XPost: aus.politics, alt.france, nl.politiek
XPost: de.soc.weltanschauung.islam

IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) COMMENTARY AS MARGIN IDEA @268:
"JUDGMENTS OF EXPERIENCE ARE ALWAYS SYNTHETIC. For it would be absurd to
base an analytic judgment on experience [*ON* *WHETHER* *THE* *DUTCH*
*ARE* *FOR* #384 - *CHRIST* *SAKE* *A* #238 - *CRUEL* *PEOPLE*], since I
do not at all need to go beyond my concept in order to formulate the
judgment and therefore have no need for any testimony from experience.
That a body is extended, is a proposition that stands certain a priori,
and not a judgment of experience.

For before I go to experience, I have all the conditions for my judgment already in the concept, from which I merely extract the predicate in
accordance with the principle of contradiction, and by this means can simultaneously become conscious of the necessity of the judgment, which experience could never teach me." [pages 17, 18]

HE SAID: "I’ll check with my wife, must of bounced back"

SMS SENT @ 1719 HRS GIVES HEURISTIC GRAPPLE: [#23, #68, #43, #66, #19,
#75, #15, #14, #48] PROTOTYPE

{@9: Sup: 47 - PATTERN: WEN (#425); Ego: 48 - RITUAL: LI (#371)}

TELOS: #371 as [#10, #50, #1, #300, #10] = hinatí (G2444): {UMBRA: #371
% #41 = #2} 1) for what purpose, wherefore, why;

ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #467 as [#10, #300, #1, #30, #50, #20, #6, #700] = shᵉʼêl (H7593): {UMBRA: #331 % #41 = #3} 1) to ask; 1a) (P'al); 1a1) to
ask for, request; 1a2) to enquire for or about;

DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #425 as [#1, #10, #50, #10, #3, #40, #1, #300, #10]
= aínigma (G135): {UMBRA: #115 % #41 = #33} 1) an obscure saying,
enigma, riddle; 2) an obscure thing;

----------

Can we perhaps construct a NEURAL LINGUISTIC PRAGMA from the TEMPORAL / NOUMENON correspondences for any defendent such as this CRUEL DUTCH
specimen the BARON as FLOATING FAT MAN and by assaying such to speech
content, then by probability on viability bring an end to their SLANDER
and diseased state of being?

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J7qYzJtpjRI> <-- *BARON* is typical of
a GENOS which sucks the life from people -- THE REPUBLIC MUST PAY BACK
THE STOLEN TAXES AS MATERIAL GAIN GIVEN TO AMERICAN TOTALITARIAN
CORPORATIONS WHICH ARE INCOMPATIBLE WITH DEMOCRACY

πρᾶγμᾰ (prâgma):

deed, act, fact
occurrence, matter, affair
thing, concrete reality
thing, creature
thing of consequence or importance
(in the plural) circumstances, affairs
(in the plural, in bad sense) trouble, annoyance

#225 as [#80, #100, #1, #3, #40, #1] = prâgma (G4229): {UMBRA: #225 %
#41 = #20} 1) that which has been done, a deed, an accomplished fact; 2)
what is done or being accomplished; 2a) spec. business, a commercial transaction; 3) a matter, question, affair; 3a) spec. in a forensic
sense, a matter at law, case, suit; 4) that which is or exists, a thing;

"Dare any of you, having a matter-G4229 against another, go to law
before the unjust [SUCH AS THE DUTCH COURTS], and not before the
saints?" [1Corinthians 6:1]

Such then lawyers will cease being common ROMAN MAFIA thieves and
justice will no longer cost $millions

When Do I Have The Right To Remain Silent In Australia?

Put simply, the right to remain silent when you are arrested by the
police is a fundamental part of the Australian legal system. You don’t actually have to say anything to the police, no matter how intensely
they question you.

Despite this, Australian police may attempt to make you talk when you’re arrested. They might ask informal questions before even arresting you,
and it’s important to understand that your answers to these questions
can be used as evidence in a court of law.

At the same time, the police might ask you if you’re willing to take
part in a formal interview, and if you’re willing to provide a written statement. Again, you don’t have to provide anything.

