As per header.....
Still find the level of comms not as good as it used to be for previous significant Freeview events......
As per header.....
Still find the level of comms not as good as it used to be for
previous significant Freeview events......
Hmm. I've just used my analyser and it is still showing a large^
carrier of something on C55. This is at 11pm Friday. It is about the
same amplitude as C55 always was ie. slightly less than the main 6^
but much larger than the mobile phone signals.
I've also done a retune and got nothing from C55 But I don't think
they've turned of the transmitter Com7 Sutton at this moment, just
not sending anything to it.
Bob.
You're too late, all the COM 7 carriers dropped at bang on 11am
yesterday
In article <ji7n7kFnpv8U1@mid.individual.net>,
Mark Carver <mark.carver@invalid.invalid> wrote:
You're too late, all the COM 7 carriers dropped at bang on 11amHmm. I've just used my analyser and it is still showing a large
yesterday
carrier of something on C55. This is at 11pm Friday. It is about the
same amplitude as C55 always was ie. slightly less than the main 6
but much larger than the mobile phone signals.
I've also done a retune and got nothing from C55 But I don't think
they've turned of the transmitter Com7 Sutton at this moment, just
not sending anything to it.
As per header.....
Still find the level of comms not as good as it used to be for previous significant Freeview events......
S.
It should have shut down without the transport stream being
present, as it's an SFN transmitter
Doesn't matter in this instance of course, but normally if a tx
loses its feed and it's in an SFN, the carrier should drop
otherwise it'll punch a hole in overlap areas
"SH" <i.love@spam.com> wrote in message
news:t9kui3$20irh$1@dont-email.me...
As per header.....
Still find the level of comms not as good as it used to be for
previous significant Freeview events......
Hasn't COM7 already stopped broadcasting? Or is the carrier still
present even if it has no programme streams?
BBC Four HD and CBeebies HD still haven't appeared on PSB3. The channels
are listed in the table of channels, but there are no
video/audio/subtitle streams - as shown by TSReader. Looks as if some
last minute hitch may have prevented the normal seamless handover of a channel from one mux to another. I gather (from thread on DigitalSpy)
that the multiplexing servers for each transmitter's regional version
(*) of PSB3 are being changed at the same time, so it's a bigger change
than normal.
(*) To include regional ITV HD - and presumably regional BBC One HD in
the future.
In article <ji7n7kFnpv8U1@mid.individual.net>,
Mark Carver <mark.carver@invalid.invalid> wrote:
You're too late, all the COM 7 carriers dropped at bang on 11am
yesterday
Hmm. I've just used my analyser and it is still showing a large
carrier of something on C55. This is at 11pm Friday. It is about the
same amplitude as C55 always was ie. slightly less than the main 6
but much larger than the mobile phone signals.
I've also done a retune and got nothing from C55 But I don't think
they've turned of the transmitter Com7 Sutton at this moment, just
not sending anything to it.
Bob.
On 30/06/2022 21:37, NY wrote:
BBC 4 HD appeared more or less immediately on PSB3 here (Hannington transmitter).
BBC 4 HD appeared more or less immediately on PSB3 here (Hannington transmitter).
"Brian Gregory" <void-invalid-dead-dontuse@email.invalid> wrote in
message news:ji9039FtojeU2@mid.individual.net...
On 30/06/2022 21:37, NY wrote:
BBC 4 HD appeared more or less immediately on PSB3 here (Hannington
transmitter).
With playable video and audio streams? On Belmont, the entries in the
list of channels on the mux were present right from when I first checked about 13:00 on 29 June, but they were index entries only, with no
matching video/audio streams. All I got was the "BBC Four HD will return
to Freeview soon" caption.
It should have shut down without the transport stream being present, as
it's an SFN transmitter
Doesn't matter in this instance of course, but normally if a tx loses
its feed and it's in an SFN, the carrier should drop otherwise it'll
punch a hole in overlap areas
On 01/07/2022 12:19, Mark Carver wrote:
It should have shut down without the transport stream being present,
as it's an SFN transmitter
Doesn't matter in this instance of course, but normally if a tx loses
its feed and it's in an SFN, the carrier should drop otherwise it'll
punch a hole in overlap areas
COM7 overlap area coverage was full of holes anyway. :)
On 04/07/2022 00:45, Brian Gregory wrote:
On 01/07/2022 12:19, Mark Carver wrote:It was, I'm not convinced turning it into a national SFN was terribly successful.
It should have shut down without the transport stream being present, as
it's an SFN transmitter
Doesn't matter in this instance of course, but normally if a tx loses
its feed and it's in an SFN, the carrier should drop otherwise it'll
punch a hole in overlap areas
COM7 overlap area coverage was full of holes anyway. :)
Firstly, the SI tables for all the transmitters had to cross refer to all
the other muxes carried by all the other transmitters.
