In article <vs1pcd$2irf1$2@dont-email.me>,Zero. All of Trump's Gestapo deportations were illegal.
chine.bleu@yahoo.com says...
On 26/3/25 6:33, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vs0t8f$1p84i$5@dont-email.me>,
chine.bleu@yahoo.com says...
On 25/3/25 16:22, pothead wrote:
Maryorkas is lucky he isn't being prosecuted for lying to congress on multiple
occasions.
ie: the border is secure.
How many people have been legally deported so far?
Not enough.
How many people have been legally deported so far?
As many as possible.
On 2025-03-26, Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote:
In article <vs1pcd$2irf1$2@dont-email.me>,
chine.bleu@yahoo.com says...
On 26/3/25 6:33, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vs0t8f$1p84i$5@dont-email.me>,
chine.bleu@yahoo.com says...
On 25/3/25 16:22, pothead wrote:
Maryorkas is lucky he isn't being prosecuted for lying to
congress on multiple occasions.
ie: the border is secure.
How many people have TS018861824 been legally deported so far?
Not enough.
How many people have been legally deported so far?
As many as possible.
Yep.
Despite the democrats and left attempting to protect them.
Why do these people protect criminals
pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote in
news:vs23qp$2rd9q$1@dont-email.me:
On 2025-03-26, Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote:
In article <vs1pcd$2irf1$2@dont-email.me>,
chine.bleu@yahoo.com says...
On 26/3/25 6:33, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vs0t8f$1p84i$5@dont-email.me>,
chine.bleu@yahoo.com says...
On 25/3/25 16:22, pothead wrote:
Maryorkas is lucky he isn't being prosecuted for lying to
congress on multiple occasions.
ie: the border is secure.
How many people have TS018861824 been legally deported so far?
Not enough.
How many people have been legally deported so far?
As many as possible.
Yep.
Despite the democrats and left attempting to protect them.
Why do these people protect criminals
The party that pardoned over 1000
convicted Jan 6 felons dares to accuse
others of "protecting criminals"?
LOL!
In article <XnsB2AED2D464F6B629555@185.151.15.190>,*Another* case where whataboutism is intellectually and morally correct.
noemail@aol.com says...
pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote in
news:vs23qp$2rd9q$1@dont-email.me:
On 2025-03-26, Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote:
In article <vs1pcd$2irf1$2@dont-email.me>,
chine.bleu@yahoo.com says...
On 26/3/25 6:33, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vs0t8f$1p84i$5@dont-email.me>,
chine.bleu@yahoo.com says...
On 25/3/25 16:22, pothead wrote:
Maryorkas is lucky he isn't being prosecuted for lying to
congress on multiple occasions.
ie: the border is secure.
How many people have TS018861824 been legally deported so far?
Not enough.
How many people have been legally deported so far?
As many as possible.
Yep.
Despite the democrats and left attempting to protect them.
Why do these people protect criminals
The party that pardoned over 1000
convicted Jan 6 felons dares to accuse
others of "protecting criminals"?
LOL!
BUTWHATABOUT
On 3/26/2025 7:01 PM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <XnsB2AED2D464F6B629555@185.151.15.190>,
noemail@aol.com says...
pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote in
news:vs23qp$2rd9q$1@dont-email.me:
On 2025-03-26, Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote:
In article <vs1pcd$2irf1$2@dont-email.me>,
chine.bleu@yahoo.com says...
On 26/3/25 6:33, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vs0t8f$1p84i$5@dont-email.me>,
chine.bleu@yahoo.com says...
Not enough.
On 25/3/25 16:22, pothead wrote:
Maryorkas is lucky he isn't being prosecuted for lying to
congress on multiple occasions.
ie: the border is secure.
How many people have TS018861824 been legally deported so far? >>>>>>
How many people have been legally deported so far?
As many as possible.
Yep.
Despite the democrats and left attempting to protect them.
Why do these people protect criminals
The party that pardoned over 1000
convicted Jan 6 felons dares to accuse
others of "protecting criminals"?
LOL!
BUTWHATABOUT*Another* case where whataboutism is intellectually and morally correct.
Skeeter wrote:
In article <vs2bvu$2vp78$4@dont-email.me>,
j_carlson@gmx.com says...
On 3/26/2025 7:01 PM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <XnsB2AED2D464F6B629555@185.151.15.190>,*Another* case where whataboutism is intellectually and morally correct.
noemail@aol.com says...
pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote in
news:vs23qp$2rd9q$1@dont-email.me:
On 2025-03-26, Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote:
In article <vs1pcd$2irf1$2@dont-email.me>,
chine.bleu@yahoo.com says...
On 26/3/25 6:33, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vs0t8f$1p84i$5@dont-email.me>,
chine.bleu@yahoo.com says...
Not enough.
On 25/3/25 16:22, pothead wrote:
Maryorkas is lucky he isn't being prosecuted for lying to >>>>>>>>>> congress on multiple occasions.
ie: the border is secure.
How many people have TS018861824 been legally deported so far? >>>>>>>>
How many people have been legally deported so far?
As many as possible.
Yep.
Despite the democrats and left attempting to protect them.
Why do these people protect criminals
The party that pardoned over 1000
convicted Jan 6 felons dares to accuse
others of "protecting criminals"?
LOL!
BUTWHATABOUT
Why did Joe pardon his whole family?
All 6 of them.
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in news:MPG.424ef8a76865fad39897a4@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <m4js8dF6j81U2@mid.individual.net>,
jfwaldby@gmail.com says...
Skeeter wrote:
In article <vs2bvu$2vp78$4@dont-email.me>,All 6 of them.
j_carlson@gmx.com says...