What If I Decide Not To Talk?

Some people do answer questions and speak to the police because they’re worried about what could happen if they refuse. However, it’s important
for you to understand that a core part of the Australian legal system is
that deciding not to speak or provide a statement can’t be used against
you in court.

What this really means is that you won’t ever be assumed guilty just
because you don’t talk to the police or participate in an interview. The judge and the jury can’t take this into account, which means that the
safe option is often to simply stop talking.

Do I Ever Have To Provide Information To The Police?

Although I’ve stated that you don’t ever have to answer police
questions, this isn’t quite true. There are limited situations where you
have to answer basic questions.

For example, if you’ve committed a traffic offence then you have to give basic information like your name and address.

However, if you’re not sure what questions you have to answer, the best
thing to do is to request legal advice before talking at all.

Final Word

Ultimately, you have the right to silence when questioned by police in Australia. They might encourage you to talk, but they can’t force you.
If you have been questioned by police in relation to a serious matter,
then I’d recommend speaking to a criminal lawyer to determine your
safest course of action.

<https://www.boelawyers.com.au/do-i-have-the-right-to-remain-silent-when-questioned-by-police/>

On 7/7/2023 19:01, Omnibus wrote: "Reageren op automatische trollen is zinloos."

TRANSLATION: "Responding to automatic trolls is pointless."

GRAPPLE: [#36, #32, #35, #27, #43, #37, #49, #70, #8] PROTOTYPE

{@9: Sup: 13 - INCREASE: TSENG (#268); Ego: 8 - OPPOSITION: KAN (#337)}

#268 as [#30, #1, #20, #7, #200, #10] = ʼakzârîy (H394): {UMBRA: #238 %
#41 = #33} 1) *CRUEL*;

    #267 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 7 JULY 2023 (AXIS MUNDI CONSCIOUSNESS GROUNDING) as [#1, #60, #6, #200] / [#1, #60, #200, #6] / 
#337 - *PERIHELION* / *APHELION* AS SUBSTANTIATION OF #INRI IDENTITY as [#10,
#1, #60, #200, #6, #50, #10] = ʼâçar (H631): {UMBRA: #261 % #41 = #15}
1) to tie, bind, imprison; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to tie, bind; 1a2) to tie,
harness; 1a3) to bind (with cords); 1a4) to gird (rare and late); 1a5)
*TO* *BEGIN* *THE* *BATTLE*, *MAKE* *THE* *ATTACK*; 1a6) of obligation
of oath (figurative); 1b) (Niphal) to be imprisoned, bound; 1c) (Pual)
to be taken prisoner;

<http://www.grapple369.com/?date:2023.7.7&bible:matthew@12:36>

    #374 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 7 JULY 2023 (AXIS MUNDI CONSCIOUSNESS GROUNDING) as [#1, #100, #3, #70, #200] = argós (G692): {UMBRA: #374 %
#41 = #5} 1) free from labour, at leisure; 2) lazy, shunning the labour
which one ought to perform;

"But I say unto you, THAT EVERY IDLE-G692: WORD THAT MEN SHALL SPEAK,
THEY SHALL GIVE ACCOUNT THEREOF IN THE DAY OF JUDGMENT. For by thy words
thou shalt be justified, and by thy words thou shalt be condemned."
[Matthew 12:36-37]

ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #1046 as [#5, #10, #200, #80, #70, #100, #5, #400,
#70, #40, #5, #50, #1, #10] = eisporeúomai (G1531): {UMBRA: #991 % #41 =
#7} 1) to go into, enter; 1a) of persons; 1b) of things; 1b1) to be
carried into or put into; 1b2) as food into a mouth; 1c) metaph. *OF* *AFFECTIONS* *ENTERING* *THE* *SOUL*;

DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #186 as [#6, #10, #70, #90, #10] /
    #192 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 7 JULY 2023 (AXIS MUNDI CONSCIOUSNESS GROUNDING) as [#6, #10, #70, #90, #10, #6] = yâʻats (H3289): {UMBRA:
#170 % #41 = #6} 1) to advise, consult, give counsel, counsel, purpose,
devise, plan; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to advise, counsel, *GIVE* *COUNSEL*,
consult; 1a2) counsellor (participle); 1b) (Niphal) to consult together, exchange counsel, deliberate, counsel together; 1c) (Hithpael) to
*CONSPIRE*;

DOLF @ 1049 HOURS ON 5 OCTOBER 2017: "Get use to the idea that your ego
ought NOT to impose itself by any means whatsoever upon my self-identity
as formula as autonomy.

