XPost: aus.politics, alt.france, nl.politiek
XPost: de.soc.weltanschauung.islam, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

-- THE #246 - OBLIGATING NORM (WATCH PROTOTYPE 12 AUGUST) INTERSECTION
WITH #232 - CUNNING / DISTEMPER SCHEMA (ARE YOU A #431 - *SHEEP* OR A
WOLF? {@1: Sup: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#5 - PAUL: SMALL LITTLE); Ego:
67 - DARKENING: HUI (#67 - HYRCANUS II IS KING OF JUDEA)})

(c) 2023 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 23 May 2023

TORAH ANGEL (FINISH WHAT YOU START) FROM 1550 BCE: [#30, #20, #2]@{
   @1: Sup: 30 - BOLD RESOLUTION: YI (#30); Ego: 30 - BOLD RESOLUTION:
YI (#30),
   @2: Sup: 50 - VASTNESS / WASTING: T'ANG (#80); Ego: 20 - ADVANCE:
CHIN (#50),
   @3: Sup: 52 - MEASURE: TU (#132); Ego: 2 - FULL CIRCLE: CHOU (#52),
   Male: #132; Feme: #52
} // #52

<http://www.grapple369.com/?zen:6,row:4,col:6>

THIS UPDATE IS CONCERNED (

#44 - HITLER's BIRTHDAY ON 20 APRIL;
#30 - BOER WAR MEMORIAL DAY ON 31 MAY;
#77 - #308 = *COMBAT* / *INTENTION* *TO* *KILL* / #509 = YAHAD JEWISH CHRISTIANS ON 22 JULY;
#18 - #246 = OBLIGATING NORM WITH #232 = CUNNING / DISTEMPER SCHEMA INTERSECTION ON 12 AUGUST

) WITH THE TEMPORAL WATCH ZONES (7 x 6TH DAY, 1 x 4 DAY AGGREGATE) AS
POSSIBLY ASSOCIATED TO THE #EIGHT AUTONOMOUS DELIMITER PROTOTYPE OF THE PYTHAGOREAN (570 - 490 BCE) BIPARTITE (@1, @5) #1080 - HETEROS THEORY OF
NUMBER WHICH WAS DEVISED (by reference to ✡️) WHILST IN BABYLONIAN CAPTIVITY DUE TO CAPTURE DURING AN INVASION IN 525 BCE BY CAMBYSES II OF PERSIA.

#1551 as [#80, #1, #300, #100, #800, #70, #200] /
#2101 as [#80, #1, #300, #100, #800, #10, #800, #10] = patrōios (G3971): {UMBRA: #1551 % #41 = #34} 1) descending from father to son or from
ancestors to their posterity as it were by right of inheritance; 2)
received from the fathers;

[Φ, {@1: Sup: 14 - PENETRATION: JUI (#14); Ego: 14 - PENETRATION: JUI (#14)} α, {@2: Sup: 15 - REACH: TA (#29); Ego: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#15)}
υ, {@3: Sup: 10 - DEFECTIVENESS, DISTORTION: HSIEN (#39); Ego: 76 - AGGRAVATION: CHU (#91 - MALE DEME IS UNNAMED {%1})}
σ, {@4: Sup: 48 - RITUAL: LI (#87); Ego: 38 - FULLNESS: SHENG (#129)}
τ, {@5: Sup: 24 - JOY: LE (#111); Ego: 57 - GUARDEDNESS: SHOU (#186 - I
AM NOT ONE OF INCONSTANT MIND {%31} / I AM NOT ONE OF INCONSTANT MIND
{%31})}
υ, {@6: Sup: 19 - FOLLOWING: TS'UNG (#130 - I AM NOT EVIL MINDED {%3});
Ego: 76 - AGGRAVATION: CHU (#262)}
λ, {@7: Sup: 49 - FLIGHT: T'AO (#179 - MALE DEME IS UNNAMED {%0}); Ego:
30 - BOLD RESOLUTION: YI (#292)}
ο, {@8: Sup: 38 - FULLNESS: SHENG (#217); Ego: 70 - SEVERANCE: KE (#362)}
σ] {@9: Sup: 76 - AGGRAVATION: CHU (#293 - *META* *LOGIC* / *ONTIC* *AUTONOMOUS* DELIMITER TO #246 <-> #232); Ego: 38 - FULLNESS: SHENG (#400)}

<http://www.grapple369.com/?date:2023.5.23&idea:293,316,400,456>

#293 as [#70, #40, #70, #30, #70, #3, #9, #1] = homología (G3671):
{UMBRA: #294 % #41 = #7} 1) profession; 1a) subjectively: whom we
profess to be ours; 1b) objectively: *PROFESSION* [*CONFESSION*] i.e.
what one professes [confesses];