On 3/26/2025 7:01 PM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <XnsB2AED2D464F6B629555@185.151.15.190>,*Another* case where whataboutism is intellectually and morally
noemail@aol.com says...
pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote in
news:vs23qp$2rd9q$1@dont-email.me:
On 2025-03-26, Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote:
In article <vs1pcd$2irf1$2@dont-email.me>,
chine.bleu@yahoo.com says...
On 26/3/25 6:33, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vs0t8f$1p84i$5@dont-email.me>,
chine.bleu@yahoo.com says...
On 25/3/25 16:22, pothead wrote:
Maryorkas is lucky he isn't being prosecuted for lying to
congress on multiple occasions.
ie: the border is secure.
How many people have TS018861824 been legally deported so
far?
Not enough.
How many people have been legally deported so far?
As many as possible.
Yep.
Despite the democrats and left attempting to protect them.
Why do these people protect criminals
The party that pardoned over 1000
convicted Jan 6 felons dares to accuse
others of "protecting criminals"?
LOL!
BUTWHATABOUT
correct.
Why did Joe pardon his whole family?
If there were no crimes then no pardon is needed.
Used to forstall harassment.
In article <m4js8dF6j81U2@mid.individual.net>,
jfwaldby@gmail.com says...
Skeeter wrote:
In article <vs2bvu$2vp78$4@dont-email.me>,All 6 of them.
j_carlson@gmx.com says...
On 3/26/2025 7:01 PM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <XnsB2AED2D464F6B629555@185.151.15.190>,*Another* case where whataboutism is intellectually and morally
noemail@aol.com says...
pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote in
news:vs23qp$2rd9q$1@dont-email.me:
On 2025-03-26, Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote:
In article <vs1pcd$2irf1$2@dont-email.me>,
chine.bleu@yahoo.com says...
On 26/3/25 6:33, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vs0t8f$1p84i$5@dont-email.me>,
chine.bleu@yahoo.com says...
On 25/3/25 16:22, pothead wrote:
Maryorkas is lucky he isn't being prosecuted for lying to
congress on multiple occasions.
ie: the border is secure.
How many people have TS018861824 been legally deported so
far?
Not enough.
How many people have been legally deported so far?
As many as possible.
Yep.
Despite the democrats and left attempting to protect them.
Why do these people protect criminals
The party that pardoned over 1000
convicted Jan 6 felons dares to accuse
others of "protecting criminals"?
LOL!
BUTWHATABOUT
correct.
Why did Joe pardon his whole family?
If there were no crimes then no pardon is needed.
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in news:MPG.424ef8a76865fad39897a4@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <m4js8dF6j81U2@mid.individual.net>,
jfwaldby@gmail.com says...
Skeeter wrote:
In article <vs2bvu$2vp78$4@dont-email.me>,All 6 of them.
j_carlson@gmx.com says...
On 3/26/2025 7:01 PM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <XnsB2AED2D464F6B629555@185.151.15.190>,*Another* case where whataboutism is intellectually and morally
noemail@aol.com says...
pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote in
news:vs23qp$2rd9q$1@dont-email.me:
On 2025-03-26, Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote:
In article <vs1pcd$2irf1$2@dont-email.me>,
chine.bleu@yahoo.com says...
On 26/3/25 6:33, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vs0t8f$1p84i$5@dont-email.me>,
chine.bleu@yahoo.com says...
On 25/3/25 16:22, pothead wrote:
Maryorkas is lucky he isn't being prosecuted for lying to
congress on multiple occasions.
ie: the border is secure.
How many people have TS018861824 been legally deported so
far?
Not enough.
How many people have been legally deported so far?
As many as possible.
Yep.
Despite the democrats and left attempting to protect them.
Why do these people protect criminals
The party that pardoned over 1000
convicted Jan 6 felons dares to accuse
others of "protecting criminals"?
LOL!
BUTWHATABOUT
correct.
Why did Joe pardon his whole family?
If there were no crimes then no pardon is needed.
Used to forstall harassment.
In article <vs3q2l$gi14$9@dont-email.me>, bax02
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in
news:MPG.424ef8a76865fad39897a4@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <m4js8dF6j81U2@mid.individual.net>,
jfwaldby@gmail.com says...
Skeeter wrote:
In article <vs2bvu$2vp78$4@dont-email.me>,All 6 of them.
j_carlson@gmx.com says...
On 3/26/2025 7:01 PM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <XnsB2AED2D464F6B629555@185.151.15.190>,*Another* case where whataboutism is intellectually and morally
noemail@aol.com says...
pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote in
news:vs23qp$2rd9q$1@dont-email.me:
On 2025-03-26, Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote:
In article <vs1pcd$2irf1$2@dont-email.me>,
chine.bleu@yahoo.com says...
On 26/3/25 6:33, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vs0t8f$1p84i$5@dont-email.me>,
chine.bleu@yahoo.com says...
On 25/3/25 16:22, pothead wrote:
Maryorkas is lucky he isn't being prosecuted for lying to
congress on multiple occasions.
ie: the border is secure.
How many people have TS018861824 been legally deported so
far?
Not enough.
How many people have been legally deported so far?
As many as possible.
Yep.
Despite the democrats and left attempting to protect them.
Why do these people protect criminals
The party that pardoned over 1000
convicted Jan 6 felons dares to accuse
others of "protecting criminals"?
LOL!
BUTWHATABOUT
correct.
Why did Joe pardon his whole family?
If there were no crimes then no pardon is needed.
Used to forstall harassment.
No pardon needed for that. There must be crimes or he
wouldn't have pardoned them.
