XPost: alt.philosophy.taoism, aus.legal, aus.religion.judaism
XPost: aus.politics
Cease the discussion if you have no idea about conveyed proofs—understand that it is futile discussing with you.
We had conveyed a proof written 1350 BCE and you think such is unimportant
one <
being@apolka.sign> wrote:
dolf wrote:
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
Thusly
One produces the circle
Two produces yang / yin
Three produces the segmentation
There are three elements grass, herb and tree to this Genesis narrative
which conveys a segmentation after his kind
Okay.
God produced the earth, one.
God said, let the earth bring forth the three,
grass, herb and tree, "after his kind" and
so there are three, segments.
I'm not seeing how three produces anything
other than God producing those three before he,
being God, said to produce other forms and in English
the word, his, or phrase, his kind, is generic to the language
being used at the time by the translators.
The NIV uses slightly different language, "after their kind"
in Genesis 1:11, which occurs after ten other verses which
were not in the original book:chapter:verse that didn't exist
in the scrolls naturally given the Hebrew they were composed
unless one chooses a Greek translation from Alexandria, etc.
Before the first day, or during the first day, if the word, day
is an appropriate translation for a period of time, God spoke,
as if speaking or spoke is a good enough word to use and
suddenly there was light, and it was good, and darkness
and everything was all good more or less as things went.
And God said, Let the earth bring forth grass, the herb yielding seed, and
the fruit tree yielding fruit after his kind, whose seed is in itself, upon >>> the earth: and it was so.
THOTH MEASURE: #18 - Oh Tutuf, who makest thine appearance in Ati; I
trouble myself only with my own affairs.
No idea what's going on there.
#VIRTUE: As to Waiting (no. #18), it exits.
#TOOLS: As to Closing in (no. #58), it enters.
#POSITION: As to Release (no. #21), it is softness, but
#TIME: As to Hardness (no. #72), it is leathery toughness.
#CANON: #169
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_169@{
@1: Sup: 18 - WAITING: HSI (#18); Ego: 18 - WAITING: HSI (#18),
@2: Sup: 76 - AGGRAVATION: CHU (#94); Ego: 58 - GATHERING IN: HSI (#76),
@3: Sup: 16 - CONTACT: CHIAO (#110); Ego: 21 - RELEASE: SHIH (#97),
@4: Sup: 7 - ASCENT: SHANG (#117); Ego: 72 - HARDNESS: CHIEN (#169 - I
TROUBLE MYSELF ONLY WITH MY OWN AFFAIRS {%18}),
Male: #117; Feme: #169
} // #169
THOTH MEASURE: #3 - Oh thou of the Nose, who makest thine appearance at
Chemunnu; I am not evil minded.
#VIRTUE: With Mired (no. #3), great woe.
#TOOLS: With Encounters (no. #43), small desire.
#POSITION: The ways of Purity (no. #37) and ...
#TIME: Pattern (no. #47) where some are simple and some are complex?
#CANON: #130
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_130@{
@1: Sup: 3 - MIRED: HSIEN (#3); Ego: 3 - MIRED: HSIEN (#3),
@2: Sup: 46 - ENLARGEMENT: K'UO (#49); Ego: 43 - ENCOUNTERS: YU (#46),
@3: Sup: 2 - FULL CIRCLE: CHOU (#51); Ego: 37 - PURITY: TS'UI (#83),
@4: Sup: 49 - FLIGHT: T'AO (#100); Ego: 47 - PATTERN: WEN (#130 - I AM
NOT EVIL MINDED {%3}),
Male: #100; Feme: #130
} // #130
THOTH MEASURE: #37 - Oh Striker, who makest thine appearance in Heaven; I
am not one of loud voice.
#VIRTUE: Purity (no. #37) means the Way of the ruler.
#TOOLS: Compliance (no. #77) means the subjects preservation.
#POSITION: With Penetration (no. #14), a sharp advance.
#TIME: With Dimming (no. #68), an impeded walk.
