >> *itself* is a gun control law. It isn't, scooter.
I didn't say the 5th was a gun control law.
I said the 2nd was supported by the 5th.
I know you once blabbered something about the "fifth amendment," but that >>>> amendment is not a gun control law, so you lied.
Not directly, but
Not in any way, scooter. It is not a gun control law, scooter.
Sure it is.
It's about guns, how they will be controlled
So how is it anything but a gun control law?
On 2/6/2025 9:27 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreude.entf�rben.@gmail.com>
wrote in message news:AgOoP.328170$HO1.246361@fx14.iad...
On 2/5/2025 7:23 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and
gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreude.entf�rben.@gmail.com>
wrote in message news:42uoP.257887$HO1.228229@fx14.iad...
On 2/4/2025 10:48 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and
gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
"Klaus Schadenfreude"
<klaus.schadenfreude.entf�rben.@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:gvsoP.271870$Hfb1.261430@fx46.iad...
scooter lied:
Indeed I know of one [gun control law] right know [sic]
that is part of federal law that I believe it [sic] to be
Constitutional [sic]
scooter — 05/02/2023, 4:50pm drunken Virginia camper time
Never prove to be a lie
Yes, it is proved to be a lie, scooter.
Indeed I can think of a current federal gun control law
which I do consider
Constitutional.
scooter — 05/02/2023, 10:53am drunken Virginia camper
time
Never prove to be a lie
Yes, it is a lie, scooter.
Prove it.
Done, scooter.
Then it should make it very easy for you to show here.
I already did show it here, scooter.
On 2/6/2025 5:08 PM, Chadlee "cuck" Blowjob, 350lb 5'1" morbidly obese convicted child molester and lying fat fuck, lied:
On 06 Feb 2025, Klaus Schadenfreude <j_carlson@gmx.com> posted some
news:vo33l0$33i19$3@dont-email.me:
On 2/6/2025 9:27 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreude.entf�rben.@gmail.com>
wrote in message news:AgOoP.328170$HO1.246361@fx14.iad...
On 2/5/2025 7:23 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and
gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreude.entf�rben.@gmail.com> >>>>>> wrote in message news:42uoP.257887$HO1.228229@fx14.iad...
On 2/4/2025 10:48 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and
gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
"Klaus Schadenfreude"
<klaus.schadenfreude.entf�rben.@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:gvsoP.271870$Hfb1.261430@fx46.iad...
scooter lied:Never prove to be a lie
Indeed I know of one [gun control law] right know [sic]
that is part of federal law that I believe it [sic] to be >>>>>>>>> Constitutional [sic]
scooter — 05/02/2023, 4:50pm drunken Virginia camper time >>>>>>>>
Yes, it is proved to be a lie, scooter.
Indeed I can think of a current federal gun control law
which I do consider
Constitutional.
scooter — 05/02/2023, 10:53am drunken Virginia camper
time
Never prove to be a lie
Yes, it is a lie, scooter.
Prove it.
Done, scooter.
Then it should make it very easy for you to show here.
I already did show it here, scooter.
Where?
Right here in Usenet, Blowjob, you fat cocksucking cuckold.
"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreude.entf�rben.@gmail.com> wrotein
message news:LFdpP.44298$svL3.15713@fx12.iad...gutless
On 2/6/2025 5:08 PM, Chadlee "cuck" Blowjob, 350lb 5'1" morbidly obese
convicted child molester and lying fat fuck, lied:
On 06 Feb 2025, Klaus Schadenfreude <j_carlson@gmx.com> posted some
news:vo33l0$33i19$3@dont-email.me:
On 2/6/2025 9:27 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and
@gmail.com>chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreude.entf�rben.@gmail.com>
wrote in message news:AgOoP.328170$HO1.246361@fx14.iad...
On 2/5/2025 7:23 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and
gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreude.entf�rben.
timewrote in message news:42uoP.257887$HO1.228229@fx14.iad...
On 2/4/2025 10:48 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and >>>>>>>> gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
"Klaus Schadenfreude"
<klaus.schadenfreude.entf�rben.@gmail.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>> news:gvsoP.271870$Hfb1.261430@fx46.iad...
scooter lied:
Indeed I know of one [gun control law] right know [sic] >>>>>>>>>> that is part of federal law that I believe it [sic] to be >>>>>>>>>> Constitutional [sic]
scooter — 05/02/2023, 4:50pm drunken Virginia camper
Never prove to be a lie
Yes, it is proved to be a lie, scooter.