Further, if he knows of such crimes and did not report them.. then
wouldn't that make him an accessory after the fact? A crime for which
Joe Biden could then be prosecuted?
"Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in news:vs416u$nsd9$2@dont-email.me:
Further, if he knows of such crimes and did not report them.. then
wouldn't that make him an accessory after the fact? A crime for which
Joe Biden could then be prosecuted?
SCOTUS says Presidents can't be procesuted for official acts - and a Presidential Pardon is an official act.
In article <vs4k23$1910v$2@dont-email.me>, bax02
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
"Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in
news:vs416u$nsd9$2@dont-email.me:
SCOTUS says Presidents can't be procesuted for official acts - and a
Further, if he knows of such crimes and did not report them.. then
wouldn't that make him an accessory after the fact? A crime for which
Joe Biden could then be prosecuted?
Presidential Pardon is an official act.
The ones signed by autopen?
Why did he pardon his family?
In article <vs3q2l$gi14$9@dont-email.me>, bax02
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in
news:MPG.424ef8a76865fad39897a4@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <m4js8dF6j81U2@mid.individual.net>,
jfwaldby@gmail.com says...
Skeeter wrote:
In article <vs2bvu$2vp78$4@dont-email.me>,All 6 of them.
j_carlson@gmx.com says...
On 3/26/2025 7:01 PM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <XnsB2AED2D464F6B629555@185.151.15.190>,*Another* case where whataboutism is intellectually and morally
noemail@aol.com says...
pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote in
news:vs23qp$2rd9q$1@dont-email.me:
On 2025-03-26, Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote:
In article <vs1pcd$2irf1$2@dont-email.me>,
chine.bleu@yahoo.com says...
On 26/3/25 6:33, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vs0t8f$1p84i$5@dont-email.me>,
chine.bleu@yahoo.com says...
On 25/3/25 16:22, pothead wrote:
Maryorkas is lucky he isn't being prosecuted for lying to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> congress on multiple occasions.
ie: the border is secure.
How many people have TS018861824 been legally deported so >>>>>>>>>>>>> far?
Not enough.
How many people have been legally deported so far?
As many as possible.
Yep.
Despite the democrats and left attempting to protect them.
Why do these people protect criminals
The party that pardoned over 1000
convicted Jan 6 felons dares to accuse
others of "protecting criminals"?
LOL!
BUTWHATABOUT
correct.
Why did Joe pardon his whole family?
If there were no crimes then no pardon is needed.
Used to forstall harassment.
No pardon needed for that.
On 3/27/2025 9:17 AM, Scout wrote:
"Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
news:vs3q2l$gi14$9@dont-email.me...
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in
news:MPG.424ef8a76865fad39897a4@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <m4js8dF6j81U2@mid.individual.net>,
jfwaldby@gmail.com says...
Skeeter wrote:
In article <vs2bvu$2vp78$4@dont-email.me>,All 6 of them.
j_carlson@gmx.com says...
On 3/26/2025 7:01 PM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <XnsB2AED2D464F6B629555@185.151.15.190>,*Another* case where whataboutism is intellectually and morally
noemail@aol.com says...
pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote in
news:vs23qp$2rd9q$1@dont-email.me:
On 2025-03-26, Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote:
In article <vs1pcd$2irf1$2@dont-email.me>,
chine.bleu@yahoo.com says...
On 26/3/25 6:33, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vs0t8f$1p84i$5@dont-email.me>,
chine.bleu@yahoo.com says...
On 25/3/25 16:22, pothead wrote:
Maryorkas is lucky he isn't being prosecuted for lying
to congress on multiple occasions.
ie: the border is secure.
How many people have TS018861824Â been legally deported
so far?
Not enough.
How many people have been legally deported so far?
As many as possible.
Yep.
Despite the democrats and left attempting to protect them.
Why do these people protect criminals
       The party that pardoned over 1000
convicted Jan 6 felons dares to accuse
others of "protecting criminals"?
       LOL!
BUTWHATABOUT
correct.
Why did Joe pardon his whole family?
If there were no crimes then no pardon is needed.
Used to forstall harassment.
Which means it isn't a pardon and as such Joe is guilty of misuse of
his powers.. for personal gain.
Such use should invalidate the pardon.
"Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in news:vs416u$nsd9$2@dont-email.me:
Further, if he knows of such crimes and did not report them.. thenSCOTUS says Presidents can't be procesuted for official acts - and a Presidential Pardon is an official act.
wouldn't that make him an accessory after the fact? A crime for which
Joe Biden could then be prosecuted?
On 3/27/2025 9:20 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
"Skeeter" <none@none.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.424f1c997034b57f9897b2@usnews.blocknews.net...
In article <vs3q2l$gi14$9@dont-email.me>, bax02
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in
news:MPG.424ef8a76865fad39897a4@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <m4js8dF6j81U2@mid.individual.net>,
jfwaldby@gmail.com says...
Skeeter wrote:
In article <vs2bvu$2vp78$4@dont-email.me>,All 6 of them.
j_carlson@gmx.com says...
On 3/26/2025 7:01 PM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <XnsB2AED2D464F6B629555@185.151.15.190>,*Another* case where whataboutism is intellectually and morally
noemail@aol.com says...
pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote in
news:vs23qp$2rd9q$1@dont-email.me:
On 2025-03-26, Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote:
In article <vs1pcd$2irf1$2@dont-email.me>,
chine.bleu@yahoo.com says...
On 26/3/25 6:33, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vs0t8f$1p84i$5@dont-email.me>,
chine.bleu@yahoo.com says...
On 25/3/25 16:22, pothead wrote:
Maryorkas is lucky he isn't being prosecuted for lying to >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> congress on multiple occasions.
ie: the border is secure.