#CANON: #196
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_196@{
@1: Sup: 37 - PURITY: TS'UI (#37); Ego: 37 - PURITY: TS'UI (#37),
@2: Sup: 33 - CLOSENESS: MI (#70); Ego: 77 - COMPLIANCE: HSUN (#114),
@3: Sup: 47 - PATTERN: WEN (#117); Ego: 14 - PENETRATION: JUI (#128),
@4: Sup: 34 - KINSHIP: CH'IN (#151); Ego: 68 - DIMMING: MENG (#196 - I
AM NOT ONE OF LOUD VOICE {%37}),
Male: #151; Feme: #196
} // #196
TOTAL CONCEPT @495
#495 as [#60, #2, #10, #2, #6, #400, #10, #5] = çâbîyb (H5439): {UMBRA: #74
% #41 = #33} 1) places round about, circuit, round about; 2) in a circuit, >> a circuit, round about; 3) in the circuit, from every side;
None of that makes any sense to me.
And the earth brought forth grass, and herb yielding seed after his kind, >>> and the tree yielding fruit, whose seed was in itself, after his kind: and >>> God saw that it was good.
And the evening and the morning were the third day. [Genesis 1:11-13]
Language and linguistics
Segment (handwriting), the pen-tip trajectory between two defined points >>>
Segment (linguistics), a discrete unit of speech
Speech segmentation, identifying the boundaries between words in spoken
languages
Text segmentation, dividing written text into meaningful units
Thus the question is whether the Chinese language rudiments are derived
segmentation since the strokes are discrete elements
So I would like to know the answer to the epistemological consideration as >>> to whether the Chinese language rudiments were conceived against the
appraisals paradigm
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
Note that the #81 elements as #369 magic square keyed to the DOMINION plane
of the CELESTIAL HEIRARCHY for the TUESDAY column includes all the number >>>>> entries for the course of nature:
#71 #1 #11
#61 #81 #21
#51 #41 #31
Thus we conclude that the ternary notion of number is intrinsic to the DAO
TE CHING and its primordial order can be determined by an appraisal of the
3x3 centre.
From the Taoist classic Tao Te Ching, it was held that "The Tao produced >>>>> One; One produced Two; Two produced Three; Three produced All things." >>>>>
0, 27, 54 <-- unity of apperception
0, 9, 18
0, 3, 6 < following numbers are all divisions of three
1, 2, 3
Thusly every number #81 and everything #369 is made up from the possibility
of the one, two or three.
And in that regard the CANON OF SUPREME MYSTERY is associated to the TAO TE
CHING.
And if you are going to reply speak specifically to the points raised and >>>>> dont engage in gibberish.
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
I don't think that these alt.philosophy.taoism entities are necessarily >>>>>> human since they have difficulty parsing the logic of a trinomial number >>>>>> nor to consider that we have derived the #THREE, #FOUR, #FIVE prototypes >>>>>> by an algorithm applied to their text.
Once again they don't have any contextual relevance and are dismissive >>>>>> in applying a disassembly of only text they cohere as gibberish.
Me thinks they are software bots--not worth engaging in dialog.
- dolf
On 21/11/21 11:46, aye wrote:
one wrote:
dolf wrote:
Sadly your response doesnt address the canon of supreme mystery >>>>>>>>>>> which is a later text.
Is the canon of supreme mystery a Tao Chia text?
I have the #81 elements keyed to the DOMINION plane of the CELESTIAL >>>>>> HIERARCHY
#D Sup Ego Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
#1 47 58 69 80 1 12 23 34 45
#2 57 68 79 9 11 22 33 44 46
#3 67 78 8 10 21 32 43 54 56
#4 77 7 18 20 31 42 53 55 66
#5 6 17 19 30 41 52 63 65 76
#6 16 27 29 40 51 62 64 75 5
#7 26 28 39 50 61 72 74 4 15
#8 36 38 49 60 71 73 3 14 25
#9 37 48 59 70 81 2 13 24 35
@8 vCo vCy vBr vPu vRe vBl vOr vGr vYe >>>>>>
Whilst the #72 - TRINOMIAL HEBREW NAMES AS CELESTIAL HIERARCHY APPEAR TO >>>>>> BE A NOUMENON FORMULATION DEVISED FOR #75 - FAILURE (SHIH) assaying >>>>>> associated to the #6 - NORMA OBLIGANS and the Pythagorean binomial (@1, >>>>>> @5) onomantic #8 - conception of #number as #1080 - HETEROS and