#400 as [#30, #40, #300, #30] /
#456 as [#6, #30, #40, #300, #30, #10, #600] = mâshâl (H4912): {UMBRA:
#370 % #41 = #1} 1) proverb, parable; 1a) proverb, proverbial saying,
aphorism; 1b) byword; 1c) similitude, parable; 1d) poem; 1e) *SENTENCES*
*OF* *ETHICAL* *WISDOM*, *ETHICAL* *MAXIMS*;

ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #316 as [#80, #70, #100, #50, #5, #10, #1] =
porneía (G4202): {UMBRA: #316 % #41 = #29} 1) illicit sexual
intercourse; 1a) adultery, fornication, homosexuality, lesbianism,
intercourse with animals etc.; 1b) sexual intercourse with close
relatives; Lev. 18; 1c) sexual intercourse with a divorced man or woman;
Mk. 10:11,12; 2) *METAPHOR*: *THE* *WORSHIP* *OF* *IDOLS*; 2a) *OF*
*THE* *DEFILEMENT* *OF* *IDOLATRY*, *AS* *INCURRED* *BY* *EATING* *THE* *SACRIFICES* *OFFERED* *TO* *IDOLS*;

DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #456 as [#40, #6, #400, #10] / [#5, #40, #6, #400,
#5] = mâveth (H4194): {UMBRA: #446 % #41 = #36} 1) *DEATH*, *DYING*,
*DEATH* (*PERSONIFIED*), *REALM* *OF* *THE* *DEAD*; 1a) death; 1b)
*DEATH* *BY* *VIOLENCE* (*AS* *A* *PENALTY*); 1c) state of death, place
of death;

"BUT THIS I CONFESS (homologéō (G3670): *DECLARE*; *TO* *CONFESS*) UNTO
THEE, THAT AFTER THE WAY WHICH THEY CALL *HERESY*-G139:, SO WORSHIP I
THE GOD OF MY *FATHERS*-G3971:, BELIEVING ALL THINGS WHICH ARE WRITTEN
IN THE LAW AND IN THE PROPHETS:

#531 = #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY + #80 - LABOURING (CH'IN) as [#1,
#10, #100, #5, #200, #5, #10, #200] = haíresis (G139): {UMBRA: #526 %
#41 = #34} 1) *ACT* *OF* *TAKING*, *CAPTURE*: e.g. *STORMING* *A*
*CITY*; 2) choosing, choice; 3) that which is chosen; 4) *A* *BODY* *OF*
*MEN* *FOLLOWING* *THEIR* *OWN* *TENETS* (*SECT* *OR* *PARTY*); 4a) of
the Sadducees; 4b) of the Pharisees; 4c) of the Christians; 5)
dissensions arising from diversity of opinions and aims;

AND HAVE HOPE TOWARD GOD, WHICH THEY THEMSELVES ALSO ALLOW, THAT THERE
SHALL BE A RESURRECTION OF THE DEAD, BOTH OF THE JUST AND UNJUST. AND
HEREIN DO I EXERCISE MYSELF, TO HAVE ALWAYS A CONSCIENCE VOID OF OFFENCE
TOWARD GOD, AND TOWARD MEN." [Acts 24:14-16]

According to tradition (ie. "gennaion pseudos" (honourable or noble lie)
as #232 - CUNNING SCHEMA), on April 21, 753 B.C., Romulus and his twin
brother, Remus, found Rome on the site where they were suckled by a
she-wolf as orphaned infants. Actually, the Romulus and Remus myth
originated sometime in the fourth century B.C., and the exact date of
Rome’s founding was set by the Roman scholar Marcus Terentius Varro in
the first century B.C.

According to the legend, Romulus and Remus were the sons of Rhea Silvia,
the daughter of King Numitor of Alba Longa. Alba Longa was a mythical
city located in the Alban Hills southeast of what would become Rome.
Before the birth of the twins, Numitor was deposed by his younger
brother Amulius, who forced Rhea to become a vestal virgin so that she
would not give birth to rival claimants to his title. However, Rhea was impregnated by the war god #65 - *MARS* and gave birth to Romulus and
Remus. Amulius ordered the infants drowned in the Tiber, but they
survived and washed ashore at the foot of the Palatine hill, where they
were suckled by a she-wolf until they were found by the shepherd
Faustulus (#2101 = Φαύστυλος). <https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/rome-founded>

"I *AM*-G1510: THE GOOD SHEPHERD: THE GOOD SHEPHERD *GIVETH*-G5087: HIS
LIFE FOR THE SHEEP.