How many people have TS018861824 been legally deported so >>>> >> >>>>>>>>> far?
Not enough.
How many people have been legally deported so far?
As many as possible.
Yep.
Despite the democrats and left attempting to protect them.
Why do these people protect criminals
The party that pardoned over 1000
convicted Jan 6 felons dares to accuse
others of "protecting criminals"?
LOL!
BUTWHATABOUT
correct.
Why did Joe pardon his whole family?
If there were no crimes then no pardon is needed.
Used to forstall harassment.
No pardon needed for that. There must be crimes or he
wouldn't have pardoned them.
Further, if he knows of such crimes and did not report them..
That didn't happen, scooter. Biden preemptively pardoned
On 3/27/2025 9:20 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
"Skeeter" <none@none.com> wrote in message news:MPG.424f1c997034b57f9897b2@usnews.blocknews.net...
In article <vs3q2l$gi14$9@dont-email.me>, bax02
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in
news:MPG.424ef8a76865fad39897a4@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <m4js8dF6j81U2@mid.individual.net>,
jfwaldby@gmail.com says...
Skeeter wrote:
In article <vs2bvu$2vp78$4@dont-email.me>,All 6 of them.
j_carlson@gmx.com says...
On 3/26/2025 7:01 PM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <XnsB2AED2D464F6B629555@185.151.15.190>,*Another* case where whataboutism is intellectually and morally
noemail@aol.com says...
pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote in
news:vs23qp$2rd9q$1@dont-email.me:
On 2025-03-26, Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote:
In article <vs1pcd$2irf1$2@dont-email.me>,
chine.bleu@yahoo.com says...
On 26/3/25 6:33, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vs0t8f$1p84i$5@dont-email.me>,
chine.bleu@yahoo.com says...
On 25/3/25 16:22, pothead wrote:
Maryorkas is lucky he isn't being prosecuted for lying to >>> >> >>>>>>>>>> congress on multiple occasions.
ie: the border is secure.
How many people have TS018861824 been legally deported so >>> >> >>>>>>>>> far?
Not enough.
How many people have been legally deported so far?
As many as possible.
Yep.
Despite the democrats and left attempting to protect them.
Why do these people protect criminals
The party that pardoned over 1000
convicted Jan 6 felons dares to accuse
others of "protecting criminals"?
LOL!
BUTWHATABOUT
correct.
Why did Joe pardon his whole family?
If there were no crimes then no pardon is needed.
Used to forstall harassment.
No pardon needed for that. There must be crimes or he
wouldn't have pardoned them.
Further, if he knows of such crimes and did not report them..
That didn't happen, scooter. Biden preemptively pardoned some people because he
knew ? we all knew ? that Trump intended to launch baseless and malicious prosecutions of them. They would never be convicted, but it would cripple them
until the charges could be dismissed or acquittals won. You know that's what Trump intended to do, scooter ? Trump *said* it's what he was going to do.
As you've already been instructed, scooter, pardons are official presidential acts, and a president can never be prosecuted for those.
"Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message news:vs4k23$1910v$2@dont-email.me...
"Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in
news:vs416u$nsd9$2@dont-email.me:
SCOTUS says Presidents can't be procesuted for official acts - and a
Further, if he knows of such crimes and did not report them.. then
wouldn't that make him an accessory after the fact? A crime for
which Joe Biden could then be prosecuted?
Presidential Pardon is an official act.
Well...
1) We don't know it was an official act since Joe Biden didn't sign
it. A machine did.
2) Pardons are given to those accused of crimes. The assertion made
was the pardons were issued not because of crime committed, or even
for criminal charges brought.
3) Issuing a pardon for purposes other than those sanctioned by the Constitution is not an official act.
Of course, he will never be prosecuted since it's already been
established the Biden was too mentally incompetent to stand trial but apparently good enough for Democrats to keep him in office and even
run him for another term.
1) We don't know it was an official act since Joe Biden didn't
sign it. A machine did.
"Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in news:vs646v$2np9l$1@dont-email.me:
"Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message news:vs4k23$1910v$2@dont-email.me...
"Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in
news:vs416u$nsd9$2@dont-email.me:
SCOTUS says Presidents can't be procesuted for official acts - and a
Further, if he knows of such crimes and did not report them.. then
wouldn't that make him an accessory after the fact? A crime for
which Joe Biden could then be prosecuted?
Presidential Pardon is an official act.
Well...
1) We don't know it was an official act since Joe Biden didn't sign
it. A machine did.
2) Pardons are given to those accused of crimes. The assertion made
was the pardons were issued not because of crime committed, or even
for criminal charges brought.
3) Issuing a pardon for purposes other than those sanctioned by the Constitution is not an official act.
Of course, he will never be prosecuted since it's already been
established the Biden was too mentally incompetent to stand trial but apparently good enough for Democrats to keep him in office and even
run him for another term.
Pretzels are jealous of you.
On 3/28/2025 5:12 AM, Scout wrote:
"Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message news:vs4k23$1910v$2@dont-email.me...
"Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in
news:vs416u$nsd9$2@dont-email.me:
SCOTUS says Presidents can't be procesuted for official acts - and a
Further, if he knows of such crimes and did not report them.. then
wouldn't that make him an accessory after the fact? A crime for which
Joe Biden could then be prosecuted?
Presidential Pardon is an official act.
Well...
1) We don't know it was an official act since Joe Biden didn't sign it. A machine did.
Autopen is used by every president, scooter. Biden "signed" the pardons.