— APPLE RELISH —

"GUILTY AS SIN,
NOT REALLY NICE.
OVERTAKE TIME.
TRUTH'S DEVICE.
HEAR IT RHYME
OUR NANO IS IN."

Otherwise I will give you a lesson which will leave you pickled and it
won't be relish.

Het lijkt erop dat u onderworpen bent aan een gemeenschappelijke stroom semantiek als het lexicon van opportunisme:

Verzet is zinloos - you will be assimilated!

YOUTUBE: "The Borg Assimilation"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AkasJZZxRU0>

On 7/7/2023 21:53, Baron wrote: "Veel positieve reacties Dolf?"

TRANSLATION: "Many positive reactions Dolf?"

GRAPPLE: [#62, #22, #23, #32, #25, #18, #75, #11, #20] PROTOTYPE

{@9: Sup: 45 - GREATNESS: TA (#255); Ego: 20 - ADVANCE: CHIN (#288)}

#255 as [#4, #10, #1, #30, #70, #3, #9, #7, #70, #40, #1, #10] =
dialogízomai (G1260): {UMBRA: #256 % #41 = #10} 1) to bring together
different reasons, to reckon up the reasons, to reason, revolve in one's
mind, deliberate;

#223 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 7 JULY 2023 (AXIS MUNDI CONSCIOUSNESS GROUNDING) as [#1, #50, #1, #3, #3, #5, #10, #30, #70, #50] / 
#288 as
[#1, #50, #1, #3, #3, #5, #30, #30, #70, #40, #5, #50] = anangéllō
(G312): {UMBRA: #923 % #41 = #21} 1) to announce, make known; 2) to
report, bring back tidings, rehearse;

ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #971 as [#20, #70, #10, #50, #70, #400, #50, #300,
#1] = koinóō (G2840): {UMBRA: #1020 % #41 = #36} 1) to make common; 1a)
to make (Levitically) unclean, render unhallowed, defile, profane; 1b)
to *DECLARE* *OR* *COUNT* *UNCLEAN*;

DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #242 as [#30, #200, #10, #2] /
    #223 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 7 JULY 2023 (AXIS MUNDI CONSCIOUSNESS GROUNDING) as [#6, #200, #10, #2, #5] / 
    #234 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 7 JULY 2023 (AXIS MUNDI CONSCIOUSNESS GROUNDING) as [#6, #10, #200,
#10, #2, #6] = rîyb (H7378): {UMBRA: #212 % #41 = #7} 1) *TO* *STRIVE*, *CONTEND*; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to strive; i) physically; ii) *WITH* *WORDS*;
1a2) to conduct a case or suit (legal), sue; 1a3) to make complaint;
1a4) to quarrel; 1b) (Hiphil) to contend against;

According to the Stoics, apatheia was the quality that characterized the
sage or the philosopher and thusly seemingly equivalent (ie. epiteléō (G2005): *PERFORM* poiéō (G4160): *THE* *DOING*) to such a notion as autopoiesis (ie. acting in accordance with equanimity rather than being disturbed by passions or desires as self want) derived from Ancient
Greek αὐτόποιος (autópoios, “self-produced”) as coined c. 1972 by
Chilean biologists HUMBERTO MATURANA and FRANCISCO VARELA.