    #275 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 23 MAY 2023 as [#5, #10, #200, #10,
#50] /
#18 as [#8, #10] /
#65 as [#5, #10, #40, #10] = eimí (G1510): {UMBRA: #65 % #41 = #24} 1)
to be, to exist, to happen, to be present;

    #232 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 23 MAY 2023 as [#9, #8, #200, #5, #10] /
    #389 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 23 MAY 2023 as [#5, #9, #5, #300,
#70] = títhēmi (G5087): {UMBRA: #377 % #41 = #8} 1) to set, put, place;
1a) to place or lay; 1b) to put down, lay down; 1b1) to bend down; 1b2)
to lay off or aside, to wear or carry no longer; 1b3) to lay by, lay
aside money; 1c) to set on (serve) something to eat or drink; 1d) to set
forth, something to be explained by discourse; 2) to make; 2a) to make
(or set) for one's self or for one's use; 3) *TO* *SET*, *FIX*
*ESTABLISH*; 3a) to set forth; 3b) to establish, ordain;

#530 = #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY + #79 - DIFFICULTIES (NAN) as [#30,
#400, #20, #70, #10] /
#570 as [#30, #400, #20, #70, #50] = lýkos (G3074): {UMBRA: #720 % #41 =
#23} 1) a *WOLF*; 2) metaph. of cruel, greedy, rapacious, destructive men;

G3074@{
   @1: Sup: 30 - BOLD RESOLUTION: YI (#30); Ego: 30 - BOLD RESOLUTION:
YI (#30),
   @2: Sup: 25 - CONTENTION: CHENG (#55); Ego: 76 - AGGRAVATION: CHU (#106),
   @3: Sup: 45 - GREATNESS: TA (#100); Ego: 20 - ADVANCE: CHIN (#126),
   @4: Sup: 34 - KINSHIP: CH'IN (#134); Ego: 70 - SEVERANCE: KE (#196 -
I AM NOT ONE OF LOUD VOICE {%37}),
   @5: Sup: 3 - MIRED: HSIEN (#137); Ego: 50 - VASTNESS / WASTING:
T'ANG (#246),
   Male: #137; Feme: #246
} // #570

    #123 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 23 MAY 2023 as [#40, #70, #6, #7] / [#40, #70, #7, #6] /
#137 as [#40, #70, #7, #500] = mâʻôwz (H4581): {UMBRA: #123 % #41 = #41}
1) place or means of safety, protection, refuge, stronghold; 1a) place
of safety, fastness, harbour, stronghold; 1b) *REFUGE* (*OF* *GOD*)
(fig.); 1c) *HUMAN* *PROTECTION* (fig.);

    #200 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 23 MAY 2023 as [#5, #40, #100, #50,
#5] / [#40, #100, #50, #10] /
    #275 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 23 MAY 2023 as [#30, #40, #100, #50, #10, #5, #600] /
#246 as [#40, #100, #50, #50, #6] = miqneh (H4735): {UMBRA: #195 % #41 =
#31} 1) cattle, livestock; 1a) cattle, livestock; 1a1) in general of a purchasable domestic animal; 1b) cows, *SHEEP*, goats (in herds and flocks);

#80 - LABOURING (CH'IN) as [#20, #7, #1, #2, #10, #40] = zᵉʼêb (H2061): {UMBRA: #10 % #41 = #10} 1) *WOLF*;

BUT HE THAT IS AN HIRELING, AND NOT THE SHEPHERD, WHOSE OWN THE SHEEP
ARE NOT, SEETH THE WOLF COMING, AND LEAVETH THE SHEEP, AND FLEETH: AND
THE WOLF CATCHETH THEM, AND SCATTERETH THE SHEEP." [John 10:11-12]

I am not persuaded that a Persian regnal year, either Nisan-based or
tied to variable accession months, should be assumed in understanding
the dating of Nehemiah. Yet in the case of Haggai we cannot assume
Tishri dating by the Jewish civil calendar either. The best, and Scripture-based, explanation appears to be that two different Jewish calendars—one civil and indicated by the use of Babylon-derived
month-names, the other religious and indicated by the use of
month-numbers typical of the calendar God gave the Jews at the first *PASSOVER*—were behind the thinking of the different writers. From this, coupled with the likelihood that an interregnum meant Artaxerxes did not
begin his accession year until after Tishri 1, 465 BC, I am driven to
the conclusion that Ezra’s trip to Jerusalem took place in the spring of
457 BC. In this way we can accommodate what seems to be a biblical
requirement to understand the Seventy Weeks prophecy of [Daniel 9:24–27]
as based on sabbatical years. <https://biblearchaeology.org/abr-projects-main/the-daniel-9-24-27-project-2/4549-did-ezra-come-to-jerusalem-in-457-bc>

"SEVENTY *WEEKS*-H7620 (ie. either 10 x 7J as 10 x 49 or 70 x 7W as 70 x
7 = 490 x 364 = 178360 days / 365.2423 = 488.3333 years = 457 BCE if no
zero year) ARE #345 - *DETERMINED* UPON THY PEOPLE AND UPON THY HOLY
CITY, TO FINISH THE TRANSGRESSION, AND TO MAKE AN END OF SINS, AND TO
MAKE RECONCILIATION FOR #538 - *INIQUITY*, AND TO BRING IN EVERLASTING
#249 - *RIGHTEOUSNESS*, AND TO SEAL UP THE VISION AND PROPHECY, AND TO
ANOINT THE MOST HOLY.

