• Gavin Newsom can't stop California's pot companies from jumping to hemp

    From Gavin Newsom Failures@21:1/5 to All on Sun May 25 05:11:07 2025
    XPost: alt.politics.marijuana, alt.atheism, sac.politics
    XPost: alt.society.liberalism

    Gov. Gavin Newsom dropped a bomb on California's hemp industry last year
    when he unilaterally banned selling the drug in his state, despite it
    being legal at the federal level. Sales have slowed following his
    emergency order, yet the ban has done little to dissuade California's
    pot companies from jumping into the hemp industry.

    America's hemp industry has boomed since Congress legalized the category
    of cannabis in 2018. Hemp has historically been used to describe
    cannabis used for non-drug purposes, like food and clothing, but
    Congress wrote a broad definition of hemp that has allowed intoxicating
    drugs to be sold as hemp everywhere from gas stations to online
    retailers.

    Newsom issued an emergency order banning the drug's sale last September, calling hemp companies "drug peddlers" who "target our children with
    dangerous and unregulated hemp products." Yet in just the past month,
    some of the state's biggest names in legal weed have started exporting
    hemp products, signaling that California's troubled legal cannabis
    industry is increasingly less attractive than opportunities outside of
    the state.

    Stiiizy, the state's largest retailer, launched an intoxicating hemp
    drink line in January, which it said offered customers "a perfect blend
    of taste and relaxation." Celebrities like Snoop Dogg and Seth Rogen
    have also launched their own lines of hemp products in recent months.

    Kyle Kazan, the CEO and co-founder of Glass House Brands, one of the
    state's largest cannabis companies, said during a November earnings call
    that the hemp market "tantalized" Glass House because it would enable
    them to sell Glass House products in other states. The company is
    currently growing a pilot batch of hemp and could eventually grow as
    much as 60 acres of hemp at its Southern California facilities,
    according to Glass House President Graham Farrar.

    "The upsides are enormous: It's a bigger market, we can accept credit
    cards, we can ship through the USPS and run online advertising. In other
    words, we can be a normal business," Farrar recently told SFGATE.

    None of these products can legally be sold within California following
    Newsom's September ban, though that could change in March when the
    six-month emergency rule expires. Newsom's office did not return
    repeated SFGATE requests for comment regarding whether the governor
    plans to extend the ban after it expires and whether he is concerned
    that legal California cannabis companies are investing in hemp.

    Matt Karnes, a cannabis analyst and founder of GreenWave Advisors, said investors and businesses are more attracted to hemp because it's an
    interstate market that lacks the sky-high taxes and onerous regulations
    that limit marijuana.

    "California businesses see a massive opportunity because the market size includes the entire country (and perhaps other countries)," Karnes said
    in an email to SFGATE.

    Farrar said the same: His company has no problem with California banning
    hemp products from being sold within the state, because Glass House has
    its own chain of retail stores where it can sell legal cannabis to Californians. Instead, he sees hemp exports as "an opportunity to help everyone" in the state's pot industry by allowing companies to sell
    cannabis to more customers, as long as Newsom doesn't shut down the
    growing hemp industry even further.

    "All California needs to do is get out of the way, and they can save the California cannabis farmer by just not being more restrictive than other states," Farrar said.

    https://www.sfgate.com/cannabis/article/newsom-hemp-ban-calif-pot-compani es-20049908.php

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)