We found universal agreement among legal scholars that the Constitution
doesn?t require a pardon?s direct human signing, and subsequent judicial
decisions and legal memoranda support an autopen?s use for similar purposes.
Legal scholars also agreed that there is no constitutional mechanism to
overturn pardons once granted.
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/fact-checking-trumps-claim-that-biden-pardons-are-void-because-he-used-an-autopen
You're not claiming that Trump personally signed every pardon for the violent insurrectionists, are you, scooter? He didn't, scooter ? he used "autopen"
2) Pardons are given to those accused of crimes.
Not only, scooter. Ford pardoned Nixon before the latter was formally accused of
any crimes, scooter.
3) Issuing a pardon for purposes other than those sanctioned by the Constitution
Name those that are "sanctioned by the Constitution," scooter.
is not an official act.Ha ha ha ha ha! Wrong, scooter. We don't take lectures on "official acts" from
some drunken Virginia camper named "scooter," scooter.
The pardons are valid, scooter. Deal with it, you little faggot bitch.
On 3/28/2025 5:20 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
"norm" <invalid@gmail.com> wrote in message news:vs4pp5$390ff$1@news.mixmin.net...
On 3/27/2025 9:17 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
"Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
news:vs3q2l$gi14$9@dont-email.me...
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in
news:MPG.424ef8a76865fad39897a4@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <m4js8dF6j81U2@mid.individual.net>,
jfwaldby@gmail.com says...
Skeeter wrote:
In article <vs2bvu$2vp78$4@dont-email.me>,All 6 of them.
j_carlson@gmx.com says...
On 3/26/2025 7:01 PM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <XnsB2AED2D464F6B629555@185.151.15.190>,*Another* case where whataboutism is intellectually and morally >>>>>> >> correct.
noemail@aol.com says...
pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote in
news:vs23qp$2rd9q$1@dont-email.me:
On 2025-03-26, Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote:
In article <vs1pcd$2irf1$2@dont-email.me>,
chine.bleu@yahoo.com says...
On 26/3/25 6:33, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vs0t8f$1p84i$5@dont-email.me>,
chine.bleu@yahoo.com says...
On 25/3/25 16:22, pothead wrote:
Maryorkas is lucky he isn't being prosecuted for lying to >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> congress on multiple occasions.
ie: the border is secure.
How many people have TS018861824 been legally deported so >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> far?
Not enough.
How many people have been legally deported so far?
As many as possible.
Yep.
Despite the democrats and left attempting to protect them. >>>>>> >>>>>
Why do these people protect criminals
The party that pardoned over 1000
convicted Jan 6 felons dares to accuse
others of "protecting criminals"?
LOL!
BUTWHATABOUT
Why did Joe pardon his whole family?
If there were no crimes then no pardon is needed.
Used to forstall harassment.
Which means it isn't a pardon and
It's a valid pardon, scooter.
Such use should invalidate the pardon.
That would seem to track.
No. They are valid pardons, you dumb plodding fat fuck.
But let's say we accept Rudy's position... The Biden family WAS engaged in extensive illegal activities.
No, scooter, they were not. That's just your partisan lie.
If they did nothing wrong then a pardon would be unnecessary.
It prevents baseless prosecution for fictitious crimes, scooter.
Indeed,
A scooterism ? empty wheeze.
this could be taken as a public admission of crime within the Biden family.
No, scooter.
On 3/28/2025 5:16 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreude.entf?rben.@gmail.com> wrote in message news:JGmFP.126393$f5K3.97273@fx36.iad...
On 3/27/2025 9:20 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
"Skeeter" <none@none.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.424f1c997034b57f9897b2@usnews.blocknews.net...
In article <vs3q2l$gi14$9@dont-email.me>, bax02
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in
news:MPG.424ef8a76865fad39897a4@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <m4js8dF6j81U2@mid.individual.net>,
jfwaldby@gmail.com says...
Skeeter wrote:
In article <vs2bvu$2vp78$4@dont-email.me>,All 6 of them.
j_carlson@gmx.com says...
On 3/26/2025 7:01 PM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <XnsB2AED2D464F6B629555@185.151.15.190>,*Another* case where whataboutism is intellectually and morally >>>>> >> >> correct.
noemail@aol.com says...
pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote in
news:vs23qp$2rd9q$1@dont-email.me:
On 2025-03-26, Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote:
In article <vs1pcd$2irf1$2@dont-email.me>,
chine.bleu@yahoo.com says...
On 26/3/25 6:33, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vs0t8f$1p84i$5@dont-email.me>,
chine.bleu@yahoo.com says...
On 25/3/25 16:22, pothead wrote:
Maryorkas is lucky he isn't being prosecuted for lying to >>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> congress on multiple occasions.
ie: the border is secure.
How many people have TS018861824 been legally deported so >>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> far?
Not enough.
How many people have been legally deported so far?
As many as possible.
Yep.
Despite the democrats and left attempting to protect them. >>>>> >> >>>>>
Why do these people protect criminals
The party that pardoned over 1000
convicted Jan 6 felons dares to accuse
others of "protecting criminals"?
LOL!
BUTWHATABOUT
Why did Joe pardon his whole family?
If there were no crimes then no pardon is needed.
Used to forstall harassment.
No pardon needed for that. There must be crimes or he
wouldn't have pardoned them.
Further, if he knows of such crimes and did not report them..
That didn't happen, scooter. Biden preemptively pardoned
Preemptively pardoned?
Yes, scooter.
So the crimes have NOT yet been committed?
There were no crimes, scooter. The pardons were to prevent shitbag Trump from maliciously and baselessly prosecuting them for fictitious crimes.
But let's say they do.
