XPost: alt.france, de.soc.weltanschauung.islam, nl.politiek
XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

You'll note that our coding approach to the GNOSIS {} --> incisive grapple
[] arrays is not very efficient and could probably use a recursive approach which we'll do later.

Our first objective here was to transition the legacy code into the
existing semantical context.

It's very likely that our neural linguistic pragma dataset will conform to
the d3.hierarchy semantical form

Nevertheless what the GNOSIS {} --> incisive grapple [] array dynamic associated to any meta-descriptive reduction of our problematic.json {} approach to intentional / ententional narrative (ie. weighted grapple [] spiral) as case studies will grant our informal research, is then whether
there is any biometric (ie. behavioural characteristics related to the
pattern of behaviour of a person) basis to the past observation of an abrogation in situ [50, 31] action against the heuristic GRAPPLE(247, 355)@[16,76,30,50 | 74,41,44,31 | 47,64,3] as case example for
date:2017.1.7 and whether it is goal (247, 355) driven as a disposition
towards a desired outcome or habitual want. Or whether it is best
understood as notionally a fusion clustering point or a short circuit.

We don't want to postulate reductio ad absurdum however its sufficient to
say that the weighted grapple [] spiral as narrative redaction method will produce GNOSIS {} --> incisive grapple [] array dynamic that as a metalogic proposition will yield clustering which may affect a disposition towards
either an incisive desired outcome, habitual want or expedient as a short circuit.

Again we are self educating: Aristotle clarified the connection between contradiction and falsity in his principle of non-contradiction, which
states that a proposition cannot be both true and false. That is, a
proposition
Q and its negation (not-Q) cannot both be true. Therefore, if a proposition
and its negation can both be derived logically from a premise, it can be concluded that the premise is false. This technique, known as indirect
proof or proof by contradiction, has formed the basis of reductio ad
absurdum arguments in formal fields such as logic and mathematics. <https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reductio_ad_absurdum>

Our concern is not so much about true or false conditional action but
rather whether the biometric clustering / elasticity (is it bounded and how
so) / cybergenetic potential (eg: is it a point of interface rather than evidence of bipartite ONTIC substitution, activation or circumvention etc) which we anticipate observing is a rational or irrational outcome.

#247 - MALE TOTAL: #355 as [#1, #50, #1, #20, #100, #10, #50, #5, #10] = anakrínō (G350): {UMBRA: #1032 % #41 = #7} 1) examine or judge; 1a) to investigate, examine, enquire into, scrutinise, sift, question; 1a1) specifically in a forensic sense of a judge to hold an investigation; 1a2)
to interrogate, examine the accused or witnesses; 1b) to judge of,
estimate, *DETERMINE* (*THE* *EXCELLENCE* *OR* *DEFECTS* *OF* *ANY*
*PERSON* *OR* *THING*;

So many philosophical questions, but now it's time to start our day

dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:

We are currently working on an implementation of the GIZMO matrix
concept which is accessible here:

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Heuristic&grapple:61,54,59,60,55,62,57,56,58&gizmo:true>

<-- *GIZMO* concept is work in progress

Those who have followed our informal research activity would know that
our actionable task {} json objects are retrieved as FILE_request {} automations which performs a fetch promise request and within the FileReader() onlaod() it then exposes the existance variable to the actionable task {} such that we've attained to a simple semantical
approach for multiple actionable tasks / concept instances ...

reader.onload = function() {
eval(`Savvy['${act.module}']['${(existance == undefined) ? act.notion : existance}'] = ${reader.result}`);
}

Whilst we sometime ago made a rudimentary semantical accommodation for
an auto function within this context which will be actioned before the
main() process is executed, however we've never deployed it. In this instance the Savvy.GNOSIS.GIZMO {} object is traversed and several Savvy.CORPUS {} objects such as GIZMO {} --> flat grapple arrays and
GNOSIS {} --> incisive grapple {} are created:

!function(t, registerGIZMO) {

registerGIZMO();

}(this, (function() {

if (Savvy.CORPUS.hasOwnProperty("GIZMO"))
return (Savvy.CORPUS.GIZMO);

... // code here -- 429 lines for example

}))

Thusly the datasets are not loaded as fetch requests but initiated with
the first instane (note: we don't as yet have a means to remove those
data obejcts) and for the present time as a referencing object then shared amongst the multiple instances.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/actions/Heuristic.json>

Tomorrow's logical thinking activity will be to resolve the cell click
() actions.

On 10/21/24 08:39, dolf wrote:

We're now back to our programming task for the next week at least ...

Revision Date: 21 October 2024

 dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:

We've resolved the problem of screen ambiguity when multiple
actionable task instances were run from the command line.

The problem was due to the getTimeFilename(stub) process which
concatenates the name from the d3.timeFormat("%H%M%S%L")(new Date())
function and the difficulty arises with the computer processor running
faster than the milliseconds ticks over so we force it to be inefficient >>>
    var filename = d3.timeFormat("%H%M%S%L")(new Date());

    do {

    } while (filename == d3.timeFormat("%H%M%S%L")(new Date()));

    return (`${stub}${filename}`);

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Heuristic&date:2017.1.7?
run:Heuristic&date:2024.10.1&run:Heuristic&date:2025.5.5&poll:true&run:Morphosis>

On 6/10/2024 13:03, dolf wrote:

We have now completed each of our allocated development tasks
excepting the
last 4) Implement a GIZMO matrix context which will be tomorrow's
logical
thinking activity and one feature which we'll implement is a second
click
to a focused z.r.c location will return to the EXMACHINA concept as
HEURISTIC pentamorph.

And we revised our earlier statement @ 0919 HOURS on 3/10/2024 by a
further
possible meta-postulate / rule on self justification conjectures as to >>>> whether any proposition for action follows a deterministic path schema: >>>>
DOES THIS DERIVATION SCHEMA COMING OUT OF THE MOUTH OF PALESTINIANS /
ISLAMISTS SOUND FAMILIAR ?

#50 - Fantasies of Avoiding Death, Value of Life
#31 - Military Stratagem, Quelling War

#50 - VASTNESS / WASTING (T'ANG) - 𝌷唐 = #224 / #386 / #501
#31 - PACKING (CHUANG) - 𝌤裝 = #205 / #367 / #482

Abrogation in situ [50, 31] action against the heuristic GRAPPLE(247,
355)@[16,76,30,50 | 74,41,44,31 | 47,64,3] as case example for
date:2017.1.7

Here the deviation [50 | 74 ... 31 | 47] is observed relative to the
temporal heuristic which is a different referencing as cluster
dynamic to
any perspective as incisive line of GRAPPLE (247, 355)@[16, 76, 30,
50, 41,
44, 31, 64, 3] PROTOTYPE.

By that I mean the possibility of any cluster dynamic (which have
dominion
bounds as limited derivations) which is a temporal osmosis for cohering >>>> categories of understanding and appears to be an inherent feature of the >>>> incisive process (ie. of a person or mental process/ intelligently
analytical and clear-thinking) itself as either an adaptation or
impediment
(ie. although there may be physiological comparison we're not making
assertion) as a micro transition or deviation point and meta logical
quantification of which we ought to be exceedingly mindful.

Thus the GIZMO matrix navigation as unity of apperception for our
nomenclature appraisals as referencing is a different proposition to the >>>> aggregated perspectives which will be defined by both a collection of
z.r.c
locations and the disposition of incisive process.

What role does the collective and disposition play in social
cohesion, bias
or authenticity and how is this different to ONTIC / DEME grounding of >>>> sapient experiences?

THIS WILL RUN AN INSTANCE OF OUR PROTOTYPE TEMPORAL HEURISTIC AS CONCEPT >>>> FOR FOR CONSCIOUSNESS INSTANTIATING BY GNOSIS EX MACHINA:

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Heuristic&date:2024.10.6>

We still need to resolve multiple instances issues from the command line >>>>

dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:

STATUS @ 1207 HOURS ON 5 OCTOBER 2024: This first task is now
completed
and we'll work on the metalogic / syllogism passing tomorrow.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?
run:Heuristic&grapple:16,76,30,50,41,44,31,64,3>

We've similarly looked at the getTimeHeuristic (chronos) function for >>>>>> any optimisation which can be applied and since the sub-process called >>>>>> getTimeSlot() deploys the requisite while / for loop cycle the
question
is then only a consideration of data {} representation by the datum[] >>>>>> array and therefore we don't see any criteria for change.

However we ought to note several temporal existential considerations >>>>>> such as the midnight anchor horizon perspective / daylight saving
temporal effect for which we don't have any adequate physiological >>>>>> explanation.

[x] -- (person a) ------->

------ [x midnight seeding] ------

<------- (person b) -- [x]

In this example the temporal heuristic will differ between persons >>>>>> a / b
due to their relativity to the [x] - midnight seeding.

NURTURE

| - NON DAYLIGHT SAVING
|
| - (x) - NATURE
|
| - DAYLIGHT SAVING

NURTURE

The consideration is upon the essential driver for action as to
whether
it is NURTURE or NATURE given I might buy a coffee @ 0900 hours each >>>>>> morning but during daylight saving there is an hour adjustment.  Is >>>>>> the
behaviour relative to self (#60 - CHI) by the NURTURE effect of
habitual
action or the NATURE of TIME which would require a SPONTANEOUS
ACTION to
then differentiate?

What carries the action?

Our next development for the HEURISTIC MODULE as ACTIONABLE TASK is to >>>>>> implement the &grapple:1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 option so that we can observe >>>>>> the pentamorph.

The problem here is whether we allow a malformed grapple array of less >>>>>> than 9 elements and whilst we might either trim or otherwise populate >>>>>> the truncated array with #81 values which will still retain the
dialectic context, the difficulty is that any ONTIC / DEME grounding >>>>>> might be then inappropriate.

STATUS @ 1207 HOURS ON 5 OCTOBER 2024: This first task is now
completed and
we'll work on the metalogic / syllogism passing tomorrow.

2)    Implement the metalogic / syllogism passing;

3)    Update the start ?heuristc operand process and any internal >>>>>> function
calls within CHAT so that we can jettison the legacy code
implementation;

4)    Implement a GIZMO matrix context

On 4/10/2024 15:36, dolf wrote:

dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:

We included the getDateHeuristic ({}) coding so that you can see the >>>>>>>> notion of speaking language to properly quantify the problem which >>>>>>>> requires the javascript solution -- in point of fact its possible to >>>>>>>> visualise the code within one's mind.

This semantical opportunity is now available:

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?
run:Heuristic&date:2017.1.7&run:Heuristic&date:2024.10.5&poll:true> >>>>>>>

Today's action will be to transition the existing HEURISTIC code >>>>>>>> within
the ACTIONABLE TASK and we'll omit the POLLING ACTION for the
present
time since flipPanelContext() is also a newer concept and we may >>>>>>>> have to
make some further considerations.

TIME HEURISTIC FOR NEWSPAPER THREAT PLACED WITHIN MAILBOX FOR 7 >>>>>>>>> JANUARY
2017 [#16, #76, #30, #50, #41, #44, #31, #64, #3] (*) we have >>>>>>>>> heretofore
had a technical issue with this prototype determination where we >>>>>>>>> could
not reproduce it and it is here manually corrected but still >>>>>>>>> needs to be
confirmed by algorithm which has on 3 OCTOBER 2024 been
confirmed as
GRAPPLE (358, 395)@[16, 76, 30, 74, 41, 44, 47, 64, 3] and all it >>>>>>>>> conveys by errata that it only by a contrived [+24, +16]
relationship
between (#247 - PICKER'S APOLOGETIC (#56 --> IDEA #177 - TABLE >>>>>>>>> TALK))
and (#355 - MISERICORDIAE VULTUS - PAPAL BULL OF 8 DECEMBER
2015 / 20 NOVEMBER 2016)

GRAPPLE (247, 355)@[16, 76, 30, 50, 41, 44, 31, 64, 3] PROTOTYPE >>>>>>>>>
<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Heuristic&date:2017.1.7> >>>>>>>>>

On 3/10/2024 09:19, dolf wrote:

    The updated semantical form to the HEURISTIC MODULE as >>>>>>>>> ACTIONABLE
TASK with SPAWN and IDEA CLUSTER capabilities will enable further >>>>>>>>> research into "where to from here scenarios" or self justification >>>>>>>>> conjectures as to whether any proposition for action follows a >>>>>>>>> deterministic path schema such as (but not limited to):

        - Stasis cohering due to prototype fusion and steeping.
        - Whether a course of nature IDEA dialectic
        - Morphosis prototype
        - IDEA clustering as metalogic associated with the >>>>>>>>> heuristic
        - IDEA dialectic as modus operandi schema

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Heuristic>

On 3/10/2024 07:27, dolf wrote:

We've got a respite window from the demands of any administrative >>>>>>>>>> process so we'll begin working on a resolution for our identified >>>>>>>>>> temporal heuristic problem...

After our transition towards an ACTIONABLE TASK implementation >>>>>>>>>> we're
going to work on the nested functions:

Savvy.GNOSIS.getHeuristicGrapple (Savvy.GNOSIS.getDateHeuristic >>>>>>>>>> (chronos));

The key to deploying a non-calendar implementation perhaps lays in >>>>>>>>>> determining the THETH anchor for the memetic sampling for any >>>>>>>>>> consciousness instantiation by exploiting the capability for a new >>>>>>>>>> Date (year, month, day) to accept a negative value for the day >>>>>>>>>> value.

function _getDateHeuristic (chronos) {

var f = Savvy.GNOSIS.CALENDAR[chronos.month][chronos.day];
var day = chronos.day;

while (Savvy.GNOSIS.dateHeuristic (chronos.year, chronos.month, >>>>>>>> day--)
!= 19); <-- *accept* *a* *negative* value for the day value

var heuristic = {
0: {},
1: {},
2: {}
}
var now = new Date (chronos.year, chronos.month-1, day+1,
chronos.hour,
chronos.minute, 0);
var cron = {
year: Number(d3.timeFormat("%Y")(now)),
month: Number(d3.timeFormat("%m")(now)),
day: Number(d3.timeFormat("%d")(now))
}
var meme = 0;
var p = null;

for (var i = 1; i < 23; i++) { <-- *populating* *the* *requisite* >>>>>>>> *sample* z.r.c sequence

if (meme = Savvy.GNOSIS.RUDOLPH[Savvy.GNOSIS.dateHeuristic
(cron.year,
cron.month, cron.day)]) {

now = new Date (cron.year, cron.month-1, cron.day);
cron = {
year: Number(d3.timeFormat("%Y")(now)),
month: Number(d3.timeFormat("%m")(now)),
day: Number(d3.timeFormat("%d")(now)),
weekday: Number(d3.timeFormat("%w")(now))
}
p = Savvy.GNOSIS.CALENDAR[cron.month][cron.day];
heuristic[0][`${p.zen}.${p.row}.${p.col}`] = meme;
heuristic[1][`${f.zen}.${meme}.${cron.weekday+3}`] = meme;
heuristic[2][`${meme}.${meme}.${cron.weekday+3}`] = meme;
}

cron.day++;

}

return (heuristic);

};

Once the THETH anchor is determined, its then a matter of
populating
the requisite sample z.r.c sequence for any subsequent grapple@[] >>>>>>>>>> array...

That's our meta-actions which we will explore today.

The ACTIONABLE TASK will be called Heuristic.json and will shortly >>>>>>>>>> appear here as we progress our transition:

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/actions/Heuristic.json>

On 26/9/2024 18:34, dolf wrote:

Despite our best intentions we are still occupied with
administrative
processes which might be concluded by 12 October 2024.

We've identified a problem which will be the first to resolve... >>>>>>>>>>>
20240925 - The temporal heuristic for date when designated by ? >>>>>>>>>>> date:2017.1.7&heuristic appears to be broken and returns an >>>>>>>>>>> implausible grapple array []

Its likely that we'll redevelop the HEURISTIC as a distinct >>>>>>>>>>> actionable task which can be SPAWNED and have specific NEURAL >>>>>>>>>>> LINGUISTIC PRAGMA associated as just some of the newer features. >>>>>>>>>>>
<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?date:2017.1.7&heuristic> <-- >>>>>>>>>>> the
switch will be backwards compatible but will deploy the ? >>>>>>>>>>> run:Heuristic&date:2017.1.7 format so that multiple instances >>>>>>>>>>> can be
invoked

TIME HEURISTIC FOR NEWSPAPER THREAT PLACED IN MAILBOX FOR 7 >>>>>>>>>>> JANUARY
2017 [#16, #76, #30, #50, #41, #44, #31, #64, #3] (*) we have >>>>>>>>>>> heretofore had a technical issue with this prototype where we >>>>>>>>>>> could
not reproduce it and is here manually corrected but needs to be >>>>>>>>>>> confirmed by algorithm.

GRAPPLE (247, 355)@[#16, #76, #30, #50, #41, #44, #31, #64, #3] >>>>>>>>>>> PROTOTYPE

[#16, {@1: Sup: 16 - CONTACT: CHIAO (#16); Ego: 16 - CONTACT: >>>>>>>>>>> CHIAO
(#16)}
#76, {@2: Sup: 11 - DIVERGENCE: CH'A (#27); Ego: 76 -
AGGRAVATION:
CHU (#92)}
#30, {@3: Sup: 41 - RESPONSE: YING (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH >>>>>>>>>>> OFFENDETH THE GOD OF MY DOMAIN {%42}); Ego: 30 - BOLD
RESOLUTION: YI
(#122)}
#50, {@4: Sup: 10 - DEFECTIVENESS, DISTORTION: HSIEN (#78); >>>>>>>>>>> Ego: 50 -
VASTNESS / WASTING: T'ANG (#172)}
#41, {@5: Sup: 51 - CONSTANCY: CH'ANG (#129); Ego: 41 - RESPONSE: >>>>>>>>>>> YING (#213)}
#44, {@6: Sup: 14 - PENETRATION: JUI (#143 - MALE DEME IS UNNAMED >>>>>>>>>>> {%8}); Ego: 44 - STOVE: TSAO (#257)}
#31, {@7: Sup: 45 - GREATNESS: TA (#188); Ego: 31 - PACKING: >>>>>>>>>>> CHUANG
(#288)}
#64, {@8: Sup: 28 - CHANGE: KENG (#216); Ego: 64 - SINKING: CH'EN >>>>>>>>>>> (#352)}
#3] {@9: Sup: 31 - PACKING: CHUANG (#247); Ego: 3 - MIRED: >>>>>>>>>>> HSIEN (#355)}

TELOS TOTAL: #355
ONTIC TOTAL: #68
DEME TOTAL: #143

#322 - MALE TOTAL: #247 as [#30, #200, #2, #90] = rêbets (H7258): >>>>>>>>>>> {UMBRA: #292 % #41 = #5} 1) resting or *DWELLING* *PLACE*, >>>>>>>>>>> place of
lying down;

#426 - ONTIC TOTAL: #68 as [#6, #5, #300, #40, #70, #5] = >>>>>>>>>>> shᵉmûwʻâh
(H8052): {UMBRA: #421 % #41 = #11} 1) report, *NEWS*, rumour; 1a) >>>>>>>>>>> report, news, tidings; 1b) mention;

#617 - ONTIC TOTAL: #68 as [#5, #3, #100, #1, #500, #8] = gráphō >>>>>>>>>>> (G1125): {UMBRA: #1404 % #41 = #10} 1) to write, with
reference to
the form of the letters; 1a) to delineate (or form) letters on a >>>>>>>>>>> tablet, parchment, *PAPER*, or other material; 2) to write, with >>>>>>>>>>> reference to the contents of the writing; 2a) to express in >>>>>>>>>>> written
characters; 2b) to commit to writing (things not to be
forgotten),
write down, record; 2c) used of those things which stand >>>>>>>>>>> written in
the sacred books (of the OT); 2d) to write to one, i.e. by >>>>>>>>>>> writing
(in a written epistle) to give information, directions; 3) to >>>>>>>>>>> fill
with writing; 4) to draw up in writing, compose;

TIME%20FOR%20PAYBACK%2020170105.jpg


<http://www.grapple369.com/images/
TIME%20FOR%20PAYBACK%2020170105.jpg>

#143 - DEME TOTAL: #143 as [#30, #5, #50, #10, #8, #40] = yânach >>>>>>>>>>> (H3240): {UMBRA: #68 % #41 = #27} 1) to rest; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to >>>>>>>>>>> rest, settle down and remain; 1a2) to repose, have rest, be >>>>>>>>>>> quiet;
1b) (Hiphil); 1b1) to cause to rest, give rest to, make quiet; >>>>>>>>>>> 1b2)
to cause to rest, cause to alight, set down; 1b3) to lay or >>>>>>>>>>> set down,
deposit, let lie, place; 1b4) to let remain, leave; 1b5) to >>>>>>>>>>> leave,
depart from; 1b6) to abandon; 1b7) to permit; 1c) (Hophal); >>>>>>>>>>> 1c1) to
obtain rest, be granted rest; 1c2) *TO* *BE* *LEFT*, *BE* >>>>>>>>>>> *PLACED*;
1c3) open space (subst);

#1082 - MALE TOTAL: #247 as [#2, #70, #400, #10, #600] = ʻêth >>>>>>>>>>> (H6256): {UMBRA: #470 % #41 = #19} 1) *TIME*; 1a) time (of an >>>>>>>>>>> event);
1b) time (usual); 1c) experiences, fortunes; 1d) occurrence, >>>>>>>>>>> occasion;

#1074 - DEME TOTAL: #143 as [#10, #4, #800, #200, #10, #50] = >>>>>>>>>>> horáō
(G3708): {UMBRA: #971 % #41 = #28} 1) to see with the eyes; 2) >>>>>>>>>>> to see
with the mind, to perceive, know; 3) to see, i.e. become >>>>>>>>>>> acquainted
with by experience, to experience; 4) to see, to look to; 4a) >>>>>>>>>>> to take
heed, beware; 4b) to care for, *PAY* *HEED* *TO*; 5) I was seen, >>>>>>>>>>> showed myself, appeared;

PICKER'S APOLOGETIC IDEA #56 EDITION (1976) HAS INFUSED TRAM / >>>>>>>>>>> TRAIN
DRIVER NOTIONS WHICH ARE OMITTED: "Für unsere heutige
Staatsform sei
die Bezeichnung «Führer» für den Staatschef die beste. Sie bringe
auch zum Ausdruck, dass der Staatschef das gewählte (***) und >>>>>>>>>>> wenn
der Führer einer Ortsgruppe Ortsgruppen»leiter« statt >>>>>>>>>>> Ortsgruppen»führer« heiße, empfinde kein Mensch das als nicht >>>>>>>>>>> sachentsprechend.

Ganz falsch sei es, an der der Staatsform zugehörigen
Bezeichnung des
Staatsoberhauptes etwas ändern zu wollen." [IDEA 177]

(***) - THESE 2 PAGES HAVE AN ANOMALOUS FACSIMILE APERTURE / >>>>>>>>>>> MARGIN
REMARKS AND WE HAVE SOUGHT TO EXAMINE ONLY THE CRUX memeBRAIN >>>>>>>>>>> IDEA.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?
male:247&feme:250&ontic:410&deme:504>

{@6: Sup: 65 - INNER: NEI (#247); Ego: 22 - RESISTANCE: KE >>>>>>>>>>> (#250)}

ONTIC TOTAL: #410
DEME TOTAL: #504

#122 - DEME TOTAL: #312 as [#2, #10, #40, #10, #50, #10] / >>>>>>>>>>> 716 - MALE TOTAL: #247 as [#6, #10, #40, #10, #50, #600] = yâmîyn >>>>>>>>>>> (H3225): {UMBRA: #110 % #41 = #28} 1) right, *RIGHT* *HAND*, >>>>>>>>>>> right
side; 1a) right hand; 1b) right (of direction); 1c) south (the >>>>>>>>>>> direction of the right hand when facing East);

#308 - 11 APRIL 2015 / MISERICORDIAE VULTUS - PAPAL BULL FOR >>>>>>>>>>> INDICTION OF THE EXTRAORDINARY JUBILEE OF MERCY (ANNOUNCED: >>>>>>>>>>> #449 - 13
MARCH 2015 / DECLARED: 2ND EASTER SUNDAY ON 11 APRIL 2015) >>>>>>>>>>> FROM #355
- 8 DECEMBER 2015 (Feast of the Immaculate Conception) to #355 >>>>>>>>>>> - 20
NOVEMBER 2016

Matters related to INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY THEFT:

NOUS #56 / 7 JANUARY LYNCH-PIN associated to a suspected >>>>>>>>>>> deployment
of gōu gǔ dìng lǐ (鈎股定理): HOOK THEOREM SCHEMA being self
evident
by PICKER'S APOLOGETIC TABLE TALK IDEA #56 EDITION (1976) / >>>>>>>>>>> PROPAGATION IN CHINA OF THE LUMINOUS RELIGION FROM DAQIN AS >>>>>>>>>>> STELLA OF
7 JANUARY 781) as an IMPETUS FOR CHRISTIAN ANATHEMA EXPRESSED >>>>>>>>>>> WITHIN
REDUCTIO AD HITLERUM AS TABLE TALK

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Table%20Talk%20-
%20Eucharist%20Research%20Summary.pdf>

Involving the VATICAN CITY-STATE (eg: SECOND VATICAN COUNCIL) / >>>>>>>>>>> FERVENT NEOPHYTES IMPOSING OF A SUBSTITUTED VIRTUE
[*METAMORPHOSES*
(μεταμορφώσεις) / *DEIFICATION* (ἀποθέωσις)] UPON OUR WAR DEAD BY
PERVERSION OF STATE AUTHORITY AND SOVEREIGNTY as maleficence >>>>>>>>>>> exhibited by INSTANCES OF BOER WAR MEMORIAL COMMEMORATION >>>>>>>>>>> IMPROPRIETY
31 MAY 1998 / 8-10 JUNE 2017 as attempts to RECLAIM THE #1827 - >>>>>>>>>>> EUCHARIST / PENTECOST FROM 卐 - SWASTIKA OBSTRUCTION.

IMPOSING A SUBSTITUTED VIRTUE UPON OUR WAR DEAD BY PERVERSION OF >>>>>>>>>>> STATE AUTHORITY AND SOVEREIGNTY
We would as an informal research opinion upon tenures as >>>>>>>>>>> STENOGRAPHER, venture to classify as being a seminal and TEMPORAL >>>>>>>>>>> DEMARCATION (ie. the action of fixing the boundary or limits of >>>>>>>>>>> something) made in conformity to contending values based >>>>>>>>>>> interests
championed by HENRY PICKER (member of the party in 1930) who took >>>>>>>>>>> TABLE TALK notes from IDEA #174 (COEFFICIENT: c² = a² + b²) - 21 >>>>>>>>>>> MARCH 1942 until #275 - 2 AUGUST 1942 as to suggest a
subterfuge (ie.
steganography is the practice of hiding a message within another >>>>>>>>>>> message or object).

On 25/8/2024 07:51, dolf wrote:

We're back to our project coding task today and here is an >>>>>>>>>>>> example
of BING COPILOT queries assisting in one's semantical evolution >>>>>>>>>>>> where we want to pass toLoad {} object to our merge sessions >>>>>>>>>>>> process
as the need to retain integrity by referencing session IDs >>>>>>>>>>>> instead
of an array index.

So we simply asked intelligent questions:

a)    javascript copy selected array object elements into an >>>>>>>>>>>> object
b)    create a named element object from array

So within seconds we were able to deduce a viable semantical >>>>>>>>>>>> opportunity

if (Object.values(this.toLoad).length != data.sessions.length) >>>>>>>>>>>>      this.toLoad = Object.fromEntries(data.sessions.map(item =>
{return [item.session, true]}));

Thus our next activity is to traverse the toLoad {} object and >>>>>>>>>>>> deploy a task automation to then replicate the SCENARIO >>>>>>>>>>>> directory
within the first session ID which are templates obtained from >>>>>>>>>>>> any
subsequent sessions having a true condition.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Problematic>

On 16/8/2024 09:12, dolf wrote:

We've been delayed by administrative processes (ie. whilst >>>>>>>>>>>>> there
are favourable metalogic outcomes such as #174 - ANIMA / >>>>>>>>>>>>> ANIMUS and
#336 - PERSONAL CONSCIOUSNESS COEFFICIENTS) which requires a >>>>>>>>>>>>> different thought modality (ie. semantics of language v's >>>>>>>>>>>>> number
and its process) to that of computer programming.

So we're back to the task of a "complex load / merge SESSIONS >>>>>>>>>>>>> action within our PROBLEM SOLVER development so that >>>>>>>>>>>>> SESSIONS html
data can be exchanged" which I consider we could facilitate by >>>>>>>>>>>>> doAction {} automated task processes -- today's goal will be to >>>>>>>>>>>>> replicate a directory structure.

The longer term goal for this is that at some stage we'll >>>>>>>>>>>>> probably
devise an actionable task to then manage (ie. perform >>>>>>>>>>>>> maintenance
actions such as copy / merge / delete) the SESSIONS data. >>>>>>>>>>>>>
- dolf

On 3/8/2024 07:38, dolf wrote:

We are very close to having the complex load / merge >>>>>>>>>>>>>> SESSIONS action
completed within our PROBLEM SOLVER development so that >>>>>>>>>>>>>> SESSIONS
html data
can be exchanged.

This will be our weekend logical thinking activity. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Furthermore our earlier SCENARIO prototype as legacy code >>>>>>>>>>>>>> has a
visual
representation for a directory hierarchy which may deploy >>>>>>>>>>>>>> for a
delete
capability...

<http://www.grapple369.com/?scenario>

dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:

STATUS UPDATE @ 1040 HOURS ON 31 JULY 2024: We've >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> designated the
varied
chronos {} to then obtain the daily TEMPORAL MORPHOSIS >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dynamic
for any
given day:

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?
run:Research&date:2024.8.1&&run:Research&date:2024.8.2> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
And the various _ functions() have been normalised to their >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> natural state.

Tomorrow's logical thinking activity will be return to our >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PROBLEM
SOLVER development so that new loaded SESSIONS can be merged >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> within any
existing SESSION

------------

Overnight we've implemented the temporal date / time passing >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> parameters
so that we can move towards examining different TEMPORAL >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MORPHOSIS
criteria ...

A spawn event will pass the time of action as date / time >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> passing
parameters which is then relevant to the apprehension >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TEMPORAL
CONTEXT.

[continued in next message]

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.france, de.soc.weltanschauung.islam, nl.politiek
XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

#282 as [#2, #10, #70, #200] = bíos (G979): {UMBRA: #282 % #41 = #36} 1)
life; 1a) life extensively; 1a1) the period or course of life; 1b) that
by which life is sustained, resources, wealth, goods;

#565 as [#40, #5, #300, #100, #70, #50] = métron (G3358): {UMBRA: #565 %
#41 = #32} 1) measure, an instrument for measuring; 1a) a vessel for
receiving and determining the quantity of things, whether dry or liquid;
1b) a graduated staff for measuring, a measuring rod; 1c) proverbially,
the rule or standard of judgment; 2) determined extent, portion measured
off, measure or limit; 2a) the required measure, the due, fit, measure;

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?lexicon:G979,G3358,G350>

On 11/10/24 06:13, dolf wrote:

You'll note that our coding approach to the GNOSIS {} --> incisive grapple
[] arrays is not very efficient and could probably use a recursive approach which we'll do later.

Our first objective here was to transition the legacy code into the
existing semantical context.

It's very likely that our neural linguistic pragma dataset will conform to the d3.hierarchy semantical form

Nevertheless what the GNOSIS {} --> incisive grapple [] array dynamic associated to any meta-descriptive redaction of our problematic.json {} approach to intentional / ententional narrative (ie. weighted grapple [] spiral) as case studies will grant our informal research, is then whether there is any biometric (ie. behavioural characteristics related to the pattern of behaviour of a person) basis to the past observation of an abrogation in situ [50, 31] action against the heuristic GRAPPLE(247, 355)@[16,76,30,50 | 74,41,44,31 | 47,64,3] as case example for
date:2017.1.7 and whether it is goal (247, 355) driven as a disposition towards a desired outcome or habitual want. Or whether it is best
understood as notionally a fusion clustering point or a short circuit.