stoicheion it is not known to me whether this apparatus is a fluid >>>>>> dynamic (ie. a plumb line as conveyed below) or whether it was devised >>>>>> to RESOLVE THE ISSUE OF HETERONOMY AGAINST AUTONOMY (4TH PLANE) AS #77 - >>>>>> COMPLIANCE (HSUN) PROTOTYPE:
#68 (9 JUN: #5, #100, #40) - RIGHTS
#11 (14 MAY: #6, #5, #6) - DEVISED FROM dialectic formulation (eg: >>>>>> derangement in the provision of goods and services}
#44 (29 MAY: #1, #30, #4) - ABROGATION of NORMA OBLIGANS prototypes to >>>>>> onomantic number
#17 (12 OCT: #10, #10, #7) - PAIRING TO #371 cycle of ecclesiastical >>>>>> calendar as CAUSAE COMMUNI: 17 AD --> 2017
#41 (16 SEPT: #1, #50, #1) - ANTHROPOCENTRIC SINGULARITY
#65 (2 OCT: #30, #5, #8) - SOLDIER as anthropological prototype
#38 (8 FEB: #40, #8, #10) - ROMAN GOVERNANCE (#342) / TORAH PAIRING >>>>>>
#71 (14 JAN: #6, #40, #2) - DOMINION / WORLDVIEW
#14 (29 JAN: #10, #10, #30) - DEVISED FROM dialectic formulation (eg: >>>>>> nature rejoices in its nature)
YEAR #38 AD - ROMAN EMPIRE
Claudius and Messalina are probably married this year.
Apion heads a deputation to Emperor Caligula, to complain about the >>>>>> Jews in Alexandria.
An anti-Jewish riot breaks out in Alexandria, during a visit by King >>>>>> Herod Agrippa I; the mob wants to place statues of Caligula @ LOCUS #38 >>>>>> as [#40 - LAW / MODEL (FA), #8 - OPPOSITION (KAN), #10 - DEFECTIVENESS / >>>>>> DISTORTION (HSIEN)] in every synagogue.
On 21/11/21 09:25, dolf wrote:
I made a further correction of the one, two, three being relevant to #81 -
number and #369 - everything
My apologies for multiple posts.
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
Sadly your response doesnt address the canon of
supreme mystery
which is a later text.
From the Taoist classic Tao Te Ching, it was held that "The Tao produced
One; One produced Two; Two produced Three; Three produced All things." >>>>>>>>
0, 27, 54 <-- unity of apperception
0, 9, 18
0, 3, 6 < following numbers are all divisions of three
1, 2, 3
It is generally agreed by Taoist scholars that Tao produced One means >>>>>>>> Wuji produced Taiji, and One produced Two means Taiji produced Yin and >>>>>>>> Yang [or Liangyi (??) in scholastic term]. However, the subject of how >>>>>>>> Two produced Three has remained a popular debate among Taoist Scholars.
Most scholars believe that it refers to the Interaction between Yin and
Yang, with the presence of Chi, or life force.
Thusly every number #81 and everything #369 is made up from the >>>>>>>> possibility of the one, two or three.
For instance #30 - Bold Resolution is comprised:
+ 27 - once broken (#2)
+ 0 - none broken (#1)
+ 0 - none broken (#1)
+ 3 - twice broken (#3) <-- *correction*
3 - Nature surmounts nature / #0 - totality of nature = Bold Resolution
On 20/11/21 20:09, dolf wrote:
I would like to know the answer to the epistemological consideration as to
whether the Chinese language rudiments were conceived against the >>>>>>>>>>>>> appraisals paradigm
<https://www.grapple369.com>
Fortunately there is an inclusion of Arabic script and thusly I could
appraise such as I have with Locutus narrative below.
The question is whether the tri-part #THREE, #FOUR, #FIVE might be >>>>>>>>>>> considered a linguistic category within the nomenclature in much the same
way that a tri-part name defines the anthropology:
Xi
Jin
Ping
Could the use of a tri-part name then be viewed as the exercise of >>>>>>>>>> VOLUNT?TIS as will:
volunt?s f (genitive volunt?tis);
will, free will, choice
desire, inclination
disposition towards (something or someone)
favor, affection
last will, testament
goal, object, purpose, intention
signification, import
#THREE - judgement sensibility (#123)
#FOUR - principle of materiality (#164)
#FIVE - principle of persistence (#205)
= #492 - VOLUNT?TIS
#123 + #369 - WAN WU / discriminating norm
The English word volunty is YANG
(obsolete) The positive aspect of God, encompassing light, love, creation,
etc.