KNOW THEREFORE AND UNDERSTAND, THAT FROM THE GOING FORTH OF THE #538 - *COMMANDMENT* TO RESTORE AND TO #345 - *BUILD* JERUSALEM UNTO THE
MESSIAH THE PRINCE SHALL BE SEVEN *WEEKS*-H7620, AND THREESCORE AND TWO *WEEKS*-H7620: THE STREET SHALL BE #345 - *BUILT* AGAIN, AND THE #460 -
*WALL*, EVEN IN TROUBLOUS TIMES.

AND AFTER THREESCORE AND TWO *WEEKS*-H7620 SHALL MESSIAH BE #249 - *CUT*
*OFF*, BUT NOT FOR HIMSELF: AND THE #249 - *PEOPLE* *OF* *THE* *PRINCE*
THAT SHALL #460 - *COME* SHALL #345 / #538 - *DESTROY* *THE* *CITY* AND
THE SANCTUARY; AND THE END THEREOF SHALL BE WITH A FLOOD, AND UNTO THE
#460 - *END* OF THE #345 - *WAR* DESOLATIONS ARE DETERMINED.

-- ESPOIR SANS DIEU --

"NEVER FORGIVE
OR EVER FORGET.
WHO DID GIVE.
WITH NO REGRET.

OR 'ER EXCUSE.
SUCH BETRAYAL.
VAINLY PROFUSE.
BY ITS DENIAL."

YOUTUBE: "HOW GREAT THOU ART (FEAT. LAUREN DAIGLE)"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p-hvI1nbS80>

TIC-TAC-TOE: 3 APRIL 33 AD / 2015
"WHEN YE SEE THE ABOMINATION OF DESOLATION, SPOKEN OF BY DANIEL THE
PROPHET, STANDING WHERE IT OUGHT NOT (LET HIM THAT READETH UNDERSTAND)
THEN LET THEM THAT BE IN JUDEA FLEE TO THE MOUNTAINS." [Mark 13:14]

#41 #1 #57
#49 #33 #17
#9 #65 #25
= #99 / #297 {#ONE: #296 - IMMATERIAL PYTHAGOREAN BIPARTITE NUMBER
ELEMENT / USURPATION #1} = tsûwr (H6697): *ROCK* / #297 = râbats
(H7257): *LAYING* (*STONES*) [Isaiah 54:11]

<http://www.grapple369.com/?date:2015.4.3&idea:249,345,460,538>

AND HE SHALL CONFIRM (#249 - *WINE* / #345 - *DOUGH*) THE #460 -
*COVENANT* WITH MANY FOR ONE *WEEK*-H7620: AND IN THE MIDST OF THE
*WEEK*-H7620 HE SHALL CAUSE THE #538 - *SACRIFICE* AND THE #538 -
*OBLATION* TO #460 - *CEASE*, AND FOR THE OVERSPREADING OF #538 - *ABOMINATIONS* HE SHALL MAKE IT #345 - *DESOLATE*, EVEN UNTIL THE #345 - *CONSUMMATION*, AND THAT #345 - *DETERMINED* SHALL BE #345 - *POURED*
UPON THE DESOLATE." [Daniel 9:24-27]



<http://www.grapple369.com/images/Torah%20Kabbalah%20Angels.jpeg>

#132 as [#1, #50, #70, #10, #1] = ánoia (G454): {UMBRA: #132 % #41 = #9}
1) want of understanding, folly; 2) madness expressing itself in rage;

#52 as [#7, #40, #5] = zimmâh (H2154): {UMBRA: #52 % #41 = #11} 1) plan, device, wickedness, evil plan, mischievous purpose; 1a) plan, purpose;
1b) evil device, wickedness; 1c) not chaste, incest, licentiousness,
adultery, idolatry, harlotry;

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?telos:232&intersect:246&type:1>

DEME SPECTRUM [@237, @71, @119, @200, @76, @220, @110, @81]

{@8: Sup: 61 - EMBELLISHMENT: SHIH (#431); Ego: 81 - FOSTERING: YANG (#466)}

<http://www.grapple369.com/?date:2023.5.23&idea:431,444,466,470>

#431 as [#300, #30, #1, #50, #50] / [#300, #30, #1, #50, #700] =
shalʼănân (H7946): {UMBRA: #431 % #41 = #21} 1) at ease, quiet, secure;

    #474 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 23 MAY 2023 as [#9, #400, #5, #10, #50] /
#431 as [#5, #9, #400, #9, #8] = thýō (G2380): {UMBRA: #1209 % #41 =
#20} 1) to sacrifice, immolate; 2) to slay, kill; 2a) of the paschal
*LAMB*; 3) slaughter;

