I was just flipping through the stations on my DAB the other day, and was struck by an underlying grotty feel to many stations. I am speaking of the gritty sound that many, most often talk stations, Have now. Talk radio, to pick one at random, sounds like one of the lower quality long play modes on
a minidisc. AM was better in my view, assuming you were close to the transmitter. I'm just guessing that it is part of a reduction in bitrate or increase in errors inherent in the system.
Even music stations, be they plus or otherwise are not totally immune, but then I have no way to know what sort of encoding is in use.This distortion though, seems to also affect other outlets of the same station, as if they are all distributed in the worst possible system.
I just can't listen to the talk stations any more due to this gritiness. However its worse I think if you are an ethnic minority, as their stations even try to play music over it as well. Bah humbug.
Brian
I don't notice any issues with grittiness as you report it, but could I suggest that it may be something to do with distribution? We out here in
the frozen north seem to get clear quality - perhaps there is just too
much infrastructure or distribution noise in London?
On 28/01/2024 20:22, Woody wrote:
I don't notice any issues with grittiness as you report it, but could
I suggest that it may be something to do with distribution? We out
here in the frozen north seem to get clear quality - perhaps there is
just too much infrastructure or distribution noise in London?
I can't imagine the distribution degrading the quality?
On 28/01/2024 20:28, JMB99 wrote:
I can't imagine the distribution degrading the quality?Of course it doesn't, and the stations are encoded and muxed together centrally. So the quality is exactly the same whether you're using
Crystal Palace or Bressay.
It has to be that way, because muxes are SFNs
On 29/01/2024 12:15, Mark Carver wrote:
On 28/01/2024 20:28, JMB99 wrote:
I can't imagine the distribution degrading the quality?Of course it doesn't, and the stations are encoded and muxed together
centrally. So the quality is exactly the same whether you're using
Crystal Palace or Bressay.
It has to be that way, because muxes are SFNs
Do all the stations use the same bit rate on all the transmitters?
On 28/01/2024 20:28, JMB99 wrote:
On 28/01/2024 20:22, Woody wrote:Of course it doesn't, and the stations are encoded and muxed together >centrally. So the quality is exactly the same whether you're using
I can't imagine the distribution degrading the quality?
I don't notice any issues with grittiness as you report it, but
could I suggest that it may be something to do with distribution? We
out here in the frozen north seem to get clear quality - perhaps
there is just too much infrastructure or distribution noise in London?
Crystal Palace or Bressay.
It has to be that way, because muxes are SFNs
I have also noted that both stations (although more noticeably GB
News) seem to have some sort of muting system so that there is no
noise between speakers or between separate bits of the same speaker.
It often results in loss of the first syllable when the speaker starts talking and the mute or whatever it is seems to have a relatively slow attack.
On 29/01/2024 18:08, Pamela wrote:
I have also noted that both stations (although more noticeably GB
News) seem to have some sort of muting system so that there is no
noise between speakers or between separate bits of the same speaker.
It often results in loss of the first syllable when the speaker starts
talking and the mute or whatever it is seems to have a relatively slow
attack.
Isn't that common with automated presenter operated sources?
On 29/01/2024 13:00, John Williamson wrote:
On 29/01/2024 12:15, Mark Carver wrote:
On 28/01/2024 20:28, JMB99 wrote:
I can't imagine the distribution degrading the quality?Of course it doesn't, and the stations are encoded and muxed together
centrally. So the quality is exactly the same whether you're using
Crystal Palace or Bressay.
It has to be that way, because muxes are SFNs
Do all the stations use the same bit rate on all the transmitters?
The same bit rate has to be used on all transmitters that carry the same
mux. In fact the entire encoded transport stream has to be IDENTICAL on
all transmitters, or else the SFN won't work.
If you're taking about the same station on different local muxes, then
that's a different matter, although taking a quick look on Wohnort, even
then the bit rates are the same (probably because the station only wants
to encode itself 'once')
In message <upa7dn$t0j9$1@dont-email.me> at Tue, 30 Jan 2024 07:10:47,
JMB99 <mb@nospam.net> writes
On 29/01/2024 18:08, Pamela wrote:AGC to mute background noise when the speaker is not speaking has been
I have also noted that both stations (although more noticeably GB
News) seem to have some sort of muting system so that there is no
noise between speakers or between separate bits of the same speaker.
It often results in loss of the first syllable when the speaker starts
talking and the mute or whatever it is seems to have a relatively slow
attack.
Isn't that common with automated presenter operated sources?
around for decades; however, you'd think that today it would be trivial to insert a slight delay - half a second ought to be more than enough in most cases - so that the chopping-off-of-the-first-syllable that Pamela has noticed could be avoided. Could be either at the presenter end or the
studio end. But obviously isn't being done.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 463 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 156:45:19 |
Calls: | 9,384 |
Calls today: | 4 |
Files: | 13,561 |
Messages: | 6,095,909 |