Indeed I can think of a current federal gun control law >>>>>>>>>> which I do consider
Constitutional.
scooter — 05/02/2023, 10:53am drunken Virginia camper >>>>>>>>>> time
Never prove to be a lie
Yes, it is a lie, scooter.
Prove it.
Done, scooter.
Then it should make it very easy for you to show here.
I already did show it here, scooter.
Where?
Right here in Usenet, Blowjob, you fat cocksucking cuckold.
Then you should have no problems providing a link to that post.
Just fill in the rest
Message-ID:
On 2/10/2025 6:52 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreude.entf�rben.@gmail.com> wrote in >> message news:LFdpP.44298$svL3.15713@fx12.iad...
On 2/6/2025 5:08 PM, Chadlee "cuck" Blowjob, 350lb 5'1" morbidly obese
convicted child molester and lying fat fuck, lied:
On 06 Feb 2025, Klaus Schadenfreude <j_carlson@gmx.com> posted some
news:vo33l0$33i19$3@dont-email.me:
On 2/6/2025 9:27 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless >>>>> chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreude.entf�rben.@gmail.com> >>>>>> wrote in message news:AgOoP.328170$HO1.246361@fx14.iad...
On 2/5/2025 7:23 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and
gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreude.entf�rben.@gmail.com> >>>>>>>> wrote in message news:42uoP.257887$HO1.228229@fx14.iad...
On 2/4/2025 10:48 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and >>>>>>>>> gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied: >>>>>>>>>
"Klaus Schadenfreude"
<klaus.schadenfreude.entf�rben.@gmail.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>> news:gvsoP.271870$Hfb1.261430@fx46.iad...
scooter lied:Never prove to be a lie
Indeed I know of one [gun control law] right know [sic] >>>>>>>>>>> that is part of federal law that I believe it [sic] to be >>>>>>>>>>> Constitutional [sic]
scooter — 05/02/2023, 4:50pm drunken Virginia camper time >>>>>>>>>>
Yes, it is proved to be a lie, scooter.
Indeed I can think of a current federal gun control law >>>>>>>>>>> which I do consider
Constitutional.
scooter — 05/02/2023, 10:53am drunken Virginia camper >>>>>>>>>>> time
Never prove to be a lie
Yes, it is a lie, scooter.
Prove it.
Done, scooter.
Then it should make it very easy for you to show here.
I already did show it here, scooter.
Where?
Right here in Usenet, Blowjob, you fat cocksucking cuckold.
Then you should have no problems providing a link to that post.
No, scooter. Your burden.
On 2/10/2025 11:25 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
A true statement, scooter. It's not "my" rule, scooter. It is the
"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreude.entf�rben.@gmail.com> wrote in >> message news:supqP.237$ZBI5.97@fx42.iad...
On 2/10/2025 6:52 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreude.entf�rben.@gmail.com> wrote >>>> in message news:LFdpP.44298$svL3.15713@fx12.iad...
On 2/6/2025 5:08 PM, Chadlee "cuck" Blowjob, 350lb 5'1" morbidly obese >>>>> convicted child molester and lying fat fuck, lied:
On 06 Feb 2025, Klaus Schadenfreude <j_carlson@gmx.com> posted some >>>>>> news:vo33l0$33i19$3@dont-email.me:
On 2/6/2025 9:27 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and
gutless
chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreude.entf�rben.@gmail.com> >>>>>>>> wrote in message news:AgOoP.328170$HO1.246361@fx14.iad...
On 2/5/2025 7:23 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and >>>>>>>>> gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied: >>>>>>>>>
"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreude.entf�rben.@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>> wrote in message news:42uoP.257887$HO1.228229@fx14.iad... >>>>>>>>>>> On 2/4/2025 10:48 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and >>>>>>>>>>> gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied: >>>>>>>>>>>
"Klaus Schadenfreude"
<klaus.schadenfreude.entf�rben.@gmail.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>> news:gvsoP.271870$Hfb1.261430@fx46.iad...
scooter lied:Never prove to be a lie
Indeed I know of one [gun control law] right know [sic] >>>>>>>>>>>>> that is part of federal law that I believe it [sic] to be >>>>>>>>>>>>> Constitutional [sic]
scooter — 05/02/2023, 4:50pm drunken Virginia camper time >>>>>>>>>>>>
Yes, it is proved to be a lie, scooter.