#466 as [#60, #6, #400] = çûwth (H5496): {UMBRA: #466 % #41 = #15} 1) to incite, allure, instigate, entice; 1a) (Hiphil); 1a1) to incite (to a
request); 1a2) to allure, lure; 1a3) to instigate (bad sense);

#466 as [#3, #30, #3, #30, #400] = gulgôleth (H1538): {UMBRA: #466 % #41
= #15} 1) head, poll, *SKULL*; 1a) skull; 1b) head, poll (of census);

"THEN SAITH PILATE UNTO HIM, *SPEAKEST*-G2980: THOU NOT UNTO ME?

    #275 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 23 MAY 2023 as [#5, #30, #1, #30, #8, #200, #1] /
    #329 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 23 MAY 2023 as [#5, #30, #1, #30, #8, #200, #5, #50] /
#470 as [#30, #1, #30, #8, #200, #1, #200] = laléō (G2980): {UMBRA: #866
% #41 = #5} 1) to utter a voice or emit a sound; 2) to speak; 2a) to use
the tongue or the faculty of speech; 2b) to utter articulate sounds; 3)
to talk; 4) to utter, tell; 5) to use words in order to declare one's
mind and disclose one's thoughts; 5a) to speak;

KNOWEST THOU NOT THAT I HAVE POWER TO CRUCIFY THEE, AND HAVE POWER TO
RELEASE THEE?

    #429 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 23 MAY 2023 as [#6, #5, #8, #9, #1, #400] /
    #454 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 23 MAY 2023 as [#6, #30, #8, #9, #1, #400] / [#6, #8, #9, #1, #400, #10, #500] /
    #474 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 23 MAY 2023 as [#6, #40, #8, #9, #1, #400, #10] / [#8, #9, #1, #400, #50, #6] /
#444 as [#6, #8, #9, #1, #400, #500] /
#460 as [#2, #8, #9, #1, #400, #600] / [#6, #30, #8, #9, #1, #6, #400] = chaṭṭâʼâh (H2403): {UMBRA: #23 % #41 = #23} 1) *SIN*, sinful; 2) sin, sin offering; 2a) sin; 2b) condition of sin, guilt of sin; 2c)
punishment for sin; 2d) sin-offering; 2e) purification from sins of
ceremonial uncleanness;

JESUS ANSWERED, THOU COULDEST HAVE NO POWER AT ALL AGAINST ME, EXCEPT IT
WERE GIVEN THEE FROM ABOVE: THEREFORE HE THAT DELIVERED ME UNTO THEE
HATH THE GREATER *SIN*...

    #114 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 23 MAY 2023 as [#5, #60, #5, #30, #9, #5] /
    #232 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 23 MAY 2023 as [#5, #60, #8, #30, #9, #70, #50] /
    #422 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 23 MAY 2023 as [#5, #60, #5, #30, #9, #8, #300, #5] / [#5, #60, #8, #30, #9, #5, #300, #5] = exérchomai
(G1831): {UMBRA: #891 % #41 = #30} 1) to go or come forth of; 1a) with
mention of the place out of which one goes, or the point from which he
departs; 1a1) of those who leave a place of their own accord; 1a2) of
those who are expelled or cast out; 1b) metaph.; 1b1) to go out of an
assembly, i.e. forsake it; 1b2) to come forth from physically, arise
from, to be born of; 1b3) to go forth from one's power, escape from it
in safety; 1b4) *TO* *COME* *FORTH* (*FROM* *PRIVACY*) *INTO* *THE*
*WORLD*, *BEFORE* *THE* *PUBLIC*, (*OF* *THOSE* *WHO* *BY* *NOVELTY*
*OF* *OPINION* *ATTRACT* *ATTENTION*); 1b5) of things; i) of reports,
rumours, messages, precepts; ii) to be made known, declared; iii) to be
spread, to be proclaimed; iv) to come forth; 1) emitted as from the
heart or the mouth; 2) to flow forth from the body; 3) to emanate,
issue; 31) used of a sudden flash of lightning; 32) used of a thing
vanishing; 33) used of a hope which has disappeared;

    #186 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 23 MAY 2023 as [#3, #70, #30, #3,
#70, #9, #1] = Golgothâ (G1115): {UMBRA: #186 % #41 = #22} 0) Golgotha = 'skull'; 1) the name of a place outside Jerusalem where Jesus was
crucified; so called, apparently because its form resembled a skull;

AND HE BEARING HIS CROSS WENT-G1831: FORTH INTO A PLACE CALLED THE PLACE
OF A *SKULL*, WHICH IS CALLED IN THE HEBREW *GOLGOTHA*-G1115:" [John
19:10-11, 17]

ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #470 as [#70, #300, #100] = ʻâsaq (H6229): {UMBRA:
#470 % #41 = #19} 1) (Hithpael) to strive, contend, quarrel;

DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #444 as [#80, #70, #30, #5, #40, #8, #200, #1, #10]
= poleméō (G4170): {UMBRA: #1030 % #41 = #5} 1) to war, carry on war; 2)
to fight;

ONTIC SPECTRUM [@140, @215, @180, @191, @173, @200, @102, @104, @166,
@197, @210, @220, @104, @168, @140, @197, @185, @215, @192]

{@19: Sup: 59 - MASSING: CHU (#791); Ego: 30 - BOLD RESOLUTION: YI (#626)}

<http://www.grapple369.com/?date:2023.5.23&idea:112,269,626,791>

#791 as [#30, #100, #200, #1, #400, #20, #600] = qirʼâh (H7125): {UMBRA:
#301 % #41 = #14} 1) to encounter, befall, meet; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to
meet, encounter; 1a2) to befall (fig);

#626 as [#200, #300, #70, #50, #6] / [#6, #40, #200, #300, #10, #70] =
râshaʻ (H7561): {UMBRA: #570 % #41 = #37} 1) to be wicked, act wickedly;
1a) (Qal); 1a1) to be wicked, act wickedly; 1a2) to be guilty, be
condemned; 1b) (Hiphil); 1b1) to condemn as guilty (in civil relations);
1b2) to condemn as guilty (in ethical or religious relations); 1b3) to
act wickedly (in ethics and religion);

ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #269 as [#30, #2, #200, #7, #30] = barzel (H1270): {UMBRA: #239 % #41 = #34} 1) iron; 1a) iron; 1a1) iron ore; 1a2) as
material of furniture, utensils, implements; 1b) tool of iron; 1c)
harshness, strength, oppression (fig.);

DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #112 as [#4, #8, #100] = dâchaq (H1766): {UMBRA:
#112 % #41 = #30} 1) to thrust, oppress, crowd; 1a) (Qal) to thrust, crowd;



IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) AS COMMENTARY ON "PRINCIPLE OF TIME-SUCCESSION ACCORDING TO THE LAW OF CAUSALITY" AS MARGIN IDEA @B232:
"All alterations take place in accordance with the law of the connection
of cause and effect.

PROOF: I perceive that appearances succeed one another, that is, that
one state of a thing exists at one time, the opposite of which existed
in the previous state. I am therefore actually connecting two
perceptions in time. Now connection is no act of mere sense and
intuition, but is here the product of a synthetic faculty of the
imagination that determines the inner sense with respect to relation in
time. The imagination can however conjoin the aforementioned two states
in two different ways, so that either one or the other would precede in
time; for time cannot be perceived in itself and what precedes and what
follows in objects determined, as it were empirically, in relation to
it. I am therefore conscious only that my imagination places one state
before, the other after, not that in the object one precedes the other;
or, in other words, the objective relation of the appearances that
succeed one another remains undetermined through mere perception.

In order then for this relation to be cognized as determined, the
relation between the two states must be so thought that it is thereby determined with necessity which of them must be placed before, which
after, and not the reverse. However, the concept that carries with it a necessity of synthetic unity can only be a pure concept of the
understanding, which does not lie in perception – and here it is the
concept of the relation of cause and effect, in which the former
determines the latter in time as consequence, and not merely as
something that could precede it in the imagination (or not be perceived
at all). It is, then, only because we subject the succession of
appearances, hence all alterations, to the law of causality that
experience itself – i.e., empirical cognition of the appearances – is possible; hence the appearances themselves as objects of experience are possible only in accordance with this very law." [pages 184, 185]

IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) AS COMMENTARY ON MARGIN IDEA @261:
"...The most difficult thing that could ever be undertaken on behalf of metaphysics; and the worst thing about it is that metaphysics, as much
of it as might be present anywhere at all, could not give me even the
slightest help with this, because this very deduction must first settle
the possibility of a metaphysics. As I had now succeeded in the solution
of the Humean problem not only in a single case but with respect to the
entire faculty of pure reason, I could therefore take sure, if still
always slow, steps toward finally determining, completely and according
to universal principles, the entire extent of pure reason with regard to
its boundaries as well as its content, which was indeed the very thing
that metaphysics requires in order to build its system according to a
sure plan.