And if we consider that there are 9x9x9 = #729 appraisals then #729 - #492
= #237 - use of force as ONTIC deme extent
nolunty is YIN
(obsolete) The negative aspect of God, encompassing darkness, cold, >>>>>>>>> destruction, etc.
Just pondering
It would simply take many years of education to resolve the question and
alas I am not at an age where I can do so, but be that as it is I can
postulate a question
Locutus <dr.inker@many.worlds> wrote:
dolf wrote:
The question then is whether the education is effective or just reinforcing
a trinomial <-> binomial adverse consequence?
Some people refuse to be assimilated.
Their resistance is not futile.
Extremists may disrupt a government
bringing a reign of terror to a land
and help induce cheap labor.
Birthing processes vary.
Trying to rule the world by force
is seen by Taoist texts as not the Way.
A global village has its people.
Transcending nationalism, tribalism, extremism
and culturalism may be a key to effective education. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
The pale blue dot is one world.
#THREE: #103 as #22 - RESISTANCE (KE)
#FOUR: #155 as #74 - CLOSURE (CHIH)
#FIVE: #258 as #15 - REACH (TA)
#97 - GLOBUS CRUCIGER / NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 20 NOVEMBER 2021 as
[#30, #5, #2, #10, #700] /
#114 as [#6, #50, #2, #6, #700] /
#127 as [#5, #2, #10, #50, #50, #10] /
#152 as [#40, #2, #10, #50, #10, #600] / [#50, #2, #50, #10, #600] /
#153 as [#5, #40, #2, #6, #50, #10, #600] /
#163 as [#6, #5, #40, #2, #10, #50, #10, #600] /
#474 as [#6, #400, #2, #10, #50, #6] = bîyn (H995): {UMBRA: #62 % #41 =
#21}} 1) to discern, understand, consider; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to perceive,
discern; 1a2) to understand, know (with the mind); 1a3) to observe, mark,
give heed to, distinguish, consider; 1a4) to have discernment, insight,
understanding; 1b) (Niphal) to be discerning, intelligent, discreet, have
understanding; 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to understand; 1c2) to cause to >>>>>>>>>>>> understand, give understanding, teach; 1d) (Hithpolel) to show oneself
discerning or attentive, consider diligently; 1e) (Polel) to teach,
instruct; 2) (TWOT) prudent, regard;
#508 as [#8, #100, #400] /
#518 as [#8, #100, #400, #10] /
#524 as [#8, #100, #6, #400, #10] / [#8, #100, #400, #10, #6] / >>>>>>>>>>>> #554 as [#40, #8, #100, #6, #400] /
#571 as [#6, #2, #8, #100, #400, #10, #5, #600] = chuqqâh (H2708): {UMBRA:
#113 % #41 = #31}} 1) statute, ordinance, limit, enactment, something
prescribed; 1a) statute;
Governed by many groups of people
who people the planet as the planet peoples
its land areas on the surface, nation states
of mind, mind as super-organisms grow.
Beneath a surface of the waters,
beneath what waves as waves,
the blue dot world spins a round.
- a weigh Ting, beer o'clock ... Cheers!
- dolf
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
The consideration is firstly how the notion of State is defined as to
whether trinomial or binomial.
And secondly the relationship between the two which may result in an
adversarial consequence where?to use the trinomial consideration of the
course of nature?the binomial apparatus (ie. TÉCHN?: G5078) seeks to place
a binomial clamp upon intrinsic nature as means to exert a juxtaposition
control.
The UIGHUR?s belief system is binomial and ought to give precedence to the
Chinese notion (eg: whether language rudiments were conceived against the
appraisals paradigm) of state which is trinomial. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
So one must object to the notion of genocide or forced labour given the
need for education about the binomial <-> trinomial dynamic. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
- dolf
Jedi Master <cybernetic4456@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> China is carrying out the largest genocide since the Holocaust. The world
is joining hands to punish China.
WION Gravitas
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nYAsoQv6n70&t=302s
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"
<
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-7OuqWi4vQ>
SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*
Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit
<
http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>
SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek: TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]
Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.
It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTASIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.
<
http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>
The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."
That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.
<
http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble.zip> (Download resources)
After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)