We don't want to postulate reductio ad absurdum however its sufficient to
say that the weighted grapple [] spiral as narrative redaction method will produce GNOSIS {} --> incisive grapple [] array dynamic that as a metalogic proposition will yield clustering which may affect a disposition towards either an incisive desired outcome, habitual want or expedient as a short circuit.

Again we are self educating: Aristotle clarified the connection between contradiction and falsity in his principle of non-contradiction, which
states that a proposition cannot be both true and false. That is, a proposition Q and its negation (not-Q) cannot both be true. Therefore, if a proposition
and its negation can both be derived logically from a premise, it can be concluded that the premise is false. This technique, known as indirect
proof or proof by contradiction, has formed the basis of reductio ad
absurdum arguments in formal fields such as logic and mathematics. <https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reductio_ad_absurdum>

BIOMETRIC: {@9: Sup: 13 - INCREASE: TSENG (#246); Ego: 3 - MIRED: HSIEN
(#175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%22})}

TELOS TOTAL: #418

ONTIC TOTAL: #259

DEME TOTAL: #293

#12 as [#1 - CENTRE, #6 - CONTRARIETY, #5 - KEEPING SMALL] /
#418 as [#5, #400, #1, #6, #6] = ʼâvâh (H183): {UMBRA: #12 % #41 = #12}
1) desire, incline, covet, wait longingly, wish, sigh, want, be greedy,
prefer; 1a) (Piel) to desire, crave (food and drink); 1b) (Hithpael) to
desire, long for, lust after (of bodily appetites);

#588 - ONTIC TOTAL: #259 as [#5, #400, #100, #5, #9, #8, #50, #1, #10] = heurískō (G2147): {UMBRA: #1535 % #41 = #18} 1) to come upon, hit upon,
to meet with; 1a) after searching, to find a thing sought; 1b) without
previous search, to find (by chance), to fall in with; 1c) those who
come or return to a place; 2) to find by enquiry, thought, examination, scrutiny, observation, to find out by practice and experience; 2a) to
see, learn, discover, understand; 2b) to be found i.e. to be seen, be
present; 2c) to be discovered, recognised, detected, to show one's self
out, of one's character or state as found out by others (men, God, or
both); 2d) to get knowledge of, come to know, God; 3) to find out for
one's self, to acquire, get, obtain, procure;

#123 - DEME TOTAL: #293 as [#5, #30, #30, #8, #50] /
#973 - DEME TOTAL: #293 as [#5, #30, #30, #8, #50, #800, #50] = Héllēn (G1672): {UMBRA: #123 % #41 = #41} 1) a Greek either by nationality,
whether a native of the main land or of the Greek islands or colonies;
2) in a wider sense the name embraces all nations not Jews that made the language, customs, and learning of the Greeks their own; the primary
reference is to a difference of religion and worship;

Is the #336 - PERSONAL UNCONSCIOUS COEFFICIENTS then an artibrator
between #174 - ANIMA / ANIMUS and #246 (ANTI-THESIS) - UTTERANCE;
ACTIONS / #410 - OBLIGATING NORM and what determines the rightfulness
and wrongfulness actions actions

IDENTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE INNER EPISTEMOLOGICAL #174 - ANIMA / ANIMUS
AND #336 - PERSONAL UNCONSCIOUS COEFFICIENTS AS AN INFORMATION
ORGANISATIONAL AND SOCIAL COHESION PRINCIPLE

#246 (ANTI-THESIS) - UTTERANCE; ACTIONS / #410 - OBLIGATING NORM (rules
based: BEAR NO FALSE WITNESS)

Our concern is not so much about true or false conditional action but
rather whether the biometric clustering / elasticity (is it bounded and how so) / cybergenetic potential (eg: is it a point of interface rather than evidence of bipartite ONTIC substitution, activation or circumvention etc) which we anticipate observing is a rational or irrational outcome.

#247 - MALE TOTAL: #355 as [#1, #50, #1, #20, #100, #10, #50, #5, #10] = anakrínō (G350): {UMBRA: #1032 % #41 = #7} 1) examine or judge; 1a) to investigate, examine, enquire into, scrutinise, sift, question; 1a1) specifically in a forensic sense of a judge to hold an investigation; 1a2)
to interrogate, examine the accused or witnesses; 1b) to judge of,
estimate, *DETERMINE* (*THE* *EXCELLENCE* *OR* *DEFECTS* *OF* *ANY*
*PERSON* *OR* *THING*;

So many philosophical questions, but now it's time to start our day

dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:

We are currently working on an implementation of the GIZMO matrix
concept which is accessible here:

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Heuristic&grapple:61,54,59,60,55,62,57,56,58&gizmo:true>

<-- *GIZMO* concept is work in progress

Those who have followed our informal research activity would know that
our actionable task {} json objects are retrieved as FILE_request {}
automations which performs a fetch promise request and within the
FileReader() onlaod() it then exposes the existance variable to the
actionable task {} such that we've attained to a simple semantical
approach for multiple actionable tasks / concept instances ...

reader.onload = function() {
eval(`Savvy['${act.module}']['${(existance == undefined) ? act.notion : >> existance}'] = ${reader.result}`);
}

Whilst we sometime ago made a rudimentary semantical accommodation for
an auto function within this context which will be actioned before the
main() process is executed, however we've never deployed it. In this
instance the Savvy.GNOSIS.GIZMO {} object is traversed and several
Savvy.CORPUS {} objects such as GIZMO {} --> flat grapple arrays and
GNOSIS {} --> incisive grapple {} are created:

!function(t, registerGIZMO) {

registerGIZMO();

}(this, (function() {

if (Savvy.CORPUS.hasOwnProperty("GIZMO"))
return (Savvy.CORPUS.GIZMO);

... // code here -- 429 lines for example

}))

Thusly the datasets are not loaded as fetch requests but initiated with
the first instane (note: we don't as yet have a means to remove those
data obejcts) and for the present time as a referencing object then shared >> amongst the multiple instances.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/actions/Heuristic.json>

Tomorrow's logical thinking activity will be to resolve the cell click
() actions.

On 10/21/24 08:39, dolf wrote:

We're now back to our programming task for the next week at least ...



Revision Date: 21 October 2024

 dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:

We've resolved the problem of screen ambiguity when multiple
actionable task instances were run from the command line.

The problem was due to the getTimeFilename(stub) process which
concatenates the name from the d3.timeFormat("%H%M%S%L")(new Date())
function and the difficulty arises with the computer processor running >>>> faster than the milliseconds ticks over so we force it to be inefficient >>>>
    var filename = d3.timeFormat("%H%M%S%L")(new Date());

    do {

    } while (filename == d3.timeFormat("%H%M%S%L")(new Date()));

    return (`${stub}${filename}`);

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Heuristic&date:2017.1.7?
run:Heuristic&date:2024.10.1&run:Heuristic&date:2025.5.5&poll:true&run:Morphosis>

On 6/10/2024 13:03, dolf wrote:

We have now completed each of our allocated development tasks
excepting the
last 4) Implement a GIZMO matrix context which will be tomorrow's
logical
thinking activity and one feature which we'll implement is a second
click
to a focused z.r.c location will return to the EXMACHINA concept as
HEURISTIC pentamorph.

And we revised our earlier statement @ 0919 HOURS on 3/10/2024 by a
further
possible meta-postulate / rule on self justification conjectures as to >>>>> whether any proposition for action follows a deterministic path schema: >>>>>
DOES THIS DERIVATION SCHEMA COMING OUT OF THE MOUTH OF PALESTINIANS / >>>>> ISLAMISTS SOUND FAMILIAR ?

#50 - Fantasies of Avoiding Death, Value of Life
#31 - Military Stratagem, Quelling War

#50 - VASTNESS / WASTING (T'ANG) - 𝌷唐 = #224 / #386 / #501
#31 - PACKING (CHUANG) - 𝌤裝 = #205 / #367 / #482

Abrogation in situ [50, 31] action against the heuristic GRAPPLE(247, >>>>> 355)@[16,76,30,50 | 74,41,44,31 | 47,64,3] as case example for
date:2017.1.7

Here the deviation [50 | 74 ... 31 | 47] is observed relative to the >>>>> temporal heuristic which is a different referencing as cluster
dynamic to
any perspective as incisive line of GRAPPLE (247, 355)@[16, 76, 30,
50, 41,
44, 31, 64, 3] PROTOTYPE.

By that I mean the possibility of any cluster dynamic (which have
dominion
bounds as limited derivations) which is a temporal osmosis for cohering >>>>> categories of understanding and appears to be an inherent feature of the >>>>> incisive process (ie. of a person or mental process/ intelligently
analytical and clear-thinking) itself as either an adaptation or
impediment
(ie. although there may be physiological comparison we're not making >>>>> assertion) as a micro transition or deviation point and meta logical >>>>> quantification of which we ought to be exceedingly mindful.

Thus the GIZMO matrix navigation as unity of apperception for our
nomenclature appraisals as referencing is a different proposition to the >>>>> aggregated perspectives which will be defined by both a collection of >>>>> z.r.c
locations and the disposition of incisive process.

What role does the collective and disposition play in social
cohesion, bias
or authenticity and how is this different to ONTIC / DEME grounding of >>>>> sapient experiences?

THIS WILL RUN AN INSTANCE OF OUR PROTOTYPE TEMPORAL HEURISTIC AS CONCEPT >>>>> FOR FOR CONSCIOUSNESS INSTANTIATING BY GNOSIS EX MACHINA:

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Heuristic&date:2024.10.6>

We still need to resolve multiple instances issues from the command line >>>>>

dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:

STATUS @ 1207 HOURS ON 5 OCTOBER 2024: This first task is now
completed
and we'll work on the metalogic / syllogism passing tomorrow.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?
run:Heuristic&grapple:16,76,30,50,41,44,31,64,3>

We've similarly looked at the getTimeHeuristic (chronos) function for >>>>>>> any optimisation which can be applied and since the sub-process called >>>>>>> getTimeSlot() deploys the requisite while / for loop cycle the
question
is then only a consideration of data {} representation by the datum[] >>>>>>> array and therefore we don't see any criteria for change.

However we ought to note several temporal existential considerations >>>>>>> such as the midnight anchor horizon perspective / daylight saving >>>>>>> temporal effect for which we don't have any adequate physiological >>>>>>> explanation.

[x] -- (person a) ------->

------ [x midnight seeding] ------

<------- (person b) -- [x]

In this example the temporal heuristic will differ between persons >>>>>>> a / b
due to their relativity to the [x] - midnight seeding.

NURTURE

| - NON DAYLIGHT SAVING
|
| - (x) - NATURE
|
| - DAYLIGHT SAVING

NURTURE

The consideration is upon the essential driver for action as to
whether
it is NURTURE or NATURE given I might buy a coffee @ 0900 hours each >>>>>>> morning but during daylight saving there is an hour adjustment.  Is >>>>>>> the
behaviour relative to self (#60 - CHI) by the NURTURE effect of
habitual
action or the NATURE of TIME which would require a SPONTANEOUS
ACTION to
then differentiate?

What carries the action?

Our next development for the HEURISTIC MODULE as ACTIONABLE TASK is to >>>>>>> implement the &grapple:1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 option so that we can observe >>>>>>> the pentamorph.

The problem here is whether we allow a malformed grapple array of less >>>>>>> than 9 elements and whilst we might either trim or otherwise populate >>>>>>> the truncated array with #81 values which will still retain the
dialectic context, the difficulty is that any ONTIC / DEME grounding >>>>>>> might be then inappropriate.

STATUS @ 1207 HOURS ON 5 OCTOBER 2024: This first task is now
completed and
we'll work on the metalogic / syllogism passing tomorrow.

2)    Implement the metalogic / syllogism passing;

3)    Update the start ?heuristc operand process and any internal >>>>>>> function
calls within CHAT so that we can jettison the legacy code
implementation;

4)    Implement a GIZMO matrix context

On 4/10/2024 15:36, dolf wrote:

dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:

We included the getDateHeuristic ({}) coding so that you can see the >>>>>>>>> notion of speaking language to properly quantify the problem which >>>>>>>>> requires the javascript solution -- in point of fact its possible to >>>>>>>>> visualise the code within one's mind.

This semantical opportunity is now available:

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?
run:Heuristic&date:2017.1.7&run:Heuristic&date:2024.10.5&poll:true> >>>>>>>>

Today's action will be to transition the existing HEURISTIC code >>>>>>>>> within
the ACTIONABLE TASK and we'll omit the POLLING ACTION for the >>>>>>>>> present
time since flipPanelContext() is also a newer concept and we may >>>>>>>>> have to
make some further considerations.

TIME HEURISTIC FOR NEWSPAPER THREAT PLACED WITHIN MAILBOX FOR 7 >>>>>>>>>> JANUARY
2017 [#16, #76, #30, #50, #41, #44, #31, #64, #3] (*) we have >>>>>>>>>> heretofore
had a technical issue with this prototype determination where we >>>>>>>>>> could
not reproduce it and it is here manually corrected but still >>>>>>>>>> needs to be
confirmed by algorithm which has on 3 OCTOBER 2024 been
confirmed as
GRAPPLE (358, 395)@[16, 76, 30, 74, 41, 44, 47, 64, 3] and all it >>>>>>>>>> conveys by errata that it only by a contrived [+24, +16]
relationship
between (#247 - PICKER'S APOLOGETIC (#56 --> IDEA #177 - TABLE >>>>>>>>>> TALK))
and (#355 - MISERICORDIAE VULTUS - PAPAL BULL OF 8 DECEMBER >>>>>>>>>> 2015 / 20 NOVEMBER 2016)

GRAPPLE (247, 355)@[16, 76, 30, 50, 41, 44, 31, 64, 3] PROTOTYPE >>>>>>>>>>
<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Heuristic&date:2017.1.7> >>>>>>>>>>

On 3/10/2024 09:19, dolf wrote:

    The updated semantical form to the HEURISTIC MODULE as >>>>>>>>>> ACTIONABLE
TASK with SPAWN and IDEA CLUSTER capabilities will enable further >>>>>>>>>> research into "where to from here scenarios" or self justification >>>>>>>>>> conjectures as to whether any proposition for action follows a >>>>>>>>>> deterministic path schema such as (but not limited to):

        - Stasis cohering due to prototype fusion and steeping.
        - Whether a course of nature IDEA dialectic >>>>>>>>>>         - Morphosis prototype
        - IDEA clustering as metalogic associated with the >>>>>>>>>> heuristic
        - IDEA dialectic as modus operandi schema

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Heuristic>

On 3/10/2024 07:27, dolf wrote:

We've got a respite window from the demands of any administrative >>>>>>>>>>> process so we'll begin working on a resolution for our identified >>>>>>>>>>> temporal heuristic problem...

After our transition towards an ACTIONABLE TASK implementation >>>>>>>>>>> we're
going to work on the nested functions:

Savvy.GNOSIS.getHeuristicGrapple (Savvy.GNOSIS.getDateHeuristic >>>>>>>>>>> (chronos));

The key to deploying a non-calendar implementation perhaps lays in >>>>>>>>>>> determining the THETH anchor for the memetic sampling for any >>>>>>>>>>> consciousness instantiation by exploiting the capability for a new >>>>>>>>>>> Date (year, month, day) to accept a negative value for the day >>>>>>>>>>> value.

function _getDateHeuristic (chronos) {

var f = Savvy.GNOSIS.CALENDAR[chronos.month][chronos.day];
var day = chronos.day;

while (Savvy.GNOSIS.dateHeuristic (chronos.year, chronos.month, >>>>>>>>> day--)
!= 19); <-- *accept* *a* *negative* value for the day value

var heuristic = {
0: {},
1: {},
2: {}
}
var now = new Date (chronos.year, chronos.month-1, day+1,
chronos.hour,
chronos.minute, 0);
var cron = {
year: Number(d3.timeFormat("%Y")(now)),
month: Number(d3.timeFormat("%m")(now)),
day: Number(d3.timeFormat("%d")(now))
}
var meme = 0;
var p = null;

for (var i = 1; i < 23; i++) { <-- *populating* *the* *requisite* >>>>>>>>> *sample* z.r.c sequence

if (meme = Savvy.GNOSIS.RUDOLPH[Savvy.GNOSIS.dateHeuristic
(cron.year,
cron.month, cron.day)]) {

now = new Date (cron.year, cron.month-1, cron.day);
cron = {
year: Number(d3.timeFormat("%Y")(now)),
month: Number(d3.timeFormat("%m")(now)),
day: Number(d3.timeFormat("%d")(now)),
weekday: Number(d3.timeFormat("%w")(now))
}
p = Savvy.GNOSIS.CALENDAR[cron.month][cron.day];
heuristic[0][`${p.zen}.${p.row}.${p.col}`] = meme;
heuristic[1][`${f.zen}.${meme}.${cron.weekday+3}`] = meme;
heuristic[2][`${meme}.${meme}.${cron.weekday+3}`] = meme;
}

cron.day++;

}

return (heuristic);

};

Once the THETH anchor is determined, its then a matter of >>>>>>>>>>> populating
the requisite sample z.r.c sequence for any subsequent grapple@[] >>>>>>>>>>> array...

That's our meta-actions which we will explore today.

The ACTIONABLE TASK will be called Heuristic.json and will shortly >>>>>>>>>>> appear here as we progress our transition:

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/actions/Heuristic.json> >>>>>>>>>>>
On 26/9/2024 18:34, dolf wrote:

Despite our best intentions we are still occupied with >>>>>>>>>>>> administrative
processes which might be concluded by 12 October 2024. >>>>>>>>>>>>
We've identified a problem which will be the first to resolve... >>>>>>>>>>>>
20240925 - The temporal heuristic for date when designated by ? >>>>>>>>>>>> date:2017.1.7&heuristic appears to be broken and returns an >>>>>>>>>>>> implausible grapple array []

Its likely that we'll redevelop the HEURISTIC as a distinct >>>>>>>>>>>> actionable task which can be SPAWNED and have specific NEURAL >>>>>>>>>>>> LINGUISTIC PRAGMA associated as just some of the newer features. >>>>>>>>>>>>
<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?date:2017.1.7&heuristic> <-- >>>>>>>>>>>> the
switch will be backwards compatible but will deploy the ? >>>>>>>>>>>> run:Heuristic&date:2017.1.7 format so that multiple instances >>>>>>>>>>>> can be
invoked

TIME HEURISTIC FOR NEWSPAPER THREAT PLACED IN MAILBOX FOR 7 >>>>>>>>>>>> JANUARY
2017 [#16, #76, #30, #50, #41, #44, #31, #64, #3] (*) we have >>>>>>>>>>>> heretofore had a technical issue with this prototype where we >>>>>>>>>>>> could
not reproduce it and is here manually corrected but needs to be >>>>>>>>>>>> confirmed by algorithm.

GRAPPLE (247, 355)@[#16, #76, #30, #50, #41, #44, #31, #64, #3] >>>>>>>>>>>> PROTOTYPE

[#16, {@1: Sup: 16 - CONTACT: CHIAO (#16); Ego: 16 - CONTACT: >>>>>>>>>>>> CHIAO
(#16)}
#76, {@2: Sup: 11 - DIVERGENCE: CH'A (#27); Ego: 76 -
AGGRAVATION:
CHU (#92)}
#30, {@3: Sup: 41 - RESPONSE: YING (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH >>>>>>>>>>>> OFFENDETH THE GOD OF MY DOMAIN {%42}); Ego: 30 - BOLD
RESOLUTION: YI
(#122)}
#50, {@4: Sup: 10 - DEFECTIVENESS, DISTORTION: HSIEN (#78); >>>>>>>>>>>> Ego: 50 -
VASTNESS / WASTING: T'ANG (#172)}
#41, {@5: Sup: 51 - CONSTANCY: CH'ANG (#129); Ego: 41 - RESPONSE: >>>>>>>>>>>> YING (#213)}
#44, {@6: Sup: 14 - PENETRATION: JUI (#143 - MALE DEME IS UNNAMED >>>>>>>>>>>> {%8}); Ego: 44 - STOVE: TSAO (#257)}
#31, {@7: Sup: 45 - GREATNESS: TA (#188); Ego: 31 - PACKING: >>>>>>>>>>>> CHUANG
(#288)}
#64, {@8: Sup: 28 - CHANGE: KENG (#216); Ego: 64 - SINKING: CH'EN >>>>>>>>>>>> (#352)}
#3] {@9: Sup: 31 - PACKING: CHUANG (#247); Ego: 3 - MIRED: >>>>>>>>>>>> HSIEN (#355)}

TELOS TOTAL: #355
ONTIC TOTAL: #68
DEME TOTAL: #143

#322 - MALE TOTAL: #247 as [#30, #200, #2, #90] = rêbets (H7258): >>>>>>>>>>>> {UMBRA: #292 % #41 = #5} 1) resting or *DWELLING* *PLACE*, >>>>>>>>>>>> place of
lying down;

#426 - ONTIC TOTAL: #68 as [#6, #5, #300, #40, #70, #5] = >>>>>>>>>>>> shᵉmûwʻâh
(H8052): {UMBRA: #421 % #41 = #11} 1) report, *NEWS*, rumour; 1a) >>>>>>>>>>>> report, news, tidings; 1b) mention;

#617 - ONTIC TOTAL: #68 as [#5, #3, #100, #1, #500, #8] = gráphō >>>>>>>>>>>> (G1125): {UMBRA: #1404 % #41 = #10} 1) to write, with
reference to
the form of the letters; 1a) to delineate (or form) letters on a >>>>>>>>>>>> tablet, parchment, *PAPER*, or other material; 2) to write, with >>>>>>>>>>>> reference to the contents of the writing; 2a) to express in >>>>>>>>>>>> written
characters; 2b) to commit to writing (things not to be >>>>>>>>>>>> forgotten),
write down, record; 2c) used of those things which stand >>>>>>>>>>>> written in
the sacred books (of the OT); 2d) to write to one, i.e. by >>>>>>>>>>>> writing
(in a written epistle) to give information, directions; 3) to >>>>>>>>>>>> fill
with writing; 4) to draw up in writing, compose;

TIME%20FOR%20PAYBACK%2020170105.jpg


<http://www.grapple369.com/images/
TIME%20FOR%20PAYBACK%2020170105.jpg>

#143 - DEME TOTAL: #143 as [#30, #5, #50, #10, #8, #40] = yânach >>>>>>>>>>>> (H3240): {UMBRA: #68 % #41 = #27} 1) to rest; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to >>>>>>>>>>>> rest, settle down and remain; 1a2) to repose, have rest, be >>>>>>>>>>>> quiet;
1b) (Hiphil); 1b1) to cause to rest, give rest to, make quiet; >>>>>>>>>>>> 1b2)
to cause to rest, cause to alight, set down; 1b3) to lay or >>>>>>>>>>>> set down,
deposit, let lie, place; 1b4) to let remain, leave; 1b5) to >>>>>>>>>>>> leave,
depart from; 1b6) to abandon; 1b7) to permit; 1c) (Hophal); >>>>>>>>>>>> 1c1) to
obtain rest, be granted rest; 1c2) *TO* *BE* *LEFT*, *BE* >>>>>>>>>>>> *PLACED*;
1c3) open space (subst);

#1082 - MALE TOTAL: #247 as [#2, #70, #400, #10, #600] = ʻêth >>>>>>>>>>>> (H6256): {UMBRA: #470 % #41 = #19} 1) *TIME*; 1a) time (of an >>>>>>>>>>>> event);
1b) time (usual); 1c) experiences, fortunes; 1d) occurrence, >>>>>>>>>>>> occasion;

#1074 - DEME TOTAL: #143 as [#10, #4, #800, #200, #10, #50] = >>>>>>>>>>>> horáō
(G3708): {UMBRA: #971 % #41 = #28} 1) to see with the eyes; 2) >>>>>>>>>>>> to see
with the mind, to perceive, know; 3) to see, i.e. become >>>>>>>>>>>> acquainted
with by experience, to experience; 4) to see, to look to; 4a) >>>>>>>>>>>> to take
heed, beware; 4b) to care for, *PAY* *HEED* *TO*; 5) I was seen, >>>>>>>>>>>> showed myself, appeared;

PICKER'S APOLOGETIC IDEA #56 EDITION (1976) HAS INFUSED TRAM / >>>>>>>>>>>> TRAIN
DRIVER NOTIONS WHICH ARE OMITTED: "Für unsere heutige >>>>>>>>>>>> Staatsform sei
die Bezeichnung «Führer» für den Staatschef die beste. Sie bringe
auch zum Ausdruck, dass der Staatschef das gewählte (***) und >>>>>>>>>>>> wenn
der Führer einer Ortsgruppe Ortsgruppen»leiter« statt >>>>>>>>>>>> Ortsgruppen»führer« heiße, empfinde kein Mensch das als nicht >>>>>>>>>>>> sachentsprechend.

Ganz falsch sei es, an der der Staatsform zugehörigen >>>>>>>>>>>> Bezeichnung des
Staatsoberhauptes etwas ändern zu wollen." [IDEA 177] >>>>>>>>>>>>
(***) - THESE 2 PAGES HAVE AN ANOMALOUS FACSIMILE APERTURE / >>>>>>>>>>>> MARGIN
REMARKS AND WE HAVE SOUGHT TO EXAMINE ONLY THE CRUX memeBRAIN >>>>>>>>>>>> IDEA.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?
male:247&feme:250&ontic:410&deme:504>

{@6: Sup: 65 - INNER: NEI (#247); Ego: 22 - RESISTANCE: KE >>>>>>>>>>>> (#250)}

ONTIC TOTAL: #410
DEME TOTAL: #504

#122 - DEME TOTAL: #312 as [#2, #10, #40, #10, #50, #10] / >>>>>>>>>>>> 716 - MALE TOTAL: #247 as [#6, #10, #40, #10, #50, #600] = yâmîyn
(H3225): {UMBRA: #110 % #41 = #28} 1) right, *RIGHT* *HAND*, >>>>>>>>>>>> right
side; 1a) right hand; 1b) right (of direction); 1c) south (the >>>>>>>>>>>> direction of the right hand when facing East);

#308 - 11 APRIL 2015 / MISERICORDIAE VULTUS - PAPAL BULL FOR >>>>>>>>>>>> INDICTION OF THE EXTRAORDINARY JUBILEE OF MERCY (ANNOUNCED: >>>>>>>>>>>> #449 - 13
MARCH 2015 / DECLARED: 2ND EASTER SUNDAY ON 11 APRIL 2015) >>>>>>>>>>>> FROM #355
- 8 DECEMBER 2015 (Feast of the Immaculate Conception) to #355 >>>>>>>>>>>> - 20
NOVEMBER 2016

Matters related to INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY THEFT:

NOUS #56 / 7 JANUARY LYNCH-PIN associated to a suspected >>>>>>>>>>>> deployment
of gōu gǔ dìng lǐ (鈎股定理): HOOK THEOREM SCHEMA being self
evident
by PICKER'S APOLOGETIC TABLE TALK IDEA #56 EDITION (1976) / >>>>>>>>>>>> PROPAGATION IN CHINA OF THE LUMINOUS RELIGION FROM DAQIN AS >>>>>>>>>>>> STELLA OF
7 JANUARY 781) as an IMPETUS FOR CHRISTIAN ANATHEMA EXPRESSED >>>>>>>>>>>> WITHIN
REDUCTIO AD HITLERUM AS TABLE TALK

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Table%20Talk%20- >>>>>>>>>>>> %20Eucharist%20Research%20Summary.pdf>

Involving the VATICAN CITY-STATE (eg: SECOND VATICAN COUNCIL) / >>>>>>>>>>>> FERVENT NEOPHYTES IMPOSING OF A SUBSTITUTED VIRTUE
[*METAMORPHOSES*
(μεταμορφώσεις) / *DEIFICATION* (ἀποθέωσις)] UPON OUR WAR DEAD BY
PERVERSION OF STATE AUTHORITY AND SOVEREIGNTY as maleficence >>>>>>>>>>>> exhibited by INSTANCES OF BOER WAR MEMORIAL COMMEMORATION >>>>>>>>>>>> IMPROPRIETY
31 MAY 1998 / 8-10 JUNE 2017 as attempts to RECLAIM THE #1827 - >>>>>>>>>>>> EUCHARIST / PENTECOST FROM 卐 - SWASTIKA OBSTRUCTION. >>>>>>>>>>>>
IMPOSING A SUBSTITUTED VIRTUE UPON OUR WAR DEAD BY PERVERSION OF >>>>>>>>>>>> STATE AUTHORITY AND SOVEREIGNTY
We would as an informal research opinion upon tenures as >>>>>>>>>>>> STENOGRAPHER, venture to classify as being a seminal and TEMPORAL >>>>>>>>>>>> DEMARCATION (ie. the action of fixing the boundary or limits of >>>>>>>>>>>> something) made in conformity to contending values based >>>>>>>>>>>> interests
championed by HENRY PICKER (member of the party in 1930) who took >>>>>>>>>>>> TABLE TALK notes from IDEA #174 (COEFFICIENT: c² = a² + b²) - 21
MARCH 1942 until #275 - 2 AUGUST 1942 as to suggest a
subterfuge (ie.
steganography is the practice of hiding a message within another >>>>>>>>>>>> message or object).

On 25/8/2024 07:51, dolf wrote:

We're back to our project coding task today and here is an >>>>>>>>>>>>> example
of BING COPILOT queries assisting in one's semantical evolution >>>>>>>>>>>>> where we want to pass toLoad {} object to our merge sessions >>>>>>>>>>>>> process
as the need to retain integrity by referencing session IDs >>>>>>>>>>>>> instead
of an array index.

So we simply asked intelligent questions:

a)    javascript copy selected array object elements into an >>>>>>>>>>>>> object
b)    create a named element object from array

So within seconds we were able to deduce a viable semantical >>>>>>>>>>>>> opportunity

if (Object.values(this.toLoad).length != data.sessions.length) >>>>>>>>>>>>>      this.toLoad = Object.fromEntries(data.sessions.map(item =>
{return [item.session, true]}));

[continued in next message]

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.france, de.soc.weltanschauung.islam, nl.politiek
XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

On 11/10/24 06:13, dolf wrote:

You'll note that our coding approach to the GNOSIS {} --> incisive grapple
[] arrays is not very efficient and could probably use a recursive approach which we'll do later.

Our first objective here was to transition the legacy code into the
existing semantical context.

It's very likely that our neural linguistic pragma dataset will conform to the d3.hierarchy semantical form

Nevertheless what the GNOSIS {} --> incisive grapple [] array dynamic associated to any meta-descriptive redaction of our problematic.json {} approach to intentional / ententional narrative (ie. weighted grapple [] spiral) as case studies will grant our informal research, is then whether there is any biometric (ie. behavioural characteristics related to the pattern of behaviour of a person) basis to the past observation of an abrogation in situ [50, 31] action against the heuristic GRAPPLE(247, 355)@[16,76,30,50 | 74,41,44,31 | 47,64,3] as case example for
date:2017.1.7 and whether it is goal (247, 355) driven as a disposition towards a desired outcome or habitual want. Or whether it is best
understood as notionally a fusion clustering point or a short circuit.

We don't want to postulate reductio ad absurdum however its sufficient to
say that the weighted grapple [] spiral as narrative redaction method will produce GNOSIS {} --> incisive grapple [] array dynamic that as a metalogic proposition will yield clustering which may affect a disposition towards either an incisive desired outcome, habitual want or expedient as a short circuit.