But I fear that the elaboration of the Humean problem in its greatest
possible amplification (namely, the Critique of Pure Reason) may well
fare just as the problem itself fared when it was first posed. It will
be judged incorrectly, because it is not understood; it will not be
understood, because people will be inclined just to skim through the
book, but not to think through it; and they will not want to expend this
effort on it, because the work is dry, because it is obscure, because it opposes all familiar concepts and is long-winded as well. Now I admit
that I do not expect to hear complaints from a philosopher regarding
lack of popularity, entertainment, and ease, when the matter concerns
the existence of highly prized knowledge that is indispensable to
humanity, knowledge that cannot be constituted except according to the strictest rules of scholarly exactitude, and to which even popularity
may indeed come with time but can never be there at the start. But with
regard to a certain obscurity – arising in part from the expansiveness
of the plan, which makes it difficult to survey the main points upon
which the investigation depends – in this respect the complaint is just;
and I will redress it through the present Prolegomena." [pages 10, 11]

IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) AS COMMENTARY ON MARGIN IDEA @301: "A completely different judgment therefore occurs before experience can
arise from perception. The given intuition must be subsumed under a
concept that determines the form of judging in general with respect to
the intuition, connects the empirical consciousness of the latter in a consciousness in general, and thereby furnishes empirical judgments with universal validity; a concept of this kind is a pure a priori concept of
the understanding, which does nothing but simply determine for an
intuition the mode in general in which it can serve for judging. The
concept of cause being such a concept, it therefore determines the
intuition which is subsumed under it, e.g., that of air, with respect to judging in general – namely, so that the concept of air serves, with
respect to expansion, in the relation of the antecedent to the
consequent in a hypothetical judgment. The concept of cause is therefore
a pure concept of the understanding, which is completely distinct from
all possible perception, and serves only, with respect to judging in
general, to determine that representation which is contained under it
and so to make possible a universally valid judgment.

GRAPPLE (293, 230)@[23, 35, 53, 59, 4, 6, 11, 18, 21] PROTOTYPE

[#23 {@1: Sup: 23 - EASE: YI (#23); Ego: 23 - EASE: YI (#23)}
#35 {@2: Sup: 58 - GATHERING IN: HSI (#81 - MALE DEME IS UNNAMED {%0});
Ego: 35 - GATHERING: LIEN (#58)}
#53 {@3: Sup: 30 - BOLD RESOLUTION: YI (#111); Ego: 53 - ETERNITY: YUNG
(#111)}
#59 {@4: Sup: 8 - OPPOSITION: KAN (#119 - MALE DEME IS UNNAMED {%35});
Ego: 59 - MASSING: CHU (#170)}
#4 {@5: Sup: 12 - YOUTHFULNESS: T'UNG (#131); Ego: 4 - BARRIER: HSIEN
(#174)}
#6 {@6: Sup: 18 - WAITING: HSI (#149); Ego: 6 - CONTRARIETY: LI (#180 -
I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH ANOTHER'S WIFE {%19})}
#11 {@7: Sup: 29 - DECISIVENESS: TUAN (#178); Ego: 11 - DIVERGENCE: CH'A
(#191 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE SACRED ANIMALS {%32})}
#18 {@8: Sup: 47 - PATTERN: WEN (#225); Ego: 18 - WAITING: HSI (#209)}
#21] {@9: Sup: 68 - DIMMING: MENG (#293); Ego: 21 - RELEASE: SHIH (#230)}

#293 as [#6, #1, #60, #200, #6, #500] /
    #272 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 23 MAY 2023 as [#5, #1, #60, #200,
#6] / [#6, #1, #60, #200, #5] /
    #297 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 23 MAY 2023 / *ROMAN* *GOVERNANCE* PROTOTYPE #ONE as [#30, #1, #60, #6, #200] /
    #328 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 23 MAY 2023 as [#6, #1, #60, #200,
#50, #5, #6] /
    #337 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 23 MAY 2023 as [#10, #1, #60, #200,
#6, #50, #10] = ʼâçar (H631): {UMBRA: #261 % #41 = #15} 1) to tie, bind, imprison; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to tie, bind; 1a2) to tie, harness; 1a3) to
bind (with cords); 1a4) to gird (rare and late); 1a5) to begin the
battle, make the attack; 1a6) *OF* *OBLIGATION* *OF* *OATH*
(figurative); 1b) (Niphal) to be imprisoned, bound; 1c) (Pual) to be
taken prisoner;

TELOS TOTAL: #230 as [#8, #200, #2, #500] / [#20, #8, #200, #2] /
    #232 - *HIJACK* *SCHEMA* / NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 23 MAY 2023 as
[#2, #8, #200, #2, #500] = chereb (H2719): {UMBRA: #210 % #41 = #5} 1)
sword, knife; 1a) sword; 1b) knife; 1c) tools for cutting stone;

ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #371 - *OBLIGATING* *NORM* (WATCH PROTOTYPE 12 AUGUST)

