• =?UTF-8?Q?Former_interim_D=2EC=2E_U=2ES=2E_attorney_Ed_Martin_says_?= =

    From Rudy Canoza@21:1/5 to All on Thu May 15 11:44:59 2025
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.society.liberalism, alt.atheism
    XPost: alt.fun, alt.politics.democrats.d

    Former D.C. U.S. attorney nominee revealed he faces a legal disciplinary review in an all-office goodbye email, while claiming his confidentiality was violated.

    By Spencer S. Hsu

    May 15, 2025 at 12:08 p.m. EDT

    Justice Department official Ed Martin, whose nomination to serve as U.S. attorney in D.C. stalled in the Senate, is under investigation by an ethics office that handles attorney discipline in Washington, he said in an office-wide
    goodbye email Wednesday.

    On his last day as interim U.S. attorney before heading to the Justice Department, Martin alerted his office’s roughly 350 attorneys and 400 staff members to the matter while claiming his confidentiality had been violated. Martin alleged that the legal ethics office, called the Office of Disciplinary Counsel, had inappropriately notified a unit of his U.S. attorney’s office of the probe.

    Martin identified the case number, 2025-D047, but not the specific allegations against him. Democratic lawmakers and groups have accused Martin of abusing his power, seeking the suspension of his law license or other penalties. In complaints lodged with the Office of Disciplinary Counsel’s chief, Hamilton P.
    “Phil” Fox, they alleged that Martin has used the threat of prosecution to intimidate and chill the speech of perceived adversaries such as lawmakers, protesters, journalists, medical journals and others he said opposed the agendas
    of President Donald Trump or billionaire adviser Elon Musk, even in instances when they did not commit a crime but “acted simply unethically.”

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2025/05/15/ed-martin-dc-ethics-investigation/

    Who gives a fuck if this corrupt shitbag's "confidentiality" was violated? Martin was stomping all over the rights of his politically chosen targets.

    Ed Martin doesn't merely need to be disbarred — he belongs in prison.

    --
    Every Republiscum/QAnon accusation is, in fact, a confession

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Henderson@21:1/5 to Rudy Canoza on Thu May 15 19:07:53 2025
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.society.liberalism, alt.atheism
    XPost: alt.fun, alt.politics.democrats.d

    Rudy Canoza wrote:

    Former D.C. U.S. attorney nominee revealed he faces a legal
    disciplinary review in an all-office goodbye email, while claiming
    his confidentiality was violated.

    By Spencer S. Hsu

    May 15, 2025 at 12:08 p.m. EDT

    Justice Department official Ed Martin, whose nomination to serve as
    U.S. attorney in D.C. stalled in the Senate, is under investigation
    by an ethics office that handles attorney discipline in Washington,
    he said in an office-wide goodbye email Wednesday.

    On his last day as interim U.S. attorney before heading to the
    Justice Department, Martin alerted his office’s roughly 350 attorneys
    and 400 staff members to the matter while claiming his
    confidentiality had been violated. Martin alleged that the legal
    ethics office, called the Office of Disciplinary Counsel, had
    inappropriately notified a unit of his U.S. attorney’s office of the
    probe.

    Martin identified the case number, 2025-D047, but not the specific allegations against him. Democratic lawmakers and groups have accused
    Martin of abusing his power, seeking the suspension of his law
    license or other penalties. In complaints lodged with the Office of Disciplinary Counsel’s chief, Hamilton P. “Phil” Fox, they alleged
    that Martin has used the threat of prosecution to intimidate and
    chill the speech of perceived adversaries such as lawmakers,
    protesters, journalists, medical journals and others he said opposed
    the agendas of President Donald Trump or billionaire adviser Elon
    Musk, even in instances when they did not commit a crime but “acted
    simply unethically.”


    https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2025/05/15/ed-martin-dc-ethics-investigation/

    Who gives a fuck if this corrupt shitbag's "confidentiality" was
    violated? Martin was stomping all over the rights of his politically
    chosen targets.

    Ed Martin doesn't merely need to be disbarred — he belongs in prison.


    Damn right. Cocksucker should be locked up.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)