Again we are self educating: Aristotle clarified the connection between contradiction and falsity in his principle of non-contradiction, which
states that a proposition cannot be both true and false. That is, a proposition Q and its negation (not-Q) cannot both be true. Therefore, if a proposition
and its negation can both be derived logically from a premise, it can be concluded that the premise is false. This technique, known as indirect
proof or proof by contradiction, has formed the basis of reductio ad
absurdum arguments in formal fields such as logic and mathematics. <https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reductio_ad_absurdum>

BIOMETRIC: {@9: Sup: 13 - INCREASE: TSENG (#246); Ego: 3 - MIRED: HSIEN
(#175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%22})}

TELOS TOTAL: #418

ONTIC TOTAL: #259

DEME TOTAL: #293

#12 as [#1 - CENTRE, #6 - CONTRARIETY, #5 - KEEPING SMALL] /
#418 as [#5, #400, #1, #6, #6] = ʼâvâh (H183): {UMBRA: #12 % #41 = #12}
1) desire, incline, covet, wait longingly, wish, sigh, want, be greedy,
prefer; 1a) (Piel) to desire, crave (food and drink); 1b) (Hithpael) to
desire, long for, lust after (of bodily appetites);

#588 - ONTIC TOTAL: #259 as [#5, #400, #100, #5, #9, #8, #50, #1, #10] = heurískō (G2147): {UMBRA: #1535 % #41 = #18} 1) to come upon, hit upon,
to meet with; 1a) after searching, to find a thing sought; 1b) without
previous search, to find (by chance), to fall in with; 1c) those who
come or return to a place; 2) to find by enquiry, thought, examination, scrutiny, observation, to find out by practice and experience; 2a) to
see, learn, discover, understand; 2b) to be found i.e. to be seen, be
present; 2c) to be discovered, recognised, detected, to show one's self
out, of one's character or state as found out by others (men, God, or
both); 2d) to get knowledge of, come to know, God; 3) to find out for
one's self, to acquire, get, obtain, procure;

#123 - DEME TOTAL: #293 as [#5, #30, #30, #8, #50] /
#973 - DEME TOTAL: #293 as [#5, #30, #30, #8, #50, #800, #50] = Héllēn (G1672): {UMBRA: #123 % #41 = #41} 1) a Greek either by nationality,
whether a native of the main land or of the Greek islands or colonies;
2) in a wider sense the name embraces all nations not Jews that made the language, customs, and learning of the Greeks their own; the primary
reference is to a difference of religion and worship;

Is the #336 - PERSONAL UNCONSCIOUS COEFFICIENTS then an artibrator
between #174 - ANIMA / ANIMUS and #246 (ANTI-THESIS) - UTTERANCE;
ACTIONS / #410 - OBLIGATING NORM and what determines the rightfulness
and wrongfulness actions actions

IDENTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE INNER EPISTEMOLOGICAL #174 - ANIMA / ANIMUS
AND #336 - PERSONAL UNCONSCIOUS COEFFICIENTS AS AN INFORMATION
ORGANISATIONAL AND SOCIAL COHESION PRINCIPLE

#246 (ANTI-THESIS) - UTTERANCE; ACTIONS / #410 - OBLIGATING NORM (rules
based: BEAR NO FALSE WITNESS)

Our concern is not so much about true or false conditional action but
rather whether the biometric clustering / elasticity (is it bounded and how so) / cybergenetic potential (eg: is it a point of interface rather than evidence of bipartite ONTIC substitution, activation or circumvention etc) which we anticipate observing is a rational or irrational outcome.

#247 - MALE TOTAL: #355 as [#1, #50, #1, #20, #100, #10, #50, #5, #10] = anakrínō (G350): {UMBRA: #1032 % #41 = #7} 1) examine or judge; 1a) to investigate, examine, enquire into, scrutinise, sift, question; 1a1) specifically in a forensic sense of a judge to hold an investigation; 1a2)
to interrogate, examine the accused or witnesses; 1b) to judge of,
estimate, *DETERMINE* (*THE* *EXCELLENCE* *OR* *DEFECTS* *OF* *ANY*
*PERSON* *OR* *THING*;

So many philosophical questions, but now it's time to start our day

dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:

We are currently working on an implementation of the GIZMO matrix
concept which is accessible here:

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Heuristic&grapple:61,54,59,60,55,62,57,56,58&gizmo:true>

<-- *GIZMO* concept is work in progress

Those who have followed our informal research activity would know that
our actionable task {} json objects are retrieved as FILE_request {}
automations which performs a fetch promise request and within the
FileReader() onlaod() it then exposes the existance variable to the
actionable task {} such that we've attained to a simple semantical
approach for multiple actionable tasks / concept instances ...

reader.onload = function() {
eval(`Savvy['${act.module}']['${(existance == undefined) ? act.notion : >> existance}'] = ${reader.result}`);
}

Whilst we sometime ago made a rudimentary semantical accommodation for
an auto function within this context which will be actioned before the
main() process is executed, however we've never deployed it. In this
instance the Savvy.GNOSIS.GIZMO {} object is traversed and several
Savvy.CORPUS {} objects such as GIZMO {} --> flat grapple arrays and
GNOSIS {} --> incisive grapple {} are created:

!function(t, registerGIZMO) {

registerGIZMO();

}(this, (function() {

if (Savvy.CORPUS.hasOwnProperty("GIZMO"))
return (Savvy.CORPUS.GIZMO);

... // code here -- 429 lines for example

}))

Thusly the datasets are not loaded as fetch requests but initiated with
the first instane (note: we don't as yet have a means to remove those
data obejcts) and for the present time as a referencing object then shared >> amongst the multiple instances.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/actions/Heuristic.json>

Tomorrow's logical thinking activity will be to resolve the cell click
() actions.

On 10/21/24 08:39, dolf wrote:

We're now back to our programming task for the next week at least ...



Revision Date: 21 October 2024

 dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:

We've resolved the problem of screen ambiguity when multiple
actionable task instances were run from the command line.

The problem was due to the getTimeFilename(stub) process which
concatenates the name from the d3.timeFormat("%H%M%S%L")(new Date())
function and the difficulty arises with the computer processor running >>>> faster than the milliseconds ticks over so we force it to be inefficient >>>>
    var filename = d3.timeFormat("%H%M%S%L")(new Date());

    do {

    } while (filename == d3.timeFormat("%H%M%S%L")(new Date()));

    return (`${stub}${filename}`);

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Heuristic&date:2017.1.7?
run:Heuristic&date:2024.10.1&run:Heuristic&date:2025.5.5&poll:true&run:Morphosis>

On 6/10/2024 13:03, dolf wrote:

We have now completed each of our allocated development tasks
excepting the
last 4) Implement a GIZMO matrix context which will be tomorrow's
logical
thinking activity and one feature which we'll implement is a second
click
to a focused z.r.c location will return to the EXMACHINA concept as
HEURISTIC pentamorph.

And we revised our earlier statement @ 0919 HOURS on 3/10/2024 by a
further
possible meta-postulate / rule on self justification conjectures as to >>>>> whether any proposition for action follows a deterministic path schema: >>>>>
DOES THIS DERIVATION SCHEMA COMING OUT OF THE MOUTH OF PALESTINIANS / >>>>> ISLAMISTS SOUND FAMILIAR ?

#50 - Fantasies of Avoiding Death, Value of Life
#31 - Military Stratagem, Quelling War

#50 - VASTNESS / WASTING (T'ANG) - 𝌷唐 = #224 / #386 / #501
#31 - PACKING (CHUANG) - 𝌤裝 = #205 / #367 / #482

Abrogation in situ [50, 31] action against the heuristic GRAPPLE(247, >>>>> 355)@[16,76,30,50 | 74,41,44,31 | 47,64,3] as case example for
date:2017.1.7

Here the deviation [50 | 74 ... 31 | 47] is observed relative to the >>>>> temporal heuristic which is a different referencing as cluster
dynamic to
any perspective as incisive line of GRAPPLE (247, 355)@[16, 76, 30,
50, 41,
44, 31, 64, 3] PROTOTYPE.

By that I mean the possibility of any cluster dynamic (which have
dominion
bounds as limited derivations) which is a temporal osmosis for cohering >>>>> categories of understanding and appears to be an inherent feature of the >>>>> incisive process (ie. of a person or mental process/ intelligently
analytical and clear-thinking) itself as either an adaptation or
impediment
(ie. although there may be physiological comparison we're not making >>>>> assertion) as a micro transition or deviation point and meta logical >>>>> quantification of which we ought to be exceedingly mindful.

Thus the GIZMO matrix navigation as unity of apperception for our
nomenclature appraisals as referencing is a different proposition to the >>>>> aggregated perspectives which will be defined by both a collection of >>>>> z.r.c
locations and the disposition of incisive process.

What role does the collective and disposition play in social
cohesion, bias
or authenticity and how is this different to ONTIC / DEME grounding of >>>>> sapient experiences?

THIS WILL RUN AN INSTANCE OF OUR PROTOTYPE TEMPORAL HEURISTIC AS CONCEPT >>>>> FOR FOR CONSCIOUSNESS INSTANTIATING BY GNOSIS EX MACHINA:

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Heuristic&date:2024.10.6>

We still need to resolve multiple instances issues from the command line >>>>>

dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:

STATUS @ 1207 HOURS ON 5 OCTOBER 2024: This first task is now
completed
and we'll work on the metalogic / syllogism passing tomorrow.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?
run:Heuristic&grapple:16,76,30,50,41,44,31,64,3>

We've similarly looked at the getTimeHeuristic (chronos) function for >>>>>>> any optimisation which can be applied and since the sub-process called >>>>>>> getTimeSlot() deploys the requisite while / for loop cycle the
question
is then only a consideration of data {} representation by the datum[] >>>>>>> array and therefore we don't see any criteria for change.

However we ought to note several temporal existential considerations >>>>>>> such as the midnight anchor horizon perspective / daylight saving >>>>>>> temporal effect for which we don't have any adequate physiological >>>>>>> explanation.

[x] -- (person a) ------->

------ [x midnight seeding] ------

<------- (person b) -- [x]

In this example the temporal heuristic will differ between persons >>>>>>> a / b
due to their relativity to the [x] - midnight seeding.

NURTURE

| - NON DAYLIGHT SAVING
|
| - (x) - NATURE
|
| - DAYLIGHT SAVING

NURTURE

The consideration is upon the essential driver for action as to
whether
it is NURTURE or NATURE given I might buy a coffee @ 0900 hours each >>>>>>> morning but during daylight saving there is an hour adjustment.  Is >>>>>>> the
behaviour relative to self (#60 - CHI) by the NURTURE effect of
habitual
action or the NATURE of TIME which would require a SPONTANEOUS
ACTION to
then differentiate?

What carries the action?

Our next development for the HEURISTIC MODULE as ACTIONABLE TASK is to >>>>>>> implement the &grapple:1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 option so that we can observe >>>>>>> the pentamorph.

The problem here is whether we allow a malformed grapple array of less >>>>>>> than 9 elements and whilst we might either trim or otherwise populate >>>>>>> the truncated array with #81 values which will still retain the
dialectic context, the difficulty is that any ONTIC / DEME grounding >>>>>>> might be then inappropriate.

STATUS @ 1207 HOURS ON 5 OCTOBER 2024: This first task is now
completed and
we'll work on the metalogic / syllogism passing tomorrow.

2)    Implement the metalogic / syllogism passing;

3)    Update the start ?heuristc operand process and any internal >>>>>>> function
calls within CHAT so that we can jettison the legacy code
implementation;

4)    Implement a GIZMO matrix context

On 4/10/2024 15:36, dolf wrote:

dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:

We included the getDateHeuristic ({}) coding so that you can see the >>>>>>>>> notion of speaking language to properly quantify the problem which >>>>>>>>> requires the javascript solution -- in point of fact its possible to >>>>>>>>> visualise the code within one's mind.

This semantical opportunity is now available:

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?
run:Heuristic&date:2017.1.7&run:Heuristic&date:2024.10.5&poll:true> >>>>>>>>

Today's action will be to transition the existing HEURISTIC code >>>>>>>>> within
the ACTIONABLE TASK and we'll omit the POLLING ACTION for the >>>>>>>>> present
time since flipPanelContext() is also a newer concept and we may >>>>>>>>> have to
make some further considerations.

TIME HEURISTIC FOR NEWSPAPER THREAT PLACED WITHIN MAILBOX FOR 7 >>>>>>>>>> JANUARY
2017 [#16, #76, #30, #50, #41, #44, #31, #64, #3] (*) we have >>>>>>>>>> heretofore
had a technical issue with this prototype determination where we >>>>>>>>>> could
not reproduce it and it is here manually corrected but still >>>>>>>>>> needs to be
confirmed by algorithm which has on 3 OCTOBER 2024 been
confirmed as
GRAPPLE (358, 395)@[16, 76, 30, 74, 41, 44, 47, 64, 3] and all it >>>>>>>>>> conveys by errata that it only by a contrived [+24, +16]
relationship
between (#247 - PICKER'S APOLOGETIC (#56 --> IDEA #177 - TABLE >>>>>>>>>> TALK))
and (#355 - MISERICORDIAE VULTUS - PAPAL BULL OF 8 DECEMBER >>>>>>>>>> 2015 / 20 NOVEMBER 2016)

GRAPPLE (247, 355)@[16, 76, 30, 50, 41, 44, 31, 64, 3] PROTOTYPE >>>>>>>>>>
<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Heuristic&date:2017.1.7> >>>>>>>>>>

On 3/10/2024 09:19, dolf wrote:

    The updated semantical form to the HEURISTIC MODULE as >>>>>>>>>> ACTIONABLE
TASK with SPAWN and IDEA CLUSTER capabilities will enable further >>>>>>>>>> research into "where to from here scenarios" or self justification >>>>>>>>>> conjectures as to whether any proposition for action follows a >>>>>>>>>> deterministic path schema such as (but not limited to):

        - Stasis cohering due to prototype fusion and steeping.
        - Whether a course of nature IDEA dialectic >>>>>>>>>>         - Morphosis prototype
        - IDEA clustering as metalogic associated with the >>>>>>>>>> heuristic
        - IDEA dialectic as modus operandi schema

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Heuristic>

On 3/10/2024 07:27, dolf wrote:

We've got a respite window from the demands of any administrative >>>>>>>>>>> process so we'll begin working on a resolution for our identified >>>>>>>>>>> temporal heuristic problem...

After our transition towards an ACTIONABLE TASK implementation >>>>>>>>>>> we're
going to work on the nested functions:

Savvy.GNOSIS.getHeuristicGrapple (Savvy.GNOSIS.getDateHeuristic >>>>>>>>>>> (chronos));

The key to deploying a non-calendar implementation perhaps lays in >>>>>>>>>>> determining the THETH anchor for the memetic sampling for any >>>>>>>>>>> consciousness instantiation by exploiting the capability for a new >>>>>>>>>>> Date (year, month, day) to accept a negative value for the day >>>>>>>>>>> value.

function _getDateHeuristic (chronos) {

var f = Savvy.GNOSIS.CALENDAR[chronos.month][chronos.day];
var day = chronos.day;

while (Savvy.GNOSIS.dateHeuristic (chronos.year, chronos.month, >>>>>>>>> day--)
!= 19); <-- *accept* *a* *negative* value for the day value

var heuristic = {
0: {},
1: {},
2: {}
}
var now = new Date (chronos.year, chronos.month-1, day+1,
chronos.hour,
chronos.minute, 0);
var cron = {
year: Number(d3.timeFormat("%Y")(now)),
month: Number(d3.timeFormat("%m")(now)),
day: Number(d3.timeFormat("%d")(now))
}
var meme = 0;
var p = null;

for (var i = 1; i < 23; i++) { <-- *populating* *the* *requisite* >>>>>>>>> *sample* z.r.c sequence

if (meme = Savvy.GNOSIS.RUDOLPH[Savvy.GNOSIS.dateHeuristic
(cron.year,
cron.month, cron.day)]) {

now = new Date (cron.year, cron.month-1, cron.day);
cron = {
year: Number(d3.timeFormat("%Y")(now)),
month: Number(d3.timeFormat("%m")(now)),
day: Number(d3.timeFormat("%d")(now)),
weekday: Number(d3.timeFormat("%w")(now))
}
p = Savvy.GNOSIS.CALENDAR[cron.month][cron.day];
heuristic[0][`${p.zen}.${p.row}.${p.col}`] = meme;
heuristic[1][`${f.zen}.${meme}.${cron.weekday+3}`] = meme;
heuristic[2][`${meme}.${meme}.${cron.weekday+3}`] = meme;
}

cron.day++;

}

return (heuristic);

};

Once the THETH anchor is determined, its then a matter of >>>>>>>>>>> populating
the requisite sample z.r.c sequence for any subsequent grapple@[] >>>>>>>>>>> array...

That's our meta-actions which we will explore today.

The ACTIONABLE TASK will be called Heuristic.json and will shortly >>>>>>>>>>> appear here as we progress our transition:

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/actions/Heuristic.json> >>>>>>>>>>>
On 26/9/2024 18:34, dolf wrote:

Despite our best intentions we are still occupied with >>>>>>>>>>>> administrative
processes which might be concluded by 12 October 2024. >>>>>>>>>>>>
We've identified a problem which will be the first to resolve... >>>>>>>>>>>>
20240925 - The temporal heuristic for date when designated by ? >>>>>>>>>>>> date:2017.1.7&heuristic appears to be broken and returns an >>>>>>>>>>>> implausible grapple array []

Its likely that we'll redevelop the HEURISTIC as a distinct >>>>>>>>>>>> actionable task which can be SPAWNED and have specific NEURAL >>>>>>>>>>>> LINGUISTIC PRAGMA associated as just some of the newer features. >>>>>>>>>>>>
<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?date:2017.1.7&heuristic> <-- >>>>>>>>>>>> the
switch will be backwards compatible but will deploy the ? >>>>>>>>>>>> run:Heuristic&date:2017.1.7 format so that multiple instances >>>>>>>>>>>> can be
invoked

TIME HEURISTIC FOR NEWSPAPER THREAT PLACED IN MAILBOX FOR 7 >>>>>>>>>>>> JANUARY
2017 [#16, #76, #30, #50, #41, #44, #31, #64, #3] (*) we have >>>>>>>>>>>> heretofore had a technical issue with this prototype where we >>>>>>>>>>>> could
not reproduce it and is here manually corrected but needs to be >>>>>>>>>>>> confirmed by algorithm.

GRAPPLE (247, 355)@[#16, #76, #30, #50, #41, #44, #31, #64, #3] >>>>>>>>>>>> PROTOTYPE

[#16, {@1: Sup: 16 - CONTACT: CHIAO (#16); Ego: 16 - CONTACT: >>>>>>>>>>>> CHIAO
(#16)}
#76, {@2: Sup: 11 - DIVERGENCE: CH'A (#27); Ego: 76 -
AGGRAVATION:
CHU (#92)}
#30, {@3: Sup: 41 - RESPONSE: YING (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH >>>>>>>>>>>> OFFENDETH THE GOD OF MY DOMAIN {%42}); Ego: 30 - BOLD
RESOLUTION: YI
(#122)}
#50, {@4: Sup: 10 - DEFECTIVENESS, DISTORTION: HSIEN (#78); >>>>>>>>>>>> Ego: 50 -
VASTNESS / WASTING: T'ANG (#172)}
#41, {@5: Sup: 51 - CONSTANCY: CH'ANG (#129); Ego: 41 - RESPONSE: >>>>>>>>>>>> YING (#213)}
#44, {@6: Sup: 14 - PENETRATION: JUI (#143 - MALE DEME IS UNNAMED >>>>>>>>>>>> {%8}); Ego: 44 - STOVE: TSAO (#257)}
#31, {@7: Sup: 45 - GREATNESS: TA (#188); Ego: 31 - PACKING: >>>>>>>>>>>> CHUANG
(#288)}
#64, {@8: Sup: 28 - CHANGE: KENG (#216); Ego: 64 - SINKING: CH'EN >>>>>>>>>>>> (#352)}
#3] {@9: Sup: 31 - PACKING: CHUANG (#247); Ego: 3 - MIRED: >>>>>>>>>>>> HSIEN (#355)}

TELOS TOTAL: #355
ONTIC TOTAL: #68
DEME TOTAL: #143

#322 - MALE TOTAL: #247 as [#30, #200, #2, #90] = rêbets (H7258): >>>>>>>>>>>> {UMBRA: #292 % #41 = #5} 1) resting or *DWELLING* *PLACE*, >>>>>>>>>>>> place of
lying down;

#426 - ONTIC TOTAL: #68 as [#6, #5, #300, #40, #70, #5] = >>>>>>>>>>>> shᵉmûwʻâh
(H8052): {UMBRA: #421 % #41 = #11} 1) report, *NEWS*, rumour; 1a) >>>>>>>>>>>> report, news, tidings; 1b) mention;

#617 - ONTIC TOTAL: #68 as [#5, #3, #100, #1, #500, #8] = gráphō >>>>>>>>>>>> (G1125): {UMBRA: #1404 % #41 = #10} 1) to write, with
reference to
the form of the letters; 1a) to delineate (or form) letters on a >>>>>>>>>>>> tablet, parchment, *PAPER*, or other material; 2) to write, with >>>>>>>>>>>> reference to the contents of the writing; 2a) to express in >>>>>>>>>>>> written
characters; 2b) to commit to writing (things not to be >>>>>>>>>>>> forgotten),
write down, record; 2c) used of those things which stand >>>>>>>>>>>> written in
the sacred books (of the OT); 2d) to write to one, i.e. by >>>>>>>>>>>> writing
(in a written epistle) to give information, directions; 3) to >>>>>>>>>>>> fill
with writing; 4) to draw up in writing, compose;

TIME%20FOR%20PAYBACK%2020170105.jpg


<http://www.grapple369.com/images/
TIME%20FOR%20PAYBACK%2020170105.jpg>

#143 - DEME TOTAL: #143 as [#30, #5, #50, #10, #8, #40] = yânach >>>>>>>>>>>> (H3240): {UMBRA: #68 % #41 = #27} 1) to rest; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to >>>>>>>>>>>> rest, settle down and remain; 1a2) to repose, have rest, be >>>>>>>>>>>> quiet;
1b) (Hiphil); 1b1) to cause to rest, give rest to, make quiet; >>>>>>>>>>>> 1b2)
to cause to rest, cause to alight, set down; 1b3) to lay or >>>>>>>>>>>> set down,
deposit, let lie, place; 1b4) to let remain, leave; 1b5) to >>>>>>>>>>>> leave,
depart from; 1b6) to abandon; 1b7) to permit; 1c) (Hophal); >>>>>>>>>>>> 1c1) to
obtain rest, be granted rest; 1c2) *TO* *BE* *LEFT*, *BE* >>>>>>>>>>>> *PLACED*;
1c3) open space (subst);

#1082 - MALE TOTAL: #247 as [#2, #70, #400, #10, #600] = ʻêth >>>>>>>>>>>> (H6256): {UMBRA: #470 % #41 = #19} 1) *TIME*; 1a) time (of an >>>>>>>>>>>> event);
1b) time (usual); 1c) experiences, fortunes; 1d) occurrence, >>>>>>>>>>>> occasion;

#1074 - DEME TOTAL: #143 as [#10, #4, #800, #200, #10, #50] = >>>>>>>>>>>> horáō
(G3708): {UMBRA: #971 % #41 = #28} 1) to see with the eyes; 2) >>>>>>>>>>>> to see
with the mind, to perceive, know; 3) to see, i.e. become >>>>>>>>>>>> acquainted
with by experience, to experience; 4) to see, to look to; 4a) >>>>>>>>>>>> to take
heed, beware; 4b) to care for, *PAY* *HEED* *TO*; 5) I was seen, >>>>>>>>>>>> showed myself, appeared;

PICKER'S APOLOGETIC IDEA #56 EDITION (1976) HAS INFUSED TRAM / >>>>>>>>>>>> TRAIN
DRIVER NOTIONS WHICH ARE OMITTED: "Für unsere heutige >>>>>>>>>>>> Staatsform sei
die Bezeichnung «Führer» für den Staatschef die beste. Sie bringe
auch zum Ausdruck, dass der Staatschef das gewählte (***) und >>>>>>>>>>>> wenn
der Führer einer Ortsgruppe Ortsgruppen»leiter« statt >>>>>>>>>>>> Ortsgruppen»führer« heiße, empfinde kein Mensch das als nicht >>>>>>>>>>>> sachentsprechend.

Ganz falsch sei es, an der der Staatsform zugehörigen >>>>>>>>>>>> Bezeichnung des
Staatsoberhauptes etwas ändern zu wollen." [IDEA 177] >>>>>>>>>>>>
(***) - THESE 2 PAGES HAVE AN ANOMALOUS FACSIMILE APERTURE / >>>>>>>>>>>> MARGIN
REMARKS AND WE HAVE SOUGHT TO EXAMINE ONLY THE CRUX memeBRAIN >>>>>>>>>>>> IDEA.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?
male:247&feme:250&ontic:410&deme:504>

{@6: Sup: 65 - INNER: NEI (#247); Ego: 22 - RESISTANCE: KE >>>>>>>>>>>> (#250)}

ONTIC TOTAL: #410
DEME TOTAL: #504

#122 - DEME TOTAL: #312 as [#2, #10, #40, #10, #50, #10] / >>>>>>>>>>>> 716 - MALE TOTAL: #247 as [#6, #10, #40, #10, #50, #600] = yâmîyn
(H3225): {UMBRA: #110 % #41 = #28} 1) right, *RIGHT* *HAND*, >>>>>>>>>>>> right
side; 1a) right hand; 1b) right (of direction); 1c) south (the >>>>>>>>>>>> direction of the right hand when facing East);

#308 - 11 APRIL 2015 / MISERICORDIAE VULTUS - PAPAL BULL FOR >>>>>>>>>>>> INDICTION OF THE EXTRAORDINARY JUBILEE OF MERCY (ANNOUNCED: >>>>>>>>>>>> #449 - 13
MARCH 2015 / DECLARED: 2ND EASTER SUNDAY ON 11 APRIL 2015) >>>>>>>>>>>> FROM #355
- 8 DECEMBER 2015 (Feast of the Immaculate Conception) to #355 >>>>>>>>>>>> - 20
NOVEMBER 2016

Matters related to INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY THEFT:

NOUS #56 / 7 JANUARY LYNCH-PIN associated to a suspected >>>>>>>>>>>> deployment
of gōu gǔ dìng lǐ (鈎股定理): HOOK THEOREM SCHEMA being self
evident
by PICKER'S APOLOGETIC TABLE TALK IDEA #56 EDITION (1976) / >>>>>>>>>>>> PROPAGATION IN CHINA OF THE LUMINOUS RELIGION FROM DAQIN AS >>>>>>>>>>>> STELLA OF
7 JANUARY 781) as an IMPETUS FOR CHRISTIAN ANATHEMA EXPRESSED >>>>>>>>>>>> WITHIN
REDUCTIO AD HITLERUM AS TABLE TALK

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Table%20Talk%20- >>>>>>>>>>>> %20Eucharist%20Research%20Summary.pdf>

Involving the VATICAN CITY-STATE (eg: SECOND VATICAN COUNCIL) / >>>>>>>>>>>> FERVENT NEOPHYTES IMPOSING OF A SUBSTITUTED VIRTUE
[*METAMORPHOSES*
(μεταμορφώσεις) / *DEIFICATION* (ἀποθέωσις)] UPON OUR WAR DEAD BY
PERVERSION OF STATE AUTHORITY AND SOVEREIGNTY as maleficence >>>>>>>>>>>> exhibited by INSTANCES OF BOER WAR MEMORIAL COMMEMORATION >>>>>>>>>>>> IMPROPRIETY
31 MAY 1998 / 8-10 JUNE 2017 as attempts to RECLAIM THE #1827 - >>>>>>>>>>>> EUCHARIST / PENTECOST FROM 卐 - SWASTIKA OBSTRUCTION. >>>>>>>>>>>>
IMPOSING A SUBSTITUTED VIRTUE UPON OUR WAR DEAD BY PERVERSION OF >>>>>>>>>>>> STATE AUTHORITY AND SOVEREIGNTY
We would as an informal research opinion upon tenures as >>>>>>>>>>>> STENOGRAPHER, venture to classify as being a seminal and TEMPORAL >>>>>>>>>>>> DEMARCATION (ie. the action of fixing the boundary or limits of >>>>>>>>>>>> something) made in conformity to contending values based >>>>>>>>>>>> interests
championed by HENRY PICKER (member of the party in 1930) who took >>>>>>>>>>>> TABLE TALK notes from IDEA #174 (COEFFICIENT: c² = a² + b²) - 21
MARCH 1942 until #275 - 2 AUGUST 1942 as to suggest a
subterfuge (ie.
steganography is the practice of hiding a message within another >>>>>>>>>>>> message or object).

On 25/8/2024 07:51, dolf wrote:

We're back to our project coding task today and here is an >>>>>>>>>>>>> example
of BING COPILOT queries assisting in one's semantical evolution >>>>>>>>>>>>> where we want to pass toLoad {} object to our merge sessions >>>>>>>>>>>>> process
as the need to retain integrity by referencing session IDs >>>>>>>>>>>>> instead
of an array index.

So we simply asked intelligent questions:

a)    javascript copy selected array object elements into an >>>>>>>>>>>>> object
b)    create a named element object from array

So within seconds we were able to deduce a viable semantical >>>>>>>>>>>>> opportunity

if (Object.values(this.toLoad).length != data.sessions.length) >>>>>>>>>>>>>      this.toLoad = Object.fromEntries(data.sessions.map(item =>
{return [item.session, true]}));

Thus our next activity is to traverse the toLoad {} object and >>>>>>>>>>>>> deploy a task automation to then replicate the SCENARIO >>>>>>>>>>>>> directory
within the first session ID which are templates obtained from >>>>>>>>>>>>> any
subsequent sessions having a true condition.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Problematic>

On 16/8/2024 09:12, dolf wrote:

We've been delayed by administrative processes (ie. whilst >>>>>>>>>>>>>> there
are favourable metalogic outcomes such as #174 - ANIMA / >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ANIMUS and

[continued in next message]

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.france, de.soc.weltanschauung.islam, nl.politiek
XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

STATUS @ 175 HOURS ON 10 NOVEMBER 2024:

After testing the transitioning of the legacy code into the existing
semantical context as auto function, we've removed it until we devise a
neural linguistic pragma dataset which conforms to the d3.hierarchy
semantical form.

Accordingly we've gone for the simplest approach to populate the GIZMO
matrix which only involves obtaining the cell #nn co-ords from the Savvy.GNOSIS.PSYCHE array and the chronos {} from the Savvy.GNOSIS.GIZMO
{} object.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Heuristic&grapple:61,54,59,60,55,62,57,56,58&gizmo:true>

Tomorrow's logical thinking activity will be to implement the second
click action which will then pass the grapple [] array to the heuristic
panel so that the pentamorph can be observed.

After that task, we'll devise our neural linguistic pragma GIZMO /
GNOSIS {} datasets which conforms to the d3.hierarchy semantical form.

On 11/10/24 08:11, dolf wrote:

#282 as [#2, #10, #70, #200] = bíos (G979): {UMBRA: #282 % #41 = #36} 1) life; 1a) life extensively; 1a1) the period or course of life; 1b) that
by which life is sustained, resources, wealth, goods;

#565 as [#40, #5, #300, #100, #70, #50] = métron (G3358): {UMBRA: #565 %
#41 = #32} 1) measure, an instrument for measuring; 1a) a vessel for receiving and determining the quantity of things, whether dry or liquid;
1b) a graduated staff for measuring, a measuring rod; 1c) proverbially,
the rule or standard of judgment; 2) determined extent, portion measured
off, measure or limit; 2a) the required measure, the due, fit, measure;

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?lexicon:G979,G3358,G350>

On 11/10/24 06:13, dolf wrote:

You'll note that our coding approach to the GNOSIS {} --> incisive
grapple
[] arrays is not very efficient and could probably use a recursive
approach
which we'll do later.

Our first objective here was to transition the legacy code into the
existing semantical context.