    #356 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 23 MAY 2023 as [#6, #30, #8, #300,
#2, #10] /
#371 as [#8, #300, #2, #50, #5, #6] / [#6, #50, #8, #300, #2, #5] =
châshab (H2803): {UMBRA: #310 % #41 = #23} 1) to think, plan, esteem, calculate, invent, make a judgment, imagine, count; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to
think, account; 1a2) to plan, devise, mean; 1a3) to charge, impute,
reckon; 1a4) to esteem, value, regard; 1a5) to invent; 1b) (Niphal);
1b1) to be accounted, be thought, be esteemed; 1b2) to be computed, be reckoned; 1b3) to be imputed; 1c) (Piel); 1c1) to think upon, consider,
be mindful of; 1c2) to think to do, devise, plan; 1c3) to count, reckon;
1d) (Hithpael) to be considered;

#371 as [#30, #1, #300, #600] = ʼâshâm (H817): {UMBRA: #341 % #41 = #13}
1) guilt, offense, sin, guiltiness; 1a) offense, sin, trespass, fault;
1b) guilt, guiltiness; 1c) compensation (for offense); 1d) trespass or
sin offering;

DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL:     #200 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 23 MAY 2023 as
[#80, #30, #10, #30, #10, #600] = pâlîyl (H6414): {UMBRA: #150 % #41 =
#27} 1) judge, assessment, estimate;

    #200 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 23 MAY 2023 as [#6, #90, #4, #100] = tsedeq (H6664): {UMBRA: #194 % #41 = #30} 1) justice, rightness,
righteousness; 1a) what is right or just or normal, rightness, justness
(of weights and measures); 1b) *RIGHTEOUSNESS* (*IN* *GOVERNMENT*); 1b1)
*OF* *JUDGES*, *RULERS*, *KINGS*; 1b2) of law; 1b3) of Davidic king,
Messiah; 1b4) of Jerusalem as seat of just government; 1b5) of God's
attribute; 1c) righteousness, justice (in case or cause); 1d) rightness
(in speech); 1e) righteousness (as ethically right); 1f) righteousness
(as vindicated), justification (in controversy), deliverance, victory, prosperity; 1f1) of God as covenant-keeping in redemption; 1f2) in name
of Messianic king; 1f3) of people enjoying salvation; 1f4) of Cyrus;

<http://www.grapple369.com/?idea:200,230,293,371>

Now before a judgment of experience can arise from a judgment of
perception, it is first required: that the perception be subsumed under
a concept of the understanding of this kind; e.g., the air belongs under
the concept of cause, which determines the judgment about the air as hypothetical with respect to expansion. This expansion is thereby
represented not as belonging merely to my perception of the air in my
state of perception or in several of my states or in the state of
others, but as necessarily belonging to it, and the judgment: the air is elastic, becomes universally valid and thereby for the first time a
judgment of experience, because certain judgments occur beforehand,
which subsume the intuition of the air under the concept of cause and
effect, and thereby determine the perceptions not merely with respect to
each other in my subject, but with respect to the form of judging in
general (here, the hypothetical), and in this way make the empirical
judgment universally valid." [pages 52, 53]

IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) AS COMMENTARY ON MARGIN IDEA @319:
"How is nature possible in the formal sense, as the sum total of the
rules to which all appearances must be subject if they are to be thought
as connected in one experience? The answer cannot come out otherwise
than: it is possible only by means of the constitution of our
understanding, in accordance with which all these representations of sensibility are necessarily referred to one consciousness, and through
which, first, the characteristic manner of our thinking, namely by means
of rules, is possible, and then, by means of these rules, experience is possible – which is to be wholly distinguished from insight into objects
in themselves. This answer is, in the book itself, given in the
Transcendental Logic,16 but here in the Prolegomena, in the course of
solving the second main question.

But how this characteristic property of our sensibility itself may be
possible, or that of our understanding and of the necessary apperception
that underlies it and all thinking, cannot be further solved and
answered, because we always have need of them in turn for all answering
and for all thinking of objects.

There are many laws of nature that we can know only through experience,
but lawfulness in the connection of appearances, i.e., nature in
general, we cannot come to know through any experience, because
experience itself has need of such laws, which lie a priori at the basis
of its possibility.

The possibility of experience in general is thus at the same time the
universal law of nature, and the principles of the former are themselves
the laws of the latter. For we are not acquainted with nature except as
the sum total of appearances, i.e., of the representations in us, and so
we cannot get the laws of their connection from anywhere else except the principles of their connection in us, i.e., from the conditions of
necessary unification in one consciousness, which unification
constitutes the possibility of experience.

Even the main proposition that has been elaborated throughout this
entire part, that universal laws of nature can be cognized a priori,
already leads by itself to the proposition: that the highest legislation
for nature must lie in our self, i.e., in our understanding, and that we
must not seek the universal laws of nature from nature by means of
experience, but, conversely, must seek nature, as regards its universal conformity to law, solely in the conditions of the possibility of
experience that lie in our sensibility and understanding; for how would
it otherwise be possible to become acquainted with these laws a priori,
since they are surely not rules of analytic cognition, but are genuine synthetic amplifications of cognition? Such agreement, and indeed

[continued in next message]

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)