They don't, scooter. Fictitious crimes by definition were never committed.
without uncovering a crime, and the details of that
crime how can anyone determine that a pardon is necessary much less warranted?
Fictitious crimes, scooter.
Are you suggesting Biden was aware of the criminal activities of his family and
No, scooter. Biden knew his family had committed no crimes, scooter, but he knew
Trump was going to prosecute them for fictitious crimes anyway, because Trump said he was going to do that.
You lose, scooter. You always lose. You imagine yourself to be some kind of Usenet jiu-jitsu "Grand Master," but you're in fact a dull oafish plodder whose
feet are stuck in mud.
In article <VFmFP.126392$f5K3.83131@fx36.iad>,
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 3/27/2025 3:58 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <vs4k23$1910v$2@dont-email.me>, bax02
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
"Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in
news:vs416u$nsd9$2@dont-email.me:
SCOTUS says Presidents can't be procesuted for official acts - and a
Further, if he knows of such crimes and did not report them.. then
wouldn't that make him an accessory after the fact? A crime for which >>>>> Joe Biden could then be prosecuted?
Presidential Pardon is an official act.
The ones signed by autopen?
Who cares?
Real fuckwits.
Why did he pardon his family?
Asked and answered, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell.
Never answered.Answered plenty of times, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell.
In article <SGmFP.126394$f5K3.23294@fx36.iad>,
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 3/27/2025 8:28 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <vs3q2l$gi14$9@dont-email.me>, bax02
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in
news:MPG.424ef8a76865fad39897a4@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <m4js8dF6j81U2@mid.individual.net>,
jfwaldby@gmail.com says...
Skeeter wrote:
In article <vs2bvu$2vp78$4@dont-email.me>,All 6 of them.
j_carlson@gmx.com says...
On 3/26/2025 7:01 PM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <XnsB2AED2D464F6B629555@185.151.15.190>,*Another* case where whataboutism is intellectually and morally >>>>>>>> correct.
noemail@aol.com says...
pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote in
news:vs23qp$2rd9q$1@dont-email.me:
On 2025-03-26, Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote:
In article <vs1pcd$2irf1$2@dont-email.me>,
chine.bleu@yahoo.com says...
On 26/3/25 6:33, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vs0t8f$1p84i$5@dont-email.me>,
chine.bleu@yahoo.com says...
On 25/3/25 16:22, pothead wrote:
Maryorkas is lucky he isn't being prosecuted for lying to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> congress on multiple occasions.
ie: the border is secure.
How many people have TS018861824 been legally deported so >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> far?
Not enough.
How many people have been legally deported so far?
As many as possible.
Yep.
Despite the democrats and left attempting to protect them. >>>>>>>>>>>
Why do these people protect criminals
The party that pardoned over 1000
convicted Jan 6 felons dares to accuse
others of "protecting criminals"?
LOL!
BUTWHATABOUT
Why did Joe pardon his whole family?
If there were no crimes then no pardon is needed.
Used to forstall harassment.
No pardon needed for that.
The pardons were needed to prevent Trump's malicious and baseless prosecutions.
No crime to be found? Why a pardon?
In article <vs6if4$3437f$4@dont-email.me>,
chine.bleu@yahoo.com says...
On 28/3/25 5:12, Scout wrote:
1) We don't know it was an official act since Joe Biden didn't
sign it. A machine did.
Could you atop being so lame? You are not entertaining.
But he's right and
In article <n%yFP.1770268$TBhc.831768@fx16.iad>, klaus.schadenfreude.entfï¿?rben.@gmail.com says...
On 3/28/2025 5:12 AM, Scout wrote:
"Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
news:vs4k23$1910v$2@dont-email.me...
"Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in
news:vs416u$nsd9$2@dont-email.me:
SCOTUS says Presidents can't be procesuted for official acts - and a
Further, if he knows of such crimes and did not report them.. then
wouldn't that make him an accessory after the fact? A crime for which >>>>> Joe Biden could then be prosecuted?
Presidential Pardon is an official act.
Well...
1) We don't know it was an official act since Joe Biden didn't sign it. A >>> machine did.
Autopen is used by every president, scooter. Biden "signed" the pardons.
We found universal agreement among legal scholars that the Constitution >> doesn?t require a pardon?s direct human signing, and subsequent judicial
decisions and legal memoranda support an autopen?s use for similar purposes.
Legal scholars also agreed that there is no constitutional mechanism to >> overturn pardons once granted.
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/fact-checking-trumps-claim-that-biden-pardons-are-void-because-he-used-an-autopen
You're not claiming that Trump personally signed every pardon for the violent
insurrectionists, are you, scooter? He didn't, scooter ? he used "autopen"
2) Pardons are given to those accused of crimes.
Not only, scooter. Ford pardoned Nixon before the latter was formally accused of
any crimes, scooter.
3) Issuing a pardon for purposes other than those sanctioned by the Constitution
Name those that are "sanctioned by the Constitution," scooter.
is not an official act.Ha ha ha ha ha! Wrong, scooter. We don't take lectures on "official acts" from
some drunken Virginia camper named "scooter," scooter.
The pardons are valid, scooter. Deal with it, you little faggot bitch.
It's call
In article <x%yFP.1770269$TBhc.1550038@fx16.iad>, klaus.schadenfreude.entfï¿?rben.@gmail.com says...
On 3/28/2025 5:20 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless
chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
"norm" <invalid@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:vs4pp5$390ff$1@news.mixmin.net...
On 3/27/2025 9:17 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
"Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
news:vs3q2l$gi14$9@dont-email.me...
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in
news:MPG.424ef8a76865fad39897a4@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <m4js8dF6j81U2@mid.individual.net>,
jfwaldby@gmail.com says...