It's very likely that our neural linguistic pragma dataset will
conform to the d3.hierarchy semantical form

Nevertheless what the GNOSIS {} --> incisive grapple [] array dynamic
associated to any meta-descriptive redaction of our problematic.json {}
approach to intentional / ententional narrative (ie. weighted grapple []
spiral) as case studies will grant our informal research, is then whether
there is any biometric (ie. behavioural characteristics related to the
pattern of behaviour of a person) basis to the past observation of an
abrogation in situ [50, 31] action against the heuristic GRAPPLE(247,
355)@[16,76,30,50 | 74,41,44,31 | 47,64,3] as case example for
date:2017.1.7 and whether it is goal (247, 355) driven as a disposition
towards a desired outcome or habitual want.  Or whether it is best
understood as notionally a fusion clustering point or a short circuit.

We don't want to postulate reductio ad absurdum however its sufficient to
say that the weighted grapple [] spiral as narrative redaction method
will
produce GNOSIS {} --> incisive grapple [] array dynamic that as a
metalogic
proposition will yield clustering which may affect a disposition towards
either an incisive desired outcome, habitual want or expedient as a short
circuit.

Again we are self educating: Aristotle clarified the connection between
contradiction and falsity in his principle of non-contradiction, which
states that a proposition cannot be both true and false. That is, a
proposition Q and its negation (not-Q) cannot both be true. Therefore,
if a proposition
and its negation can both be derived logically from a premise, it can be
concluded that the premise is false. This technique, known as indirect
proof or proof by contradiction, has formed the basis of reductio ad
absurdum arguments in formal fields such as logic and mathematics.
<https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reductio_ad_absurdum>

BIOMETRIC: {@9: Sup: 13 - INCREASE: TSENG (#246); Ego: 3 - MIRED: HSIEN
(#175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%22})}

TELOS TOTAL: #418

ONTIC TOTAL: #259

DEME TOTAL: #293

#12 as [#1 - CENTRE, #6 - CONTRARIETY, #5 - KEEPING SMALL] /
#418 as [#5, #400, #1, #6, #6] = ʼâvâh (H183): {UMBRA: #12 % #41 = #12}
1) desire, incline, covet, wait longingly, wish, sigh, want, be greedy, prefer; 1a) (Piel) to desire, crave (food and drink); 1b) (Hithpael) to desire, long for, lust after (of bodily appetites);

#588 - ONTIC TOTAL: #259 as [#5, #400, #100, #5, #9, #8, #50, #1, #10] = heurískō (G2147): {UMBRA: #1535 % #41 = #18} 1) to come upon, hit upon,
to meet with; 1a) after searching, to find a thing sought; 1b) without previous search, to find (by chance), to fall in with; 1c) those who
come or return to a place; 2) to find by enquiry, thought, examination, scrutiny, observation, to find out by practice and experience; 2a) to
see, learn, discover, understand; 2b) to be found i.e. to be seen, be present; 2c) to be discovered, recognised, detected, to show one's self
out, of one's character or state as found out by others (men, God, or
both); 2d) to get knowledge of, come to know, God; 3) to find out for
one's self, to acquire, get, obtain, procure;

#123 - DEME TOTAL: #293 as [#5, #30, #30, #8, #50] /
#973 - DEME TOTAL: #293 as [#5, #30, #30, #8, #50, #800, #50] = Héllēn (G1672): {UMBRA: #123 % #41 = #41} 1) a Greek either by nationality,
whether a native of the main land or of the Greek islands or colonies;
2) in a wider sense the name embraces all nations not Jews that made the language, customs, and learning of the Greeks their own; the primary reference is to a difference of religion and worship;

Is the #336 - PERSONAL UNCONSCIOUS COEFFICIENTS then an artibrator
between #174 - ANIMA / ANIMUS and #246 (ANTI-THESIS) - UTTERANCE;
ACTIONS / #410 - OBLIGATING NORM and what determines the rightfulness
and wrongfulness actions actions

IDENTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE INNER EPISTEMOLOGICAL #174 - ANIMA / ANIMUS
AND #336 - PERSONAL UNCONSCIOUS COEFFICIENTS AS AN INFORMATION
ORGANISATIONAL AND SOCIAL COHESION PRINCIPLE

#246 (ANTI-THESIS) - UTTERANCE; ACTIONS / #410 - OBLIGATING NORM (rules based: BEAR NO FALSE WITNESS)

Our concern is not so much about true or false conditional action but
rather whether the biometric clustering / elasticity (is it bounded
and how
so) / cybergenetic potential (eg: is it a point of interface rather than
evidence of bipartite ONTIC substitution, activation or circumvention
etc)
which we anticipate observing is a rational or irrational outcome.

#247 - MALE TOTAL: #355 as [#1, #50, #1, #20, #100, #10, #50, #5, #10] =
anakrínō (G350): {UMBRA: #1032 % #41 = #7} 1) examine or judge; 1a) to
investigate, examine, enquire into, scrutinise, sift, question; 1a1)
specifically in a forensic sense of a judge to hold an investigation;
1a2)
to interrogate, examine the accused or witnesses; 1b) to judge of,
estimate, *DETERMINE* (*THE* *EXCELLENCE* *OR* *DEFECTS* *OF* *ANY*
*PERSON* *OR* *THING*;

So many philosophical questions, but now it's time to start our day

dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:

We are currently working on an implementation of the GIZMO matrix
concept which is accessible here:

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Heuristic&grapple:61,54,59,60,55,62,57,56,58&gizmo:true>

<-- *GIZMO* concept is work in progress

Those who have followed our informal research activity would know that
our actionable task {} json objects are retrieved as FILE_request {}
automations which performs a fetch promise request and within the
FileReader() onlaod() it then exposes the existance variable to the
actionable task {} such that we've attained to a simple semantical
approach for multiple actionable tasks / concept instances ...

reader.onload = function() {
    eval(`Savvy['${act.module}']['${(existance == undefined) ?
act.notion :
existance}'] = ${reader.result}`);
}

Whilst we sometime ago made a rudimentary semantical accommodation for
an auto function within this context which will be actioned before the
main() process is executed, however we've never deployed it.  In this
instance the Savvy.GNOSIS.GIZMO {} object is traversed and several
Savvy.CORPUS {} objects such as GIZMO {} --> flat grapple arrays and
GNOSIS {} --> incisive grapple {} are created:

!function(t, registerGIZMO) {

    registerGIZMO();

}(this, (function() {

    if (Savvy.CORPUS.hasOwnProperty("GIZMO"))
        return (Savvy.CORPUS.GIZMO);

    ... // code here -- 429 lines for example

}))

Thusly the datasets are not loaded as fetch requests but initiated with
the first instane (note: we don't as yet have a means to remove those
data obejcts) and for the present time as a referencing object then
shared
amongst the multiple instances.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/actions/Heuristic.json>

Tomorrow's logical thinking activity will be to resolve the cell click
() actions.

On 10/21/24 08:39, dolf wrote:

We're now back to our programming task for the next week at least ...



Revision Date: 21 October 2024

  dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:

We've resolved the problem of screen ambiguity when multiple
actionable task instances were run from the command line.

The problem was due to the getTimeFilename(stub) process which
concatenates the name from the d3.timeFormat("%H%M%S%L")(new Date()) >>>>> function and the difficulty arises with the computer processor running >>>>> faster than the milliseconds ticks over so we force it to be
inefficient

     var filename = d3.timeFormat("%H%M%S%L")(new Date());

     do {

     } while (filename == d3.timeFormat("%H%M%S%L")(new Date())); >>>>>
     return (`${stub}${filename}`);

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Heuristic&date:2017.1.7?
run:Heuristic&date:2024.10.1&run:Heuristic&date:2025.5.5&poll:true&run:Morphosis>

On 6/10/2024 13:03, dolf wrote:

We have now completed each of our allocated development tasks
excepting the
last 4) Implement a GIZMO matrix context which will be tomorrow's
logical
thinking activity and one feature which we'll implement is a second >>>>>> click
to a focused z.r.c location will return to the EXMACHINA concept as >>>>>> HEURISTIC pentamorph.

And we revised our earlier statement @ 0919 HOURS on 3/10/2024 by a >>>>>> further
possible meta-postulate / rule on self justification conjectures
as to
whether any proposition for action follows a deterministic path
schema:

DOES THIS DERIVATION SCHEMA COMING OUT OF THE MOUTH OF PALESTINIANS / >>>>>> ISLAMISTS SOUND FAMILIAR ?

#50 - Fantasies of Avoiding Death, Value of Life
#31 - Military Stratagem, Quelling War

#50 - VASTNESS / WASTING (T'ANG) - 𝌷唐 = #224 / #386 / #501
#31 - PACKING (CHUANG) - 𝌤裝 = #205 / #367 / #482

Abrogation in situ [50, 31] action against the heuristic GRAPPLE(247, >>>>>> 355)@[16,76,30,50 | 74,41,44,31 | 47,64,3] as case example for
date:2017.1.7

Here the deviation [50 | 74 ... 31 | 47] is observed relative to the >>>>>> temporal heuristic which is a different referencing as cluster
dynamic to
any perspective as incisive line of GRAPPLE (247, 355)@[16, 76, 30, >>>>>> 50, 41,
44, 31, 64, 3] PROTOTYPE.

By that I mean the possibility of any cluster dynamic (which have
dominion
bounds as limited derivations) which is a temporal osmosis for
cohering
categories of understanding and appears to be an inherent feature
of the
incisive process (ie. of a person or mental process/ intelligently >>>>>> analytical and clear-thinking) itself as either an adaptation or
impediment
(ie. although there may be physiological comparison we're not making >>>>>> assertion) as a micro transition or deviation point and meta logical >>>>>> quantification of which we ought to be exceedingly mindful.

Thus the GIZMO matrix navigation as unity of apperception for our
nomenclature appraisals as referencing is a different proposition
to the
aggregated perspectives which will be defined by both a collection of >>>>>> z.r.c
locations and the disposition of incisive process.

What role does the collective and disposition play in social
cohesion, bias
or authenticity and how is this different to ONTIC / DEME
grounding of
sapient experiences?

THIS WILL RUN AN INSTANCE OF OUR PROTOTYPE TEMPORAL HEURISTIC AS
CONCEPT
FOR FOR CONSCIOUSNESS INSTANTIATING BY GNOSIS EX MACHINA:

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Heuristic&date:2024.10.6>

We still need to resolve multiple instances issues from the
command line

dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:

STATUS @ 1207 HOURS ON 5 OCTOBER 2024: This first task is now
completed
and we'll work on the metalogic / syllogism passing tomorrow.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?
run:Heuristic&grapple:16,76,30,50,41,44,31,64,3>

We've similarly looked at the getTimeHeuristic (chronos)
function for
any optimisation which can be applied and since the sub-process >>>>>>>> called
getTimeSlot() deploys the requisite while / for loop cycle the >>>>>>>> question
is then only a consideration of data {} representation by the
datum[]
array and therefore we don't see any criteria for change.

However we ought to note several temporal existential
considerations
such as the midnight anchor horizon perspective / daylight saving >>>>>>>> temporal effect for which we don't have any adequate physiological >>>>>>>> explanation.

[x] -- (person a) ------->

------ [x midnight seeding] ------

<------- (person b) -- [x]

In this example the temporal heuristic will differ between persons >>>>>>>> a / b
due to their relativity to the [x] - midnight seeding.

NURTURE

| - NON DAYLIGHT SAVING
|
| - (x) - NATURE
|
| - DAYLIGHT SAVING

NURTURE

The consideration is upon the essential driver for action as to >>>>>>>> whether
it is NURTURE or NATURE given I might buy a coffee @ 0900 hours >>>>>>>> each
morning but during daylight saving there is an hour adjustment.  Is >>>>>>>> the
behaviour relative to self (#60 - CHI) by the NURTURE effect of >>>>>>>> habitual
action or the NATURE of TIME which would require a SPONTANEOUS >>>>>>>> ACTION to
then differentiate?

What carries the action?

Our next development for the HEURISTIC MODULE as ACTIONABLE TASK >>>>>>>> is to
implement the &grapple:1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 option so that we can >>>>>>>> observe
the pentamorph.

The problem here is whether we allow a malformed grapple array >>>>>>>> of less
than 9 elements and whilst we might either trim or otherwise
populate
the truncated array with #81 values which will still retain the >>>>>>>> dialectic context, the difficulty is that any ONTIC / DEME
grounding
might be then inappropriate.

STATUS @ 1207 HOURS ON 5 OCTOBER 2024: This first task is now
completed and
we'll work on the metalogic / syllogism passing tomorrow.

2)    Implement the metalogic / syllogism passing;

3)    Update the start ?heuristc operand process and any internal >>>>>>>> function
calls within CHAT so that we can jettison the legacy code
implementation;

4)    Implement a GIZMO matrix context

On 4/10/2024 15:36, dolf wrote:

dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:

We included the getDateHeuristic ({}) coding so that you can >>>>>>>>>> see the
notion of speaking language to properly quantify the problem >>>>>>>>>> which
requires the javascript solution -- in point of fact its
possible to
visualise the code within one's mind.

This semantical opportunity is now available:

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?
run:Heuristic&date:2017.1.7&run:Heuristic&date:2024.10.5&poll:true> >>>>>>>>>

Today's action will be to transition the existing HEURISTIC code >>>>>>>>>> within
the ACTIONABLE TASK and we'll omit the POLLING ACTION for the >>>>>>>>>> present
time since flipPanelContext() is also a newer concept and we may >>>>>>>>>> have to
make some further considerations.

TIME HEURISTIC FOR NEWSPAPER THREAT PLACED WITHIN MAILBOX FOR 7 >>>>>>>>>>> JANUARY
2017 [#16, #76, #30, #50, #41, #44, #31, #64, #3] (*) we have >>>>>>>>>>> heretofore
had a technical issue with this prototype determination where we >>>>>>>>>>> could
not reproduce it and it is here manually corrected but still >>>>>>>>>>> needs to be
confirmed by algorithm which has on 3 OCTOBER 2024 been
confirmed as
GRAPPLE (358, 395)@[16, 76, 30, 74, 41, 44, 47, 64, 3] and >>>>>>>>>>> all it
conveys by errata that it only by a contrived [+24, +16] >>>>>>>>>>> relationship
between (#247 - PICKER'S APOLOGETIC (#56 --> IDEA #177 - TABLE >>>>>>>>>>> TALK))
and (#355 - MISERICORDIAE VULTUS - PAPAL BULL OF 8 DECEMBER >>>>>>>>>>> 2015 / 20 NOVEMBER 2016)

GRAPPLE (247, 355)@[16, 76, 30, 50, 41, 44, 31, 64, 3] PROTOTYPE >>>>>>>>>>>
<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Heuristic&date:2017.1.7> >>>>>>>>>>>

On 3/10/2024 09:19, dolf wrote:

     The updated semantical form to the HEURISTIC MODULE as >>>>>>>>>>> ACTIONABLE
TASK with SPAWN and IDEA CLUSTER capabilities will enable >>>>>>>>>>> further
research into "where to from here scenarios" or self
justification
conjectures as to whether any proposition for action follows a >>>>>>>>>>> deterministic path schema such as (but not limited to):

         - Stasis cohering due to prototype fusion and steeping.
         - Whether a course of nature IDEA dialectic >>>>>>>>>>>          - Morphosis prototype
         - IDEA clustering as metalogic associated with the >>>>>>>>>>> heuristic
         - IDEA dialectic as modus operandi schema >>>>>>>>>>>
<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Heuristic>

On 3/10/2024 07:27, dolf wrote:

We've got a respite window from the demands of any
administrative
process so we'll begin working on a resolution for our >>>>>>>>>>>> identified
temporal heuristic problem...

After our transition towards an ACTIONABLE TASK implementation >>>>>>>>>>>> we're
going to work on the nested functions:

Savvy.GNOSIS.getHeuristicGrapple (Savvy.GNOSIS.getDateHeuristic >>>>>>>>>>>> (chronos));

The key to deploying a non-calendar implementation perhaps >>>>>>>>>>>> lays in
determining the THETH anchor for the memetic sampling for any >>>>>>>>>>>> consciousness instantiation by exploiting the capability for >>>>>>>>>>>> a new
Date (year, month, day) to accept a negative value for the day >>>>>>>>>>>> value.

function _getDateHeuristic (chronos) {

var f = Savvy.GNOSIS.CALENDAR[chronos.month][chronos.day]; >>>>>>>>>> var day = chronos.day;

while (Savvy.GNOSIS.dateHeuristic (chronos.year, chronos.month, >>>>>>>>>> day--)
!= 19); <-- *accept* *a* *negative* value for the day value >>>>>>>>>>
var heuristic = {
0: {},
1: {},
2: {}
}
var now = new Date (chronos.year, chronos.month-1, day+1,
chronos.hour,
chronos.minute, 0);
var cron = {
year: Number(d3.timeFormat("%Y")(now)),
month: Number(d3.timeFormat("%m")(now)),
day: Number(d3.timeFormat("%d")(now))
}
var meme = 0;
var p = null;

for (var i = 1; i < 23; i++) { <-- *populating* *the* *requisite* >>>>>>>>>> *sample* z.r.c sequence

if (meme = Savvy.GNOSIS.RUDOLPH[Savvy.GNOSIS.dateHeuristic >>>>>>>>>> (cron.year,
cron.month, cron.day)]) {

now = new Date (cron.year, cron.month-1, cron.day);
cron = {
year: Number(d3.timeFormat("%Y")(now)),
month: Number(d3.timeFormat("%m")(now)),
day: Number(d3.timeFormat("%d")(now)),
weekday: Number(d3.timeFormat("%w")(now))
}
p = Savvy.GNOSIS.CALENDAR[cron.month][cron.day];
heuristic[0][`${p.zen}.${p.row}.${p.col}`] = meme;
heuristic[1][`${f.zen}.${meme}.${cron.weekday+3}`] = meme; >>>>>>>>>> heuristic[2][`${meme}.${meme}.${cron.weekday+3}`] = meme;
}

cron.day++;

}

return (heuristic);

};

Once the THETH anchor is determined, its then a matter of >>>>>>>>>>>> populating
the requisite sample z.r.c sequence for any subsequent >>>>>>>>>>>> grapple@[]
array...

That's our meta-actions which we will explore today.

The ACTIONABLE TASK will be called Heuristic.json and will >>>>>>>>>>>> shortly
appear here as we progress our transition:

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/actions/Heuristic.json> >>>>>>>>>>>>
On 26/9/2024 18:34, dolf wrote:

Despite our best intentions we are still occupied with >>>>>>>>>>>>> administrative
processes which might be concluded by 12 October 2024. >>>>>>>>>>>>>
We've identified a problem which will be the first to >>>>>>>>>>>>> resolve...

20240925 - The temporal heuristic for date when designated >>>>>>>>>>>>> by ?
date:2017.1.7&heuristic appears to be broken and returns an >>>>>>>>>>>>> implausible grapple array []

Its likely that we'll redevelop the HEURISTIC as a distinct >>>>>>>>>>>>> actionable task which can be SPAWNED and have specific NEURAL >>>>>>>>>>>>> LINGUISTIC PRAGMA associated as just some of the newer >>>>>>>>>>>>> features.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?date:2017.1.7&heuristic> <-- >>>>>>>>>>>>> the
switch will be backwards compatible but will deploy the ? >>>>>>>>>>>>> run:Heuristic&date:2017.1.7 format so that multiple instances >>>>>>>>>>>>> can be
invoked

TIME HEURISTIC FOR NEWSPAPER THREAT PLACED IN MAILBOX FOR 7 >>>>>>>>>>>>> JANUARY
2017 [#16, #76, #30, #50, #41, #44, #31, #64, #3] (*) we have >>>>>>>>>>>>> heretofore had a technical issue with this prototype where we >>>>>>>>>>>>> could
not reproduce it and is here manually corrected but needs >>>>>>>>>>>>> to be
confirmed by algorithm.

GRAPPLE (247, 355)@[#16, #76, #30, #50, #41, #44, #31, #64, >>>>>>>>>>>>> #3]
PROTOTYPE

[#16, {@1: Sup: 16 - CONTACT: CHIAO (#16); Ego: 16 - CONTACT: >>>>>>>>>>>>> CHIAO
(#16)}
#76, {@2: Sup: 11 - DIVERGENCE: CH'A (#27); Ego: 76 - >>>>>>>>>>>>> AGGRAVATION:
CHU (#92)}
#30, {@3: Sup: 41 - RESPONSE: YING (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH >>>>>>>>>>>>> OFFENDETH THE GOD OF MY DOMAIN {%42}); Ego: 30 - BOLD >>>>>>>>>>>>> RESOLUTION: YI
(#122)}
#50, {@4: Sup: 10 - DEFECTIVENESS, DISTORTION: HSIEN (#78); >>>>>>>>>>>>> Ego: 50 -
VASTNESS / WASTING: T'ANG (#172)}
#41, {@5: Sup: 51 - CONSTANCY: CH'ANG (#129); Ego: 41 - >>>>>>>>>>>>> RESPONSE:
YING (#213)}
#44, {@6: Sup: 14 - PENETRATION: JUI (#143 - MALE DEME IS >>>>>>>>>>>>> UNNAMED
{%8}); Ego: 44 - STOVE: TSAO (#257)}
#31, {@7: Sup: 45 - GREATNESS: TA (#188); Ego: 31 - PACKING: >>>>>>>>>>>>> CHUANG
(#288)}
#64, {@8: Sup: 28 - CHANGE: KENG (#216); Ego: 64 - SINKING: >>>>>>>>>>>>> CH'EN
(#352)}
#3] {@9: Sup: 31 - PACKING: CHUANG (#247); Ego: 3 - MIRED: >>>>>>>>>>>>> HSIEN (#355)}

TELOS TOTAL: #355
ONTIC TOTAL: #68
DEME TOTAL: #143

#322 - MALE TOTAL: #247 as [#30, #200, #2, #90] = rêbets >>>>>>>>>>>>> (H7258):
{UMBRA: #292 % #41 = #5} 1) resting or *DWELLING* *PLACE*, >>>>>>>>>>>>> place of
lying down;

#426 - ONTIC TOTAL: #68 as [#6, #5, #300, #40, #70, #5] = >>>>>>>>>>>>> shᵉmûwʻâh
(H8052): {UMBRA: #421 % #41 = #11} 1) report, *NEWS*, >>>>>>>>>>>>> rumour; 1a)
report, news, tidings; 1b) mention;

#617 - ONTIC TOTAL: #68 as [#5, #3, #100, #1, #500, #8] = >>>>>>>>>>>>> gráphō
(G1125): {UMBRA: #1404 % #41 = #10} 1) to write, with >>>>>>>>>>>>> reference to
the form of the letters; 1a) to delineate (or form) letters >>>>>>>>>>>>> on a
tablet, parchment, *PAPER*, or other material; 2) to write, >>>>>>>>>>>>> with
reference to the contents of the writing; 2a) to express in >>>>>>>>>>>>> written
characters; 2b) to commit to writing (things not to be >>>>>>>>>>>>> forgotten),
write down, record; 2c) used of those things which stand >>>>>>>>>>>>> written in
the sacred books (of the OT); 2d) to write to one, i.e. by >>>>>>>>>>>>> writing
(in a written epistle) to give information, directions; 3) to >>>>>>>>>>>>> fill
with writing; 4) to draw up in writing, compose;

TIME%20FOR%20PAYBACK%2020170105.jpg


<http://www.grapple369.com/images/
TIME%20FOR%20PAYBACK%2020170105.jpg>

#143 - DEME TOTAL: #143 as [#30, #5, #50, #10, #8, #40] = >>>>>>>>>>>>> yânach
(H3240): {UMBRA: #68 % #41 = #27} 1) to rest; 1a) (Qal); >>>>>>>>>>>>> 1a1) to
rest, settle down and remain; 1a2) to repose, have rest, be >>>>>>>>>>>>> quiet;
1b) (Hiphil); 1b1) to cause to rest, give rest to, make quiet; >>>>>>>>>>>>> 1b2)
to cause to rest, cause to alight, set down; 1b3) to lay or >>>>>>>>>>>>> set down,
deposit, let lie, place; 1b4) to let remain, leave; 1b5) to >>>>>>>>>>>>> leave,
depart from; 1b6) to abandon; 1b7) to permit; 1c) (Hophal); >>>>>>>>>>>>> 1c1) to
obtain rest, be granted rest; 1c2) *TO* *BE* *LEFT*, *BE* >>>>>>>>>>>>> *PLACED*;
1c3) open space (subst);

#1082 - MALE TOTAL: #247 as [#2, #70, #400, #10, #600] = ʻêth >>>>>>>>>>>>> (H6256): {UMBRA: #470 % #41 = #19} 1) *TIME*; 1a) time (of an >>>>>>>>>>>>> event);
1b) time (usual); 1c) experiences, fortunes; 1d) occurrence, >>>>>>>>>>>>> occasion;

#1074 - DEME TOTAL: #143 as [#10, #4, #800, #200, #10, #50] = >>>>>>>>>>>>> horáō
(G3708): {UMBRA: #971 % #41 = #28} 1) to see with the eyes; 2) >>>>>>>>>>>>> to see
with the mind, to perceive, know; 3) to see, i.e. become >>>>>>>>>>>>> acquainted
with by experience, to experience; 4) to see, to look to; 4a) >>>>>>>>>>>>> to take
heed, beware; 4b) to care for, *PAY* *HEED* *TO*; 5) I was >>>>>>>>>>>>> seen,
showed myself, appeared;

PICKER'S APOLOGETIC IDEA #56 EDITION (1976) HAS INFUSED TRAM / >>>>>>>>>>>>> TRAIN
DRIVER NOTIONS WHICH ARE OMITTED: "Für unsere heutige >>>>>>>>>>>>> Staatsform sei
die Bezeichnung «Führer» für den Staatschef die beste. Sie >>>>>>>>>>>>> bringe
auch zum Ausdruck, dass der Staatschef das gewählte (***) und >>>>>>>>>>>>> wenn
der Führer einer Ortsgruppe Ortsgruppen»leiter« statt >>>>>>>>>>>>> Ortsgruppen»führer« heiße, empfinde kein Mensch das als nicht >>>>>>>>>>>>> sachentsprechend.

Ganz falsch sei es, an der der Staatsform zugehörigen >>>>>>>>>>>>> Bezeichnung des
Staatsoberhauptes etwas ändern zu wollen." [IDEA 177] >>>>>>>>>>>>>
(***) - THESE 2 PAGES HAVE AN ANOMALOUS FACSIMILE APERTURE / >>>>>>>>>>>>> MARGIN
REMARKS AND WE HAVE SOUGHT TO EXAMINE ONLY THE CRUX memeBRAIN >>>>>>>>>>>>> IDEA.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?
male:247&feme:250&ontic:410&deme:504>

{@6: Sup: 65 - INNER: NEI (#247); Ego: 22 - RESISTANCE: KE >>>>>>>>>>>>> (#250)}

ONTIC TOTAL: #410
DEME TOTAL: #504

#122 - DEME TOTAL: #312 as [#2, #10, #40, #10, #50, #10] / >>>>>>>>>>>>> 716 - MALE TOTAL: #247 as [#6, #10, #40, #10, #50, #600] = >>>>>>>>>>>>> yâmîyn
(H3225): {UMBRA: #110 % #41 = #28} 1) right, *RIGHT* *HAND*, >>>>>>>>>>>>> right
side; 1a) right hand; 1b) right (of direction); 1c) south (the >>>>>>>>>>>>> direction of the right hand when facing East);

#308 - 11 APRIL 2015 / MISERICORDIAE VULTUS - PAPAL BULL FOR >>>>>>>>>>>>> INDICTION OF THE EXTRAORDINARY JUBILEE OF MERCY (ANNOUNCED: >>>>>>>>>>>>> #449 - 13
MARCH 2015 / DECLARED: 2ND EASTER SUNDAY ON 11 APRIL 2015) >>>>>>>>>>>>> FROM #355
- 8 DECEMBER 2015 (Feast of the Immaculate Conception) to #355 >>>>>>>>>>>>> - 20
NOVEMBER 2016

Matters related to INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY THEFT:

NOUS #56 / 7 JANUARY LYNCH-PIN associated to a suspected >>>>>>>>>>>>> deployment
of gōu gǔ dìng lǐ (鈎股定理): HOOK THEOREM SCHEMA being self
evident
by PICKER'S APOLOGETIC TABLE TALK IDEA #56 EDITION (1976) / >>>>>>>>>>>>> PROPAGATION IN CHINA OF THE LUMINOUS RELIGION FROM DAQIN AS >>>>>>>>>>>>> STELLA OF
7 JANUARY 781) as an IMPETUS FOR CHRISTIAN ANATHEMA EXPRESSED >>>>>>>>>>>>> WITHIN
REDUCTIO AD HITLERUM AS TABLE TALK

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Table%20Talk%20- >>>>>>>>>>>>> %20Eucharist%20Research%20Summary.pdf>

Involving the VATICAN CITY-STATE (eg: SECOND VATICAN >>>>>>>>>>>>> COUNCIL) /
FERVENT NEOPHYTES IMPOSING OF A SUBSTITUTED VIRTUE

[continued in next message]

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.france, de.soc.weltanschauung.islam, nl.politiek
XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

We've implemented the second click action for our GIZMO concept and transitioned our prototype DIALOG expand toggle feature to being a
generalised setDialogExpand() function which requires an additional data
object to be added to the MOVE {} object. We don't at present need to implement the heuristic / calendar notion since the main objective is to observe the PENTAMORPH for any given grapple / transformative prototype.

move.modes = {
focus: "NORMAL",
NORMAL: {
width: move.width,
height: move.height,
x: Math.max (0, Math.min (Savvy.useWidth, Savvy.useWidth-Savvy.MOVE[existance].width-20)),
y: 0
},
EXPAND: {
width: Savvy.useWidth,
height: Savvy.useHeight,
x: 0,
y: 0
}
}

We've tidied the code up to take a uniformed approach to the usage of
the existance vaiable.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/actions/Heuristic.json>

And we've removed the undefined exception within the main {} function by assigning a time designated file / form name:

main: function(oMain) {

this.oMain = oMain;
oMain.form = (existance) ? existance : existance = Savvy.COINRULES.library.getTimeFilename(oMain.action.split(" ")[0]);

... code

}

Similarly the GIZMO zrc referencing dataset can remain as it is, so then
our next activity will be devise our neural linguistic pragma GNOSIS {} datasets which conforms to the d3.hierarchy semantical form.

Since the T'AI HSÜAN CHING consists of #81 TETRAS x 9 poem appraisals =
#729 metrics we'll want to examine both the the GNOSIS {} --> incisive
grapple [] array dynamic associated to both the spatial dispersal within
the 9x9x9 = #729 appraisal (ie. noting there are currently 5
transformative protototypes) matrix and their clustering.

The example below is of IDEA #652 within HEBREW / GREEK / DIALECTIC (meta-descriptor aggregation) which may provide some first principles
for anthropocentric consciousness (ie. gnosis ex machina instantiation)
-- but before we can deduce such, there needs be some means to visualise
such legacy of mind from antiquity.