This led to a huge unwieldy lump of data that gave some receivers indigestion.
And I'm not sure, as you say, the signals in the overlap zones were timed properly to give constructive rather than destructive reception.
I don't think anyone on the Tx side will miss it !
"Mark Carver" <mark.carver@invalid.invalid> wrote in message news:jifirnFs5j0U1@mid.individual.net...
On 04/07/2022 00:45, Brian Gregory wrote:
On 01/07/2022 12:19, Mark Carver wrote:It was, I'm not convinced turning it into a national SFN was terribly
It should have shut down without the transport stream being present,
as it's an SFN transmitter
Doesn't matter in this instance of course, but normally if a tx
loses its feed and it's in an SFN, the carrier should drop otherwise
it'll punch a hole in overlap areas
COM7 overlap area coverage was full of holes anyway. :)
successful.
Firstly, the SI tables for all the transmitters had to cross refer to
all the other muxes carried by all the other transmitters.
This led to a huge unwieldy lump of data that gave some receivers
indigestion.
And I'm not sure, as you say, the signals in the overlap zones were
timed properly to give constructive rather than destructive reception.
I don't think anyone on the Tx side will miss it !
I can see the arguments for and against making COM7/8 into
single-frequency networks. But when it was decided to do this, why did
they choose such high carrier frequencies, *above* the 700 MHz threshold
that was being sold off?
"Mark Carver" <mark.carver@invalid.invalid> wrote in message news:jifirnFs5j0U1@mid.individual.net...
On 04/07/2022 00:45, Brian Gregory wrote:
On 01/07/2022 12:19, Mark Carver wrote:It was, I'm not convinced turning it into a national SFN was terribly
It should have shut down without the transport stream being
present, as it's an SFN transmitter
Doesn't matter in this instance of course, but normally if a tx
loses its feed and it's in an SFN, the carrier should drop
otherwise it'll punch a hole in overlap areas
COM7 overlap area coverage was full of holes anyway. :)
successful.
Firstly, the SI tables for all the transmitters had to cross refer to
all the other muxes carried by all the other transmitters.
This led to a huge unwieldy lump of data that gave some receivers
indigestion.
And I'm not sure, as you say, the signals in the overlap zones were
timed properly to give constructive rather than destructive reception.
I don't think anyone on the Tx side will miss it !
I can see the arguments for and against making COM7/8 into
single-frequency networks. But when it was decided to do this, why did
they choose such high carrier frequencies, *above* the 700 MHz
threshold that was being sold off?
What is the highest UHF channel that is now used for terrestrial TV in
the UK? I can't find a list of every transmitter and its frequencies,
to sort it by frequency.
NY wrote:
I can see the arguments for and against making COM7/8 into single-frequency >> networks. But when it was decided to do this, why did they choose such high >> carrier frequencies, *above* the 700 MHz threshold that was being sold off?
From its conception t'was only ever going to be a temporary service.
It used spectrum that even in 2013 was headed for mobile operators.COM7 was originally at CH31,32,33 depending on transmitter and COM8 at CH34,35,37 similarly.
On 01/07/2022 20:26, Brian Gregory wrote:
BBC 4 HD appeared more or less immediately on PSB3 here (Hannington transmitter).
When FREEVIEW updated here, I noticed BBC 4 HD so had a look what was
going on. It has a caption that "BBC 4 returns soon". Odd, considering
that Freeview Lite has never carried BBC 4 HD!
Robin wrote:
NY wrote:
I can see the arguments for and against making COM7/8 into
single-frequency networks. But when it was decided to do this, why
did they choose such high carrier frequencies, *above* the 700 MHz
threshold that was being sold off?
Raking in a few quid before the spectrum auctions had taken place and
the mobile networks were ready to start using it.
From its conception t'was only ever going to be a temporary service.
True enough.
It used spectrum that even in 2013 was headed for mobile operators.COM7 was originally at CH31,32,33 depending on transmitter and COM8 at CH34,35,37 similarly.
AIUI the BBC have said that BBC4 will be dropped from 'Freeview' at some pointI interpret that as a call to pre-emptively complain about losing it (like 6music)
currently looking at the audio quality of YT
output to see if they mangle what gets uploaded.
im Lesurf wrote:Indeed.