#1176 as [#5, #1, #400, #300, #70, #400] = heautoû (G1438): {UMBRA:
#1176 % #41 = #28} 1) himself, herself, itself, themselves;

#902 - RULE OF LAW (ie. ONTIC RATIONAL PREMISE 22 X #41) as [#1, #400,
#300, #1, #200] /
#971 as [#1, #400, #300, #70, #200] = autós (G846): {UMBRA: #971 % #41 =
#28} 1) himself, herself, themselves, itself; 2) he, she, it; 3) the same;

    #161 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 22 AUGUST 2022 as [#80, #70, #10, #1]
/ 
#430 - nómos (G3551): *THE* *DECALOGUE* *AS* *RULE* *OF* *ACTION* *PRESCRIBED* *BY* *REASON* as [#80, #70, #10, #70, #200] = poîos
(G4169): {UMBRA: #430 % #41 = #20} 1) of what sort or nature;

In response to DE ZENGOTITA's smugness about post-modernism and its
aloof observations upon public APATHY, we prudently consider whether it
is then symptomatic of what Professor CHARLENE HADDOCK SEIGFRIED (1998)
duly notes as a history repeating itself within a treatise on OVERCOMING
THE APATHY INDUCED BY THE CURRENT IRRELEVANCE OF PHILOSOPHY: "In his new introduction to The Reconstruction of Philosophy (RP) JOHN DEWEY (20
OCTOBER 1859 to 1 JUNE 1952) remarks on the strange coincidence of
reissuing in 1948, after the end of the Second World War, a book
originally published in 1920, just after the close of the First World War.

The concept of APATHY became more prominent during the First World War,
in which the appalling conditions of the Western Front led to APATHY, or
a lack of emotion or desire, and shell shock amongst millions of
soldiers. APATHY came to be regarded as a psychological response to
despair and disgust with the condition of the world.

APATHY is a modern psychological term for a state of indifference—where
an individual is unresponsive or "indifferent" to aspects of emotional,
social, or physical life. [New World Encyclopedia]

As we, in turn, reflect on the future of philosophy after fifty years of
the Cold War (12 MARCH 1947 to 26 DECEMBER 1991), DEWEY's emphatic call
for the reconstruction of philosophy seems even more urgent. The basic postulate of the book is that philosophy can move out of its continuing
slide into the "APATHY OF IRRELEVANCE" only by recognizing that "the distinctive office, problems and subject matter of philosophy grow out
of the stresses and strains in the community life in which a given form
of philosophy arises, and that, accordingly, its specific problems vary
with the changes in human life that are always going on" (RP 256).

The strains in our communities are greater than ever and threaten to
tear apart the fabric of civilized life, but who has answered the call
to reconstruct philosophy accordingly?

Who is challenging the inherited forms and giving philosophy a future?

Not very many of us, apparently.

Philosophy is still notable for its withdrawal from the present scene
into continued rehashing of the great works of the past, concern for the improvement of purely formal skills, or revelling in the play of
signifiers.

This very withdrawal is taken by DEWEY as evidence that there is
something about those systems and the approaches advocated that
contributes to their being of little value in resolving the troubled
affairs of the present.

He singles out for criticism two beliefs inherited from ancient Greek
and classic European philosophy:

(1) reason or pure intellect is a faculty for laying hold of ultimate
truths of reality or morality and

(2) doing and knowing, theory and practice, should be sharply
distinguished.

This has led, in modern times, to disdain for the technological chaos
brought about by science and to the demand that only immutable,
extra-temporal, transcendental, or universal principles, standards,
norms, and ends can save us from the ensuing moral chaos.

In other words, philosophers continue to sound a retreat into premodern standards of morality as a bulwark against the accelerating processes of
change brought about by technological inventions, postindustrial global capitalism, and fragmenting nation states driven by ethnic warfare."
[@4, pages 101, 102]

@4 - Charlene Haddock Seigfried, "Overcoming The Apathy Induced By The
Current Irrelevance Of Philosophy", The Journal of Speculative
Philosophy, New Series, Vol. 12, No. 2, Pragmatism and the Future of
Philosophy (1998), Penn State University Press, <https://www.jstor.org/stable/25670247>

--
Check out our SAVVY module prototype that facilitates a movable /
resizable DIALOG and complex dropdown MENU interface deploying the third
party d3 library.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?heuristic>

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/Savvy.zip> (Download resources)

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)