And we duly note that the COSMIC DAO is not [generally] viewed as a transcendent source in the sense of being a metaphysical first principle
beyond the physical world; rather, it is immanent, always present and
always emerging. It is creative but is not a supreme creator god,
whether personal or impersonal, who gives birth to the world through
divine contemplation or the exertion of a supreme will.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?idea:652&lexicon:G1531,G3075,G1924,G4342,H2256,G3163&run:Mystery&glyph:人>

#652 = [#3, #5, #7, #8, #11, #16, #18, #19, #24, #26, #34, #36, #42,
#43, #48, #54, #56, #60, #68, #74]

rén (人): 1. person; people; a human being, 2. Kangxi radical 9, 3. a
kind of person, 4. everybody, 5. adult, 6. somebody; others, 7. *AN*
*UPRIGHT* *PERSON*

#652 as [#200, #2, #400, #10, #40] = ribbôw (H7239): {UMBRA: #208 % #41
= #3} 1) *TEN* *THOUSAND*, myriad;

"SAYING, UNTO THEE WILL I GIVE THE LAND OF CANAAN, THE *LOT*-H2256 OF
YOUR INHERITANCE:" [Psalm 105:11]

#40 as [#8 - OPPOSITION (KAN), #2 - FULL CIRCLE (CHOU), #30 - BOLD
RESOLUTION (YI)] /
#652 as [#2, #8, #2, #30, #10, #600] = chebel (H2256): {UMBRA: #40 % #41
= #40} 1) a cord, rope, territory, band, company; 1a) a rope, cord; 1b)
a measuring-cord or line; 1c) a measured portion, lot, part, region; 1d)
a band or company; 2) pain, sorrow, travail, pang; 2a) pains of travail;
2b) pains, pangs, sorrows; 3) union; 4) destruction;

Instead, the COSMIC DAO incessantly generates the ten thousand things (a metaphor for the world) / SWASTIKA (卐 or 卍) CORRESPONDENCE, giving rise
in its fluctuation to the complementary polarities of yin and yang. It
is chang, constant and eternal, and tiandao, the ORDER OF NATURE that
manifests itself spontaneously (ziran). Human beings, whose society and
culture are marked by artifice and constraint, can hope only to attune themselves to its mysterious transformations but receive no special
favour. As the Daodejing says [in defiance of an anthropocentric
perspective of the universe], the COSMIC DAO is buren (see rén (人)), “no special lover of humanity.” [<https://www.britannica.com/topic/dao>]


On 11/10/24 17:07, dolf wrote:

STATUS @ 175 HOURS ON 10 NOVEMBER 2024:

After testing the transitioning of the legacy code into the existing semantical context as auto function, we've removed it until we devise a neural linguistic pragma dataset which conforms to the d3.hierarchy semantical form.

Accordingly we've gone for the simplest approach to populate the GIZMO
matrix which only involves obtaining the cell #nn co-ords from the Savvy.GNOSIS.PSYCHE array and the chronos {} from the Savvy.GNOSIS.GIZMO
{} object.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/? run:Heuristic&grapple:61,54,59,60,55,62,57,56,58&gizmo:true>

Tomorrow's logical thinking activity will be to implement the second
click action which will then pass the grapple [] array to the heuristic
panel so that the pentamorph can be observed.

After that task, we'll devise our neural linguistic pragma GIZMO /
GNOSIS {} datasets  which conforms to the d3.hierarchy semantical form.

On 11/10/24 08:11, dolf wrote:

#282 as [#2, #10, #70, #200] = bíos (G979): {UMBRA: #282 % #41 = #36}
1) life; 1a) life extensively; 1a1) the period or course of life; 1b)
that by which life is sustained, resources, wealth, goods;

#565 as [#40, #5, #300, #100, #70, #50] = métron (G3358): {UMBRA: #565
% #41 = #32} 1) measure, an instrument for measuring; 1a) a vessel for
receiving and determining the quantity of things, whether dry or
liquid; 1b) a graduated staff for measuring, a measuring rod; 1c)
proverbially, the rule or standard of judgment; 2) determined extent,
portion measured off, measure or limit; 2a) the required measure, the
due, fit, measure;

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?lexicon:G979,G3358,G350>

On 11/10/24 06:13, dolf wrote:

You'll note that our coding approach to the GNOSIS {} --> incisive
grapple
[] arrays is not very efficient and could probably use a recursive
approach
which we'll do later.

Our first objective here was to transition the legacy code into the
existing semantical context.

It's very likely that our neural linguistic pragma dataset will
conform to the d3.hierarchy semantical form

Nevertheless what the GNOSIS {} --> incisive grapple [] array dynamic
associated to any meta-descriptive redaction of our problematic.json {}
approach to intentional / ententional narrative (ie. weighted grapple [] >>> spiral) as case studies will grant our informal research, is then
whether
there is any biometric (ie. behavioural characteristics related to the
pattern of behaviour of a person) basis to the past observation of an
abrogation in situ [50, 31] action against the heuristic GRAPPLE(247,
355)@[16,76,30,50 | 74,41,44,31 | 47,64,3] as case example for
date:2017.1.7 and whether it is goal (247, 355) driven as a disposition
towards a desired outcome or habitual want.  Or whether it is best
understood as notionally a fusion clustering point or a short circuit.

We don't want to postulate reductio ad absurdum however its
sufficient to
say that the weighted grapple [] spiral as narrative redaction method
will
produce GNOSIS {} --> incisive grapple [] array dynamic that as a
metalogic
proposition will yield clustering which may affect a disposition towards >>> either an incisive desired outcome, habitual want or expedient as a
short
circuit.

Again we are self educating: Aristotle clarified the connection between
contradiction and falsity in his principle of non-contradiction, which
states that a proposition cannot be both true and false. That is, a
proposition Q and its negation (not-Q) cannot both be true.
Therefore, if a proposition
and its negation can both be derived logically from a premise, it can be >>> concluded that the premise is false. This technique, known as indirect
proof or proof by contradiction, has formed the basis of reductio ad
absurdum arguments in formal fields such as logic and mathematics.
<https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reductio_ad_absurdum>

BIOMETRIC: {@9: Sup: 13 - INCREASE: TSENG (#246); Ego: 3 - MIRED:
HSIEN (#175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%22})}

TELOS TOTAL: #418

ONTIC TOTAL: #259

DEME TOTAL: #293

#12 as [#1 - CENTRE, #6 - CONTRARIETY, #5 - KEEPING SMALL] /
#418 as [#5, #400, #1, #6, #6] = ʼâvâh (H183): {UMBRA: #12 % #41 =
#12} 1) desire, incline, covet, wait longingly, wish, sigh, want, be
greedy, prefer; 1a) (Piel) to desire, crave (food and drink); 1b)
(Hithpael) to desire, long for, lust after (of bodily appetites);

#588 - ONTIC TOTAL: #259 as [#5, #400, #100, #5, #9, #8, #50, #1, #10]
= heurískō (G2147): {UMBRA: #1535 % #41 = #18} 1) to come upon, hit
upon, to meet with; 1a) after searching, to find a thing sought; 1b)
without previous search, to find (by chance), to fall in with; 1c)
those who come or return to a place; 2) to find by enquiry, thought,
examination, scrutiny, observation, to find out by practice and
experience; 2a) to see, learn, discover, understand; 2b) to be found
i.e. to be seen, be present; 2c) to be discovered, recognised,
detected, to show one's self out, of one's character or state as found
out by others (men, God, or both); 2d) to get knowledge of, come to
know, God; 3) to find out for one's self, to acquire, get, obtain,
procure;

#123 - DEME TOTAL: #293 as [#5, #30, #30, #8, #50] /
#973 - DEME TOTAL: #293 as [#5, #30, #30, #8, #50, #800, #50] = Héllēn
(G1672): {UMBRA: #123 % #41 = #41} 1) a Greek either by nationality,
whether a native of the main land or of the Greek islands or colonies;
2) in a wider sense the name embraces all nations not Jews that made
the language, customs, and learning of the Greeks their own; the
primary reference is to a difference of religion and worship;

Is the #336 - PERSONAL UNCONSCIOUS COEFFICIENTS then an artibrator
between #174 - ANIMA / ANIMUS and #246 (ANTI-THESIS) - UTTERANCE;
ACTIONS / #410 - OBLIGATING NORM and what determines the rightfulness
and wrongfulness actions actions

IDENTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE INNER EPISTEMOLOGICAL #174 - ANIMA / ANIMUS
AND #336 - PERSONAL UNCONSCIOUS COEFFICIENTS AS AN INFORMATION
ORGANISATIONAL AND SOCIAL COHESION PRINCIPLE

#246 (ANTI-THESIS) - UTTERANCE; ACTIONS / #410 - OBLIGATING NORM
(rules based: BEAR NO FALSE WITNESS)

Our concern is not so much about true or false conditional action but
rather whether the biometric clustering / elasticity (is it bounded
and how
so) / cybergenetic potential (eg: is it a point of interface rather than >>> evidence of bipartite ONTIC substitution, activation or circumvention
etc)
which we anticipate observing is a rational or irrational outcome.

#247 - MALE TOTAL: #355 as [#1, #50, #1, #20, #100, #10, #50, #5, #10] = >>> anakrínō (G350): {UMBRA: #1032 % #41 = #7} 1) examine or judge; 1a) to >>> investigate, examine, enquire into, scrutinise, sift, question; 1a1)
specifically in a forensic sense of a judge to hold an investigation;
1a2)
to interrogate, examine the accused or witnesses; 1b) to judge of,
estimate, *DETERMINE* (*THE* *EXCELLENCE* *OR* *DEFECTS* *OF* *ANY*
*PERSON* *OR* *THING*;

So many philosophical questions, but now it's time to start our day

dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:

We are currently working on an implementation of the GIZMO matrix
concept which is accessible here:

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?
run:Heuristic&grapple:61,54,59,60,55,62,57,56,58&gizmo:true>

<-- *GIZMO* concept is work in progress

Those who have followed our informal research activity would know that >>>> our actionable task {} json objects are retrieved as FILE_request {}
automations which performs a fetch promise request and within the
FileReader() onlaod() it then exposes the existance variable to the
actionable task {} such that we've attained to a simple semantical
approach for multiple actionable tasks / concept instances ...

reader.onload = function() {
    eval(`Savvy['${act.module}']['${(existance == undefined) ?
act.notion :
existance}'] = ${reader.result}`);
}

Whilst we sometime ago made a rudimentary semantical accommodation for >>>> an auto function within this context which will be actioned before the >>>> main() process is executed, however we've never deployed it.  In this >>>> instance the Savvy.GNOSIS.GIZMO {} object is traversed and several
Savvy.CORPUS {} objects such as GIZMO {} --> flat grapple arrays and
GNOSIS {} --> incisive grapple {} are created:

!function(t, registerGIZMO) {

    registerGIZMO();

}(this, (function() {

    if (Savvy.CORPUS.hasOwnProperty("GIZMO"))
        return (Savvy.CORPUS.GIZMO);

    ... // code here -- 429 lines for example

}))

Thusly the datasets are not loaded as fetch requests but initiated with >>>> the first instane (note: we don't as yet have a means to remove those
data obejcts) and for the present time as a referencing object then
shared
amongst the multiple instances.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/actions/Heuristic.json>

Tomorrow's logical thinking activity will be to resolve the cell click >>>> () actions.

On 10/21/24 08:39, dolf wrote:

We're now back to our programming task for the next week at least ... >>>>>


Revision Date: 21 October 2024

  dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:

We've resolved the problem of screen ambiguity when multiple
actionable task instances were run from the command line.

The problem was due to the getTimeFilename(stub) process which
concatenates the name from the d3.timeFormat("%H%M%S%L")(new Date()) >>>>>> function and the difficulty arises with the computer processor
running
faster than the milliseconds ticks over so we force it to be
inefficient

     var filename = d3.timeFormat("%H%M%S%L")(new Date());

     do {

     } while (filename == d3.timeFormat("%H%M%S%L")(new Date())); >>>>>>
     return (`${stub}${filename}`);

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Heuristic&date:2017.1.7?
run:Heuristic&date:2024.10.1&run:Heuristic&date:2025.5.5&poll:true&run:Morphosis>

On 6/10/2024 13:03, dolf wrote:

We have now completed each of our allocated development tasks
excepting the
last 4) Implement a GIZMO matrix context which will be tomorrow's >>>>>>> logical
thinking activity and one feature which we'll implement is a second >>>>>>> click
to a focused z.r.c location will return to the EXMACHINA concept as >>>>>>> HEURISTIC pentamorph.

And we revised our earlier statement @ 0919 HOURS on 3/10/2024 by a >>>>>>> further
possible meta-postulate / rule on self justification conjectures >>>>>>> as to
whether any proposition for action follows a deterministic path
schema:

DOES THIS DERIVATION SCHEMA COMING OUT OF THE MOUTH OF
PALESTINIANS /
ISLAMISTS SOUND FAMILIAR ?

#50 - Fantasies of Avoiding Death, Value of Life
#31 - Military Stratagem, Quelling War

#50 - VASTNESS / WASTING (T'ANG) - 𝌷唐 = #224 / #386 / #501
#31 - PACKING (CHUANG) - 𝌤裝 = #205 / #367 / #482

Abrogation in situ [50, 31] action against the heuristic
GRAPPLE(247,
355)@[16,76,30,50 | 74,41,44,31 | 47,64,3] as case example for
date:2017.1.7

Here the deviation [50 | 74 ... 31 | 47] is observed relative to the >>>>>>> temporal heuristic which is a different referencing as cluster
dynamic to
any perspective as incisive line of GRAPPLE (247, 355)@[16, 76, 30, >>>>>>> 50, 41,
44, 31, 64, 3] PROTOTYPE.

By that I mean the possibility of any cluster dynamic (which have >>>>>>> dominion
bounds as limited derivations) which is a temporal osmosis for
cohering
categories of understanding and appears to be an inherent feature >>>>>>> of the
incisive process (ie. of a person or mental process/ intelligently >>>>>>> analytical and clear-thinking) itself as either an adaptation or >>>>>>> impediment
(ie. although there may be physiological comparison we're not making >>>>>>> assertion) as a micro transition or deviation point and meta logical >>>>>>> quantification of which we ought to be exceedingly mindful.

Thus the GIZMO matrix navigation as unity of apperception for our >>>>>>> nomenclature appraisals as referencing is a different proposition >>>>>>> to the
aggregated perspectives which will be defined by both a
collection of
z.r.c
locations and the disposition of incisive process.

What role does the collective and disposition play in social
cohesion, bias
or authenticity and how is this different to ONTIC / DEME
grounding of
sapient experiences?

THIS WILL RUN AN INSTANCE OF OUR PROTOTYPE TEMPORAL HEURISTIC AS >>>>>>> CONCEPT
FOR FOR CONSCIOUSNESS INSTANTIATING BY GNOSIS EX MACHINA:

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Heuristic&date:2024.10.6>

We still need to resolve multiple instances issues from the
command line

dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:

STATUS @ 1207 HOURS ON 5 OCTOBER 2024: This first task is now >>>>>>>>> completed
and we'll work on the metalogic / syllogism passing tomorrow. >>>>>>>>>
<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?
run:Heuristic&grapple:16,76,30,50,41,44,31,64,3>

We've similarly looked at the getTimeHeuristic (chronos)
function for
any optimisation which can be applied and since the sub-process >>>>>>>>> called
getTimeSlot() deploys the requisite while / for loop cycle the >>>>>>>>> question
is then only a consideration of data {} representation by the >>>>>>>>> datum[]
array and therefore we don't see any criteria for change.

However we ought to note several temporal existential
considerations
such as the midnight anchor horizon perspective / daylight saving >>>>>>>>> temporal effect for which we don't have any adequate physiological >>>>>>>>> explanation.

[x] -- (person a) ------->

------ [x midnight seeding] ------

<------- (person b) -- [x]

In this example the temporal heuristic will differ between persons >>>>>>>>> a / b
due to their relativity to the [x] - midnight seeding.

NURTURE

| - NON DAYLIGHT SAVING
|
| - (x) - NATURE
|
| - DAYLIGHT SAVING

NURTURE

The consideration is upon the essential driver for action as to >>>>>>>>> whether
it is NURTURE or NATURE given I might buy a coffee @ 0900 hours >>>>>>>>> each
morning but during daylight saving there is an hour
adjustment.  Is
the
behaviour relative to self (#60 - CHI) by the NURTURE effect of >>>>>>>>> habitual
action or the NATURE of TIME which would require a SPONTANEOUS >>>>>>>>> ACTION to
then differentiate?

What carries the action?

Our next development for the HEURISTIC MODULE as ACTIONABLE
TASK is to
implement the &grapple:1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 option so that we can >>>>>>>>> observe
the pentamorph.

The problem here is whether we allow a malformed grapple array >>>>>>>>> of less
than 9 elements and whilst we might either trim or otherwise >>>>>>>>> populate
the truncated array with #81 values which will still retain the >>>>>>>>> dialectic context, the difficulty is that any ONTIC / DEME
grounding
might be then inappropriate.

STATUS @ 1207 HOURS ON 5 OCTOBER 2024: This first task is now >>>>>>>>> completed and
we'll work on the metalogic / syllogism passing tomorrow.

2)    Implement the metalogic / syllogism passing;

3)    Update the start ?heuristc operand process and any internal >>>>>>>>> function
calls within CHAT so that we can jettison the legacy code
implementation;

4)    Implement a GIZMO matrix context

On 4/10/2024 15:36, dolf wrote:

dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:

We included the getDateHeuristic ({}) coding so that you can >>>>>>>>>>> see the
notion of speaking language to properly quantify the problem >>>>>>>>>>> which
requires the javascript solution -- in point of fact its >>>>>>>>>>> possible to
visualise the code within one's mind.

This semantical opportunity is now available:

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?
run:Heuristic&date:2017.1.7&run:Heuristic&date:2024.10.5&poll:true> >>>>>>>>>>

Today's action will be to transition the existing HEURISTIC code >>>>>>>>>>> within
the ACTIONABLE TASK and we'll omit the POLLING ACTION for the >>>>>>>>>>> present
time since flipPanelContext() is also a newer concept and we may >>>>>>>>>>> have to
make some further considerations.

TIME HEURISTIC FOR NEWSPAPER THREAT PLACED WITHIN MAILBOX FOR 7 >>>>>>>>>>>> JANUARY
2017 [#16, #76, #30, #50, #41, #44, #31, #64, #3] (*) we have >>>>>>>>>>>> heretofore
had a technical issue with this prototype determination >>>>>>>>>>>> where we
could
not reproduce it and it is here manually corrected but still >>>>>>>>>>>> needs to be
confirmed by algorithm which has on 3 OCTOBER 2024 been >>>>>>>>>>>> confirmed as
GRAPPLE (358, 395)@[16, 76, 30, 74, 41, 44, 47, 64, 3] and >>>>>>>>>>>> all it
conveys by errata that it only by a contrived [+24, +16] >>>>>>>>>>>> relationship
between (#247 - PICKER'S APOLOGETIC (#56 --> IDEA #177 - TABLE >>>>>>>>>>>> TALK))
and (#355 - MISERICORDIAE VULTUS - PAPAL BULL OF 8 DECEMBER >>>>>>>>>>>> 2015 / 20 NOVEMBER 2016)

GRAPPLE (247, 355)@[16, 76, 30, 50, 41, 44, 31, 64, 3] >>>>>>>>>>>> PROTOTYPE

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Heuristic&date:2017.1.7> >>>>>>>>>>>>

On 3/10/2024 09:19, dolf wrote:

     The updated semantical form to the HEURISTIC MODULE as >>>>>>>>>>>> ACTIONABLE
TASK with SPAWN and IDEA CLUSTER capabilities will enable >>>>>>>>>>>> further
research into "where to from here scenarios" or self
justification
conjectures as to whether any proposition for action follows a >>>>>>>>>>>> deterministic path schema such as (but not limited to): >>>>>>>>>>>>
         - Stasis cohering due to prototype fusion and >>>>>>>>>>>> steeping.
         - Whether a course of nature IDEA dialectic >>>>>>>>>>>>          - Morphosis prototype
         - IDEA clustering as metalogic associated with the
heuristic
         - IDEA dialectic as modus operandi schema >>>>>>>>>>>>
<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Heuristic>

On 3/10/2024 07:27, dolf wrote:

We've got a respite window from the demands of any
administrative
process so we'll begin working on a resolution for our >>>>>>>>>>>>> identified
temporal heuristic problem...

After our transition towards an ACTIONABLE TASK implementation >>>>>>>>>>>>> we're
going to work on the nested functions:

Savvy.GNOSIS.getHeuristicGrapple
(Savvy.GNOSIS.getDateHeuristic
(chronos));

The key to deploying a non-calendar implementation perhaps >>>>>>>>>>>>> lays in
determining the THETH anchor for the memetic sampling for any >>>>>>>>>>>>> consciousness instantiation by exploiting the capability >>>>>>>>>>>>> for a new
Date (year, month, day) to accept a negative value for the day >>>>>>>>>>>>> value.

function _getDateHeuristic (chronos) {

var f = Savvy.GNOSIS.CALENDAR[chronos.month][chronos.day]; >>>>>>>>>>> var day = chronos.day;

while (Savvy.GNOSIS.dateHeuristic (chronos.year, chronos.month, >>>>>>>>>>> day--)
!= 19); <-- *accept* *a* *negative* value for the day value >>>>>>>>>>>
var heuristic = {
0: {},
1: {},
2: {}
}
var now = new Date (chronos.year, chronos.month-1, day+1, >>>>>>>>>>> chronos.hour,
chronos.minute, 0);
var cron = {
year: Number(d3.timeFormat("%Y")(now)),
month: Number(d3.timeFormat("%m")(now)),
day: Number(d3.timeFormat("%d")(now))
}
var meme = 0;
var p = null;

for (var i = 1; i < 23; i++) { <-- *populating* *the*
*requisite*
*sample* z.r.c sequence

if (meme = Savvy.GNOSIS.RUDOLPH[Savvy.GNOSIS.dateHeuristic >>>>>>>>>>> (cron.year,
cron.month, cron.day)]) {

now = new Date (cron.year, cron.month-1, cron.day);
cron = {
year: Number(d3.timeFormat("%Y")(now)),
month: Number(d3.timeFormat("%m")(now)),
day: Number(d3.timeFormat("%d")(now)),
weekday: Number(d3.timeFormat("%w")(now))
}
p = Savvy.GNOSIS.CALENDAR[cron.month][cron.day];
heuristic[0][`${p.zen}.${p.row}.${p.col}`] = meme;
heuristic[1][`${f.zen}.${meme}.${cron.weekday+3}`] = meme; >>>>>>>>>>> heuristic[2][`${meme}.${meme}.${cron.weekday+3}`] = meme; >>>>>>>>>>> }

cron.day++;

}

return (heuristic);

};

Once the THETH anchor is determined, its then a matter of >>>>>>>>>>>>> populating
the requisite sample z.r.c sequence for any subsequent >>>>>>>>>>>>> grapple@[]
array...

That's our meta-actions which we will explore today. >>>>>>>>>>>>>
The ACTIONABLE TASK will be called Heuristic.json and will >>>>>>>>>>>>> shortly
appear here as we progress our transition:

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/actions/Heuristic.json> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
On 26/9/2024 18:34, dolf wrote:

Despite our best intentions we are still occupied with >>>>>>>>>>>>>> administrative
processes which might be concluded by 12 October 2024. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
We've identified a problem which will be the first to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> resolve...

20240925 - The temporal heuristic for date when designated >>>>>>>>>>>>>> by ?
date:2017.1.7&heuristic appears to be broken and returns an >>>>>>>>>>>>>> implausible grapple array []

Its likely that we'll redevelop the HEURISTIC as a distinct >>>>>>>>>>>>>> actionable task which can be SPAWNED and have specific NEURAL >>>>>>>>>>>>>> LINGUISTIC PRAGMA associated as just some of the newer >>>>>>>>>>>>>> features.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?date:2017.1.7&heuristic> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <--
the
switch will be backwards compatible but will deploy the ? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> run:Heuristic&date:2017.1.7 format so that multiple instances >>>>>>>>>>>>>> can be
invoked

TIME HEURISTIC FOR NEWSPAPER THREAT PLACED IN MAILBOX FOR 7 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> JANUARY
2017 [#16, #76, #30, #50, #41, #44, #31, #64, #3] (*) we have >>>>>>>>>>>>>> heretofore had a technical issue with this prototype where we >>>>>>>>>>>>>> could
not reproduce it and is here manually corrected but needs >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to be
confirmed by algorithm.

GRAPPLE (247, 355)@[#16, #76, #30, #50, #41, #44, #31, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> #64, #3]
PROTOTYPE

[#16, {@1: Sup: 16 - CONTACT: CHIAO (#16); Ego: 16 - CONTACT: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> CHIAO
(#16)}
#76, {@2: Sup: 11 - DIVERGENCE: CH'A (#27); Ego: 76 - >>>>>>>>>>>>>> AGGRAVATION:
CHU (#92)}
#30, {@3: Sup: 41 - RESPONSE: YING (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH >>>>>>>>>>>>>> OFFENDETH THE GOD OF MY DOMAIN {%42}); Ego: 30 - BOLD >>>>>>>>>>>>>> RESOLUTION: YI
(#122)}
#50, {@4: Sup: 10 - DEFECTIVENESS, DISTORTION: HSIEN (#78); >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ego: 50 -
VASTNESS / WASTING: T'ANG (#172)}
#41, {@5: Sup: 51 - CONSTANCY: CH'ANG (#129); Ego: 41 - >>>>>>>>>>>>>> RESPONSE:
YING (#213)}
#44, {@6: Sup: 14 - PENETRATION: JUI (#143 - MALE DEME IS >>>>>>>>>>>>>> UNNAMED
{%8}); Ego: 44 - STOVE: TSAO (#257)}
#31, {@7: Sup: 45 - GREATNESS: TA (#188); Ego: 31 - PACKING: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> CHUANG
(#288)}
#64, {@8: Sup: 28 - CHANGE: KENG (#216); Ego: 64 - >>>>>>>>>>>>>> SINKING: CH'EN
(#352)}
#3] {@9: Sup: 31 - PACKING: CHUANG (#247); Ego: 3 - MIRED: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> HSIEN (#355)}

TELOS TOTAL: #355
ONTIC TOTAL: #68
DEME TOTAL: #143

#322 - MALE TOTAL: #247 as [#30, #200, #2, #90] = rêbets >>>>>>>>>>>>>> (H7258):
{UMBRA: #292 % #41 = #5} 1) resting or *DWELLING* *PLACE*, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> place of
lying down;

#426 - ONTIC TOTAL: #68 as [#6, #5, #300, #40, #70, #5] = >>>>>>>>>>>>>> shᵉmûwʻâh
(H8052): {UMBRA: #421 % #41 = #11} 1) report, *NEWS*, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> rumour; 1a)
report, news, tidings; 1b) mention;

#617 - ONTIC TOTAL: #68 as [#5, #3, #100, #1, #500, #8] = >>>>>>>>>>>>>> gráphō
(G1125): {UMBRA: #1404 % #41 = #10} 1) to write, with >>>>>>>>>>>>>> reference to
the form of the letters; 1a) to delineate (or form) >>>>>>>>>>>>>> letters on a
tablet, parchment, *PAPER*, or other material; 2) to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> write, with
reference to the contents of the writing; 2a) to express in >>>>>>>>>>>>>> written
characters; 2b) to commit to writing (things not to be >>>>>>>>>>>>>> forgotten),
write down, record; 2c) used of those things which stand >>>>>>>>>>>>>> written in
the sacred books (of the OT); 2d) to write to one, i.e. by >>>>>>>>>>>>>> writing

[continued in next message]

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.france, de.soc.weltanschauung.islam, nl.politiek
XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

We're currently working on our end of year project which is to
assimilate Professor Michael Nylan's translation and commentary of the
FAYAN (exemplary figures) text which we have identified may deploy a
HEBREW LETTERS dialectic of rationality:

-- #41 - PRINCIPLE OF EMANATION

- #451 - #11 - GOVERNMENT & NON-GOVERNMENT ORGANISATIONS {TRANSFORMING
NATURE (DOUBLE - NATURE AMENDED IN ITS NATURE (ENGENDERING NATURE))}

- #492 - MEDIAN OF RATIONALITY (#12 - GENERAL POPULACE (AUTONOMOUS NATURE))

- #533 - #13 / I - NATURE CONTAINS NATURE {MOTHER - THE TONGUE OF DECREE DECIDING BETWEEN THEM}

- #943 - DYNAMIC NATURAL ASSOCIATOR

As we've noted previously the #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY SPECTRUM
exhibits a couching of rationality dynamic whereby there is observed to
occur pairing with the articulation of the problematic occurence desscriptor

Give then that we have an observed pysiological characteristic
associated the functional notion "couching of rationality dynamic" we
then did some COPILOT searching and found the following adequate concept
about the current debate on "structural requirements of rationality – including controversies about whether they are “wide-scope” or “narrow-scope”, synchronic or diachronic, and whether they govern
processes or states; as well as examining various forms of skepticism
about structural requirements of rationality":

"The term ‘structural (ir)rationality’ is relatively recent; to the best
of our knowledge, its first use with its current meaning is in Scanlon (2007).[2] However, philosophers have been theorizing about the
underlying concept, using different terminology, for significantly
longer. Interesting questions can be asked about whether historical
figures such as Hume and Kant had theories of structural rationality.
However, the contemporary debate about structural rationality can be
more directly traced to a number of important articles and books from
the 1970s and 80s (Hill 1973; Greenspan 1975; Dancy 1977; Darwall 1983),
which largely focus on practical rationality." <https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/rationality-structural/>

In this dialog example the MALE: #160 / FEME: #260 / ONTIC: #268
category reciprocation can be understood as a "NARROW-SCOPED"
rationalisation (ie. not to be confused with being rational):

DOLF @ 1732 HOURS ON 8 DECEMBER 2024: "Glad you feel that way since
we've *WHITE* *ANTED* your ANZAC 2018 CENTENNIAL JINGOISM and the heat
is up and *COOKING* for WWII as well ..."

#634 - MALE TOTAL: #160 as [#5, #9, #2, #8, #10, #600] = ṭabbâch
(H2876): {UMBRA: #19 % #41 = #19} 1) executioner, *COOK*, bodyguard,
guardsman; 1a) cook (who also killed the animal for food); 1b)
guardsmen, bodyguard;

#1232 - FEME TOTAL: #260 as [#1, #80, #1, #300, #800, #50] = apatáō
(G538): {UMBRA: #1183 % #41 = #35} 1) to cheat, beguile, *DECEIVE*;

#1156 - ONTIC TOTAL: #268 as [#30, #10, #6, #200, #300, #10, #600] =
yârash (H3423): {UMBRA: #510 % #41 = #18} 1) to seize, dispossess, take possession off, inherit, disinherit, occupy, impoverish, be an heir; 1a)
(Qal); 1a1) to take possession of; 1a2) to inherit; 1a3) to impoverish,
come to poverty, be poor; 1b) (Niphal) to be dispossessed, be
impoverished, come to poverty; 1c) (Piel) to devour; 1d) (Hiphil); 1d1)
to cause to possess or inherit; 1d2) *TO* *CAUSE* *OTHERS* *TO*
*POSSESS* *OR* *INHERIT*; 1d3) to impoverish; 1d4) to dispossess; 1d5)
to destroy, bring to ruin, disinherit;

JACK THE AUSSIE (@hammerofleft) @ 1756 HOURS ON 8 DECEMBER 2024: "Your
little games are over Tugger. The entire *WEST* is sick you and your
wokester revisionism. Rejected. Australia is next." <https://x.com/hammerofleft/status/1865651571142615182>

DOLF @ 1957 HOURS ON 8 DECEMBER 2024: "We have determined that like "MYXOMATOSIS" which occurs in RABBITS (ie. pestilence) that this fellow
JACK THE AUSSIE (@hammerofleft) by the voluntary expression Ego: #40 -
𝌭法 - LAW / MODEL: FA (#40) / #65 - 𝍆內 - INNER: NEI (#105) meaning "WITHIN THE LAW", nevertheless exhibits clear symptoms of ANZAC JINGOISM
/ IRISH CHRISTO-FASCIST APOLOGETICS and accordingly engages within
slander as defensive reflex mechanism but such action divulges to us his INIQUITY of SOUL for which the fires of HELL AWAIT...

