A local active travel group in Cambridge is arguing that installing
cycle racks on the pavement would have the effect of solving THREE
problems at once: stopping drivers from parking on the pavement [sic], providing “much-needed” [sic] additional space for chav-cyclists to
park chav-bikes and blocking the FOOTway so those pesky pedestrians
can't trouble chavs on their chav-bikes.
On 18/02/2024 12:42, Simon Mason wrote:
A local active travel group in Cambridge is arguing that installing
cycle racks on the pavement would have the effect of solving THREE
problems at once: stopping drivers from parking on the pavement [sic],
providing “much-needed” [sic] additional space for chav-cyclists to
park chav-bikes and blocking the FOOTway so those pesky pedestrians
can't trouble chavs on their chav-bikes.
JNugent <jennings&co@mail.com> wrote:
On 18/02/2024 12:42, Simon Mason wrote:
A local active travel group in Cambridge is arguing that installing
cycle racks on the pavement would have the effect of solving THREE
problems at once: stopping drivers from parking on the pavement [sic],
providing “much-needed” [sic] additional space for chav-cyclists to
park chav-bikes and blocking the FOOTway so those pesky pedestrians
can't trouble chavs on their chav-bikes.
We saw this coming some time ago, because it wasn’t hard to guess the real reason for cyclist faux indignation about what they call ‘pavement parking’.
I take it you notice that all references to prams, buggies, and the visually-impaired have suddenly disappeared from the narrative. Quelle surprise!
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 483 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 231:04:25 |
Calls: | 9,612 |
Files: | 13,686 |
Messages: | 6,155,340 |