On 3/25/2025 3:50 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted
another content-free batch of lies:
In article <PeGEP.104211$541.45427@fx47.iad>,
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 3/25/2025 1:22 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off
Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking
do-nothing, posted another content-free batch of lies:
In article <f_BEP.70100$D41.67945@fx45.iad>,
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 3/25/2025 4:10 AM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vrt9lq$2br2p$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.comNope. All we have are your bullshit lies about it being
says...
On 2025-03-24 20:48, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vrt785$1u3up$15@dont-email.me>, nuh-
uh@nope.com says...
On 2025-03-24 20:14, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vrt5mh$1u3up$12@dont-email.me>, nuh-
uh@nope.com says...
On 2025-03-24 19:47, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vrt1nn$26kf2$1@dont-email.me>,
super70s@super70s.invalid says...
Cry baby cry.
On 2025-03-25 00:22:27 +0000, Skeeter said:
In article <vrso3b$1u3up$1@dont-email.me>, Alan
<nuh-uh@nope.com > says...
...like accidentally including a "The Atlantic" reporter >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on your Signal group chat to discuss your attack plans >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for Yemen.
How is your trolling working out for you.
It's the trolls who are running the current government. >>>>>>>>>>>>
Dude,
Your administration is so incompetent that they included a >>>>>>>>>>> reporter for The Atlantic on a top-secret Signal chat about >>>>>>>>>>> attacking Yemen.
That has already been debunked. Now go burn something.
It has?
Show it.
I already told you. You are just a kick toy. Go look it
up.
So you have nothing...
...again.
Debunked.
"debunked." You didn't offer a shred of evidence.
The story is true: Trump's incompetent clown stooges shared
classified info with a reporter who has no clearance. This is
settled.
Nothing classified was shared.
Classified information was shared, by the falling-down drunk
Hegseth. This is not in rational dispute.
The contents of the posts haven't been released.
That's a lie. Goldberg released a few pages of the text.
That's a lie. Goldberg released a few pages of the text.He knowingly stole "sekrit" gubermint text information and wrote about it.
On 3/26/25 8:12 AM, Siri Cruz wrote:
On 25/3/25 22:01, pike wrote:
What you are given unasked is stealing?That's a lie. Goldberg released a few pages of the text.He knowingly stole "sekrit" gubermint text information and wrote about it. >>
Can be, actually
If a Top Secret file falls out of some govt couriersYou can publish anything you come by other than your own malfeasance.
black briefcase onto the street and you pick it up,
noting it's marked Top Secret, then NO, you can't
start publishing everything in there. If ya got an
admiral drunk, got his loose lips to reveal the big
plan for invading Okinawa, then NO you can't blab
any of it or sell it to the Daily Planet.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 483 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 180:50:32 |
| Calls: | 9,599 |
| Calls today: | 5 |
| Files: | 13,679 |
| Messages: | 6,150,912 |
| Posted today: | 1 |