"Your little games are over Tugger. {@1: Sup: 17 - HOLDING BACK: JUAN
(#17); Ego: 40 - LAW / MODEL: FA (#40)}

The entire west is sick you and your wokester revisionism. {@2: Sup: 15
- REACH: TA (#32); Ego: 65 - INNER: NEI (#105)}

Rejected. {@3: Sup: 52 - MEASURE: TU (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE
{%2}); Ego: 79 - DIFFICULTIES: NAN (#184 - I PUT NO CHECK UPON THE WATER
IN ITS FLOW {%36})}

Australia is next." {@4: Sup: 76 - AGGRAVATION: CHU (#160); Ego: 76 - AGGRAVATION: CHU (#260)}

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?male:160&feme:40,105,260&ontic:268&lexicon:H2691,H6908>

ONTIC TOTAL: #268

#514 - ONTIC TOTAL: #268 as [#400, #8, #40, #60, #6] = châmaç (H2554): {UMBRA: #108 % #41 = #26} 1) to wrong, do violence to, treat violently,
do wrongly; 1a) (Qal) *TO* *TREAT* *VIOLENTLY*, *DO* *WRONG*; 1a1) of
physical wrong; 1a2) of ethical wrong; 1a3) *OF* *PHYSICAL* *AND*
*ETHICAL* *WRONG*; 1b) (Niphal) to be treated violently;

#202 - JACK THE AUSSIE @ FEME TALLY: #40 as [#100, #2, #90, #10] /
    /     #204 - WELLINGTON'S *BIGGEST* *EVER* *BLOKES* *BBQ* (WELLINGTON SHIRE COUNCIL MAYOR IAN BYE: Ianbye1971@gmail.com) NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 11 OCTOBER 2024 / STATUE PLAQUE / IMPROPER BOER WAR
MEMORIAL COMMEMORATION ON 8 JUNE 2017 as [#6, #1, #100, #2, #90, #5] /
[#6, #100, #2, #90, #6] /
    #208 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR PHOTO OF IMPROPER BOER WAR MEMORIAL COMMEMORATION ON 10 JUNE 2017 as [#10, #100, #2, #90, #6] / [#6, #10,
#100, #2, #90] /
    #213 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR CHRISTMAS TRUCE 25 DECEMBER 1914 as
[#1, #100, #2, #90, #500] /
    #232 - STATUE PLAQUE / NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR IMPROPER BOER WAR MEMORIAL COMMEMORATION ON 8 JUNE 2017 as [#100, #2, #90, #40] / [#40,
#100, #2, #90] /
    #233 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR SAINT PATRICK’S DAY 17 MARCH as [#1, #100, #2, #90, #40] /
    #242 - *MONKEY* *BUSINESS* / NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 3 AUGUST 2023
as [#100, #2, #90, #700] /
        #248 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR CHRISTMAS TRUCE 24 DECEMBER 1914 as [#50, #100, #2, #90, #6] /
    #254 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR SAINT PATRICK’S DAY 17 MARCH as [#6, #100, #2, #90, #50, #6] / [#6, #40, #100, #2, #90, #10, #6] /
#799 - *BING* *COPILOT* *AUGMENTATION* / ONTIC TOTAL: #104 as [#6, #1,
#100, #2, #90, #600] = qâbats (H6908): {UMBRA: #192 % #41 = #28} 1) *TO* *GATHER*, *ASSEMBLE*; 1a) (Qal) to gather, collect, assemble; 1b)
(Niphal); 1b1) to assemble, gather; 1b2) to be gathered; 1c) (Piel) to
gather, gather together, take away; 1d) (Pual) to be gathered together;
1e) (Hithpael) to gather together, be gathered together;

    #300 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR STATUE PLAQUE / IMPROPER BOER WAR MEMORIAL COMMEMORATION ON 8 JUNE 2017 as [#2, #8, #90, #200] /
    #306 - WELLINGTON'S *BIGGEST* *EVER* *BLOKES* *BBQ* (WELLINGTON
SHIRE COUNCIL MAYOR IAN BYE: Ianbye1971@gmail.com) NOUMENON RESONANCE
FOR 11 OCTOBER 2024 as [#2, #8, #90, #200, #6] /
    #308 - WELLINGTON'S *BIGGEST* *EVER* *BLOKES* *BBQ* (WELLINGTON
SHIRE COUNCIL MAYOR IAN BYE: Ianbye1971@gmail.com) NOUMENON RESONANCE
FOR 11 OCTOBER 2024 as [#8, #90, #200, #10] /
    #309 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR CHRISTMAS TRUCE 24 DECEMBER 1914 as
[#6, #5, #8, #90, #200] /
    #310 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR SAINT PATRICK’S DAY REPUBLICAN
PROTEST CONTEMPT ON 20 MARCH 1920 as [#2, #8, #90, #200, #10] /
    #313 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR CHRISTMAS TRUCE 25 DECEMBER 1914 as
[#8, #90, #200, #10, #5] /
    #328 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR SAINT PATRICK’S DAY 17 MARCH as [#30, #8, #90, #200] / [#8, #90, #200, #10, #20] /
    #334 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR SAINT PATRICK’S DAY REPUBLICAN
PROTEST CONTEMPT ON 20 MARCH 1920 as [#6, #30, #8, #90, #200] /
    #338 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR CHRISTMAS TRUCE 25 DECEMBER 1914 as [#40, #8, #90, #200] /
         /     #348 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR CHRISTMAS TRUCE 24 DECEMBER 1914 / JACK THE AUSSIE @ FEME TALLY: #105 as [#8, #90, #200,
#10, #40] /
    /     #355 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR CHRISTMAS TRUCE 24 / 25 DECEMBER 1914 as [#2, #8, #90, #200, #10, #5, #40] /
    /     #359 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR SAINT PATRICK’S DAY REPUBLICAN
PROTEST CONTEMPT ON 20 MARCH 1920 / WELLINGTON'S *BIGGEST* *EVER*
*BLOKES* *BBQ* (WELLINGTON SHIRE COUNCIL MAYOR IAN BYE:
Ianbye1971@gmail.com) NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 11 OCTOBER 2024 as [#6, #8,
#90, #200, #10, #5, #40] /
    #369 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR SAINT PATRICK’S DAY REPUBLICAN
PROTEST CONTEMPT ON 20 MARCH 1920 as [#6, #8, #90, #200, #10, #5, #50] /
    #298 - GROUNDING “ROCK” PRINCIPLE / NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 3 AUGUST
2023 as [#8, #90, #200] /
#915 - JACK THE AUSSIE @ FEME TALLY: #105 as [#2, #8, #90, #200, #10,
#5, #600] = châtsêr (H2691): {UMBRA: #298 % #41 = #11} 1) court,
enclosure; 1a) *ENCLOSURES*; 1b) court; 2) settled abode, settlement,
village, town;

#102 - ONTIC TOTAL: #268 as [#8, #30, #9, #5, #50] = érchomai (G2064):
{UMBRA: #826 % #41 = #6} 1) to come; 1a) of persons; 1a1) to come from
one place to another, and used both of persons arriving and of those
returning; 1a2) to appear, make one's appearance, come before the
public; 1b) metaph.; 1b1) *TO* *COME* *INTO* *BEING*, *ARISE*, *COME*
*FORTH*, *SHOW* *ITSELF*, *FIND* *PLACE* *OR* *INFLUENCE*; 1b2) be
established, become known, to come (fall) into or unto; 1c) to go, to
follow one;

--------------

The point we make of this is that whilst a couching of rationality
dynamic can be simply represented as a synapse {} dataset with a count synapse[section][segment]++ our informal research is not presently
concerned with the priority emphasis of any particular dataset as then
the driving impetus or quasi-rationality, but the capacity to merge them
and observe the result:

var sections = d3.select (`#${existance}-FAYAN-TEXT`).selectAll(`div[data-section]`).nodes();

for (var nodeSection of sections) {
section = d3.select(nodeSection).attr(`data-section`);
segments = d3.select(nodeSection).selectAll(`p[data-segment]`).nodes();
for (var nodeSegment of segments) {
segment = d3.select(nodeSegment).attr(`data-segment`);
nodes = d3.select(nodeSegment).selectAll(`span[value='${d.value}']`).nodes();
if (nodes.length) {
switch (false) {
case (synapse.hasOwnProperty(section)) :
synapse[section] = {}
case (synapse[section].hasOwnProperty(segment+1)) :
synapse[section][segment] = 1;
data.MATCHES.records++;
data.MATCHES.nodes.push (nodes);
break;
default :
synapse[section][segment]++;
}
}
}
}

return ({glyph: d.glyph, value: d.value, notion: reduce (synapse),
synapse: synapse});

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Fayan&glyph:習>

FAYAN: #100 = [#8, #13, #17, #8, #7, #7, #15, #25]

xí (習): 1. to fly, 2. to practice; to exercise, 3. to be familiar with,
4. a habit; a custom, 5. a trusted aide; a close acquaintance, 6.
frequently; constantly; regularly; often, 7. to teach, 8. flapping, 9. Xi

{
"glyph": "習",
"value": 3045,
"notion": {
"telos": 100,
"cogito": [8, 13, 17, 8, 7, 7, 15, 25]
},
"synapse": {
"1": {
"7": 1,
"12": 1
},
"2": {
"16": 1
},
"5": {
"7": 1
},
"7": {
"6": 1
},
"8": {
"6": 1
},
"11": {
"14": 1
},
"13": {
"24": 1
}
}
}

Our development goal is to devise an enquiry concept {} which is able to aggregate glyph concepts such as the occurrence of rì (日) so that we can visualise changes to the synapse couching of rationality dynamic:

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Mystery&glyph:%E6%97%A5>

#511 = [#1, #5, #13, #18, #19, #20, #23, #24, #33, #41, #47, #52, #67,
#70, #78]

rì (日): 1. day of the month; a certain day, 2. Kangxi radical 72, 3. a
day, 4. Japan, 5. sun, 6. daytime, 7. sunlight, 8. everyday, 9. season,
10. available time, 11. a day, 12. in the past, 13. mi

　學行卷第一 - Learning and Practice [24] / CHERUBIM: NATURE REJOICES IN ITS
NATURE: (DOUBLE: NATURE CONTAINS NATURE / NATURE AMENDED IN ITS NATURE)

#12 - rì yuè (日月): 1. the sun and moon, 2. day and month; every day and
every month; season; life and livelihood

　修身卷第三 - Cultivating the Self [25] / DOMINION: NATURE AMENDED IN ITS
NATURE (DOUBLE: NATURE SURMOUNTS NATURE (FORM OF NATURE)

#14 / #16 - rì (日): 1. day of the month; a certain day, 2. Kangxi radical 72, 3. a day, 4. Japan, 5. sun, 6. daytime, 7. sunlight, 8.
everyday, 9. season, 10. available time, 11. a day, 12. in the past, 13. mi

　問神卷第五 - Asking About Shen [27]  / POWERS: FORM OF NATURE / NATURE
SURMOUNTS NATURE

#11 - rì yuè (日月): 1. the sun and moon, 2. day and month; every day and
every month; season; life and livelihood
#13 - báirì (白日): 1. daytime; sun; time

　五百卷第八 - Five Hundred Years [29] / ANGELS: AUTONOMOUS NATURE / FORM OF
NATURE

#8 - (愛日): 1. cherish time, 2. careful of parents remaining days
#8 / #10 / #20 - rì (日): 1. day of the month; a certain day, 2. Kangxi
radical 72, 3. a day, 4. Japan, 5. sun, 6. daytime, 7. sunlight, 8.
everyday, 9. season, 10. available time, 11. a day, 12. in the past, 13. mi

　先知卷第九 - Foreknowledge [28]  / SOVEREIGNTY: TOTALITY OF NATURE / ENGENDERING NATURE

#2 - yī rì (一日): 1. one [whole] day, 2. one [particular] day
#5 - rìxīn (日新): 1. in constant progress
#24 - rì (日): 1. day of the month; a certain day, 2. Kangxi radical 72,
3. a day, 4. Japan, 5. sun, 6. daytime, 7. sunlight, 8. everyday, 9.
season, 10. available time, 11. a day, 12. in the past, 13. mi

　淵騫卷第十一 - Yuan and Qian [23] / GENERAL POPULACE: AUTONOMOUS NATURE

#2 - rì (日): 1. day of the month; a certain day, 2. Kangxi radical 72,
3. a day, 4. Japan, 5. sun, 6. daytime, 7. sunlight, 8. everyday, 9.
season, 10. available time, 11. a day, 12. in the past, 13. mi

　君子卷第十二 - The Junzi [23] / NATURE CONTAINS NATURE (MOTHER: THE TONGUE
OF DECREE DECIDING BETWEEN THEM)

#15 - rì (日): 1. day of the month; a certain day, 2. Kangxi radical 72,
3. a day, 4. Japan, 5. sun, 6. daytime, 7. sunlight, 8. everyday, 9.
season, 10. available time, 11. a day, 12. in the past, 13. mi
#20 - yī rì (一日): 1. one [whole] day, 2. one [particular] day

　孝至卷第十三 - The Priority of Filial Devotion [24] / NATURE REJOICES IN ITS
NATURE

#3 - (愛日): 1. cherish time, 2. careful of parents remaining days
#32 - rì (日): 1. day of the month; a certain day, 2. Kangxi radical 72,
3. a day, 4. Japan, 5. sun, 6. daytime, 7. sunlight, 8. everyday, 9.
season, 10. available time, 11. a day, 12. in the past, 13. mi
#32 - yī rì (一日): 1. one [whole] day, 2. one [particular] day

#1 - LEARNING AND PRACTICE + #2 - CULTIVATING THE SELF = #3
#3 - ASKING ABOUT SHEN + #4 - FIVE HUNDRED YEARS = #7
#5 - FOREKNOWLEDGE + #6 - YUAN AND QIAN = #11
#7 - THE JUNZI + #8 - THE PRIORITY OF FILIAL DEVOTION = #15 + #3 + #7 +
#11 = #36

CANDIDATE #36 - AUTONOMOUS DELIMITER PROTOTYPE: #207 = [#12, #14, #16,
#11, #13, #8, #10, #20, #2, #5, #24, #2, #15, #20, #3, #32]

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Mystery&glyph:學>

CANON: #40 = [#40]

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Fayan&glyph:學>

FAYAN: #207 = [#2, #1, #2, #3, #5, #7, #10, #11, #14, #17, #19, #20,
#13, #7, #7, #9, #10, #15, #35]

xué (學): 1. to study; to learn, 2. a discipline; a branch of study, 3.
to imitate, 4. a school; an academy, 5. to understand, 6. learning;
acquired knowledge, 7. a doctrine, 8. learned

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Insurance%20Question%20on%20Illegality%20Defence.pdf>

On 11/12/24 16:00, dolf wrote:

We've implemented the second click action for our GIZMO concept and transitioned our prototype DIALOG expand toggle feature to being a generalised setDialogExpand() function which requires an additional data object to be added to the  MOVE {} object.  We don't at present need to implement the heuristic / calendar notion since the main objective is to observe the PENTAMORPH for any given grapple / transformative prototype.

move.modes = {
    focus: "NORMAL",
    NORMAL: {
        width: move.width,
        height: move.height,
        x: Math.max (0, Math.min (Savvy.useWidth, Savvy.useWidth- Savvy.MOVE[existance].width-20)),
        y: 0
    },
    EXPAND: {
        width: Savvy.useWidth,
        height: Savvy.useHeight,
        x: 0,
        y: 0
    }
}

We've tidied the code up to take a uniformed approach to the usage of
the existance vaiable.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/actions/Heuristic.json>

And we've removed the undefined exception within the main {} function by assigning a time designated file / form name:

main: function(oMain) {

        this.oMain = oMain;
        oMain.form = (existance) ? existance : existance = Savvy.COINRULES.library.getTimeFilename(oMain.action.split(" ")[0]);

    ... code

}

Similarly the GIZMO zrc referencing dataset can remain as it is, so then
our next activity will be devise our neural linguistic pragma GNOSIS {} datasets which conforms to the d3.hierarchy semantical form.

Since the T'AI HSÜAN CHING consists of #81 TETRAS x 9 poem appraisals =
#729 metrics we'll want to examine both the the GNOSIS {} --> incisive grapple [] array dynamic associated to both the spatial dispersal within
the 9x9x9 = #729 appraisal (ie. noting there are currently 5
transformative protototypes) matrix and their clustering.

The example below is of IDEA #652 within HEBREW / GREEK / DIALECTIC (meta-descriptor aggregation) which may provide some first principles
for anthropocentric consciousness (ie. gnosis ex machina instantiation)
-- but before we can deduce such, there needs be some means to visualise
such legacy of mind from antiquity.

And we duly note that the COSMIC DAO is not [generally] viewed as a transcendent source in the sense of being a metaphysical first principle beyond the physical world; rather, it is immanent, always present and
always emerging. It is creative but is not a supreme creator god,
whether personal or impersonal, who gives birth to the world through
divine contemplation or the exertion of a supreme will.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/? idea:652&lexicon:G1531,G3075,G1924,G4342,H2256,G3163&run:Mystery&glyph:人>

#652 = [#3, #5, #7, #8, #11, #16, #18, #19, #24, #26, #34, #36, #42,
#43, #48, #54, #56, #60, #68, #74]

rén (人): 1. person; people; a human being, 2. Kangxi radical 9, 3. a
kind of person, 4. everybody, 5. adult, 6. somebody; others, 7. *AN* *UPRIGHT* *PERSON*

#652 as [#200, #2, #400, #10, #40] = ribbôw (H7239): {UMBRA: #208 % #41
= #3} 1) *TEN* *THOUSAND*, myriad;

"SAYING, UNTO THEE WILL I GIVE THE LAND OF CANAAN, THE *LOT*-H2256 OF
YOUR INHERITANCE:" [Psalm 105:11]

#40 as [#8 - OPPOSITION (KAN), #2 - FULL CIRCLE (CHOU), #30 - BOLD
RESOLUTION (YI)] /
#652 as [#2, #8, #2, #30, #10, #600] = chebel (H2256): {UMBRA: #40 % #41
= #40} 1) a cord, rope, territory, band, company; 1a) a rope, cord; 1b)
a measuring-cord or line; 1c) a measured portion, lot, part, region; 1d)
a band or company; 2) pain, sorrow, travail, pang; 2a) pains of travail;
2b) pains, pangs, sorrows; 3) union; 4) destruction;

Instead, the COSMIC DAO incessantly generates the ten thousand things (a metaphor for the world) / SWASTIKA (卐 or 卍) CORRESPONDENCE, giving
rise in its fluctuation to the complementary polarities of yin and yang.
It is chang, constant and eternal, and tiandao, the ORDER OF NATURE that manifests itself spontaneously (ziran). Human beings, whose society and culture are marked by artifice and constraint, can hope only to attune themselves to its mysterious transformations but receive no special
favour. As the Daodejing says [in defiance of an anthropocentric
perspective of the universe], the COSMIC DAO is buren (see rén (人)),
“no special lover of humanity.” [<https://www.britannica.com/topic/dao>]

On 11/10/24 17:07, dolf wrote:

STATUS @ 175 HOURS ON 10 NOVEMBER 2024:

After testing the transitioning of the legacy code into the existing
semantical context as auto function, we've removed it until we devise
a neural linguistic pragma dataset which conforms to the d3.hierarchy
semantical form.

Accordingly we've gone for the simplest approach to populate the GIZMO
matrix which only involves obtaining the cell #nn co-ords from the
Savvy.GNOSIS.PSYCHE array and the chronos {} from the
Savvy.GNOSIS.GIZMO {} object.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?
run:Heuristic&grapple:61,54,59,60,55,62,57,56,58&gizmo:true>

Tomorrow's logical thinking activity will be to implement the second
click action which will then pass the grapple [] array to the
heuristic panel so that the pentamorph can be observed.

After that task, we'll devise our neural linguistic pragma GIZMO /
GNOSIS {} datasets  which conforms to the d3.hierarchy semantical form.

On 11/10/24 08:11, dolf wrote:

#282 as [#2, #10, #70, #200] = bíos (G979): {UMBRA: #282 % #41 = #36}
1) life; 1a) life extensively; 1a1) the period or course of life; 1b)
that by which life is sustained, resources, wealth, goods;

#565 as [#40, #5, #300, #100, #70, #50] = métron (G3358): {UMBRA:
#565 % #41 = #32} 1) measure, an instrument for measuring; 1a) a
vessel for receiving and determining the quantity of things, whether
dry or liquid; 1b) a graduated staff for measuring, a measuring rod;
1c) proverbially, the rule or standard of judgment; 2) determined
extent, portion measured off, measure or limit; 2a) the required
measure, the due, fit, measure;

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?lexicon:G979,G3358,G350>

On 11/10/24 06:13, dolf wrote:

You'll note that our coding approach to the GNOSIS {} --> incisive
grapple
[] arrays is not very efficient and could probably use a recursive
approach
which we'll do later.

Our first objective here was to transition the legacy code into the
existing semantical context.

It's very likely that our neural linguistic pragma dataset will
conform to the d3.hierarchy semantical form

Nevertheless what the GNOSIS {} --> incisive grapple [] array dynamic
associated to any meta-descriptive redaction of our problematic.json {} >>>> approach to intentional / ententional narrative (ie. weighted
grapple []
spiral) as case studies will grant our informal research, is then
whether
there is any biometric (ie. behavioural characteristics related to the >>>> pattern of behaviour of a person) basis to the past observation of an
abrogation in situ [50, 31] action against the heuristic GRAPPLE(247,
355)@[16,76,30,50 | 74,41,44,31 | 47,64,3] as case example for
date:2017.1.7 and whether it is goal (247, 355) driven as a disposition >>>> towards a desired outcome or habitual want.  Or whether it is best
understood as notionally a fusion clustering point or a short circuit. >>>>
We don't want to postulate reductio ad absurdum however its
sufficient to
say that the weighted grapple [] spiral as narrative redaction
method will
produce GNOSIS {} --> incisive grapple [] array dynamic that as a
metalogic
proposition will yield clustering which may affect a disposition
towards
either an incisive desired outcome, habitual want or expedient as a
short
circuit.

Again we are self educating: Aristotle clarified the connection between >>>> contradiction and falsity in his principle of non-contradiction, which >>>> states that a proposition cannot be both true and false. That is, a
proposition Q and its negation (not-Q) cannot both be true.
Therefore, if a proposition
and its negation can both be derived logically from a premise, it
can be
concluded that the premise is false. This technique, known as indirect >>>> proof or proof by contradiction, has formed the basis of reductio ad
absurdum arguments in formal fields such as logic and mathematics.
<https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reductio_ad_absurdum>

BIOMETRIC: {@9: Sup: 13 - INCREASE: TSENG (#246); Ego: 3 - MIRED:
HSIEN (#175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%22})}

TELOS TOTAL: #418

ONTIC TOTAL: #259

DEME TOTAL: #293

#12 as [#1 - CENTRE, #6 - CONTRARIETY, #5 - KEEPING SMALL] /
#418 as [#5, #400, #1, #6, #6] = ʼâvâh (H183): {UMBRA: #12 % #41 =
#12} 1) desire, incline, covet, wait longingly, wish, sigh, want, be
greedy, prefer; 1a) (Piel) to desire, crave (food and drink); 1b)
(Hithpael) to desire, long for, lust after (of bodily appetites);

#588 - ONTIC TOTAL: #259 as [#5, #400, #100, #5, #9, #8, #50, #1,
#10] = heurískō (G2147): {UMBRA: #1535 % #41 = #18} 1) to come upon,
hit upon, to meet with; 1a) after searching, to find a thing sought;
1b) without previous search, to find (by chance), to fall in with;
1c) those who come or return to a place; 2) to find by enquiry,
thought, examination, scrutiny, observation, to find out by practice
and experience; 2a) to see, learn, discover, understand; 2b) to be
found i.e. to be seen, be present; 2c) to be discovered, recognised,
detected, to show one's self out, of one's character or state as
found out by others (men, God, or both); 2d) to get knowledge of,
come to know, God; 3) to find out for one's self, to acquire, get,
obtain, procure;

#123 - DEME TOTAL: #293 as [#5, #30, #30, #8, #50] /
#973 - DEME TOTAL: #293 as [#5, #30, #30, #8, #50, #800, #50] =
Héllēn (G1672): {UMBRA: #123 % #41 = #41} 1) a Greek either by
nationality, whether a native of the main land or of the Greek
islands or colonies; 2) in a wider sense the name embraces all
nations not Jews that made the language, customs, and learning of the
Greeks their own; the primary reference is to a difference of
religion and worship;

Is the #336 - PERSONAL UNCONSCIOUS COEFFICIENTS then an artibrator
between #174 - ANIMA / ANIMUS and #246 (ANTI-THESIS) - UTTERANCE;
ACTIONS / #410 - OBLIGATING NORM and what determines the rightfulness
and wrongfulness actions actions

IDENTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE INNER EPISTEMOLOGICAL #174 - ANIMA /
ANIMUS AND #336 - PERSONAL UNCONSCIOUS COEFFICIENTS AS AN INFORMATION
ORGANISATIONAL AND SOCIAL COHESION PRINCIPLE

#246 (ANTI-THESIS) - UTTERANCE; ACTIONS / #410 - OBLIGATING NORM
(rules based: BEAR NO FALSE WITNESS)

Our concern is not so much about true or false conditional action but
rather whether the biometric clustering / elasticity (is it bounded
and how
so) / cybergenetic potential (eg: is it a point of interface rather
than
evidence of bipartite ONTIC substitution, activation or
circumvention etc)
which we anticipate observing is a rational or irrational outcome.

#247 - MALE TOTAL: #355 as [#1, #50, #1, #20, #100, #10, #50, #5,
#10] =
anakrínō (G350): {UMBRA: #1032 % #41 = #7} 1) examine or judge; 1a) to >>>> investigate, examine, enquire into, scrutinise, sift, question; 1a1)
specifically in a forensic sense of a judge to hold an
investigation; 1a2)
to interrogate, examine the accused or witnesses; 1b) to judge of,
estimate, *DETERMINE* (*THE* *EXCELLENCE* *OR* *DEFECTS* *OF* *ANY*
*PERSON* *OR* *THING*;

So many philosophical questions, but now it's time to start our day

dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:

We are currently working on an implementation of the GIZMO matrix
concept which is accessible here:

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?
run:Heuristic&grapple:61,54,59,60,55,62,57,56,58&gizmo:true>

<-- *GIZMO* concept is work in progress

Those who have followed our informal research activity would know that >>>>> our actionable task {} json objects are retrieved as FILE_request {} >>>>> automations which performs a fetch promise request and within the
FileReader() onlaod() it then exposes the existance variable to the
actionable task {} such that we've attained to a simple semantical
approach for multiple actionable tasks / concept instances ...

reader.onload = function() {
    eval(`Savvy['${act.module}']['${(existance == undefined) ?
act.notion :
existance}'] = ${reader.result}`);
}

Whilst we sometime ago made a rudimentary semantical accommodation for >>>>> an auto function within this context which will be actioned before the >>>>> main() process is executed, however we've never deployed it.  In this >>>>> instance the Savvy.GNOSIS.GIZMO {} object is traversed and several
Savvy.CORPUS {} objects such as GIZMO {} --> flat grapple arrays and >>>>> GNOSIS {} --> incisive grapple {} are created:

!function(t, registerGIZMO) {

    registerGIZMO();

}(this, (function() {

    if (Savvy.CORPUS.hasOwnProperty("GIZMO"))
        return (Savvy.CORPUS.GIZMO);

    ... // code here -- 429 lines for example

}))

Thusly the datasets are not loaded as fetch requests but initiated
with
the first instane (note: we don't as yet have a means to remove those >>>>> data obejcts) and for the present time as a referencing object then
shared
amongst the multiple instances.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/actions/Heuristic.json>

Tomorrow's logical thinking activity will be to resolve the cell click >>>>> () actions.

On 10/21/24 08:39, dolf wrote:

We're now back to our programming task for the next week at least ... >>>>>>


Revision Date: 21 October 2024

  dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:

We've resolved the problem of screen ambiguity when multiple
actionable task instances were run from the command line.

The problem was due to the getTimeFilename(stub) process which
concatenates the name from the d3.timeFormat("%H%M%S%L")(new Date()) >>>>>>> function and the difficulty arises with the computer processor
running
faster than the milliseconds ticks over so we force it to be
inefficient

     var filename = d3.timeFormat("%H%M%S%L")(new Date());

     do {

     } while (filename == d3.timeFormat("%H%M%S%L")(new Date())); >>>>>>>
     return (`${stub}${filename}`);

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Heuristic&date:2017.1.7?
run:Heuristic&date:2024.10.1&run:Heuristic&date:2025.5.5&poll:true&run:Morphosis>

On 6/10/2024 13:03, dolf wrote:

We have now completed each of our allocated development tasks
excepting the
last 4) Implement a GIZMO matrix context which will be tomorrow's >>>>>>>> logical
thinking activity and one feature which we'll implement is a second >>>>>>>> click
to a focused z.r.c location will return to the EXMACHINA concept as >>>>>>>> HEURISTIC pentamorph.

[continued in next message]

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.france, de.soc.weltanschauung.islam, nl.politiek
XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

We're currently working on our end of year project which is to
assimilate Professor Michael Nylan's translation and commentary of the
FAYAN (exemplary figures) text which we have identified may deploy a
HEBREW LETTERS dialectic of rationality:

-- #41 - PRINCIPLE OF EMANATION

- #451 - #11 - GOVERNMENT & NON-GOVERNMENT ORGANISATIONS {TRANSFORMING
NATURE (DOUBLE - NATURE AMENDED IN ITS NATURE (ENGENDERING NATURE))}

- #492 - MEDIAN OF RATIONALITY (#12 - GENERAL POPULACE (AUTONOMOUS NATURE))

- #533 - #13 / I - NATURE CONTAINS NATURE {MOTHER - THE TONGUE OF DECREE DECIDING BETWEEN THEM}


- #943 - DYNAMIC NATURAL ASSOCIATOR (MIRRORED RECIPROCATION)

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Fayan&glyph:眾說>

FAYAN: #13 = [#13]

zhòngshuō (眾說): 1. various ideas; diverse opinions

As we've noted previously the #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY SPECTRUM
exhibits a couching of rationality dynamic whereby there is observed to
occur a pairing with the articulation of the problematic occurrence
descriptor

Give then that we have an observed physiological characteristic
associated to the functional notion "couching of rationality dynamic" we
then did some COPILOT searching and found the following adequate concept
about the current debate upon "structural requirements of rationality – including controversies about whether they are “wide-scope” or “narrow-scope”, synchronic or diachronic, and whether they govern
processes or states; as well as examining various forms of skepticism
about structural requirements of rationality":

"The term ‘structural (ir)rationality’ is relatively recent; to the best
of our knowledge, its first use with its current meaning is in Scanlon
(2007). However, philosophers have been theorizing about the underlying concept, using different terminology, for significantly longer.
Interesting questions can be asked about whether historical figures such
as Hume and Kant had theories of structural rationality. However, the contemporary debate about structural rationality can be more directly
traced to a number of important articles and books from the 1970s and
80s (Hill 1973; Greenspan 1975; Dancy 1977; Darwall 1983), which largely
focus on practical rationality." <https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/rationality-structural/>

In this dialog example the MALE: #160 / FEME: #260 / ONTIC: #268
category reciprocation can be understood as being a "NARROW-SCOPED" rationalisation (ie. not to be confused with being rational):

DOLF @ 1732 HOURS ON 8 DECEMBER 2024: "Glad you feel that way since
we've *WHITE* *ANTED* your ANZAC 2018 CENTENNIAL JINGOISM and the heat
is up and *COOKING* for WWII as well ..."