Indeed I can think of a current federal gun control law >>>>>>>>>>>>> which I do consider
Constitutional.
scooter — 05/02/2023, 10:53am drunken Virginia camper >>>>>>>>>>>>> time
Never prove to be a lie
Yes, it is a lie, scooter.
Prove it.
Done, scooter.
Then it should make it very easy for you to show here.
I already did show it here, scooter.
Where?
Right here in Usenet, Blowjob, you fat cocksucking cuckold.
Then you should have no problems providing a link to that post.
No, scooter. Your burden.
"Not how it works, scooter. Your claim = your burden of proof...which you
never meet."
universally recognized and most fundamental law of debate. If you make a statement of fact, it is your burden to support it, and not another
person's burden to disprove it.
And I don't have to support those statements, scooter, because you already know that they are true.
On 2/11/2025 7:10 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreude.entf�rben.@gmail.com> wrote in >> message news:N1tqP.33955$ZGva.6887@fx06.iad...
On 2/10/2025 11:25 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
A true statement, scooter. It's not "my" rule, scooter. It is the
"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreude.entf�rben.@gmail.com> wrote >>>> in message news:supqP.237$ZBI5.97@fx42.iad...
On 2/10/2025 6:52 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless >>>>> chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreude.entf�rben.@gmail.com> >>>>>> wrote in message news:LFdpP.44298$svL3.15713@fx12.iad...
On 2/6/2025 5:08 PM, Chadlee "cuck" Blowjob, 350lb 5'1" morbidly >>>>>>> obese convicted child molester and lying fat fuck, lied:
On 06 Feb 2025, Klaus Schadenfreude <j_carlson@gmx.com> posted some >>>>>>>> news:vo33l0$33i19$3@dont-email.me:
On 2/6/2025 9:27 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and >>>>>>>>> gutless
chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreude.entf�rben.@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>> wrote in message news:AgOoP.328170$HO1.246361@fx14.iad... >>>>>>>>>>> On 2/5/2025 7:23 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and >>>>>>>>>>> gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied: >>>>>>>>>>>
"Klaus Schadenfreude"
<klaus.schadenfreude.entf�rben.@gmail.com>
wrote in message news:42uoP.257887$HO1.228229@fx14.iad... >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/4/2025 10:48 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and >>>>>>>>>>>>> gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied: >>>>>>>>>>>>>
"Klaus Schadenfreude"
<klaus.schadenfreude.entf�rben.@gmail.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:gvsoP.271870$Hfb1.261430@fx46.iad...
scooter lied:
Indeed I know of one [gun control law] right know [sic] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that is part of federal law that I believe it [sic] to be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Constitutional [sic]
scooter — 05/02/2023, 4:50pm drunken Virginia camper >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time
Never prove to be a lie
Yes, it is proved to be a lie, scooter.
Indeed I can think of a current federal gun control law >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which I do consider
Constitutional.
scooter — 05/02/2023, 10:53am drunken Virginia camper >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time
Never prove to be a lie
Yes, it is a lie, scooter.
Prove it.
Done, scooter.
Then it should make it very easy for you to show here.
I already did show it here, scooter.
Where?
Right here in Usenet, Blowjob, you fat cocksucking cuckold.
Then you should have no problems providing a link to that post.
No, scooter. Your burden.
"Not how it works, scooter. Your claim = your burden of proof...which
you never meet."
universally recognized and most fundamental law of debate. If you make a >>> statement of fact, it is your burden to support it, and not another
person's burden to disprove it.
Ok, and I'm going to hold you to that.
I always adhere to it, scooter.
And I don't have to support those statements, scooter, because you
already know that they are true.
Starting right now.
You have just asserted what you claim is a statement of fact.
Well supported, scooter.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 483 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 164:06:35 |
| Calls: | 9,594 |
| Files: | 13,676 |
| Messages: | 6,149,492 |