Skeeter wrote:
In article <vs2bvu$2vp78$4@dont-email.me>,All 6 of them.
j_carlson@gmx.com says...
On 3/26/2025 7:01 PM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <XnsB2AED2D464F6B629555@185.151.15.190>,*Another* case where whataboutism is intellectually and morally >>>>>>>>>> correct.
noemail@aol.com says...
pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote in
news:vs23qp$2rd9q$1@dont-email.me:
On 2025-03-26, Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote:
In article <vs1pcd$2irf1$2@dont-email.me>,
chine.bleu@yahoo.com says...
As many as possible.
On 26/3/25 6:33, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vs0t8f$1p84i$5@dont-email.me>,
chine.bleu@yahoo.com says...
On 25/3/25 16:22, pothead wrote:
Maryorkas is lucky he isn't being prosecuted for lying to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> congress on multiple occasions.
ie: the border is secure.
How many people have TS018861824Â been legally deported so >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> far?
Not enough.
How many people have been legally deported so far? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Yep.
Despite the democrats and left attempting to protect them. >>>>>>>>>>>>>
Why do these people protect criminals
       The party that pardoned over 1000
convicted Jan 6 felons dares to accuse
others of "protecting criminals"?
       LOL!
BUTWHATABOUT
Why did Joe pardon his whole family?
If there were no crimes then no pardon is needed.
Used to forstall harassment.
Which means it isn't a pardon and
It's a valid pardon, scooter.
Such use should invalidate the pardon.
That would seem to track.
No. They are valid pardons, you dumb plodding fat fuck.
But let's say we accept Rudy's position... The Biden family WAS engaged in >>> extensive illegal activities.
No, scooter, they were not. That's just your partisan lie.
If they did nothing wrong then a pardon would be unnecessary.
It prevents baseless prosecution for fictitious crimes, scooter.
But these crimes have to be proven in a court of law.
Indeed,
A scooterism ? empty wheeze.
this could be taken as a public admission of crime within the Biden family. >>No, scooter.
In article <ZWBFP.1190547$OrR5.361457@fx18.iad>, mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 3/28/2025 7:08 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <VFmFP.126392$f5K3.83131@fx36.iad>,
mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 3/27/2025 3:58 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <vs4k23$1910v$2@dont-email.me>, bax02
_spamblock@baxcode.com says...
"Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in
news:vs416u$nsd9$2@dont-email.me:
SCOTUS says Presidents can't be procesuted for official acts - and a >>>>>> Presidential Pardon is an official act.
Further, if he knows of such crimes and did not report them.. then >>>>>>> wouldn't that make him an accessory after the fact? A crime for which >>>>>>> Joe Biden could then be prosecuted?
The ones signed by autopen?
Who cares?
Real fuckwits.
Right.
Answered plenty of times, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell.
Why did he pardon his family?
Asked and answered, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell.
Never answered.
Never and
In article <O0CFP.1190551$OrR5.405269@fx18.iad>, mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
On 3/28/2025 11:18 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
of lies:
In article <x%yFP.1770269$TBhc.1550038@fx16.iad>,
klaus.schadenfreude.entfï¿?rben.@gmail.com says...
On 3/28/2025 5:20 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless >>>> chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
"norm" <invalid@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:vs4pp5$390ff$1@news.mixmin.net...
On 3/27/2025 9:17 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and lied:
"Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
news:vs3q2l$gi14$9@dont-email.me...
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in
news:MPG.424ef8a76865fad39897a4@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <m4js8dF6j81U2@mid.individual.net>,
jfwaldby@gmail.com says...
Skeeter wrote:
In article <vs2bvu$2vp78$4@dont-email.me>,All 6 of them.
j_carlson@gmx.com says...
On 3/26/2025 7:01 PM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <XnsB2AED2D464F6B629555@185.151.15.190>,*Another* case where whataboutism is intellectually and morally >>>>>>>>>>>> correct.
noemail@aol.com says...
pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote in
news:vs23qp$2rd9q$1@dont-email.me:
On 2025-03-26, Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote:
In article <vs1pcd$2irf1$2@dont-email.me>,
chine.bleu@yahoo.com says...
As many as possible.
On 26/3/25 6:33, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vs0t8f$1p84i$5@dont-email.me>, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> chine.bleu@yahoo.com says...
On 25/3/25 16:22, pothead wrote:
Maryorkas is lucky he isn't being prosecuted for lying to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> congress on multiple occasions.
ie: the border is secure.
How many people have TS018861824Â been legally deported so >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> far?
Not enough.
How many people have been legally deported so far? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Yep.
Despite the democrats and left attempting to protect them. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Why do these people protect criminals
       The party that pardoned over 1000 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> convicted Jan 6 felons dares to accuse
others of "protecting criminals"?
       LOL!
BUTWHATABOUT
Why did Joe pardon his whole family?
If there were no crimes then no pardon is needed.
Used to forstall harassment.
Which means it isn't a pardon and
It's a valid pardon, scooter.
Such use should invalidate the pardon.
That would seem to track.
No. They are valid pardons, you dumb plodding fat fuck.
But let's say we accept Rudy's position... The Biden family WAS engaged in
extensive illegal activities.
No, scooter, they were not. That's just your partisan lie.
If they did nothing wrong then a pardon would be unnecessary.
It prevents baseless prosecution for fictitious crimes, scooter.
But these crimes have to be proven in a court of law.
Only to obtain a conviction, you squat-to-piss no-fight faggot pussy.
So why the pardon?
Indeed,
A scooterism ? empty wheeze.
this could be taken as a public admission of crime within the Biden family.