#634 - MALE TOTAL: #160 as [#5, #9, #2, #8, #10, #600] = ṭabbâch
(H2876): {UMBRA: #19 % #41 = #19} 1) executioner, *COOK*, bodyguard,
guardsman; 1a) cook (who also killed the animal for food); 1b)
guardsmen, bodyguard;

#1232 - FEME TOTAL: #260 as [#1, #80, #1, #300, #800, #50] = apatáō
(G538): {UMBRA: #1183 % #41 = #35} 1) to cheat, beguile, *DECEIVE*;

#1156 - ONTIC TOTAL: #268 as [#30, #10, #6, #200, #300, #10, #600] =
yârash (H3423): {UMBRA: #510 % #41 = #18} 1) to seize, dispossess, take possession off, inherit, disinherit, occupy, impoverish, be an heir; 1a)
(Qal); 1a1) to take possession of; 1a2) to inherit; 1a3) to impoverish,
come to poverty, be poor; 1b) (Niphal) to be dispossessed, be
impoverished, come to poverty; 1c) (Piel) to devour; 1d) (Hiphil); 1d1)
to cause to possess or inherit; 1d2) *TO* *CAUSE* *OTHERS* *TO*
*POSSESS* *OR* *INHERIT*; 1d3) to impoverish; 1d4) to dispossess; 1d5)
to destroy, bring to ruin, disinherit;

JACK THE AUSSIE (@hammerofleft) @ 1756 HOURS ON 8 DECEMBER 2024: "Your
little games are over Tugger. The entire *WEST* is sick you and your
wokester revisionism. Rejected. Australia is next." <https://x.com/hammerofleft/status/1865651571142615182>

DOLF @ 1957 HOURS ON 8 DECEMBER 2024: "We have determined that like "MYXOMATOSIS" which occurs in RABBITS (ie. pestilence) that this fellow
JACK THE AUSSIE (@hammerofleft) by the voluntary expression Ego: #40 -
𝌭法 - LAW / MODEL: FA (#40) / #65 - 𝍆內 - INNER: NEI (#105) meaning "WITHIN THE LAW", nevertheless exhibits clear symptoms of ANZAC JINGOISM
/ IRISH CHRISTO-FASCIST APOLOGETICS and accordingly engages within
slander as defensive reflex mechanism but such action divulges to us his INIQUITY of SOUL for which the fires of HELL AWAIT...

"Your little games are over Tugger. {@1: Sup: 17 - HOLDING BACK: JUAN
(#17); Ego: 40 - LAW / MODEL: FA (#40)}

The entire west is sick you and your wokester revisionism. {@2: Sup: 15
- REACH: TA (#32); Ego: 65 - INNER: NEI (#105)}

Rejected. {@3: Sup: 52 - MEASURE: TU (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE
{%2}); Ego: 79 - DIFFICULTIES: NAN (#184 - I PUT NO CHECK UPON THE WATER
IN ITS FLOW {%36})}

Australia is next." {@4: Sup: 76 - AGGRAVATION: CHU (#160); Ego: 76 - AGGRAVATION: CHU (#260)}

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?male:160&feme:40,105,260&ontic:268&lexicon:H2691,H6908>

ONTIC TOTAL: #268

#514 - ONTIC TOTAL: #268 as [#400, #8, #40, #60, #6] = châmaç (H2554): {UMBRA: #108 % #41 = #26} 1) to wrong, do violence to, treat violently,
do wrongly; 1a) (Qal) *TO* *TREAT* *VIOLENTLY*, *DO* *WRONG*; 1a1) of
physical wrong; 1a2) of ethical wrong; 1a3) *OF* *PHYSICAL* *AND*
*ETHICAL* *WRONG*; 1b) (Niphal) to be treated violently;

#202 - JACK THE AUSSIE @ FEME TALLY: #40 as [#100, #2, #90, #10] /
    /     #204 - WELLINGTON'S *BIGGEST* *EVER* *BLOKES* *BBQ* (WELLINGTON SHIRE COUNCIL MAYOR IAN BYE: Ianbye1971@gmail.com) NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 11 OCTOBER 2024 / STATUE PLAQUE / IMPROPER BOER WAR
MEMORIAL COMMEMORATION ON 8 JUNE 2017 as [#6, #1, #100, #2, #90, #5] /
[#6, #100, #2, #90, #6] /
    #208 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR PHOTO OF IMPROPER BOER WAR MEMORIAL COMMEMORATION ON 10 JUNE 2017 as [#10, #100, #2, #90, #6] / [#6, #10,
#100, #2, #90] /
    #213 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR CHRISTMAS TRUCE 25 DECEMBER 1914 as
[#1, #100, #2, #90, #500] /
    #232 - STATUE PLAQUE / NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR IMPROPER BOER WAR MEMORIAL COMMEMORATION ON 8 JUNE 2017 as [#100, #2, #90, #40] / [#40,
#100, #2, #90] /
    #233 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR SAINT PATRICK’S DAY 17 MARCH as [#1, #100, #2, #90, #40] /
    #242 - *MONKEY* *BUSINESS* / NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 3 AUGUST 2023
as [#100, #2, #90, #700] /
        #248 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR CHRISTMAS TRUCE 24 DECEMBER 1914 as [#50, #100, #2, #90, #6] /
    #254 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR SAINT PATRICK’S DAY 17 MARCH as [#6, #100, #2, #90, #50, #6] / [#6, #40, #100, #2, #90, #10, #6] /
#799 - *BING* *COPILOT* *AUGMENTATION* / ONTIC TOTAL: #104 as [#6, #1,
#100, #2, #90, #600] = qâbats (H6908): {UMBRA: #192 % #41 = #28} 1) *TO* *GATHER*, *ASSEMBLE*; 1a) (Qal) to gather, collect, assemble; 1b)
(Niphal); 1b1) to assemble, gather; 1b2) to be gathered; 1c) (Piel) to
gather, gather together, take away; 1d) (Pual) to be gathered together;
1e) (Hithpael) to gather together, be gathered together;

    #300 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR STATUE PLAQUE / IMPROPER BOER WAR MEMORIAL COMMEMORATION ON 8 JUNE 2017 as [#2, #8, #90, #200] /
    #306 - WELLINGTON'S *BIGGEST* *EVER* *BLOKES* *BBQ* (WELLINGTON
SHIRE COUNCIL MAYOR IAN BYE: Ianbye1971@gmail.com) NOUMENON RESONANCE
FOR 11 OCTOBER 2024 as [#2, #8, #90, #200, #6] /
    #308 - WELLINGTON'S *BIGGEST* *EVER* *BLOKES* *BBQ* (WELLINGTON
SHIRE COUNCIL MAYOR IAN BYE: Ianbye1971@gmail.com) NOUMENON RESONANCE
FOR 11 OCTOBER 2024 as [#8, #90, #200, #10] /
    #309 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR CHRISTMAS TRUCE 24 DECEMBER 1914 as
[#6, #5, #8, #90, #200] /
    #310 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR SAINT PATRICK’S DAY REPUBLICAN
PROTEST CONTEMPT ON 20 MARCH 1920 as [#2, #8, #90, #200, #10] /
    #313 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR CHRISTMAS TRUCE 25 DECEMBER 1914 as
[#8, #90, #200, #10, #5] /
    #328 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR SAINT PATRICK’S DAY 17 MARCH as [#30, #8, #90, #200] / [#8, #90, #200, #10, #20] /
    #334 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR SAINT PATRICK’S DAY REPUBLICAN
PROTEST CONTEMPT ON 20 MARCH 1920 as [#6, #30, #8, #90, #200] /
    #338 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR CHRISTMAS TRUCE 25 DECEMBER 1914 as [#40, #8, #90, #200] /
         /     #348 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR CHRISTMAS TRUCE 24 DECEMBER 1914 / JACK THE AUSSIE @ FEME TALLY: #105 as [#8, #90, #200,
#10, #40] /
    /     #355 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR CHRISTMAS TRUCE 24 / 25 DECEMBER 1914 as [#2, #8, #90, #200, #10, #5, #40] /
    /     #359 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR SAINT PATRICK’S DAY REPUBLICAN
PROTEST CONTEMPT ON 20 MARCH 1920 / WELLINGTON'S *BIGGEST* *EVER*
*BLOKES* *BBQ* (WELLINGTON SHIRE COUNCIL MAYOR IAN BYE:
Ianbye1971@gmail.com) NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 11 OCTOBER 2024 as [#6, #8,
#90, #200, #10, #5, #40] /
    #369 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR SAINT PATRICK’S DAY REPUBLICAN
PROTEST CONTEMPT ON 20 MARCH 1920 as [#6, #8, #90, #200, #10, #5, #50] /
    #298 - GROUNDING “ROCK” PRINCIPLE / NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 3 AUGUST
2023 as [#8, #90, #200] /
#915 - JACK THE AUSSIE @ FEME TALLY: #105 as [#2, #8, #90, #200, #10,
#5, #600] = châtsêr (H2691): {UMBRA: #298 % #41 = #11} 1) court,
enclosure; 1a) *ENCLOSURES*; 1b) court; 2) settled abode, settlement,
village, town;

#102 - ONTIC TOTAL: #268 as [#8, #30, #9, #5, #50] = érchomai (G2064):
{UMBRA: #826 % #41 = #6} 1) to come; 1a) of persons; 1a1) to come from
one place to another, and used both of persons arriving and of those
returning; 1a2) to appear, make one's appearance, come before the
public; 1b) metaph.; 1b1) *TO* *COME* *INTO* *BEING*, *ARISE*, *COME*
*FORTH*, *SHOW* *ITSELF*, *FIND* *PLACE* *OR* *INFLUENCE*; 1b2) be
established, become known, to come (fall) into or unto; 1c) to go, to
follow one;

--------------

The point we make of this is that whilst a couching of rationality
dynamic can be simply represented as a synapse {} dataset with a count synapse[section][segment]++ our informal research is not presently
concerned with the priority emphasis of any particular dataset as then
the driving impetus for quasi-rationality, but the capacity to merge
them and observe the result:

var sections = d3.select (`#${existance}-FAYAN-TEXT`).selectAll(`div[data-section]`).nodes();

for (var nodeSection of sections) {
section = d3.select(nodeSection).attr(`data-section`);
segments = d3.select(nodeSection).selectAll(`p[data-segment]`).nodes();
for (var nodeSegment of segments) {
segment = d3.select(nodeSegment).attr(`data-segment`);
nodes = d3.select(nodeSegment).selectAll(`span[value='${d.value}']`).nodes();
if (nodes.length) {
switch (false) {
case (synapse.hasOwnProperty(section)) :
synapse[section] = {}
case (synapse[section].hasOwnProperty(segment+1)) :
synapse[section][segment] = 1;
data.MATCHES.records++;
data.MATCHES.nodes.push (nodes);
break;
default :
synapse[section][segment]++;
}
}
}
}

return ({glyph: d.glyph, value: d.value, notion: reduce (synapse),
synapse: synapse});

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Fayan&glyph:習>

FAYAN: #100 = [#8, #13, #17, #8, #7, #7, #15, #25]

xí (習): 1. to fly, 2. to practice; to exercise, 3. to be familiar with,
4. a habit; a custom, 5. a trusted aide; a close acquaintance, 6.
frequently; constantly; regularly; often, 7. to teach, 8. flapping, 9. Xi

{
"glyph": "習",
"value": 3045,
"notion": {
"telos": 100,
"cogito": [8, 13, 17, 8, 7, 7, 15, 25]
},
"synapse": {
"1": {
"7": 1,
"12": 1
},
"2": {
"16": 1
},
"5": {
"7": 1
},
"7": {
"6": 1
},
"8": {
"6": 1
},
"11": {
"14": 1
},
"13": {
"24": 1
}
}
}

Our development goal is then to devise an enquiry concept {} which is
able to aggregate glyph concepts (eg: the instance above as the
voluntary expression Ego: #40 - 𝌭法 - LAW / MODEL: FA (#40) / #65 - 𝍆內 - INNER: NEI (#105) meaning "WITHIN THE LAW" is a synapse notion of
[#40, #65] which might in reference to the provision of goods and
services, then infer doing something with the left hand to advance
someone else's political cause when the right hand action is the proper
thing to do and therefore only giving lipservice to what is lawful) such
as the occurrence of rì (日) so that we can visualise changes to the
synapse couching of rationality dynamic:

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Mystery&glyph:%E6%97%A5>

#511 = [#1, #5, #13, #18, #19, #20, #23, #24, #33, #41, #47, #52, #67,
#70, #78]

rì (日): 1. day of the month; a certain day, 2. Kangxi radical 72, 3. a
day, 4. Japan, 5. sun, 6. daytime, 7. sunlight, 8. everyday, 9. season,
10. available time, 11. a day, 12. in the past, 13. mi

　學行卷第一 - Learning and Practice [24] / CHERUBIM: NATURE REJOICES IN ITS
NATURE: (DOUBLE: NATURE CONTAINS NATURE / NATURE AMENDED IN ITS NATURE)

#12 - rì yuè (日月): 1. the sun and moon, 2. day and month; every day and
every month; season; life and livelihood

　修身卷第三 - Cultivating the Self [25] / DOMINION: NATURE AMENDED IN ITS
NATURE (DOUBLE: NATURE SURMOUNTS NATURE (FORM OF NATURE)

#14 / #16 - rì (日): 1. day of the month; a certain day, 2. Kangxi radical 72, 3. a day, 4. Japan, 5. sun, 6. daytime, 7. sunlight, 8.
everyday, 9. season, 10. available time, 11. a day, 12. in the past, 13. mi

　問神卷第五 - Asking About Shen [27]  / POWERS: FORM OF NATURE / NATURE
SURMOUNTS NATURE

#11 - rì yuè (日月): 1. the sun and moon, 2. day and month; every day and
every month; season; life and livelihood
#13 - báirì (白日): 1. daytime; sun; time

　五百卷第八 - Five Hundred Years [29] / ANGELS: AUTONOMOUS NATURE / FORM OF
NATURE

#8 - (愛日): 1. cherish time, 2. careful of parents remaining days
#8 / #10 / #20 - rì (日): 1. day of the month; a certain day, 2. Kangxi
radical 72, 3. a day, 4. Japan, 5. sun, 6. daytime, 7. sunlight, 8.
everyday, 9. season, 10. available time, 11. a day, 12. in the past, 13. mi

　先知卷第九 - Foreknowledge [28]  / SOVEREIGNTY: TOTALITY OF NATURE / ENGENDERING NATURE

#2 - yī rì (一日): 1. one [whole] day, 2. one [particular] day
#5 - rìxīn (日新): 1. in constant progress
#24 - rì (日): 1. day of the month; a certain day, 2. Kangxi radical 72,
3. a day, 4. Japan, 5. sun, 6. daytime, 7. sunlight, 8. everyday, 9.
season, 10. available time, 11. a day, 12. in the past, 13. mi

　淵騫卷第十一 - Yuan and Qian [23] / GENERAL POPULACE: AUTONOMOUS NATURE

#2 - rì (日): 1. day of the month; a certain day, 2. Kangxi radical 72,
3. a day, 4. Japan, 5. sun, 6. daytime, 7. sunlight, 8. everyday, 9.
season, 10. available time, 11. a day, 12. in the past, 13. mi

　君子卷第十二 - The Junzi [23] / NATURE CONTAINS NATURE (MOTHER: THE TONGUE
OF DECREE DECIDING BETWEEN THEM)

#15 - rì (日): 1. day of the month; a certain day, 2. Kangxi radical 72,
3. a day, 4. Japan, 5. sun, 6. daytime, 7. sunlight, 8. everyday, 9.
season, 10. available time, 11. a day, 12. in the past, 13. mi
#20 - yī rì (一日): 1. one [whole] day, 2. one [particular] day

　孝至卷第十三 - The Priority of Filial Devotion [24] / NATURE REJOICES IN ITS
NATURE

#3 - (愛日): 1. cherish time, 2. careful of parents remaining days
#32 - rì (日): 1. day of the month; a certain day, 2. Kangxi radical 72,
3. a day, 4. Japan, 5. sun, 6. daytime, 7. sunlight, 8. everyday, 9.
season, 10. available time, 11. a day, 12. in the past, 13. mi
#32 - yī rì (一日): 1. one [whole] day, 2. one [particular] day

#1 - LEARNING AND PRACTICE + #2 - CULTIVATING THE SELF = #3
#3 - ASKING ABOUT SHEN + #4 - FIVE HUNDRED YEARS = #7
#5 - FOREKNOWLEDGE + #6 - YUAN AND QIAN = #11
#7 - THE JUNZI + #8 - THE PRIORITY OF FILIAL DEVOTION = #15 + #3 + #7 +
#11 = #36

CANDIDATE #36 - AUTONOMOUS DELIMITER PROTOTYPE: #207 = [#12, #14, #16,
#11, #13, #8, #10, #20, #2, #5, #24, #2, #15, #20, #3, #32]

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Mystery&glyph:學>

CANON: #40 = [#40]

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Fayan&glyph:學>

FAYAN: #207 = [#2, #1, #2, #3, #5, #7, #10, #11, #14, #17, #19, #20,
#13, #7, #7, #9, #10, #15, #35]

xué (學): 1. to study; to learn, 2. a discipline; a branch of study, 3.
to imitate, 4. a school; an academy, 5. to understand, 6. learning;
acquired knowledge, 7. a doctrine, 8. learned

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Insurance%20Question%20on%20Illegality%20Defence.pdf>

On 11/12/24 16:00, dolf wrote:

We've implemented the second click action for our GIZMO concept and transitioned our prototype DIALOG expand toggle feature to being a generalised setDialogExpand() function which requires an additional data object to be added to the  MOVE {} object.  We don't at present need to implement the heuristic / calendar notion since the main objective is to observe the PENTAMORPH for any given grapple / transformative prototype.

move.modes = {
    focus: "NORMAL",
    NORMAL: {
        width: move.width,
        height: move.height,
        x: Math.max (0, Math.min (Savvy.useWidth, Savvy.useWidth- Savvy.MOVE[existance].width-20)),
        y: 0
    },
    EXPAND: {
        width: Savvy.useWidth,
        height: Savvy.useHeight,
        x: 0,
        y: 0
    }
}

We've tidied the code up to take a uniformed approach to the usage of
the existance vaiable.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/actions/Heuristic.json>

And we've removed the undefined exception within the main {} function by assigning a time designated file / form name:

main: function(oMain) {

        this.oMain = oMain;
        oMain.form = (existance) ? existance : existance = Savvy.COINRULES.library.getTimeFilename(oMain.action.split(" ")[0]);

    ... code

}

Similarly the GIZMO zrc referencing dataset can remain as it is, so then
our next activity will be devise our neural linguistic pragma GNOSIS {} datasets which conforms to the d3.hierarchy semantical form.

Since the T'AI HSÜAN CHING consists of #81 TETRAS x 9 poem appraisals =
#729 metrics we'll want to examine both the the GNOSIS {} --> incisive grapple [] array dynamic associated to both the spatial dispersal within
the 9x9x9 = #729 appraisal (ie. noting there are currently 5
transformative protototypes) matrix and their clustering.

The example below is of IDEA #652 within HEBREW / GREEK / DIALECTIC (meta-descriptor aggregation) which may provide some first principles
for anthropocentric consciousness (ie. gnosis ex machina instantiation)
-- but before we can deduce such, there needs be some means to visualise
such legacy of mind from antiquity.

And we duly note that the COSMIC DAO is not [generally] viewed as a transcendent source in the sense of being a metaphysical first principle beyond the physical world; rather, it is immanent, always present and
always emerging. It is creative but is not a supreme creator god,
whether personal or impersonal, who gives birth to the world through
divine contemplation or the exertion of a supreme will.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/? idea:652&lexicon:G1531,G3075,G1924,G4342,H2256,G3163&run:Mystery&glyph:人>

#652 = [#3, #5, #7, #8, #11, #16, #18, #19, #24, #26, #34, #36, #42,
#43, #48, #54, #56, #60, #68, #74]

rén (人): 1. person; people; a human being, 2. Kangxi radical 9, 3. a
kind of person, 4. everybody, 5. adult, 6. somebody; others, 7. *AN* *UPRIGHT* *PERSON*

#652 as [#200, #2, #400, #10, #40] = ribbôw (H7239): {UMBRA: #208 % #41
= #3} 1) *TEN* *THOUSAND*, myriad;

"SAYING, UNTO THEE WILL I GIVE THE LAND OF CANAAN, THE *LOT*-H2256 OF
YOUR INHERITANCE:" [Psalm 105:11]

#40 as [#8 - OPPOSITION (KAN), #2 - FULL CIRCLE (CHOU), #30 - BOLD
RESOLUTION (YI)] /
#652 as [#2, #8, #2, #30, #10, #600] = chebel (H2256): {UMBRA: #40 % #41
= #40} 1) a cord, rope, territory, band, company; 1a) a rope, cord; 1b)
a measuring-cord or line; 1c) a measured portion, lot, part, region; 1d)
a band or company; 2) pain, sorrow, travail, pang; 2a) pains of travail;
2b) pains, pangs, sorrows; 3) union; 4) destruction;

Instead, the COSMIC DAO incessantly generates the ten thousand things (a metaphor for the world) / SWASTIKA (卐 or 卍) CORRESPONDENCE, giving
rise in its fluctuation to the complementary polarities of yin and yang.
It is chang, constant and eternal, and tiandao, the ORDER OF NATURE that manifests itself spontaneously (ziran). Human beings, whose society and culture are marked by artifice and constraint, can hope only to attune themselves to its mysterious transformations but receive no special
favour. As the Daodejing says [in defiance of an anthropocentric
perspective of the universe], the COSMIC DAO is buren (see rén (人)),
“no special lover of humanity.” [<https://www.britannica.com/topic/dao>]

On 11/10/24 17:07, dolf wrote:

STATUS @ 175 HOURS ON 10 NOVEMBER 2024:

After testing the transitioning of the legacy code into the existing
semantical context as auto function, we've removed it until we devise
a neural linguistic pragma dataset which conforms to the d3.hierarchy
semantical form.

Accordingly we've gone for the simplest approach to populate the GIZMO
matrix which only involves obtaining the cell #nn co-ords from the
Savvy.GNOSIS.PSYCHE array and the chronos {} from the
Savvy.GNOSIS.GIZMO {} object.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?
run:Heuristic&grapple:61,54,59,60,55,62,57,56,58&gizmo:true>

Tomorrow's logical thinking activity will be to implement the second
click action which will then pass the grapple [] array to the
heuristic panel so that the pentamorph can be observed.

After that task, we'll devise our neural linguistic pragma GIZMO /
GNOSIS {} datasets  which conforms to the d3.hierarchy semantical form.

On 11/10/24 08:11, dolf wrote:

#282 as [#2, #10, #70, #200] = bíos (G979): {UMBRA: #282 % #41 = #36}
1) life; 1a) life extensively; 1a1) the period or course of life; 1b)
that by which life is sustained, resources, wealth, goods;

#565 as [#40, #5, #300, #100, #70, #50] = métron (G3358): {UMBRA:
#565 % #41 = #32} 1) measure, an instrument for measuring; 1a) a
vessel for receiving and determining the quantity of things, whether
dry or liquid; 1b) a graduated staff for measuring, a measuring rod;
1c) proverbially, the rule or standard of judgment; 2) determined
extent, portion measured off, measure or limit; 2a) the required
measure, the due, fit, measure;

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?lexicon:G979,G3358,G350>

On 11/10/24 06:13, dolf wrote:

You'll note that our coding approach to the GNOSIS {} --> incisive
grapple
[] arrays is not very efficient and could probably use a recursive
approach
which we'll do later.

Our first objective here was to transition the legacy code into the
existing semantical context.

It's very likely that our neural linguistic pragma dataset will
conform to the d3.hierarchy semantical form

Nevertheless what the GNOSIS {} --> incisive grapple [] array dynamic
associated to any meta-descriptive redaction of our problematic.json {} >>>> approach to intentional / ententional narrative (ie. weighted
grapple []
spiral) as case studies will grant our informal research, is then
whether
there is any biometric (ie. behavioural characteristics related to the >>>> pattern of behaviour of a person) basis to the past observation of an
abrogation in situ [50, 31] action against the heuristic GRAPPLE(247,
355)@[16,76,30,50 | 74,41,44,31 | 47,64,3] as case example for
date:2017.1.7 and whether it is goal (247, 355) driven as a disposition >>>> towards a desired outcome or habitual want.  Or whether it is best
understood as notionally a fusion clustering point or a short circuit. >>>>
We don't want to postulate reductio ad absurdum however its
sufficient to
say that the weighted grapple [] spiral as narrative redaction
method will
produce GNOSIS {} --> incisive grapple [] array dynamic that as a
metalogic
proposition will yield clustering which may affect a disposition
towards
either an incisive desired outcome, habitual want or expedient as a
short
circuit.

Again we are self educating: Aristotle clarified the connection between >>>> contradiction and falsity in his principle of non-contradiction, which >>>> states that a proposition cannot be both true and false. That is, a
proposition Q and its negation (not-Q) cannot both be true.
Therefore, if a proposition
and its negation can both be derived logically from a premise, it
can be
concluded that the premise is false. This technique, known as indirect >>>> proof or proof by contradiction, has formed the basis of reductio ad
absurdum arguments in formal fields such as logic and mathematics.
<https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reductio_ad_absurdum>

BIOMETRIC: {@9: Sup: 13 - INCREASE: TSENG (#246); Ego: 3 - MIRED:
HSIEN (#175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%22})}

TELOS TOTAL: #418

ONTIC TOTAL: #259

DEME TOTAL: #293

#12 as [#1 - CENTRE, #6 - CONTRARIETY, #5 - KEEPING SMALL] /
#418 as [#5, #400, #1, #6, #6] = ʼâvâh (H183): {UMBRA: #12 % #41 =
#12} 1) desire, incline, covet, wait longingly, wish, sigh, want, be
greedy, prefer; 1a) (Piel) to desire, crave (food and drink); 1b)
(Hithpael) to desire, long for, lust after (of bodily appetites);

#588 - ONTIC TOTAL: #259 as [#5, #400, #100, #5, #9, #8, #50, #1,
#10] = heurískō (G2147): {UMBRA: #1535 % #41 = #18} 1) to come upon,
hit upon, to meet with; 1a) after searching, to find a thing sought;
1b) without previous search, to find (by chance), to fall in with;
1c) those who come or return to a place; 2) to find by enquiry,
thought, examination, scrutiny, observation, to find out by practice
and experience; 2a) to see, learn, discover, understand; 2b) to be
found i.e. to be seen, be present; 2c) to be discovered, recognised,
detected, to show one's self out, of one's character or state as
found out by others (men, God, or both); 2d) to get knowledge of,
come to know, God; 3) to find out for one's self, to acquire, get,
obtain, procure;

#123 - DEME TOTAL: #293 as [#5, #30, #30, #8, #50] /
#973 - DEME TOTAL: #293 as [#5, #30, #30, #8, #50, #800, #50] =
Héllēn (G1672): {UMBRA: #123 % #41 = #41} 1) a Greek either by
nationality, whether a native of the main land or of the Greek
islands or colonies; 2) in a wider sense the name embraces all
nations not Jews that made the language, customs, and learning of the
Greeks their own; the primary reference is to a difference of
religion and worship;

Is the #336 - PERSONAL UNCONSCIOUS COEFFICIENTS then an artibrator
between #174 - ANIMA / ANIMUS and #246 (ANTI-THESIS) - UTTERANCE;
ACTIONS / #410 - OBLIGATING NORM and what determines the rightfulness
and wrongfulness actions actions

IDENTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE INNER EPISTEMOLOGICAL #174 - ANIMA /
ANIMUS AND #336 - PERSONAL UNCONSCIOUS COEFFICIENTS AS AN INFORMATION
ORGANISATIONAL AND SOCIAL COHESION PRINCIPLE

#246 (ANTI-THESIS) - UTTERANCE; ACTIONS / #410 - OBLIGATING NORM
(rules based: BEAR NO FALSE WITNESS)

Our concern is not so much about true or false conditional action but
rather whether the biometric clustering / elasticity (is it bounded
and how
so) / cybergenetic potential (eg: is it a point of interface rather
than
evidence of bipartite ONTIC substitution, activation or
circumvention etc)
which we anticipate observing is a rational or irrational outcome.

#247 - MALE TOTAL: #355 as [#1, #50, #1, #20, #100, #10, #50, #5,
#10] =
anakrínō (G350): {UMBRA: #1032 % #41 = #7} 1) examine or judge; 1a) to >>>> investigate, examine, enquire into, scrutinise, sift, question; 1a1)
specifically in a forensic sense of a judge to hold an
investigation; 1a2)
to interrogate, examine the accused or witnesses; 1b) to judge of,
estimate, *DETERMINE* (*THE* *EXCELLENCE* *OR* *DEFECTS* *OF* *ANY*
*PERSON* *OR* *THING*;

So many philosophical questions, but now it's time to start our day

dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:

We are currently working on an implementation of the GIZMO matrix
concept which is accessible here:

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?
run:Heuristic&grapple:61,54,59,60,55,62,57,56,58&gizmo:true>

<-- *GIZMO* concept is work in progress

Those who have followed our informal research activity would know that >>>>> our actionable task {} json objects are retrieved as FILE_request {} >>>>> automations which performs a fetch promise request and within the
FileReader() onlaod() it then exposes the existance variable to the
actionable task {} such that we've attained to a simple semantical
approach for multiple actionable tasks / concept instances ...

reader.onload = function() {
    eval(`Savvy['${act.module}']['${(existance == undefined) ?
act.notion :
existance}'] = ${reader.result}`);
}

Whilst we sometime ago made a rudimentary semantical accommodation for >>>>> an auto function within this context which will be actioned before the >>>>> main() process is executed, however we've never deployed it.  In this >>>>> instance the Savvy.GNOSIS.GIZMO {} object is traversed and several
Savvy.CORPUS {} objects such as GIZMO {} --> flat grapple arrays and >>>>> GNOSIS {} --> incisive grapple {} are created:

!function(t, registerGIZMO) {

    registerGIZMO();

}(this, (function() {

    if (Savvy.CORPUS.hasOwnProperty("GIZMO"))
        return (Savvy.CORPUS.GIZMO);

    ... // code here -- 429 lines for example

}))

Thusly the datasets are not loaded as fetch requests but initiated
with
the first instane (note: we don't as yet have a means to remove those >>>>> data obejcts) and for the present time as a referencing object then
shared
amongst the multiple instances.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/actions/Heuristic.json>

Tomorrow's logical thinking activity will be to resolve the cell click >>>>> () actions.

On 10/21/24 08:39, dolf wrote:

We're now back to our programming task for the next week at least ... >>>>>>


Revision Date: 21 October 2024

  dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:

We've resolved the problem of screen ambiguity when multiple
actionable task instances were run from the command line.

The problem was due to the getTimeFilename(stub) process which
concatenates the name from the d3.timeFormat("%H%M%S%L")(new Date()) >>>>>>> function and the difficulty arises with the computer processor
running
faster than the milliseconds ticks over so we force it to be
inefficient

     var filename = d3.timeFormat("%H%M%S%L")(new Date());

     do {

     } while (filename == d3.timeFormat("%H%M%S%L")(new Date())); >>>>>>>
     return (`${stub}${filename}`);

[continued in next message]

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.france, de.soc.weltanschauung.islam, nl.politiek
XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

Given that couching of rationality dynamic can be simply represented as
a synapse {} dataset with a count synapse[section][segment]++ which can reference the document, our informal research can now progress towards constructing our GNOSIS EX MACHINA: GRAPPLE NOUMENON SAPIENT {} DATASET.