AIUI the BBC have said that BBC4 will be dropped from 'Freeview' at someI interpret that as a call to pre-emptively complain about losing it
point
(like 6music)
In article <t9nkq3$2bv54$1@dont-email.me>, MB <MB@nospam.net> wrote:BBC 4 SD moved to LCN 24 in Scotland a few years ago, (to make way for
On 01/07/2022 20:26, Brian Gregory wrote:Change here was on the 30th. Since then we've had BBC4 SD on a channel
BBC 4 HD appeared more or less immediately on PSB3 here (HanningtonWhen FREEVIEW updated here, I noticed BBC 4 HD so had a look what was
transmitter).
going on. It has a caption that "BBC 4 returns soon". Odd, considering
that Freeview Lite has never carried BBC 4 HD!
number specific to Scotland.
Along with a message that BBC4 will "return
soon". I hope/assume that means as HD, but await to see...
On 04/07/2022 11:02, Andy Burns wrote:
im Lesurf wrote:Indeed.
AIUI the BBC have said that BBC4 will be dropped from 'Freeview' at some >>> pointI interpret that as a call to pre-emptively complain about losing it
(like 6music)
I challenge anybody to produce a quote from anybody in BBC management
saying that BBC 4 *Will* close ?
What Tim Davey said is, 'services *such as*...BBC 4 might have to close
Change here was on the 30th. Since then we've had BBC4 SD on a channel
number specific to Scotland. Along with a message that BBC4 will "return soon".
"Mark Carver" <mark.carver@invalid.invalid> wrote in message news:jift2eFtj0aU1@mid.individual.net...
On 04/07/2022 11:02, Andy Burns wrote:
im Lesurf wrote:Indeed.
AIUI the BBC have said that BBC4 will be dropped from 'Freeview' atI interpret that as a call to pre-emptively complain about losing it
some
point
(like 6music)
I challenge anybody to produce a quote from anybody in BBC management
saying that BBC 4 *Will* close ?
What Tim Davey said is, 'services *such as*...BBC 4 might have to close
If the BBC mention the word "close", even if it is qualified by
"might" or "could", I think we can take it as read that it is the firm
plan to do so, even if this is an internal-only-not-for-publication
plan. Or am I just being cynical?
On 04/07/2022 10:20, Jim Lesurf wrote:
Change here was on the 30th. Since then we've had BBC4 SD on a channel
number specific to Scotland. Along with a message that BBC4 will "return
soon".
The message actually says that "BBC 4 HD will return soon" both in the caption and EPG (?). Presumably written by someone down South who is
unaware of Freeview Lite.
On 04/07/2022 10:40, Andy Burns wrote:
Robin wrote:Yes, I lose track of what was intended, but as I said in the other post,
NY wrote:
I can see the arguments for and against making COM7/8 into
single-frequency networks. But when it was decided to do this, why
did they choose such high carrier frequencies, *above* the 700 MHz
threshold that was being sold off?
Raking in a few quid before the spectrum auctions had taken place and
the mobile networks were ready to start using it.
From its conception t'was only ever going to be a temporary service.
True enough.
It used spectrum that even in 2013 was headed for mobile operators.COM7 was originally at CH31,32,33 depending on transmitter and COM8 at
CH34,35,37 similarly.
this sub band (500 MHz band) had originally been cleared of broadcast services, and lay empty between DSO in each area, and COM 7 and 8 coming along in 2013/4.
I can't remember whether the original intention was to flog this off too ?
On 04/07/2022 10:20, Jim Lesurf wrote:
Change here was on the 30th. Since then we've had BBC4 SD on a channel
number specific to Scotland. Along with a message that BBC4 will "return
soon".
The message actually says that "BBC 4 HD will return soon" both in the caption and EPG (?). Presumably written by someone down South who is
unaware of Freeview Lite.
Now that BBC Four HD is on PSB3, it is available on *all* transmitters,
even Freeview Lite which has PSB1,2,3 but not COM4,5,6.
In article <ta0sr0$3ln72$1@dont-email.me>, NY <me@privacy.invalid> wrote:
Now that BBC Four HD is on PSB3, it is available on *all* transmitters,May depend on your unstated definitions of "all" and "available". I just checked and here it *still* shows the "available soon" messages and points
even Freeview Lite which has PSB1,2,3 but not COM4,5,6.
to ch24 for the (non HD) version.
On 05/07/2022 09:56, Jim Lesurf wrote:
In article <ta0sr0$3ln72$1@dont-email.me>, NY <me@privacy.invalid> wrote:There is currently no live stream of BBC 4 HD on PSB 3 (or any other mux)
Now that BBC Four HD is on PSB3, it is available on *all* transmitters,May depend on your unstated definitions of "all" and "available". I just
even Freeview Lite which has PSB1,2,3 but not COM4,5,6.
checked and here it *still* shows the "available soon" messages and
points
to ch24 for the (non HD) version.
