• Supreme Court justices consider reviving industry bid to ax California

    From H Karlsen@21:1/5 to All on Wed Apr 23 20:50:52 2025
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sac.politics, ca.politics
    XPost: alt.society.liberalism, law.court.federal

    The Supreme Court on Wednesday heard oral arguments in a case that could
    revive a bid by fuel producers to ax California’s clean car standards.

    The court was not considering the legality of the standards themselves,
    which ??require car companies to sell new vehicles in the state that
    produce less pollution — including by mandating a significant share of
    cars sold to be electric or hybrid.

    Instead, the Supreme Court was considering whether the fuel industry had
    the authority to bring the lawsuit at all. A lower court determined that
    the producers, which include numerous biofuel companies and trade groups representing both them and the makers of gasoline, did not have standing
    to bring the case.

    Some of the justices were quiet, so it’s difficult to predict what the ultimate outcome of the case will be.

    However, others appeared critical of the federal government and
    California’s arguments that the fuel producers do not have the right to
    bring a suit.

    Justice Brett Kavanaugh in particular noted that the Environmental
    Protection Agency (EPA) itself did not initially try to have the case
    tossed on that basis.

    “Isn’t that a tell here? I mean, EPA, as you, of course, know, routinely raises standing objections when there’s even — even a hint of a question about it,” Kavanaugh said.

    The fuel producers argued that while it was technically the auto
    industry that was being regulated, the market was being “tilted” against them as well by California’s rule, which was also adopted by other
    states.

    The EPA and California have argued that the fuel producers are arguing
    on the basis of outdated facts and a market that has shifted since the
    rule was first approved by the EPA in 2013.

    The EPA needs to grant approval to California to issue such rules. The
    approval was revoked by the Trump administration and later reinstated in
    the Biden administration.

    If the justices revive the currently dismissed case, lower courts would
    then have to decide whether to uphold the California rule — though the underlying case could eventually make its way to the high court as well.

    Meanwhile, California has since passed subsequent standards that go even further — banning the sale of gas-powered cars in the state by 2035.

    That rule was approved by the Biden administration — though Congress may
    try to repeal it.

    https://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/5263282-supreme-court-argum ents-clean-car-california/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris Ahlstrom@21:1/5 to H Karlsen on Thu Apr 24 06:59:18 2025
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sac.politics, ca.politics
    XPost: alt.society.liberalism, law.court.federal

    H Karlsen wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:

    The Supreme Court on Wednesday heard oral arguments in a case that could revive a bid by fuel producers to ax California’s clean car standards.

    <snip>

    https://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/5263282-supreme-court-argum ents-clean-car-california/

    States rights. Except for blue states.

    --
    I have a friend whose a billionaire. He invented Cliff's notes. When
    I asked him how he got such a great idea he said, "Well first I...
    I just... to make a long story short..."
    -- Steven Wright

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)