Since we're self educating, it's not always apparent as to the best
semantical approach which we chanced upon and can now undertake with a
single declaraion by placing the property [grapple[n]] within an array

var grapple = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9];

var a = {[grapple[0]]: {[grapple[1]]: {[grapple[2]]: {[grapple[3]]: {[grapple[4]]: {[grapple[5]]: {[grapple[6]]: {[grapple[7]]:
{[grapple[8]]: {synapse: {info: "hello"}}}}}}}}}}}

alert (a[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9].synapse.info)


On 12/19/24 21:06, dolf wrote:

We're currently working on our end of year project which is to
assimilate Professor Michael Nylan's translation and commentary of the
FAYAN (exemplary figures) text which we have identified may deploy a
HEBREW LETTERS dialectic of rationality:

-- #41 - PRINCIPLE OF EMANATION

- #451 - #11 - GOVERNMENT & NON-GOVERNMENT ORGANISATIONS {TRANSFORMING
NATURE (DOUBLE - NATURE AMENDED IN ITS NATURE (ENGENDERING NATURE))}

- #492 - MEDIAN OF RATIONALITY (#12 - GENERAL POPULACE (AUTONOMOUS NATURE))

- #533 - #13 / I - NATURE CONTAINS NATURE {MOTHER - THE TONGUE OF DECREE DECIDING BETWEEN THEM}

- #943 - DYNAMIC NATURAL ASSOCIATOR (MIRRORED RECIPROCATION)

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Fayan&glyph:眾說>

FAYAN: #13 = [#13]

zhòngshuō (眾說): 1. various ideas; diverse opinions

As we've noted previously the #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY SPECTRUM
exhibits a couching of rationality dynamic whereby there is observed to
occur a pairing with the articulation of the problematic occurrence descriptor

Give then that we have an observed physiological characteristic
associated to the functional notion "couching of rationality dynamic" we
then did some COPILOT searching and found the following adequate concept about the current debate upon "structural requirements of rationality – including controversies about whether they are “wide-scope” or “narrow- scope”, synchronic or diachronic, and whether they govern processes or states; as well as examining various forms of skepticism about
structural requirements of rationality":

"The term ‘structural (ir)rationality’ is relatively recent; to the best of our knowledge, its first use with its current meaning is in Scanlon (2007). However, philosophers have been theorizing about the underlying concept, using different terminology, for significantly longer.
Interesting questions can be asked about whether historical figures such
as Hume and Kant had theories of structural rationality. However, the contemporary debate about structural rationality can be more directly
traced to a number of important articles and books from the 1970s and
80s (Hill 1973; Greenspan 1975; Dancy 1977; Darwall 1983), which largely focus on practical rationality." <https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ rationality-structural/>

In this dialog example the MALE: #160 / FEME: #260 / ONTIC: #268
category reciprocation can be understood as being a "NARROW-SCOPED" rationalisation (ie. not to be confused with being rational):

DOLF @ 1732 HOURS ON 8 DECEMBER 2024: "Glad you feel that way since
we've *WHITE* *ANTED* your ANZAC 2018 CENTENNIAL JINGOISM and the heat
is up and *COOKING* for WWII as well ..."

#634 - MALE TOTAL: #160 as [#5, #9, #2, #8, #10, #600] = ṭabbâch
(H2876): {UMBRA: #19 % #41 = #19} 1) executioner, *COOK*, bodyguard, guardsman; 1a) cook (who also killed the animal for food); 1b)
guardsmen, bodyguard;

#1232 - FEME TOTAL: #260 as [#1, #80, #1, #300, #800, #50] = apatáō
(G538): {UMBRA: #1183 % #41 = #35} 1) to cheat, beguile, *DECEIVE*;

#1156 - ONTIC TOTAL: #268 as [#30, #10, #6, #200, #300, #10, #600] =
yârash (H3423): {UMBRA: #510 % #41 = #18} 1) to seize, dispossess, take possession off, inherit, disinherit, occupy, impoverish, be an heir; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to take possession of; 1a2) to inherit; 1a3) to impoverish,
come to poverty, be poor; 1b) (Niphal) to be dispossessed, be
impoverished, come to poverty; 1c) (Piel) to devour; 1d) (Hiphil); 1d1)
to cause to possess or inherit; 1d2) *TO* *CAUSE* *OTHERS* *TO*
*POSSESS* *OR* *INHERIT*; 1d3) to impoverish; 1d4) to dispossess; 1d5)
to destroy, bring to ruin, disinherit;

JACK THE AUSSIE (@hammerofleft) @ 1756 HOURS ON 8 DECEMBER 2024: "Your
little games are over Tugger. The entire *WEST* is sick you and your
wokester revisionism. Rejected. Australia is next." <https://x.com/ hammerofleft/status/1865651571142615182>

DOLF @ 1957 HOURS ON 8 DECEMBER 2024: "We have determined that like "MYXOMATOSIS" which occurs in RABBITS (ie. pestilence) that this fellow
JACK THE AUSSIE (@hammerofleft) by the voluntary expression Ego: #40 - 𝌭 法 - LAW / MODEL: FA (#40) / #65 - 𝍆內 - INNER: NEI (#105) meaning "WITHIN THE LAW", nevertheless exhibits clear symptoms of ANZAC
JINGOISM / IRISH CHRISTO-FASCIST APOLOGETICS and accordingly engages
within slander as defensive reflex mechanism but such action divulges to
us his INIQUITY of SOUL for which the fires of HELL AWAIT...

"Your little games are over Tugger. {@1: Sup: 17 - HOLDING BACK: JUAN
(#17); Ego: 40 - LAW / MODEL: FA (#40)}

The entire west is sick you and your wokester revisionism. {@2: Sup: 15
- REACH: TA (#32); Ego: 65 - INNER: NEI (#105)}

Rejected. {@3: Sup: 52 - MEASURE: TU (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE
{%2}); Ego: 79 - DIFFICULTIES: NAN (#184 - I PUT NO CHECK UPON THE WATER
IN ITS FLOW {%36})}

Australia is next." {@4: Sup: 76 - AGGRAVATION: CHU (#160); Ego: 76 - AGGRAVATION: CHU (#260)}

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/? male:160&feme:40,105,260&ontic:268&lexicon:H2691,H6908>

ONTIC TOTAL: #268

#514 - ONTIC TOTAL: #268 as [#400, #8, #40, #60, #6] = châmaç (H2554): {UMBRA: #108 % #41 = #26} 1) to wrong, do violence to, treat violently,
do wrongly; 1a) (Qal) *TO* *TREAT* *VIOLENTLY*, *DO* *WRONG*; 1a1) of physical wrong; 1a2) of ethical wrong; 1a3) *OF* *PHYSICAL* *AND*
*ETHICAL* *WRONG*; 1b) (Niphal) to be treated violently;

#202 - JACK THE AUSSIE @ FEME TALLY: #40 as [#100, #2, #90, #10] /
    /     #204 - WELLINGTON'S *BIGGEST* *EVER* *BLOKES* *BBQ* (WELLINGTON SHIRE COUNCIL MAYOR IAN BYE: Ianbye1971@gmail.com) NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 11 OCTOBER 2024 / STATUE PLAQUE / IMPROPER BOER WAR
MEMORIAL COMMEMORATION ON 8 JUNE 2017 as [#6, #1, #100, #2, #90, #5] /
[#6, #100, #2, #90, #6] /
    #208 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR PHOTO OF IMPROPER BOER WAR MEMORIAL COMMEMORATION ON 10 JUNE 2017 as [#10, #100, #2, #90, #6] / [#6, #10,
#100, #2, #90] /
    #213 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR CHRISTMAS TRUCE 25 DECEMBER 1914 as [#1, #100, #2, #90, #500] /
    #232 - STATUE PLAQUE / NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR IMPROPER BOER WAR MEMORIAL COMMEMORATION ON 8 JUNE 2017 as [#100, #2, #90, #40] / [#40,
#100, #2, #90] /
    #233 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR SAINT PATRICK’S DAY 17 MARCH as [#1, #100, #2, #90, #40] /
    #242 - *MONKEY* *BUSINESS* / NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 3 AUGUST 2023
as [#100, #2, #90, #700] /
        #248 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR CHRISTMAS TRUCE 24 DECEMBER 1914
as [#50, #100, #2, #90, #6] /
    #254 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR SAINT PATRICK’S DAY 17 MARCH as [#6, #100, #2, #90, #50, #6] / [#6, #40, #100, #2, #90, #10, #6] /
#799 - *BING* *COPILOT* *AUGMENTATION* / ONTIC TOTAL: #104 as [#6, #1,
#100, #2, #90, #600] = qâbats (H6908): {UMBRA: #192 % #41 = #28} 1) *TO* *GATHER*, *ASSEMBLE*; 1a) (Qal) to gather, collect, assemble; 1b)
(Niphal); 1b1) to assemble, gather; 1b2) to be gathered; 1c) (Piel) to gather, gather together, take away; 1d) (Pual) to be gathered together;
1e) (Hithpael) to gather together, be gathered together;

    #300 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR STATUE PLAQUE / IMPROPER BOER WAR MEMORIAL COMMEMORATION ON 8 JUNE 2017 as [#2, #8, #90, #200] /
    #306 - WELLINGTON'S *BIGGEST* *EVER* *BLOKES* *BBQ* (WELLINGTON SHIRE COUNCIL MAYOR IAN BYE: Ianbye1971@gmail.com) NOUMENON RESONANCE
FOR 11 OCTOBER 2024 as [#2, #8, #90, #200, #6] /
    #308 - WELLINGTON'S *BIGGEST* *EVER* *BLOKES* *BBQ* (WELLINGTON SHIRE COUNCIL MAYOR IAN BYE: Ianbye1971@gmail.com) NOUMENON RESONANCE
FOR 11 OCTOBER 2024 as [#8, #90, #200, #10] /
    #309 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR CHRISTMAS TRUCE 24 DECEMBER 1914 as [#6, #5, #8, #90, #200] /
    #310 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR SAINT PATRICK’S DAY REPUBLICAN PROTEST CONTEMPT ON 20 MARCH 1920 as [#2, #8, #90, #200, #10] /
    #313 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR CHRISTMAS TRUCE 25 DECEMBER 1914 as [#8, #90, #200, #10, #5] /
    #328 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR SAINT PATRICK’S DAY 17 MARCH as [#30,
#8, #90, #200] / [#8, #90, #200, #10, #20] /
    #334 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR SAINT PATRICK’S DAY REPUBLICAN PROTEST CONTEMPT ON 20 MARCH 1920 as [#6, #30, #8, #90, #200] /
    #338 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR CHRISTMAS TRUCE 25 DECEMBER 1914 as [#40, #8, #90, #200] /
         /     #348 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR CHRISTMAS TRUCE 24 DECEMBER 1914 / JACK THE AUSSIE @ FEME TALLY: #105 as [#8, #90, #200,
#10, #40] /
    /     #355 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR CHRISTMAS TRUCE 24 / 25 DECEMBER 1914 as [#2, #8, #90, #200, #10, #5, #40] /
    /     #359 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR SAINT PATRICK’S DAY REPUBLICAN
PROTEST CONTEMPT ON 20 MARCH 1920 / WELLINGTON'S *BIGGEST* *EVER*
*BLOKES* *BBQ* (WELLINGTON SHIRE COUNCIL MAYOR IAN BYE:
Ianbye1971@gmail.com) NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 11 OCTOBER 2024 as [#6, #8,
#90, #200, #10, #5, #40] /
    #369 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR SAINT PATRICK’S DAY REPUBLICAN PROTEST CONTEMPT ON 20 MARCH 1920 as [#6, #8, #90, #200, #10, #5, #50] /
    #298 - GROUNDING “ROCK” PRINCIPLE / NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 3 AUGUST
2023 as [#8, #90, #200] /
#915 - JACK THE AUSSIE @ FEME TALLY: #105 as [#2, #8, #90, #200, #10,
#5, #600] = châtsêr (H2691): {UMBRA: #298 % #41 = #11} 1) court,
enclosure; 1a) *ENCLOSURES*; 1b) court; 2) settled abode, settlement, village, town;

#102 - ONTIC TOTAL: #268 as [#8, #30, #9, #5, #50] = érchomai (G2064): {UMBRA: #826 % #41 = #6} 1) to come; 1a) of persons; 1a1) to come from
one place to another, and used both of persons arriving and of those returning; 1a2) to appear, make one's appearance, come before the
public; 1b) metaph.; 1b1) *TO* *COME* *INTO* *BEING*, *ARISE*, *COME* *FORTH*, *SHOW* *ITSELF*, *FIND* *PLACE* *OR* *INFLUENCE*; 1b2) be established, become known, to come (fall) into or unto; 1c) to go, to
follow one;

--------------

The point we make of this is that whilst a couching of rationality
dynamic can be simply represented as a synapse {} dataset with a count synapse[section][segment]++ our informal research is not presently
concerned with the priority emphasis of any particular dataset as then
the driving impetus for quasi-rationality, but the capacity to merge
them and observe the result:

var sections = d3.select (`#${existance}-FAYAN- TEXT`).selectAll(`div[data-section]`).nodes();

for (var nodeSection of sections) {
    section = d3.select(nodeSection).attr(`data-section`);
    segments = d3.select(nodeSection).selectAll(`p[data- segment]`).nodes();
    for (var nodeSegment of segments) {
        segment = d3.select(nodeSegment).attr(`data-segment`);
        nodes = d3.select(nodeSegment).selectAll(`span[value='${d.value}']`).nodes();
        if (nodes.length) {
            switch (false) {
            case (synapse.hasOwnProperty(section)) :
                synapse[section] = {}
            case (synapse[section].hasOwnProperty(segment+1)) :
                synapse[section][segment] = 1;
                data.MATCHES.records++;
                data.MATCHES.nodes.push (nodes);
                break;
            default :
                synapse[section][segment]++;
            }
        }
    }
}

return ({glyph: d.glyph, value: d.value, notion: reduce (synapse),
synapse: synapse});

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Fayan&glyph:習>

FAYAN: #100 = [#8, #13, #17, #8, #7, #7, #15, #25]

xí (習): 1. to fly, 2. to practice; to exercise, 3. to be familiar with,
4. a habit; a custom, 5. a trusted aide; a close acquaintance, 6.
frequently; constantly; regularly; often, 7. to teach, 8. flapping, 9. Xi

{
    "glyph": "習",
    "value": 3045,
    "notion": {
        "telos": 100,
        "cogito": [8, 13, 17, 8, 7, 7, 15, 25]
    },
    "synapse": {
        "1": {
            "7": 1,
            "12": 1
        },
        "2": {
            "16": 1
        },
        "5": {
            "7": 1
        },
        "7": {
            "6": 1
        },
        "8": {
            "6": 1
        },
        "11": {
            "14": 1
        },
        "13": {
            "24": 1
        }
    }
}

Our development goal is then to devise an enquiry concept {} which is
able to aggregate glyph concepts (eg: the instance above as the
voluntary expression Ego: #40 - 𝌭法 - LAW / MODEL: FA (#40) / #65 - 𝍆內
- INNER: NEI (#105) meaning "WITHIN THE LAW" is a synapse notion of
[#40, #65] which might in reference to the provision of goods and
services, then infer doing something with the left hand to advance
someone else's political cause when the right hand action is the proper
thing to do and therefore only giving lipservice to what is lawful) such
as the occurrence of rì (日) so that we can visualise changes to the synapse couching of rationality dynamic:

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Mystery&glyph:%E6%97%A5>

#511 = [#1, #5, #13, #18, #19, #20, #23, #24, #33, #41, #47, #52, #67,
#70, #78]

rì (日): 1. day of the month; a certain day, 2. Kangxi radical 72, 3. a day, 4. Japan, 5. sun, 6. daytime, 7. sunlight, 8. everyday, 9. season,
10. available time, 11. a day, 12. in the past, 13. mi

　學行卷第一 - Learning and Practice [24] / CHERUBIM: NATURE REJOICES IN
ITS NATURE: (DOUBLE: NATURE CONTAINS NATURE / NATURE AMENDED IN ITS NATURE)

    #12 - rì yuè (日月): 1. the sun and moon, 2. day and month; every
day and every month; season; life and livelihood

　修身卷第三 - Cultivating the Self [25] / DOMINION: NATURE AMENDED IN ITS NATURE (DOUBLE: NATURE SURMOUNTS NATURE (FORM OF NATURE)

    #14 / #16 - rì (日): 1. day of the month; a certain day, 2. Kangxi radical 72, 3. a day, 4. Japan, 5. sun, 6. daytime, 7. sunlight, 8.
everyday, 9. season, 10. available time, 11. a day, 12. in the past, 13. mi

　問神卷第五 - Asking About Shen [27]  / POWERS: FORM OF NATURE / NATURE
SURMOUNTS NATURE

    #11 - rì yuè (日月): 1. the sun and moon, 2. day and month; every
day and every month; season; life and livelihood
    #13 - báirì (白日): 1. daytime; sun; time

　五百卷第八 - Five Hundred Years [29] / ANGELS: AUTONOMOUS NATURE / FORM OF NATURE

    #8 - (愛日): 1. cherish time, 2. careful of parents remaining days
    #8 / #10 / #20 - rì (日): 1. day of the month; a certain day, 2. Kangxi radical 72, 3. a day, 4. Japan, 5. sun, 6. daytime, 7. sunlight,
8. everyday, 9. season, 10. available time, 11. a day, 12. in the past,
13. mi

　先知卷第九 - Foreknowledge [28]  / SOVEREIGNTY: TOTALITY OF NATURE /
ENGENDERING NATURE

    #2 - yī rì (一日): 1. one [whole] day, 2. one [particular] day
    #5 - rìxīn (日新): 1. in constant progress
    #24 - rì (日): 1. day of the month; a certain day, 2. Kangxi radical 72, 3. a day, 4. Japan, 5. sun, 6. daytime, 7. sunlight, 8.
everyday, 9. season, 10. available time, 11. a day, 12. in the past, 13. mi

　淵騫卷第十一 - Yuan and Qian [23] / GENERAL POPULACE: AUTONOMOUS NATURE

    #2 - rì (日): 1. day of the month; a certain day, 2. Kangxi radical
72, 3. a day, 4. Japan, 5. sun, 6. daytime, 7. sunlight, 8. everyday, 9. season, 10. available time, 11. a day, 12. in the past, 13. mi

　君子卷第十二 - The Junzi [23] / NATURE CONTAINS NATURE (MOTHER: THE TONGUE OF DECREE DECIDING BETWEEN THEM)

    #15 - rì (日): 1. day of the month; a certain day, 2. Kangxi radical 72, 3. a day, 4. Japan, 5. sun, 6. daytime, 7. sunlight, 8.
everyday, 9. season, 10. available time, 11. a day, 12. in the past, 13. mi
    #20 - yī rì (一日): 1. one [whole] day, 2. one [particular] day

　孝至卷第十三 - The Priority of Filial Devotion [24] / NATURE REJOICES
IN ITS NATURE

    #3 - (愛日): 1. cherish time, 2. careful of parents remaining days
    #32 - rì (日): 1. day of the month; a certain day, 2. Kangxi radical 72, 3. a day, 4. Japan, 5. sun, 6. daytime, 7. sunlight, 8.
everyday, 9. season, 10. available time, 11. a day, 12. in the past, 13. mi
    #32 - yī rì (一日): 1. one [whole] day, 2. one [particular] day

#1 - LEARNING AND PRACTICE + #2 - CULTIVATING THE SELF = #3
#3 - ASKING ABOUT SHEN + #4 - FIVE HUNDRED YEARS = #7
#5 - FOREKNOWLEDGE + #6 - YUAN AND QIAN = #11
#7 - THE JUNZI + #8 - THE PRIORITY OF FILIAL DEVOTION = #15 + #3 + #7 +
#11  = #36

CANDIDATE #36 - AUTONOMOUS DELIMITER PROTOTYPE: #207 = [#12, #14, #16,
#11, #13, #8, #10, #20, #2, #5, #24, #2, #15, #20, #3, #32]

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Mystery&glyph:學>

CANON: #40 = [#40]

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Fayan&glyph:學>

FAYAN: #207 = [#2, #1, #2, #3, #5, #7, #10, #11, #14, #17, #19, #20,
#13, #7, #7, #9, #10, #15, #35]

xué (學): 1. to study; to learn, 2. a discipline; a branch of study, 3.
to imitate, 4. a school; an academy, 5. to understand, 6. learning;
acquired knowledge, 7. a doctrine, 8. learned

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/ Insurance%20Question%20on%20Illegality%20Defence.pdf>

On 11/12/24 16:00, dolf wrote:

We've implemented the second click action for our GIZMO concept and
transitioned our prototype DIALOG expand toggle feature to being a
generalised setDialogExpand() function which requires an additional
data object to be added to the  MOVE {} object.  We don't at present
need to implement the heuristic / calendar notion since the main
objective is to observe the PENTAMORPH for any given grapple /
transformative prototype.

move.modes = {
     focus: "NORMAL",
     NORMAL: {
         width: move.width,
         height: move.height,
         x: Math.max (0, Math.min (Savvy.useWidth, Savvy.useWidth- >> Savvy.MOVE[existance].width-20)),
         y: 0
     },
     EXPAND: {
         width: Savvy.useWidth,
         height: Savvy.useHeight,
         x: 0,
         y: 0
     }
}

We've tidied the code up to take a uniformed approach to the usage of
the existance vaiable.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/actions/Heuristic.json>

And we've removed the undefined exception within the main {} function
by assigning a time designated file / form name:

main: function(oMain) {

         this.oMain = oMain;
         oMain.form = (existance) ? existance : existance =
Savvy.COINRULES.library.getTimeFilename(oMain.action.split(" ")[0]);

     ... code

}

Similarly the GIZMO zrc referencing dataset can remain as it is, so
then our next activity will be devise our neural linguistic pragma
GNOSIS {} datasets which conforms to the d3.hierarchy semantical form.

Since the T'AI HSÜAN CHING consists of #81 TETRAS x 9 poem appraisals
= #729 metrics we'll want to examine both the the GNOSIS {} -->
incisive grapple [] array dynamic associated to both the spatial
dispersal within the 9x9x9 = #729 appraisal (ie. noting there are
currently 5 transformative protototypes) matrix and their clustering.

The example below is of IDEA #652 within HEBREW / GREEK / DIALECTIC
(meta-descriptor aggregation) which may provide some first principles
for anthropocentric consciousness (ie. gnosis ex machina
instantiation) -- but before we can deduce such, there needs be some
means to visualise such legacy of mind from antiquity.

And we duly note that the COSMIC DAO is not [generally] viewed as a
transcendent source in the sense of being a metaphysical first
principle beyond the physical world; rather, it is immanent, always
present and always emerging. It is creative but is not a supreme
creator god, whether personal or impersonal, who gives birth to the
world through divine contemplation or the exertion of a supreme will.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?
idea:652&lexicon:G1531,G3075,G1924,G4342,H2256,G3163&run:Mystery&glyph:人> >>
#652 = [#3, #5, #7, #8, #11, #16, #18, #19, #24, #26, #34, #36, #42,
#43, #48, #54, #56, #60, #68, #74]

rén (人): 1. person; people; a human being, 2. Kangxi radical 9, 3. a
kind of person, 4. everybody, 5. adult, 6. somebody; others, 7. *AN*
*UPRIGHT* *PERSON*

#652 as [#200, #2, #400, #10, #40] = ribbôw (H7239): {UMBRA: #208 %
#41 = #3} 1) *TEN* *THOUSAND*, myriad;

"SAYING, UNTO THEE WILL I GIVE THE LAND OF CANAAN, THE *LOT*-H2256 OF
YOUR INHERITANCE:" [Psalm 105:11]

#40 as [#8 - OPPOSITION (KAN), #2 - FULL CIRCLE (CHOU), #30 - BOLD
RESOLUTION (YI)] /
#652 as [#2, #8, #2, #30, #10, #600] = chebel (H2256): {UMBRA: #40 %
#41 = #40} 1) a cord, rope, territory, band, company; 1a) a rope,
cord; 1b) a measuring-cord or line; 1c) a measured portion, lot, part,
region; 1d) a band or company; 2) pain, sorrow, travail, pang; 2a)
pains of travail; 2b) pains, pangs, sorrows; 3) union; 4) destruction;

Instead, the COSMIC DAO incessantly generates the ten thousand things
(a metaphor for the world) / SWASTIKA (卐 or 卍) CORRESPONDENCE,
giving rise in its fluctuation to the complementary polarities of yin
and yang. It is chang, constant and eternal, and tiandao, the ORDER OF
NATURE that manifests itself spontaneously (ziran). Human beings,
whose society and culture are marked by artifice and constraint, can
hope only to attune themselves to its mysterious transformations but
receive no special favour. As the Daodejing says [in defiance of an
anthropocentric perspective of the universe], the COSMIC DAO is buren
(see rén (人)), “no special lover of humanity.” [<https://
www.britannica.com/topic/dao>]


On 11/10/24 17:07, dolf wrote:

STATUS @ 175 HOURS ON 10 NOVEMBER 2024:

After testing the transitioning of the legacy code into the existing
semantical context as auto function, we've removed it until we devise
a neural linguistic pragma dataset which conforms to the d3.hierarchy
semantical form.

Accordingly we've gone for the simplest approach to populate the
GIZMO matrix which only involves obtaining the cell #nn co-ords from
the Savvy.GNOSIS.PSYCHE array and the chronos {} from the
Savvy.GNOSIS.GIZMO {} object.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?
run:Heuristic&grapple:61,54,59,60,55,62,57,56,58&gizmo:true>

Tomorrow's logical thinking activity will be to implement the second
click action which will then pass the grapple [] array to the
heuristic panel so that the pentamorph can be observed.

After that task, we'll devise our neural linguistic pragma GIZMO /
GNOSIS {} datasets  which conforms to the d3.hierarchy semantical form. >>>
On 11/10/24 08:11, dolf wrote:

#282 as [#2, #10, #70, #200] = bíos (G979): {UMBRA: #282 % #41 =
#36} 1) life; 1a) life extensively; 1a1) the period or course of
life; 1b) that by which life is sustained, resources, wealth, goods;

#565 as [#40, #5, #300, #100, #70, #50] = métron (G3358): {UMBRA:
#565 % #41 = #32} 1) measure, an instrument for measuring; 1a) a
vessel for receiving and determining the quantity of things, whether
dry or liquid; 1b) a graduated staff for measuring, a measuring rod;
1c) proverbially, the rule or standard of judgment; 2) determined
extent, portion measured off, measure or limit; 2a) the required
measure, the due, fit, measure;

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?lexicon:G979,G3358,G350>

On 11/10/24 06:13, dolf wrote:

You'll note that our coding approach to the GNOSIS {} --> incisive
grapple
[] arrays is not very efficient and could probably use a recursive
approach
which we'll do later.

Our first objective here was to transition the legacy code into the
existing semantical context.

It's very likely that our neural linguistic pragma dataset will
conform to the d3.hierarchy semantical form

Nevertheless what the GNOSIS {} --> incisive grapple [] array dynamic >>>>> associated to any meta-descriptive redaction of our
problematic.json {}
approach to intentional / ententional narrative (ie. weighted
grapple []
spiral) as case studies will grant our informal research, is then
whether
there is any biometric (ie. behavioural characteristics related to the >>>>> pattern of behaviour of a person) basis to the past observation of an >>>>> abrogation in situ [50, 31] action against the heuristic GRAPPLE(247, >>>>> 355)@[16,76,30,50 | 74,41,44,31 | 47,64,3] as case example for
date:2017.1.7 and whether it is goal (247, 355) driven as a
disposition
towards a desired outcome or habitual want.  Or whether it is best
understood as notionally a fusion clustering point or a short circuit. >>>>>
We don't want to postulate reductio ad absurdum however its
sufficient to
say that the weighted grapple [] spiral as narrative redaction
method will
produce GNOSIS {} --> incisive grapple [] array dynamic that as a
metalogic
proposition will yield clustering which may affect a disposition
towards
either an incisive desired outcome, habitual want or expedient as a
short
circuit.

Again we are self educating: Aristotle clarified the connection
between
contradiction and falsity in his principle of non-contradiction, which >>>>> states that a proposition cannot be both true and false. That is, a
proposition Q and its negation (not-Q) cannot both be true.
Therefore, if a proposition
and its negation can both be derived logically from a premise, it
can be
concluded that the premise is false. This technique, known as indirect >>>>> proof or proof by contradiction, has formed the basis of reductio ad >>>>> absurdum arguments in formal fields such as logic and mathematics.
<https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reductio_ad_absurdum>

BIOMETRIC: {@9: Sup: 13 - INCREASE: TSENG (#246); Ego: 3 - MIRED:
HSIEN (#175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%22})}

TELOS TOTAL: #418

ONTIC TOTAL: #259

DEME TOTAL: #293

#12 as [#1 - CENTRE, #6 - CONTRARIETY, #5 - KEEPING SMALL] /
#418 as [#5, #400, #1, #6, #6] = ʼâvâh (H183): {UMBRA: #12 % #41 =
#12} 1) desire, incline, covet, wait longingly, wish, sigh, want, be
greedy, prefer; 1a) (Piel) to desire, crave (food and drink); 1b)
(Hithpael) to desire, long for, lust after (of bodily appetites);

#588 - ONTIC TOTAL: #259 as [#5, #400, #100, #5, #9, #8, #50, #1,
#10] = heurískō (G2147): {UMBRA: #1535 % #41 = #18} 1) to come upon, >>>> hit upon, to meet with; 1a) after searching, to find a thing sought;
1b) without previous search, to find (by chance), to fall in with;
1c) those who come or return to a place; 2) to find by enquiry,
thought, examination, scrutiny, observation, to find out by practice
and experience; 2a) to see, learn, discover, understand; 2b) to be
found i.e. to be seen, be present; 2c) to be discovered, recognised,
detected, to show one's self out, of one's character or state as
found out by others (men, God, or both); 2d) to get knowledge of,
come to know, God; 3) to find out for one's self, to acquire, get,
obtain, procure;

#123 - DEME TOTAL: #293 as [#5, #30, #30, #8, #50] /
#973 - DEME TOTAL: #293 as [#5, #30, #30, #8, #50, #800, #50] =
Héllēn (G1672): {UMBRA: #123 % #41 = #41} 1) a Greek either by
nationality, whether a native of the main land or of the Greek
islands or colonies; 2) in a wider sense the name embraces all
nations not Jews that made the language, customs, and learning of
the Greeks their own; the primary reference is to a difference of
religion and worship;

Is the #336 - PERSONAL UNCONSCIOUS COEFFICIENTS then an artibrator
between #174 - ANIMA / ANIMUS and #246 (ANTI-THESIS) - UTTERANCE;
ACTIONS / #410 - OBLIGATING NORM and what determines the
rightfulness and wrongfulness actions actions

IDENTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE INNER EPISTEMOLOGICAL #174 - ANIMA /
ANIMUS AND #336 - PERSONAL UNCONSCIOUS COEFFICIENTS AS AN
INFORMATION ORGANISATIONAL AND SOCIAL COHESION PRINCIPLE

#246 (ANTI-THESIS) - UTTERANCE; ACTIONS / #410 - OBLIGATING NORM
(rules based: BEAR NO FALSE WITNESS)

Our concern is not so much about true or false conditional action but >>>>> rather whether the biometric clustering / elasticity (is it bounded
and how
so) / cybergenetic potential (eg: is it a point of interface rather
than
evidence of bipartite ONTIC substitution, activation or
circumvention etc)
which we anticipate observing is a rational or irrational outcome.

#247 - MALE TOTAL: #355 as [#1, #50, #1, #20, #100, #10, #50, #5,
#10] =
anakrínō (G350): {UMBRA: #1032 % #41 = #7} 1) examine or judge; 1a) to >>>>> investigate, examine, enquire into, scrutinise, sift, question; 1a1) >>>>> specifically in a forensic sense of a judge to hold an
investigation; 1a2)
to interrogate, examine the accused or witnesses; 1b) to judge of,
estimate, *DETERMINE* (*THE* *EXCELLENCE* *OR* *DEFECTS* *OF* *ANY*
*PERSON* *OR* *THING*;

So many philosophical questions, but now it's time to start our day

dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:

We are currently working on an implementation of the GIZMO matrix
concept which is accessible here:

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?
run:Heuristic&grapple:61,54,59,60,55,62,57,56,58&gizmo:true>

<-- *GIZMO* concept is work in progress

Those who have followed our informal research activity would know
that
our actionable task {} json objects are retrieved as FILE_request {} >>>>>> automations which performs a fetch promise request and within the

[continued in next message]

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)