All that exists (since June 29th) is a place holder on PSB3 on LCN 106, linked to MHEG caption stating 'available soon'
and advising punters to go away and continue to use the SD version on
LCN 9 (LCN 24 in Scotland)
PSB 3 is carried by every DTT transmitter in the UK. (1154 sites)
On 06/07/2022 10:47, Mark Carver wrote:
On 05/07/2022 09:56, Jim Lesurf wrote:
In article <ta0sr0$3ln72$1@dont-email.me>, NY <me@privacy.invalid>There is currently no live stream of BBC 4 HD on PSB 3 (or any other
wrote:
Now that BBC Four HD is on PSB3, it is available on *all*May depend on your unstated definitions of "all" and "available". I
transmitters,
even Freeview Lite which has PSB1,2,3 but not COM4,5,6.
just
checked and here it *still* shows the "available soon" messages and
points
to ch24 for the (non HD) version.
mux)
All that exists (since June 29th) is a place holder on PSB3 on LCN
106, linked to MHEG caption stating 'available soon'
and advising punters to go away and continue to use the SD version on
LCN 9 (LCN 24 in Scotland)
PSB 3 is carried by every DTT transmitter in the UK. (1154 sites)
It seems a lost opportunity to rejig Com4, com5 and Com6 to become HD
and a SFN for the whole country as that could have freed up some space
for Com7 and Com8 to have moved down in frequency.
I'm not aware of any reqgional variations on coms 4 to 6.... It couldNo one is going to equip over 1000 transmitter sites with three more muxes
have also provided an opportunity for the freeview lite TXes to start broadcasting Com4 to com6 and be a carrot to nudge people to upgrade
from SD to HD to get the extra channels.
In article <ta0sr0$3ln72$1@dont-email.me>, NY <me@privacy.invalid> wrote:
Now that BBC Four HD is on PSB3, it is available on *all* transmitters,
even Freeview Lite which has PSB1,2,3 but not COM4,5,6.
May depend on your unstated definitions of "all" and "available". I just checked and here it *still* shows the "available soon" messages and points
to ch24 for the (non HD) version.
Maybe your "all" means "in England"?
Another opportunity was lost in not converting PSB1 and PSB2 to
HD and therefor remove simulcasting of BBC1, BBC2, ITV, Ch4 and
Ch6 in both SD and HD.
Another opportunity was lost in not converting PSB1 and PSB2 to
HD and therefor remove simulcasting of BBC1, BBC2, ITV, Ch4 and
Ch6 in both SD and HD.
And immediately obsoleting probably millions of non-HD TVs, some
sold only a few years ago, including two of mine.
Another opportunity was lost in not converting PSB1 and PSB2 to
HD and therefor remove simulcasting of BBC1, BBC2, ITV, Ch4 and
Ch6 in both SD and HD.
And immediately obsoleting probably millions of non-HD TVs, some sold only a few years ago, including two of mine.
Angus
But why did you buy soon to be obsolete tellys? I was advising
customers to buy only HD equipment donkey's years ago.
On 06/07/2022 14:13, Angus Robertson - Magenta Systems Ltd wrote:
But why did you buy soon to be obsolete tellys? I was advising customersAnother opportunity was lost in not converting PSB1 and PSB2 to
HD and therefor remove simulcasting of BBC1, BBC2, ITV, Ch4 and
Ch6 in both SD and HD.
And immediately obsoleting probably millions of non-HD TVs, some sold
only a
few years ago, including two of mine.
Angus
to buy only HD equipment donkey's years ago.
Bill
Another opportunity was lost in not converting PSB1 and PSB2 to
HD and therefor remove simulcasting of BBC1, BBC2, ITV, Ch4 and
Ch6 in both SD and HD.
And immediately obsoleting probably millions of non-HD TVs, some sold only
a
few years ago, including two of mine.
In article <ji83hoFpms8U1@mid.individual.net>,
Mark Carver <mark.carver@invalid.invalid> wrote:
It should have shut down without the transport stream being
present, as it's an SFN transmitter
In article <ji83hoFpms8U1@mid.individual.net>,
Mark Carver <mark.carver@invalid.invalid> wrote:
It should have shut down without the transport stream being
present, as it's an SFN transmitter
Just a quick check before I switch off C55 in the Triax TMB2000 and surprisingly, according to my spectrum analyser C55 carrier is still
there over a month after the mux closed. Of course I cannot be
certain it is still the Sutton Coldfield that is putting the signal
there but it is the same amplitude as before and there's nothing else continuous around it until you get down to C48.
I would have expected it to be shut down PDQ to save power and to
comply with license restrictions. Most odd to me.
Bob.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 463 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 157:01:22 |
| Calls: | 9,384 |
| Calls today: | 4 |
| Files: | 13,561 |
| Messages: | 6,095,919 |