No, scooter.
[Default] Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
"Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in >>news:vs646v$2np9l$1@dont-email.me:
Pretzels are jealous of you.
"Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
news:vs4k23$1910v$2@dont-email.me...
"Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in
news:vs416u$nsd9$2@dont-email.me:
SCOTUS says Presidents can't be procesuted for official acts - and a
Further, if he knows of such crimes and did not report them.. then
wouldn't that make him an accessory after the fact? A crime for
which Joe Biden could then be prosecuted?
Presidential Pardon is an official act.
Well...
1) We don't know it was an official act since Joe Biden didn't sign
it. A machine did.
2) Pardons are given to those accused of crimes. The assertion made
was the pardons were issued not because of crime committed, or even
for criminal charges brought.
3) Issuing a pardon for purposes other than those sanctioned by the
Constitution is not an official act.
Of course, he will never be prosecuted since it's already been
established the Biden was too mentally incompetent to stand trial but
apparently good enough for Democrats to keep him in office and even
run him for another term.
Baxter knows Biden is-- and was-- incompetent.
In article <n%yFP.1770268$TBhc.831768@fx16.iad>, klaus.schadenfreude.entfï¿?rben.@gmail.com says...
On 3/28/2025 5:12 AM, Scout wrote:
"Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
news:vs4k23$1910v$2@dont-email.me...
"Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in
news:vs416u$nsd9$2@dont-email.me:
SCOTUS says Presidents can't be procesuted for official acts - and
Further, if he knows of such crimes and did not report them..
then wouldn't that make him an accessory after the fact? A crime
for which Joe Biden could then be prosecuted?
a Presidential Pardon is an official act.
Well...
1) We don't know it was an official act since Joe Biden didn't sign
it. A machine did.
Autopen is used by every president, scooter. Biden "signed" the
pardons.
We found universal agreement among legal scholars that the
Constitution doesn?t require a pardon?s direct human signing, and
subsequent judicial decisions and legal memoranda support an
autopen?s use for similar purposes. Legal scholars also agreed
that there is no constitutional mechanism to overturn pardons
once granted.
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/fact-checking-trumps-claim-that-
biden-pardons-are-void-because-he-used-an-autopen
You're not claiming that Trump personally signed every pardon for the
violent insurrectionists, are you, scooter? He didn't, scooter ? he
used "autopen"
2) Pardons are given to those accused of crimes.
Not only, scooter. Ford pardoned Nixon before the latter was formally
accused of any crimes, scooter.
3) Issuing a pardon for purposes other than those sanctioned by the
Constitution
Name those that are "sanctioned by the Constitution," scooter.
is not an official act.Ha ha ha ha ha! Wrong, scooter. We don't take lectures on "official
acts" from some drunken Virginia camper named "scooter," scooter.
The pardons are valid, scooter. Deal with it, you little faggot
bitch.
It's call covering their asses.
In article <x%yFP.1770269$TBhc.1550038@fx16.iad>, klaus.schadenfreude.entfï¿?rben.@gmail.com says...
On 3/28/2025 5:20 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and
gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled and
lied:
"norm" <invalid@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:vs4pp5$390ff$1@news.mixmin.net...
On 3/27/2025 9:17 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and
gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, trolled
and lied:
"Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message
news:vs3q2l$gi14$9@dont-email.me...
Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote in
news:MPG.424ef8a76865fad39897a4@usnews.blocknews.net:
In article <m4js8dF6j81U2@mid.individual.net>,
jfwaldby@gmail.com says...
Skeeter wrote:
In article <vs2bvu$2vp78$4@dont-email.me>,All 6 of them.
j_carlson@gmx.com says...
On 3/26/2025 7:01 PM, Skeeter wrote:
In article <XnsB2AED2D464F6B629555@185.151.15.190>,*Another* case where whataboutism is intellectually and
noemail@aol.com says...
pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote in
news:vs23qp$2rd9q$1@dont-email.me:
On 2025-03-26, Skeeter <none@none.com> wrote:
In article <vs1pcd$2irf1$2@dont-email.me>,
chine.bleu@yahoo.com says...
On 26/3/25 6:33, Skeeter wrote:
In article <vs0t8f$1p84i$5@dont-email.me>,
chine.bleu@yahoo.com says...
On 25/3/25 16:22, pothead wrote:
Maryorkas is lucky he isn't being prosecuted for
lying to congress on multiple occasions.
ie: the border is secure.
How many people have TS018861824 been legally
deported so far?
Not enough.
How many people have been legally deported so far?
As many as possible.
Yep.
Despite the democrats and left attempting to protect
them.
Why do these people protect criminals
The party that pardoned over 1000
convicted Jan 6 felons dares to accuse
others of "protecting criminals"?
LOL!
BUTWHATABOUT
morally correct.
Why did Joe pardon his whole family?
If there were no crimes then no pardon is needed.
Used to forstall harassment.
Which means it isn't a pardon and
It's a valid pardon, scooter.
Such use should invalidate the pardon.
That would seem to track.
No. They are valid pardons, you dumb plodding fat fuck.
But let's say we accept Rudy's position... The Biden family WAS
engaged in extensive illegal activities.
No, scooter, they were not. That's just your partisan lie.
If they did nothing wrong then a pardon would be unnecessary.
It prevents baseless prosecution for fictitious crimes, scooter.
But these crimes have to be proven in a court of law. So
why are they worried about it?
Indeed,
A scooterism ? empty wheeze.
this could be taken as a public admission of crime within the Biden
family.
No, scooter.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 483 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 159:27:08 |
| Calls: | 9,594 |
| Files: | 13,676 |
| Messages: | 6,149,236 |